Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
935
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
935 results for “probability”
Data from: Distributional shifts – not geographic isolation – as a probable driver of montane species divergence
As biodiversity hotspots, montane regions have been a focus of research to understand the divergence process. Like their oceanic counterparts, the diversity of the "sky islands" might be ascribed to geographic isolation of mountaintops. However, because the sky islands, and especially those in northern latitudes, are subject to extreme climatic events such as the glacial cycles that drove both altitudinal and geographical shifts in species' distributions, the dynamic colonization process is also a possible factor driving divergence. Here we test these two hypotheses (i.e., isolation versus colonization) in a flightless montane grasshopper, Melanoplus oregonensis, which is a member of a diverse group that radiated across the Rocky Mountains of North America. Using approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) and spatially explicit simulations that account for spatial heterogeneity and temporal shifts in species distributions, we show that a colonization model of the sky islands from refugial populations provides a significantly better fit to the empirical genetic data than a model of the geographic isolation among sky islands. Moreover, support for the colonization model holds irrespective of whether the movement of individuals was modeled as a diffusion process or was informed by differences in habitat suitabilities across the landscape. With validation analyses to confirm the models provide a good fit to the data, as well as general power and quality analyses, the research not only adds to a growing body of work on the complex dynamics underlying montane biodiversity, but it also provides much needed evaluation of competing hypotheses based on explicit models of the divergence process, as opposed to inferences about diversification drivers from species diversity patterns.
Wmid-f467a6 - probable pendant
A complete lead alloy pendant probably dating from the Medieval or Post-Medieval period, circa AD 1400-1800. The probable pendant is irregular in shape with a circular piercing located at the upper edge. The piercing has an internal diameter of 7.4 mm. Below this is a sub oval section which almost looks like a gloved hand holding something. The reverse has a folded ridge. For more information, please visit the database record available at: https://finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/1055842 Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Wmid-f3dde6 - probable strap fitting
An incomplete probable strap fitting or possible shoe cleat, of Post Medieval dating (AD 1600 to AD 1800). The probable strap fitting is rectangular in shape, with a rectangular slot in the centre. This measures 13.2 mm in length and 4.9 mm wide.The short edges curve round to form downward pointing points (both incomplete). Traces of iron corrosion products are present at either end of the rectangular slot. Rectangular recesses are present on both long edges. No decoration is visible on the upper surface. For further information, please visit the database record at: https://finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/1055819 Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Wmid-42aa23 - probable Roman knife handle
An incomplete copper alloy probable knife or possibly a mirror handle, of probable Roman dating (AD 43 to AD 410). The probable handle is cuboid in shape. The base of the probable handle is square (14.2 mm by 15.9 mm), and then it tapers diagonally down to a smaller square (6.7 mm by 7.0 mm), which forms the basis of the handle. A small collar is present at that junction. This handle section then extends (19.6 mm in length) and gradually widens before the split terminal section, which is a wider flatter rectangle (19.0 mm by 12.3 mm by 6.6 mm). Parts of a iron blade are present in the split terminal, providing evidence that this was a knife handle. No decoration appears present on either face. For more information, please visit the online database record available at: https://finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/1059809 Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Follow-up: Prospective compound design using the ‘SAR Matrix’ method and matrix-derived conditional probabilities of activity
<p>Details of the conditional probability calculations on exemplary the matrix provided in Figure 3 of the publication (see Gupta-Ostermann, Hirose, Odagami & Bajorath, Follow-up: Prospective compound design using the ‘SAR Matrix’ method and matrix-derived conditional probabilities of activity, F1000Research 2015, 4:75 , DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.6271.1 ) is provided in an excel sheet. </p> <p>Informative SARMs from the PRISM library are included. Due to proprietary issues the structural information of compounds is not included. Key and value fragments of SARMs are provided with an identifier.</p>
Figure 2. - Phylogenetic relationships among Dicronocephalus species reconstructed with Bayesian inference using COI sequences. Numbers above branches indicate ML bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Numbers below branches are bootstrap, symmetric resampling, and jacknife support from parsimony searches, respectively. Scale bar represents 10% nucleotide mutation rate.
Figure 2. - Phylogenetic relationships among Dicronocephalus species reconstructed with Bayesian inference using COI sequences. Numbers above branches indicate ML bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Numbers below branches are bootstrap, symmetric resampling, and jacknife support from parsimony searches, respectively. Scale bar represents 10% nucleotide mutation rate.
Figure 2. - Bayesian (GTR+Γ+I and HKY+Γ models) and maximum likelihood 50% majority-rule consensus tree. Numbers in the nodes represent posterior probabilities (GTR+Γ+I and HKY+Γ, respectively), and bootstrap value for maximum likelihood and parsimony analyses, respectively. c1–Bragança, Pará; c2–Santa Maria do Pará, Pará; c3–National Forest of Amapá, Amapá; c4–Belém, Pará; i1–Solimões River, near Manaus, Amazonas; i2–Xingu River, Altamira, Pará; i3 and i4–Itacoatiara, Amazonas. MYBP–million years before present.
Figure 2. - Bayesian (GTR+Γ+I and HKY+Γ models) and maximum likelihood 50% majority-rule consensus tree. Numbers in the nodes represent posterior probabilities (GTR+Γ+I and HKY+Γ, respectively), and bootstrap value for maximum likelihood and parsimony analyses, respectively. c1–Bragança, Pará; c2–Santa Maria do Pará, Pará; c3–National Forest of Amapá, Amapá; c4–Belém, Pará; i1–Solimões River, near Manaus, Amazonas; i2–Xingu River, Altamira, Pará; i3 and i4–Itacoatiara, Amazonas. MYBP–million years before present.
Figure 4. - Phylogenetic relationships among Dicronocephalus species reconstructed with Bayesian inference using COI and 16S rRNA sequences. Numbers above branches indicate ML bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Numbers below branches are bootstrap, symmetric resampling, and jacknife support from parsimony searches, respectively. Scale bar represents 10% nucleotide mutation rate.
Figure 4. - Phylogenetic relationships among Dicronocephalus species reconstructed with Bayesian inference using COI and 16S rRNA sequences. Numbers above branches indicate ML bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Numbers below branches are bootstrap, symmetric resampling, and jacknife support from parsimony searches, respectively. Scale bar represents 10% nucleotide mutation rate.
Figure 3. - Phylogenetic relationships among Dicronocephalus species reconstructed with Bayesian inference using 16S rRNA sequences. Numbers above branches indicate ML bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Numbers below branches are bootstrap, symmetric resampling, and jacknife support from parsimony searches, respectively. Scale bar represents 10% nucleotide mutation rate.
Figure 3. - Phylogenetic relationships among Dicronocephalus species reconstructed with Bayesian inference using 16S rRNA sequences. Numbers above branches indicate ML bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Numbers below branches are bootstrap, symmetric resampling, and jacknife support from parsimony searches, respectively. Scale bar represents 10% nucleotide mutation rate.
Figure 1. - Bayesian phylogeny of Euptychia based on one mitochondrial (COI) and one nuclear (EF1-a) gene. Posterior probabilities are listed above and bootstrap values below branches. A dash denotes bootstrap support lower than 50%. (Euptychiaattenboroughi is not included in the analysis – see text for details.)
Figure 1. - Bayesian phylogeny of Euptychia based on one mitochondrial (COI) and one nuclear (EF1-a) gene. Posterior probabilities are listed above and bootstrap values below branches. A dash denotes bootstrap support lower than 50%. (Euptychiaattenboroughi is not included in the analysis – see text for details.)
Tessera (probably forgery)
ID: MKGHamburg 1921.329 <br> Object type: Tessera <br> Date/Period: 1.-3. cent. AD <br> Material: Ivory <br> Measurements: 1.8 cm (height); 6.5 cm (width) <br> Language: Greek <br> Museum/Collection: Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg Inv. 1921.329 <br> MKGHamburg: [dc00125287](https://sammlungonline.mkg-hamburg.de/de/object/Tessera-wohl-F%C3%A4lschung/1921.329/dc00125287?s=1921.329&h=0) <br> The research for this 3D object was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany´s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2176 'Understanding Written Artefacts: Material, Interaction and Transmission in Manuscript Cultures', project no. 390893796. The research was conducted within the scope of the Centre for the Study of Manuscript Cultures (CSMC) at Universität Hamburg. Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Wmid-a6c396 - Probable Post Medieval pendant
A complete copper alloy zoomorphic (bird like) probable pendant, of uncertain dating but probably Post medieval (AD 1500 to AD 1700). The probable pendant is curved, and an almost a teardrop shape. The design resembles a bird with beak against breast, the long neck forming a loop. From the body, it tapers down to a sharp point at the base of the tail. A concave eye is present on one side. It has been recorded as WMID-A6C396 by the Portable Antiquities Scheme. The full record can be viewed here. https://finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/1052149 Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Tomb, probably of Sir Richard de Pembrugge.
*All Saints, Clehonger, Herefordshire* A military effigy on a tomb chest that most likely depicts Sir Richard de Pembrugge (Pembridge), who in April 1342 endowed a chantry chapel in the church. He was a Member of Parliament for Herefordshire between September 1337 and February 1337/8 and died in 1345/6. Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Assessing Heavy Metal Contamination in Agricultural Soils: A Predictive Model Integrating GIS Tools and Probability-Risk Matrix – Case Study: Guarda Region, Portugal
<p>In these files we can find the final risk map of heavy metal contamination for the guarding area in Portugal obtained according to the methodology explained in the paper "Assessing Heavy Metal Contamination in Agricultural Soils: A Predictive Model Instegrating GIS Tools and Probability-Risk Matrix - Case Study: Guarda Region (Portugal)</p> <p>Final Risk Equal.tiff: GeoTiff with a pixel size of 30m. EPSG:3763 - ETRS89 / Portugal TM06</p> <p>Also attached is the symbolisation for the image in .qml (Quantum GIS Layer Style File) format.</p> <p>A file called RISK RECLASS is also available, where you can find the risk classification maps for each of the studied factors: </p> <ul> <li>Proximity to roads</li> <li>Proximity to industrial areas</li> <li>Ph</li> <li>Soil organic content</li> <li>Slope</li> <li>Soil texture</li> <li>Mining extraction areas </li> <li>Drainage</li> </ul> <p>finally a DATABASE file where the data of the 360 points for the calculation of the risk maps can be found. </p>
Global extinction probabilities of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine species groups
<p>This is the updated dataset presented in the manuscript titled "Global extinction probabilities of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine species groups".</p> <p>The dataset gives the code (R code), as well as the resulting raster files for the suggested Global extinction probabilities for different taxonomic groups, for use in Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA). We supply the results on 5arc minute resolution, aggregated for relevant spatial scales (e.g. terrestrial ecoregions or watersheds), as well as at country scale.</p> <p>For application in LCIA, we recommend applying GEPs to CFs with corresponding species groups and spatial scales. If the species group of the CFs do not match any of the provided GEPs, see (1); if the spatial scale of the CFs do not match any of the provided GEPs, see (2).</p> <ol> <li>If the species groups of the CFs do not match any of the provided sets of GEPs, we recommend recalculating GEPs for corresponding species groups and spatial scales based on the provided R scripts (e.g., see the R script for the freshwater heterotroph GEPs). Alternatively, GEPs can be aggregated to species group combinations by calculating species number-weighted GEP averages of the existing GEPs (see Table 4 in the article for species numbers per species group). In case of the latter approach, we recommend calculate GEP averages for all regions across the world (and not just those included in the analysis) and normalise the region-level average GEPs by the sum of the region-level average GEPs for consistency with the GEP concept.</li> <li>In addition to species group aggregation, GEPs can be aggregated to different spatial scales by calculating the sum of the cell-level GEPs contained per region (e.g., see R scripts).</li> </ol> <p> </p> <p>Updates: corrected mistakes in cnidarians. Removedcpiuntry GEPs for marine species groups.</p>
Data from: The stochastic dynamics of early epidemics: probability of establishment, initial growth rate, and infection cluster size at first detection
<p>Emerging epidemics and local infection clusters are initially prone to stochastic effects that can substantially impact the epidemic trajectory. While numerous studies are devoted to the deterministic regime of an established epidemic, mathematical descriptions of the initial phase of epidemic growth are comparatively rarer. Here, we review existing mathematical results on the epidemic size over time, and derive new results to elucidate the early dynamics of an infection cluster started by a single infected individual. We show that the initial growth of epidemics that eventually take off is accelerated by stochasticity. These results are critical to improve early cluster detection and control. As an application, we compute the distribution of the first detection time of an infected individual in an infection cluster depending on the testing effort, and estimate that the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern Alpha detected in September 2020 first appeared in the United Kingdom early August 2020. We also compute a minimal testing frequency to detect clusters before they exceed a given threshold size. These results improve our theoretical understanding of early epidemics and will be useful for the study and control of local infectious disease clusters.</p>
Combining genotypes and T cell receptor distributions to infer genetic loci determining V(D)J recombination probabilities: validation cohort meta data and parsed TCR repertoire data
<p>Meta data corresponding the the validation cohort for the paper, "Combining genotypes and T cell receptor distributions to infer genetic loci determining V(D)J recombination probabilities" by Magdalena L Russell, Aisha Souquette, David M Levine, Stefan A Schattgen, E Kaitlynn Allen, Guillermina Kuan, Noah Simon, Angel Balmaseda, Aubree Gordon, Paul G Thomas, Frederick A Matsen IV, and Philip Bradley. These meta data include: </p> <p>(1) SNP genotypes for the two SNPs which overlap with the discovery cohort<br> - (nicaragua_snp_genotypes_ints.tsv) -- SNP genotypes as integers<br> - (nicaragua_snp_genotypes_strings.tsv) -- SNP genotypes as allele strings <br> (2) the ancestry PCs for each individual in the validation cohort (nicaragua_snp_ancestry_PCA.tsv)<br> (3) a file including IMGT genes and sequences used for parsing TCRB repertoire data (human_vj_allele_cdr3_nucseqs.tsv)<br> (4) a file including IMGT genes used for parsing TCRA repertoire data (human_vj_alleles_alpha.tsv)<br> (5) Parsed TCRA repertoire data (nicaragua_parsed_TCRA.tgz)<br> (6) Parsed TCRB repertoire data (nicaragua_parsed_TCRB.tgz) </p> <p><strong>Corresponding raw validation cohort TCR repertoire data is available here:</strong> https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA762269 (The BioProject database, accession number: PRJNA762269)</p> <p><strong>Software tools designed to work with these data are available here:</strong> https://github.com/phbradley/tcr-gwas</p>
The Dark Energy Survey 5-year photometrically identified Type Ia Supernovae classification probabilities with SuperNNova
<p>Classification probabilities obtained for the Dark Energy Survey 5-year photometrically identified SN Ia.</p> <p>Probabilities were obtained with SuperNNova (Möller et al. 2020) using multi-band light-curves and host galaxy redshifts. The classification models were trained to disentangle type Ia vs. non Ia supernovae.</p>
Dispersal probabilities and geography input for BioGeoBEARS
<p>Dispersal probabilities by assigned geographical time-slice and range data for use in BioGeoBEARS ancestral range reconstruction of Caribbean <em>Micrathena. </em></p>
Interagency report: Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States: Updated Mean Projections and Extreme Water Level Probabilities Along U.S. Coastlines
<p><strong>Code and data for Section 2 of the Interagency report: Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States: Updated Mean Projections and Extreme Water Level Probabilities Along U.S. Coastlines</strong></p> <p><strong>Versions:</strong></p> <p>Version 1.1 This one:</p> <ul> <li>updated region names</li> </ul> <p>Version 1.0 <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5951626">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5951626</a></p> <p>This repository contains the code and data needed to produce the trajectories, projections, and observations for the Interagency report: Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States: Updated Mean Projections and Extreme Water Level Probabilities Along U.S. Coastlines.</p> <p>The report can be found on <a href="https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/hazards/sealevelrise/sealevelrise-tech-report-sections.html">https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/hazards/sealevelrise/sealevelrise-tech-report-sections.html</a></p> <p>An interactive tool to study the observations, trajectories, and scenarios can be accessed from <a href="https://sealevel.nasa.gov/task-force-scenario-tool">https://sealevel.nasa.gov/task-force-scenario-tool</a></p> <p>Frequently-asked questions: <a href="https://sealevel.nasa.gov/faq/16/">https://sealevel.nasa.gov/faq/16/</a></p> <p><strong>Authors</strong></p> <ul> <li>William V. Sweet, NOAA National Ocean Service</li> <li>Benjamin D. Hamlington, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory</li> <li>Robert E. Kopp, Rutgers University</li> <li>Christopher P. Weaver, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency</li> <li>Patrick L. Barnard, U.S. Geological Survey</li> <li>Michael Craghan, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency</li> <li>Gregory Dusek, NOAA National Ocean Service</li> <li>Thomas Frederikse, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory</li> <li>Gregory Garner, Rutgers University</li> <li>Ayesha S. Genz, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research</li> <li>John P. Krasting, NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory</li> <li>Eric Larour, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory</li> <li>Doug Marcy, NOAA National Ocean Service</li> <li>John J. Marra, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information</li> <li>Jayantha Obeysekera, Florida International University</li> <li>Mark Osler, NOAA National Ocean Service</li> <li>Matthew Pendleton, Lynker</li> <li>Daniel Roman, NOAA National Ocean Service</li> <li>Lauren Schmied, FEMA Risk Management Directorate</li> <li>William C. Veatch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers</li> <li>Kathleen D. White, U.S. Department of Defense</li> <li>Casey Zuzak, FEMA Risk Management Directorate</li> </ul> <p><strong>Contents</strong></p> <p>This data and code set contains the following directories:</p> <p><em>Results</em></p> <p>The <code>Results</code> folder contains the resulting projections, trajectories and observations from the report.</p> <ul> <li><code>TR_global_projections.nc</code>: GMSL projections, trajectory, and observations</li> <li><code>TR_regional_projections.nc</code>: Regional observations, projections and trajectories</li> <li><code>TR_local_projections.nc</code>: Local observations, projections and trajectories</li> <li><code>TR_gridded_projections.nc</code>: Gridded projections</li> </ul> <p>These files are in the NetCDF forrmat. To read the NetCDF files, many free software packages are available, including <a href="http://meteora.ucsd.edu/~pierce/ncview_home_page.html">ncview</a> and <a href="https://www.giss.nasa.gov/tools/panoply/">Panoply</a>. Free NetCDF packages are available to directly import the data into <a href="https://github.com/Alexander-Barth/NCDatasets.jl">Julia</a> and <a href="https://unidata.github.io/netcdf4-python/">Python</a> code.</p> <p><em>Code</em></p> <p>The <code>Code</code> folder contains all the computer code used to read and analyze the observations and the projections, and to generate the trajectories.</p> <p>To run this code, you need <a href="https://julialang.org/">Julia</a>. The code requires the Julia packages <code>CSV</code>, <code>Interpolations</code>, <code>JSON</code>, <code>LoopVectorization</code>, <code>MAT</code>, <code>NCDatasets</code>, <code>NetCDF</code>, <code>Plots</code>, <code>XLSX</code>, <code>LinearAlgebra</code>, and <code>Statistics</code>. They can be installed by pressing <code>]</code> at the Julia REPL and typing:</p> <pre><code>add CSV Interpolations JSON LoopVectorization MAT NCDatasets NetCDF Plots XLSX LinearAlgebra Statistics </code></pre> <p>This program also requires <a href="http://segal.ubi.pt/hector/">Hector</a>. Hector needs to be installed or compiled. In the file <code>Hector.jl</code> update the path to the Hector executable on lines 30 and 104.</p> <p>Run <code>Run_TR.jl</code> in the REPL or run <code>julia Run_TR.jl</code> from the command line to run the projections. The projections are then written to the <code>.\Data</code> directory.</p> <p>The folder contains the following files:</p> <ul> <li><code>Run_TR.jl</code>: This is the main routine that (eventually) calls all the functions to compute the projections.</li> <li><code>ConvertNCA5ToGrid.jl</code>: Converts the original NCA5 projections to a set of netCDF files that's used throughout this code</li> <li><code>ProcessObservations.jl</code>: Reads and processes the tide-gauge and altimetry observations</li> <li><code>GlobalProjections.jl</code>: Reads and processes the GMSL observations and projections, and computes the trajectory</li> <li><code>RegionalProjections.jl</code>: Reads and processes the regional projections and computes the trajectories</li> <li><code>LocalProjections.jl</code>: Reads and processes the local projections at the tide-gauge locations and computes the trajectories</li> <li><code>GriddedProjections.jl</code>: Reads the gridded NCA5 projections and add a GMSL baseline correction for the 2005 vs 2000 baseline</li> <li><code>SaveFigureData.jl</code>: Reads the results and writes text files for GMT</li> <li><code>Hector.jl</code>: Wrapper for <a href="http://segal.ubi.pt/hector/">Hector</a>, used to compute trends and uncertainties.</li> <li><code>Masks.jl</code>: Defines the region masks for each region.</li> </ul> <p><em>Data</em></p> <p>The <code>Data</code> directory contains the input data sets used during the computations. Please appropriately cite the input data if you use it. It contains the following:</p> <p>Directories:</p> <ul> <li><code>ClimIdx</code>: Map with climate indices (NAO, PDO, MEI) used to remove internal variability. All the indices come from NOAA <a href="https://psl.noaa.gov/data/climateindices/">Physical Sciences Laboratory (PSL)</a> and <a href="https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/teledoc/telecontents.shtml">NOAA Climate Prediction Centre (CPC)</a></li> <li><code>NCA5_projections</code> Contains the NCA5 projections for each scenario (Low, IntLow, Int, IntHigh, and High). For each scenario, the GMSL projections, projections at tide-gauge locations and on a 1-degree grid are provided.</li> </ul> <p>Files:</p> <ul> <li><code>basin_codes.nc</code>: Map with basin codes. from Eric Leuliette/NOAA. Data provided by the NOAA Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry.</li> <li><code>CDS_monthly_1993_2020.nc</code>: Monthly-mean sea level (1993-2020) from gridded altimetry. Obtained from <a href="https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/satellite-sea-level-global">Copernicus Climate Data Store</a>. This dataset contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information [2020]</li> <li><code>enso_correction.mat</code>: GMSL correction for ENSO/PDO from Hamlington, B. D., Frederikse, T., Nerem, R. S., Fasullo, J. T., & Adhikari, S. (2020). Investigating the Acceleration of Regional Sea‐level Rise During the Satellite Altimeter Era. Geophysical Research Letters. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086528">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086528</a></li> <li><code>filelist_psmsl.txt</code>: List with PSMSL file names and PSMSL IDs. Obtained from the Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (<a href="http://www.psmsl.org/">PSMSL</a>), 2021, Retrieved 29 Nov 2021. Simon J. Holgate, Andrew Matthews, Philip L. Woodworth, Lesley J. Rickards, Mark E. Tamisiea, Elizabeth Bradshaw, Peter R. Foden, Kathleen M. Gordon, Svetlana Jevrejeva, and Jeff Pugh (2013) New Data Systems and Products at the Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level. Journal of Coastal Research: Volume 29, Issue 3: pp. 493 – 504. <a href="https://doi.org/:10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00175.1">https://doi.org/:10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00175.1</a>.</li> <li><code>GEBCO_bathymetry_05.nc</code>: Bathymetry map of the global oceans from the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (<a href="https://www.gebco.net/">GEBCO</a>). Source: GEBCO Compilation Group (2021) GEBCO 2021 Grid (<code>doi:10.5285/c6612cbe-50b3-0cff-e053-6c86abc09f8f</code>) The source data have been re-gridded onto a 0.5 degree grid.</li> <li><code>GIA_Caron_stats_05.nc</code>: Glacial Isostatic Adjustment estimates from Caron, L., Ivins, E. R., Larour, E., Adhikari, S., Nilsson, J., & Blewitt, G. (2018). GIA Model Statistics for GRACE Hydrology, Cryosphere, and Ocean Science. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(5), 2203–2212. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076644">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076644</a>. The source data have been re-gridded onto a 0.5 degree grid.</li> <li><code>global_timeseries_measures.nc</code>: Time series of estimated 20th-century GMSL and its components, based on Frederikse, T., Landerer, F., Caron, L., Adhikari, S., Parkes, D., Humphrey, V. W., Dangendorf, S., Hogarth, P., Zanna, L., Cheng, L., & Wu, Y.-H. (2020). The causes of sea-level rise since 1900. Nature, 584(7821), 393–397. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2591-3">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2591-3</a></li> <li><code>GMSL_ensembles.nc</code>: Ensemble GMSL reconstruction from tide-gauges based on Frederikse, T., Landerer, F., Caron, L., Adhikari, S., Parkes, D., Humphrey, V. W., Dangendorf, S., Hogarth, P., Zanna, L., Cheng, L., & Wu, Y.-H. (2020). The causes of sea-level rise since 1900. Nature, 584(7821), 393–397. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2591-3">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2591-3</a></li> <li><code>GMSL_TPJAOS_5.0_199209_202106.txt</code>: Global Mean Sea Level Trend from Integrated Multi-Mission Ocean Altimeters TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, OSTM/Jason-2, and Jason-3 Version 5.1 [Data set]. NASA Physical Oceanography DAAC. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/GMSLM-TJ151">https://doi.org/10.5067/GMSLM-TJ151</a>. This altimetry dataset uses the methods as described in Beckley, B. D., Callahan, P. S., Hancock, D. W., Mitchum, G. T., & Ray, R. D. (2017). On the “Cal-Mode” Correction to TOPEX Satellite Altimetry and Its Effect on the Global Mean Sea Level Time Series. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122(11), 8371–8384. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013090">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013090</a></li> <li><code>grd_1992_2020.nc</code>: Seafloor deformation due to contemporary GRD effects based on Frederikse, T., Landerer, F., Caron, L., Adhikari, S., Parkes, D., Humphrey, V. W., Dangendorf, S., Hogarth, P., Zanna, L., Cheng, L., & Wu, Y.-H. (2020). The causes of sea-level rise since 1900. Nature, 584(7821), 393–397. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2591-3">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2591-3</a></li> <li><code>region_mask.nc</code>: Mask with the definition of all regions.</li> <li><code>US_tg_monthly.xlsx</code>: Tide gauge observations from the NOAA tide gauge network</li> </ul> <p><em>GMT</em></p> <p>This directory contains the <a href="https://www.generic-mapping-tools.org/">GMT</a> scripts to make Figures 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.6, and A.1.2 from the report. To generate the figures, make sure GMT is installed and run the Shell script in each directory.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.