Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
400
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
400 results for “trust”
Figures 84–90 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 84–90. Male genitalia of Hypotrabala species, a: clasping apparatus, b: lateral view of phallus, c: eighth sternite, d: dorsal view of phallus (a, b, c to scale, d magnified). 84. H. neavei (Aurivillius, 1915), Malawi [LG 6288]. 85. H. lunda sp. n., holotype [LG 6313]. 86. H. horridula Tams, 1925, Zambia [LG 6321]. 87. Id., Zambia [LG 6325]. 88. Id., holotype, Zambia [BM Lasiocampidae 506]. 89. Id., Zambia [LG 6340]. 90. H. dollmani Tams, 1925, paratype, Zambia [BM Lasiocampidae 193].
Figure 1 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood tree of Hypotrabala species and Selenepherini outgroups based on DNA barcodes. Numbers indicate bootstrap values and posterior probabilities (BS/PP). Scale bar indicates substitution rates per site.
Figures 14–21 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 14–21. Hypotrabala species: 14. H. castanea Holland, 1893, ♂, Republic of Congo, Nouabalé-Ndoki NP [ANHRTUK 00284967]. 15. Id., ♂, Uganda, Kampala [NHMUK 010292297]. 16. H. smithi sp. n., holotype ♂. 17. Id., paratype ♂. 18. H. exquisita sp. n., holotype ♂. 19. Id., paratype ♂. 20. H. extenuata sp. n., holotype ♂. 21. Id., paratype ♂.
Figures 50–59 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 50–59. Hypotrabala species: 50. H. pruinosa sp. n., holotype ♂. 51. Id., paratype ♂. 52. H. indefinita sp. n., holotype ♂. 53. Id., paratype ♂. 54. H. pallens sp. n., holotype ♂. 55. Id., paratype ♂. 56. H. obscura sp. n., holotype ♂. 57. Id., paratype ♂. 58. H. dollmani Tams, 1925, holotype ♂ [NHMUK 010292293]. 59. Id., paratype ♂ [NHMUK 010292327].
Figures 5–13 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 5–13. Hypotrabala species: 5. H. guttata (Aurivillius, 1915), ♂, Ivory Coast, Tai NP [ANHRTUK 00024479]. 6. Id., holotype ♂ of Pachymeta guttata Aurivillius, 1915 [NHMUK 010292296]. 7. H. magnimacula sp. n., holotype ♂. 8. Id., paratype ♂. 9. H. aurantiaca sp. n., holotype ♂. 10. Id., paratype ♂. 11. H. retorta sp. n., holotype ♂. 12. Id., paratype ♂. 13. Id., paratype ♀.
Figures 39–49 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 39–49. Hypotrabala species: 39. H. tamsi sp. n., holotype ♂. 40. Id., paratype ♂. 41. H. argenteoguttata (Aurivillius, 1909), ♂, Mozambique, Maputo Special Reserve [ANHRTUK 00035111]. 42. Id., ♂, Kenya, Shimba Hills [ANHRTUK 00235806]. 43. H. giustii sp. n., holotype ♂. 44. Id., paratype ♂. 45. H. horridula Tams, 1925, ♂, Zambia, Hillwood [ANHRTUK 00224481]. 46. Id., holotype ♂ [NHMUK 010292292]. 47. Id., ♂, Zambia, Nyangombe Falls [ANHRTUK 00067068]. 48. Id., ♂, Zambia, Lukwakwa [ANHRTUK 00066310]. 49. Id., ♀, Zambia, Ntumbachushi Falls [ANHRTUK 00276150].
Figures 2–4. Megatrabala gen. n in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 2–4. Megatrabala gen. n. regalis (Tams, 1953): 2. ♂, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kapanga [NHMUK 010292326]. 3. ♂, id., genitalia (a: clasping apparatus, b: lateral view of phallus, c: eighth sternite). 4. paratype ♀, id. [NHMUK 010606816].
Figures 66–71 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 66–71. Male genitalia of Hypotrabala species, a: clasping apparatus, b: lateral view of phallus, c: eighth sternite, d: dorsal view of phallus (a, b, c to scale, d magnified). 66. H. exquisita sp. n., holotype [LG 6307]. 67. H. extenuata sp. n., holotype [LG 6309]. 68. H. pruinosa sp. n., holotype [LG 6285]. 69. H. indefinita sp. n., holotype [LG 6324]. 70. H. pallens sp. n., holotype [LG 6293]. 71. H. ophioglossa sp. n., holotype [LG 6287].
Figures 29–38 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 29–38. Hypotrabala species: 29. H. volynkini sp. n., holotype ♂. 30. H. ophioglossa sp. n., holotype ♂. 31. H. lydiae sp. n., holotype ♂. 32. Id., paratype ♂. 33. H. tabithae sp. n., holotype ♂. 34. Id., paratype ♂. 35. H. lunda sp. n., holotype ♂. 36. Id., paratype ♂. 37. H. neavei (Aurivillius, 1915), ♂, Malawi, Mzuzu Wildlife Sanctuary [ANHRTUK 00270070]. 38. Id., holotype ♂ of Pachymeta neavei Aurivillius, 1915 [NHMUK 0010292291].
Figures 72–77 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 72–77. Male genitalia of Hypotrabala species, a: clasping apparatus, b: lateral view of phallus, c: eighth sternite, d: dorsal view of phallus (a, b, c to scale, d magnified). 72. H. obscura sp. n., holotype [LG 6331]. 73. H. giustii sp. n., holotype [LG 6295]. 74. Id., paratype [LG 6296]. 75. H. argenteoguttata (Aurivillius, 1909), Mozambique [LG 6322]. 76. H. tamsi sp. n., holotype [LG 6291]. 77. Id., paratype, Cameroon [LG 6290].
Figures 78–83 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 78–83. Male genitalia of Hypotrabala species, a: clasping apparatus, b: lateral view of phallus, c: eighth sternite, d: dorsal view of phallus (a, b, c to scale, d magnified). 78. H. cinereamargo sp. n., holotype [LG 6310]. 79. H. igneata sp. n., holotype [LG 6305]. 80. H. joiceyi Tams, 1925, D.R. Congo [LG 6349]. 81. H. lydiae sp. n., holotype [LG 6318]. 82. H. tabithae sp. n., holotype [LG 6319]. 83. H. volynkini sp. n., holotype [LG 6312].
Figures 22–28 in Descriptions of new Hypotrabala Holland, 1893 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Selenepherini) in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with notes on allied genera and the description of a new genus
Figures 22–28. Hypotrabala species: 22. H. joiceyi Tams, 1925, ♂, northeast D.R. Congo [ANHRTUK 00381417]. 23. Id., holotype ♂ [NHMUK 0010292290]. 24. H. cinereamargo sp. n., holotype ♂. 25. Id., paratype ♂. 26. H. igneata sp. n., holotype ♂. 27. Id., paratype ♂. 28. Id., ♀.
Figures 12–19 in Descriptions of three new Sonitha Zolotuhin & Prozorov, 2010 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Gastropachini) from West Africa in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with taxonomic notes on the genus
Figures 12–19. Sonitha species (♂). 12. S. bryoniae sp. n., holotype. 13. S. bernardii Zolotuhin & Prozorov, 2010, Republic of Congo, Nouabalé-Ndoki NP [ANHRTUK 00329746]. 14. S. laszloi sp. n., holotype. 15. S. alucard Zolotuhin & Prozorov, 2010, Republic of Congo, Nouabalé-Ndoki NP [ANHRTUK 00315096]. 16. S. bryoniae sp. n., holotype, genitalia [HT 003]. 17. S. bernardii, genitalia [HT 002]. 18. S. laszloi sp. n., holotype, genitalia [HT 009]. 19. S. alucard, genitalia [HT 005].
Figures 8–11 in Descriptions of three new Sonitha Zolotuhin & Prozorov, 2010 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Gastropachini) from West Africa in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with taxonomic notes on the genus
Figures 8–11. Sonitha species (♂). 8. S. smithi sp. n., holotype. 9. S. lila Zolotuhin & Prozorov, 2010, Zambia, Hillwood [ANHRTUK 00340024]. 10. S. smithi sp. n., holotype, genitalia [HT 004]. 11. S. lila, genitalia [HT 007].
Figures 1–7. Sonitha species. 1. S in Descriptions of three new Sonitha Zolotuhin & Prozorov, 2010 (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae: Lasiocampinae: Gastropachini) from West Africa in the collections of the African Natural History Research Trust, with taxonomic notes on the genus
Figures 1–7. Sonitha species. 1. S. libera (Aurivillius, 1915), ♂, Liberia, Nimba Mts. [ANHRTUK 00261556]. 2. Id., holotype ♂ of Stenophatna libera Aurivillius, 1915 [NHMUK 014200366]. 3. Id., ♀, Liberia, Nimba Mts. [ANHRTUK 00056329]. 4. S. chocolatina Zolotuhin & Prozorov, 2010, ♂, Gabon, Mts. de Cristal [ANHRTUK 00204687]. 5. Id., ♂, id. [ANHRTUK 00129611]. 6. Male genitalia of S. libera, Liberia [HT 008]. 7. Male genitalia of S. chocolatina, Gabon [HT 006].
Benchmark EEG data set for trust assessment for interactions with social robots
<p>The data collection consisted of a game interaction with a small humanoid EZ-robot. The robot explains a word to the participant either through movements depicting the concept or by verbal description. Depending on their performance, participants could "earn" or loose candy as remuneration for their participation.</p> <p>The dataset comprises EEG (Electroencephalography) recordings from 21 participants, gathered using Emotiv headsets. Each participant's EEG data includes timestamps and measurements from 14 sensors placed across different regions of the scalp. The sensor labels in the header are as follows: EEG.AF3, EEG.F7, EEG.F3, EEG.FC5, EEG.T7, EEG.P7, EEG.O1, EEG.O2, EEG.P8, EEG.T8, EEG.FC6, EEG.F4, EEG.F8, EEG.AF4, and Time.</p> <p>The EEG data provides insights into the electrical activity of the brain, offering a window into cognitive processes and emotional responses during various activities or stimuli in the form of microvolt and with a frame rate of 128 Hz. The whole data set consists of 3651124 data points for each sensor, i.e. 173863 on average for each participant (min. 128505, max. 249631). </p> <p>Files are named after participant numbers starting with ID01. The data has to be pre-processed making use of the information given in the details.xlsx file that contains annotations corresponding to the EEG recordings. These annotations denote the timing of different phases related to trust across the participants' interactions. Each phase is delineated by a start time and an end time, representing distinct stages of the trust-building process. All the other data (timestamps) which are outside the start and end of each phase should be considered as breaks, e.g. filling out the questionnaires. The last element is the trust score for the given phase, which is calculated on the answers in an MDMT questionnaire.</p> <p>The following phases have been annotated:</p> <ol> <li>Trust Building: This phase involves friendly initial interactions for establishing trust between participants and the robot.</li> <li>Situational Awareness: This phase continues to build up trust by showing situation awareness of the robot, e.g. by complimenting on the participant's fashion choice.</li> <li>Transparency: Trust is maintained by increased openness and clarity in communicating about the robot's abilities.</li> <li>Trust Violation: Trust is compromised during this phase by deliberately misleading the participant and making it impossible to answer correctly. </li> <li>Trust Repair: The robot shows efforts to repair trust by apologizing for the behavior in the previous stage.</li> </ol> <p>If you work with the data, please cite one of the article given below.</p>
Supplemental Material for "Make Your Tools Sparkle with Trust: The PICSE Framework for Trust in Software Tools"
<p>This package contains the materials that were used for the paper "Make Your Tools Sparkle with Trust: The PICSE Framework for Trust in Software Tools".</p> <ul> <li><strong>Interview Script.docx</strong> contains the script that was used for the semi-structured interviews.</li> <li><strong>Codebook.xlsx </strong>contains the final codebook of the study.</li> </ul>
WP5 Deliverable 5.1. Literature Review: Legitimate Crisis Governance and Trust
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic that emerged in 2020 as a health crisis, and which later became an economic and even political crisis (Boin et al. 2020), has shown that political actors like governments, leaders and courts were willing to take or endorse drastic measures to mitigate the spread of the virus. So-called lockdowns and other social restrictions were imposed on citizens without much public participation (Bol et al. 2021). Measures to counter the economic crisis that followed the health crisis were taken as a reaction to increasing demands of the public, though, sometimes, without parliamentary approval (e.g., Bursens et al. 2021). During the sovereign debt crisis as well, the EU imposed austerity policies on various countries without much public debate (Hartveld et al. 2013). At the same time, political systems are increasingly interconnected, forming a multilevel governance (MLG) structure. This means that local, regional, national and supranational levels of government each have their separate spheres of authority, but these levels also need to cooperate, hence the interconnectedness, and therefore become increasingly complex (Behnke et al. 2019; Biela et al. 2013). This interconnectedness of various levels is well expressed in times of crisis. Within the European Union (EU), for example, different levels of government were, in one way or another, involved in the mitigation of the pandemic (Lynggaard et al. 2022). The absence of public participation in the mitigation of crises and the increasing complexity of political systems raise questions on citizens’ perceptions of their governments such as, among others, their political trust. Indeed, political trust is seen as an important precondition for the functioning of a political system, especially in times of crisis (Schraff 2020). Research shows, for example, that political trust influences citizens’ willingness to vaccinate (Wynen et al. 2022) or to comply with laws (Marien & Hooghe 2011). The concept of political trust, which is related to concepts of legitimacy of a political system, is even more relevant in complex MLG contexts, where different tiers of government directly or indirectly influence citizens’ and where citizens can express trust in several levels simultaneously.</p> <p>Political trust can thus be considered as important in both crisis and MLG contexts, and especially in times of crisis in a MLG system. That is why this paper examines the following question: How do crises mitigating measures and multilevel governance contexts impact political trust? Political trust being defined as a “person’s belief that political institutions will act consistently with their expectations of positive behaviour” (Algan 2018). We study this question by means of a systematic literature review based on the PRISMA guidelines of 46 papers on crisis mitigating measures and/or MLG systems, and political trust, whereby political trust is the dependent variable. The goal of this research is to systematize and integrate knowledge of these distinct strands of research, searching for overlaps, in order to get more insight in the phenomenon of political trust. This review thus aims to bridge the gap between two different strands of research by searching for communalities in the way crisis mitigating measures affect political trust and how MLG contexts affect political trust. This is even more relevant given the global scope of crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and the increasing pertinence of MLG structures. Both themes are extensively studied, but rarely in combination with political trust or in combination with each other (see for example Boin et al. 2020 for crisis governance, or Behnke et al. 2019 for MLG). The growing complexity and 'trans boundedness' of crises (Boin and Lodge 2016), however, require a stronger focus on the relationships between crises and MLG, as well as how they together affect political trust. This literature review is therefore a first step to determine the state of the art and to integrate findings with regards to political trust in both contexts. This paper shows that there are some overlaps between the different strands of research, both in use of data and methods as in conceptions of and explanations for trust. There are, however, some gaps in the literature, especially with regards to the levels of government that are commonly studied. Research on the effect of crisis governance on trust focuses on the national level as the most important level, neglecting the MLG structure of most political systems. Additionally, the research on trust in MLG contexts focuses mostly on national and supranational levels of government. Literature on lower levels of government, especially the regional level, remains scarce. In both strands of research, various conceptualisations and notions of trust are used. Finally, literature on crisis governance focuses on the policies themselves and on how the implementation of a policy affects political trust. This literature, however, neglects the possible impact of the way in which measures were decided on political trust, for example whether the fact that decisions on measures were taken after intergovernmental consultations or without public participation affects political trust. The paper consists of six parts and is structured as follows: the first part elaborates on the research strategy of the paper, namely how the systematic literature review is performed. The second part discusses the findings with regards to the dependent variable, political trust, while the third and fourth part assess the impact of respectively crisis governance and MLG structures on political trust. In a fifth part, the impact of crisis governance on political trust in a multilevel system is discussed by means of four articles dealing with the sovereign debt crisis, and related austerity policies, in the EU. The paper concludes with a discussion of similarities between the two kinds of research and of the gaps in the literature, finally also providing avenues for further research.</p>
[HECAT] [ETAPAS] [TECHETHOS] Policy Launch: Public Service AI /// Trust – Values – Accuracy
<p><strong>Public Service AI /// Trust – Values – Accuracy</strong></p> <p><strong>Policy Launch 26.05.23 11:00 CET Zoom</strong></p> <p><strong>YouTube Link to POLICY LAUNCH Recording: </strong><a href="https://youtu.be/OqkqUbA-6PI">https://youtu.be/OqkqUbA-6PI</a></p> <p><strong>Policy 1 – HECAT Project </strong> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/7921614">“Algorithm Profiling in Public Employment Services; Reporting Standards”</a></p> <p><strong>Policy 2 – ETAPAS Project </strong> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/7634617#.ZFIf7ezMKt_">“ETAPAS AND ALTAI – Two European Trustworthy AI Assessment Methodologies”</a></p> <p><strong>Policy 3 – TechEthos Project </strong><a href="https://www.techethos.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/TECHETHOS_Policy-Brief_XR-General-purpose-AI_final.pdf">“XR and General Purpose AI: From Values and Principals to Norms and Standards”</a></p>
Experience and trust: The benefits of mate familiarity are realized through sex-specific specialization of parental roles in cassin’s auklet
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.