Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
949
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
949 results for “species names”
IG receptor germline set for species: Mouse subgroup: C57BL/6J set_name: C57BL/6J IGKV
<p>Germline Reference set published on the Open Germline Receptor Database (OGRDB)</p>
IG receptor germline set for species: Mouse subgroup: C57BL/6J set_name: C57BL/6J IGLV
<p>Germline Reference set published on the Open Germline Receptor Database (OGRDB)</p>
Figs 1–24 in The species-group names of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea, Apiformes) described from Crimea, North Caucasus, European part of Russia and Ural. Part III. Families Melittidae and Apidae (Except Bombus Latreille and Apis Linnaeus)
Figs 1–24. Labels of the lectotypes designated in this paper. 1 – Epeolus luctuosus Evers-
Fig. 10 in The Bezzi Diptera collection at the Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano: a list of the named genera and species, with their present status
Fig. 10 - Occurrence of genera with n species / Numero di generi con n specie.
Fig. 6 in The Bezzi Diptera collection at the Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano: a list of the named genera and species, with their present status
Fig. 6 - The third cabinet of Bezzi's collection. / Il terzo armadio della collezione Bezzi.
Fig. 8 - A in The Bezzi Diptera collection at the Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano: a list of the named genera and species, with their present status
Fig. 8 - A crowded box (box # 317). / Una scatola affollata (n. 317).
Handwritten Species Names Data
<p>This dataset is part of a paper presented at the <em>41st European Conference on Information Retrieval</em> ,14th – 18th April 2019, in Cologne. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15712-8_43</p> <p><strong>Data summary:</strong> Word images from 240 field notes from a natural history collection have been segmented and semantically annotated. This has been carried out in the context of the project ''Making Sense of Illustrated Handwritten Archives'', http://www.makingsenseproject.org/. From a field book on mammals, field notes from four different writers have been selected, to account for different handwriting styles and structures. The segmented word images were obtained from a nichesourcing effort, with the help of a group of domain expert labellers and a handwriting recognition system MONK, developed by Lambert Schomaker. The word images were subsequently manually annotated using four classes: Genus (0), Species(1), Author(2) and Other (3). </p> <p><strong>Dataframe fields:</strong> rel_xc (relative centroid x coordinate), rel_yc (relative centroid y coordinate), page (identifier of field book page), rel_x1 (relative left x coordinate bounding box), rel_x2 (relative right x coordinate bounding box), rel_y1 (relative upper y coordinate bounding box), rel_y2 (relative lower y coordinate bounding box), type (class label, 0-3), image (pixels of word image), height (height word image), size (height * width word image), width (width word image). </p> <p> </p>
IG receptor germline set for species: Human set_name: IGLambda_VJ
<p>Germline Reference set published on the Open Germline Receptor Database (OGRDB)</p>
IG receptor germline set for species: Human set_name: IGKappa_VJ
<p>Germline Reference set published on the Open Germline Receptor Database (OGRDB)</p>
IG receptor germline set for species: Human set_name: IGH_VDJ
<p>Germline Reference set published on the Open Germline Receptor Database (OGRDB)</p>
IG receptor germline set for species: Mouse subgroup: C57BL/6 set_name: C57BL/6 IGH
<p>Germline Reference set published on the Open Germline Receptor Database (OGRDB)</p>
IG receptor germline set for species: Mouse subgroup: PWD/PhJ set_name: PWD/PhJ IGH
<p>Germline Reference set published on the Open Germline Receptor Database (OGRDB)</p>
Table 2 in Invasive neo-species and how to name them
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Decision table based on the presence of reproductive barriers and phenotypic differentiation using the term “neo”.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th></th><th>Substantial reproductive isolation</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Yes</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th>Substantial phenotypic differentiation</th><td>Yes</td><td>New neo-species (neo)</td><td>New subspecies (subsp.)</td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>New neo-species (neo)</td><td>No changes</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in Invasive neo-species and how to name them
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Decision table based on the presence of reproductive barriers and phenotypic differentiation using the current nomenclature.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th>Substantial reproductive isolation</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>Yes</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th>Substantial phenotypic differentiation</th><td>Yes</td><td>New</td><td>species within genus</td><td>New subspecies (subsp.)</td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>New</td><td>species within genus</td><td>No changes</td></tr></tbody></table>
Can species naming drive scientific attention? A perspective from plant-feeding arthropods
<p>How do researchers choose their study species? Some choices are based on ecological or economic importance, some on ease of study, some on tradition – but could the name of a species influence researcher decisions? We asked whether phytophagous arthropod species named after their host plants were more likely to be assayed for host-associated genetic differentiation (or 'HAD'; the evolution of cryptic, genetically isolated host specialists within an apparently more generalist lineage). We chose 30 arthropod species (from a Google Scholar search) for which a HAD hypothesis has been tested. We traced the etymologies of species names in the 30 corresponding genera, and asked whether HAD tests were more frequent among species whose etymologies were based on host-plant names (e.g., <em>Eurosta</em> <em>solidaginis</em>, which attacks <em>Solidago</em>) vs. those with other etymologies (e.g., <em>Eurosta</em> <em>fenestrata</em>, from Latin fenestra, or window). Species with host-derived etymologies were more likely to feature in studies of HAD than those with other etymologies. We speculate that the etymology of a scientific name can draw a researcher's attention to aspects of life-history and thus influence the direction of our scientific gaze.</p>
Can species naming drive scientific attention? A perspective from plant-feeding arthropods
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
What’s in a name? Taxonomic and gender biases in the etymology of new species names
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
FIGURE 2 in The disconnect between DNA and species names: lessons from reptile species in the NCBI taxonomy database
FIGURE 2. Growth of reptile species numbers in the Reptile Database and NCBI Taxonomy/ GenBank. "Genbank binomial species" are those that have a valid equivalent in the Reptile Database while GenBank all reptile "species" include all other unique names, even when their identity is not clear (or not reported to GenBank, see Table 1).
FIGURE 1 in The disconnect between DNA and species names: lessons from reptile species in the NCBI taxonomy database
FIGURE 1. Relationship between databases, such as the NCBI Taxonomy, the Reptile Database, and other taxonomic databases and data sources. Some of the resources shown are examples for other data resources not shown. Arrows indicate data flow or referencing (linking) between databases. For instance, iNaturalist uses names from the Reptile Database, with the latter linking back directly to iNaturalist species pages. Arrows to and from collections (and collection data aggregators such as VertNet) indicate cross-referencing of specimens, but not necessarily hyperlinks.
FIGURES 3–5 in To which species should the name heynei Rühl, [1893] (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) be referred?
FIGURES 3–5. The neotype of Melitaea arduinna heynei Rühl, [1893], 3: upperside; 4: underside; 5: labels. (Scale bar = 10 mm).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.