Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
259
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
259 results for “synapomorphy”
Fig. 14 in The egg-brooding frogs Fritziana Mello-Leit˜ao, 1937 and Flectonotus Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 (Amphibia: Anura): osteology and putative synapomorphies for hemiphractid frogs
Fig. 14. Parsimonious optimization onto Echevarría et al. (2021) phylogenetic hypothesis (A) clavicules orientation (B) shape of omostermum. See Supplemental Material for the complete matrix, including outgroups. Gray represents unknown condition.
Fig. 8 in The egg-brooding frogs Fritziana Mello-Leit˜ao, 1937 and Flectonotus Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 (Amphibia: Anura): osteology and putative synapomorphies for hemiphractid frogs
Fig. 8. Parsimonious optimization onto Echevarría et al. (2021) phylogenetic hypothesis: extension of anterior terminus of cultriform process of parasphenoid. See Supplemental Material for the complete matrix, including outgroups. Gray represents unknown condition.
Fig. 7 in The egg-brooding frogs Fritziana Mello-Leit˜ao, 1937 and Flectonotus Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 (Amphibia: Anura): osteology and putative synapomorphies for hemiphractid frogs
Fig. 7. Manus and pes (dorsal view) of Fritziana and Flectonotus species represented by (A) Fr. ohausi manus (B) Fl. fitzgeraldi manus (C) Fr. ohausi pes; and (D) Fl. fitzgeraldi pes. Roman typeface is used to label the bones, whereas italics are used to designate a part of a bone. Scale bar = 1 mm. E. = element.
Fig. 11 in The egg-brooding frogs Fritziana Mello-Leit˜ao, 1937 and Flectonotus Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 (Amphibia: Anura): osteology and putative synapomorphies for hemiphractid frogs
Fig. 11. Parsimonious optimization onto Echevarría et al. (2021) phylogenetic hypothesis (A) preorbital process of maxilla (B) extension of anterior terminus of quadratojugal. See Supplemental Material for the complete matrix, including outgroups. Gray represents unknown condition.
Fig. 12 in The egg-brooding frogs Fritziana Mello-Leit˜ao, 1937 and Flectonotus Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 (Amphibia: Anura): osteology and putative synapomorphies for hemiphractid frogs
Fig. 12. Parsimonious optimization onto Echevarría et al. (2021) phylogenetic hypothesis (A) nasal size (B) exposition of frontoparietal fenestra. See Supplemental Material for the complete matrix, including outgroups. Gray represents unknown condition.
Fig. 10 in The egg-brooding frogs Fritziana Mello-Leit˜ao, 1937 and Flectonotus Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 (Amphibia: Anura): osteology and putative synapomorphies for hemiphractid frogs
Fig. 10. Parsimonious optimization onto Echevarría et al. (2021) phylogenetic hypothesis (A) medial contact of vomers (B) orientation of dentigerous process of vomers. See Supplemental Material for the complete matrix, including outgroups. Gray represents unknown condition.
Fig. 1 in The egg-brooding frogs Fritziana Mello-Leit˜ao, 1937 and Flectonotus Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 (Amphibia: Anura): osteology and putative synapomorphies for hemiphractid frogs
Fig. 1. Skull (dorsal view) of Fritziana and Flectonotus species (A) Fr. goeldii (ZUFRJ 12964) (B) Fr. ohausi (ZUFRJ 597) (C) Fr. fissilis (MNRJ 56992) (D) Fr. tonimi (ZUFRJ 1361) (E) Fr. izecksohni (ZUFRJ 13978) (F) Fr. ulei (ZUFRJ 13347) (G) Fl. pygmaeus (KU 167759); and (H) Fl. fitzgeraldi (KU 192399). Roman typeface is used to label the bones, whereas italics are used to designate a part of a bone (e.g., ramus, process). Scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 6 in On the systematic allocation of Liomma Roewer, 1959 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Nomoclastidae) and discovery of a putative synapomorphy for Nomoclastinae
Figure 6. Liomma laeve, male (MNRJ 19235) from Baños: a. habitus, dorsal view; b. same, left lateral view; c. female (MNRJ 19235), left lateral view. Penis (MNRJ 19235): d. dorsal view; e. ventrolateral view; f. lateral view. Scale bars: a–c = 1 mm; d–f = 0.05 mm.
Figure 2 in On the systematic allocation of Liomma Roewer, 1959 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Nomoclastidae) and discovery of a putative synapomorphy for Nomoclastinae
Figure 2. Liomma laeve, male (MNRJ 19235). Right metatarsus I: a. dorsal view; b. mesoapical view; c. detail of modified setae. Zamora granulata (MNRJ 19266): d–g. Metatarsus I; d. dorsal view; e. subapical portion in mesal view; f. tarsomeres I; g. calcaneus, dorsal view.
Figure 5 in On the systematic allocation of Liomma Roewer, 1959 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Nomoclastidae) and discovery of a putative synapomorphy for Nomoclastinae
Figure 5. Liomma laeve, male (MNRJ 19235) from Baños: a. left pedipalpus mesal view; b. same, ectal view; c. penis, distal part, dorsal view; d. same, ventral view; e. same, panoramic lateral view; f. same, lateral view. Scale bars: a = 0.5 mm; b = 1.0 mm; c, d, f = 0.05 mm; e = 0.1 mm.
Figure 4 in On the systematic allocation of Liomma Roewer, 1959 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Nomoclastidae) and discovery of a putative synapomorphy for Nomoclastinae
Figure 4. Liomma laeve, male (MNRJ 19235) from Baños: a. habitus, dorsal view; b. same, ventral view; c. same, right lateral view; d. same, frontal view. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figure 3 in On the systematic allocation of Liomma Roewer, 1959 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Nomoclastidae) and discovery of a putative synapomorphy for Nomoclastinae
Figure 3. Liomma laeve, female holotype (SMF RII 12765) from Baños: a. habitus, dorsal view; b. same, ventral view; c. same, dextrolateral view; d. labels of the holotype.
Figure 1 in On the systematic allocation of Liomma Roewer, 1959 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Nomoclastidae) and discovery of a putative synapomorphy for Nomoclastinae
Figure 1. Nomoclastes quasimodo, male (MNRJ 7762). Right metatarsus I: a. dorsal view; b. mesoapical view; c. Detail of modified setae. Quindina bella (MNRJ 17946), right metatarsus I: d. dorsal view; e. same, mesal view; f. same, distal portion, dorsal view; g. detail of carenate setae.
Figure 7 in On the systematic allocation of Liomma Roewer, 1959 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Nomoclastidae) and discovery of a putative synapomorphy for Nomoclastinae
Figure 7. Liomma laeve, female (MNRJ 19235) from Baños: a. habitus, dorsal view; b. same, left lateral view; c. same, frontal view. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figure 28 in What is a 'strong' synapomorphy? Redescriptions of Murray's type species and descriptions of new taxa challenge the systematics of Hypsibiidae (Eutardigrada: Parachela)
Figure 28. General morphology of Platicrista nivea sp. nov. (holotype in ventral view, PCM). Scale bar is in micrometres.
Figure 23 in What is a 'strong' synapomorphy? Redescriptions of Murray's type species and descriptions of new taxa challenge the systematics of Hypsibiidae (Eutardigrada: Parachela)
Figure 23. Dorsal sculpturing of Platicrista brunsoni (PCM): A, rostral part; B, C, central part; D, caudal part. Scale bars: 20 μm.
Figure 22 in What is a 'strong' synapomorphy? Redescriptions of Murray's type species and descriptions of new taxa challenge the systematics of Hypsibiidae (Eutardigrada: Parachela)
Figure 22. Detailed morphology of Platicrista brunsoni Miller & J.D. Miller, 2021 (PCM): A, buccopharyngeal apparatus in toto; B, claws I; C, claws II (black arrowhead indicates internal bar); D, claws IV (empty white arrowhead indicates pseudolunule). Scale bars are in micrometres.
Figure 20 in What is a 'strong' synapomorphy? Redescriptions of Murray's type species and descriptions of new taxa challenge the systematics of Hypsibiidae (Eutardigrada: Parachela)
Figure 20. Claws of Platicrista angustata: A, claws III (neotype, PCM); B, claws IV (neotype, PCM); C, claws I (SEM); D, claws III (SEM); E, claws IV (SEM). Empty white arrowheads indicate pseudolunulae. Scale bars are in micrometres.
Figure 38 in What is a 'strong' synapomorphy? Redescriptions of Murray's type species and descriptions of new taxa challenge the systematics of Hypsibiidae (Eutardigrada: Parachela)
Figure 38. General morphology of Pilatobius cf. rugosus (Bartoš, 1935) (all but C, PCM): A, specimen in toto (ventral view); B, cuticular sculpturing of the caudal region; C, cuticular sculpturing of the caudal region (SEM); D, buccopharyngeal apparatus in toto. Scale bars are in micrometres.
Figure 39 in What is a 'strong' synapomorphy? Redescriptions of Murray's type species and descriptions of new taxa challenge the systematics of Hypsibiidae (Eutardigrada: Parachela)
Figure 39. Claws of Pilatobius cf. rugosus: A, claws II (PCM); B, claws IV (PCM); C, claws III (SEM); D, claws IV (SEM). Black arrowheads indicate internal and posterior bars, and white arrowhead indicates anterior bar. Scale bars are in micrometres, identical in panels A, B and in C, D.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.