Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,047
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,047 results for “turtles”
Figure 5. 2007-2008 in Conservation considerations revealed by the movements of post-nesting green turtles from the Republic of the Marshall Islands
Figure 5. 2007-2008 post-nesting movement of a 96 cm CCL green turtle ID 40703, "Loj3", from Erikub Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands to the southern islands of Bikini Atoll. Loj3 traveled a total distance of 6,739 km, in the 215 days the satellite tag transmitted.
Figure 3. 2007-2008 in Conservation considerations revealed by the movements of post-nesting green turtles from the Republic of the Marshall Islands
Figure 3. 2007-2008 post-nesting movement of a 105 cm CCL green turtle ID 40719, "Loj2", from Erikub Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands to Palawan Island, Philippines. Loj2 traveled a total distance of 6,935 km, in the 345 days the satellite tag transmitted.
Figure 4. 2007-2008 in Conservation considerations revealed by the movements of post-nesting green turtles from the Republic of the Marshall Islands
Figure 4. 2007-2008 post-nesting movement of a 100 cm CCL green turtle ID 40728, "Loj1", from Erikub Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands to Tarawa, Kiribati. Loj1 traveled a total distance of 2,795 km, in the 234 days the satellite tag transmitted.
Figure 2. 2007-2008 in Conservation considerations revealed by the movements of post-nesting green turtles from the Republic of the Marshall Islands
Figure 2. 2007-2008 post-nesting movement of five green turtles from Erikub Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands.
Figure 1 in Conservation considerations revealed by the movements of post-nesting green turtles from the Republic of the Marshall Islands
Figure 1. Map of Republic of the Marshall Islands – major atolls labeled. Inset map of Erikub Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Loj island, the nesting site where turtles were satellitetagged, is indicated by red arrow.
Figure 4. a in Destination Revealed: Post-Nesting Migrations of Hawksbill Turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) from Moso Island, Republic of Vanuatu
Figure 4. a. Example of typical diel movement of Launmakala in her forage grounds showing period of near zero nocturnal movement indicating resting behavior and periods of positive diurnal movement indicating swimming and foraging behavior. b. Example of typical diel movement of Tassiriki in her forage grounds showing periods of near zero nocturnal movement indicating resting behavior and periods of positive diurnal movement indicating swimming and foraging behavior.
Figure 3. a in Destination Revealed: Post-Nesting Migrations of Hawksbill Turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) from Moso Island, Republic of Vanuatu
Figure 3. a. Internesting movements of Pua Lilia (704626A) between January 10, 2019 and March 7, 2019 off Moso Island, Republic of Vanuatu. The 95% KUD (light yellow) = 1.2 km2 and the 50% KUD (dark yellow) = 0.04 km2. b. The sum of the minimum distance moved between consecutive location fixes for Pua Lilia. The increased slope of the distances indicates increased swimming activity and correlates in each case with the time before and after the suspected nesting dates. c. Internesting tracks and KUD for Tassiriki (713458) from January 8, 2020 to February 8, 2020. The 95% KUD (light yellow) = 0.3 km2 and the 50% KUD (dark yellow) of 0.009 km2. d. The sum of the minimum distance moved between consecutive location fixes for Tassiriki. The increased slope of the distance traveled indicates increased swimming activity and correlates in each case with the time before and after the suspected nesting dates.
Figure 2 in Destination Revealed: Post-Nesting Migrations of Hawksbill Turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) from Moso Island, Republic of Vanuatu
Figure 2. Home range calculations for four post-nesting hawksbills tagged on Moso Island, Republic of Vanuatu using the kernel utilization distribution (KUD) estimator. a. 95% KUD = 28.9 km2 and b. 50% KUD = 5.7 km2 for Ethana (164948). c. 95% KUD = 7.4 km2 and d. 50% KUD = 2.0 km2 for Pua Lilia (704626A). e. 95% KUD = 1.7 km2 f. 50% KUD = 0.2 km2 for Launmakala (713459). g. 95% KUD = 7.4 km2 and h. 50% KUD = 0.6 km2 for Tassiriki (713458).
Fig. 2 in An Eocene sea turtle from the eastern North Pacific fills a Paleogene gap
Fig. 2. Photographs of sea turtle nuchal and peripherals of Chelonioidea gen. et sp. indet. (SDSNH 103374) from the Eocene Santiago Formation of California, USA (SDSNH loc. 5570). Ventral (A 1, A 4), anterior (A 2), and dorsal (A 3, A 5) views.
Fig. 1 in An Eocene sea turtle from the eastern North Pacific fills a Paleogene gap
Fig. 1. Geographic and geologic context of sea turtle fragments (Chelonioidea gen. et sp. indet.). A. Map of northern Pacific showing sea turtle localities. B. Position of Bressi Ranch locality of the Santiago Formation (SDSNH loc. 5570) in Southern California, USA. C. Stratigraphic column of the Bressi Ranch.
Fig. 1. A in First known gigantic sea turtle from the Maastrichtian deposits in Egypt
Fig. 1. A. Location map of the south Western Desert of Egypt (star). B. Geologic map of the studied area at Abu Minqar.
Fig. 4 in First known gigantic sea turtle from the Maastrichtian deposits in Egypt
Fig. 4. Left humerus (NVP010) of panchelonioidean turtle, from Maastrichtian, Abu Minqar, southern Western Desert of Egypt. Photograps (A) and explanatory drawings (B), in anterior (A1, B1), dorsal (A2, B2), posterior (A3, B3), ventral (A4, B4), distal (A5, B5), and proximal (A6, B6) views.
Fig. 3. A in First known gigantic sea turtle from the Maastrichtian deposits in Egypt
Fig. 3. A. General view of Qaret Selmi, north Abu Minqar, showing the Dakhla and Tarawan formations. B. The fossiliferous siltstone and sandstone layer, showing bioturbations or enormous concentrations of ammonites (e.g., Baculites sp.), bivalves (e.g., Exogyra overwagi, Pycnodonta vesicularis, pectinids), gastropods, echinoids, corals, fossilized fruits of mangrove palm (Nypa) and vertebrate remains.
Fig. 2 in First known gigantic sea turtle from the Maastrichtian deposits in Egypt
Fig. 2. Stratigraphic section of Qaret Selmi, north Abu Miqar village, showing the Maastrichtian–Paleocene successions of Dakhla Formation.
Fig. 5 in Multispecies leatherback turtle assemblage from the Oligocene Chandler Bridge and Ashley formations of South Carolina, USA
Fig. 5. Ossicles of leatherback turtle cf. Psephophorus sp. from Oligocene of South Carolina, USA. CCNHM 5460 (A) and CCNHM 5543 (B), in dorsal A1, B1), visceral (A2, B2), and sutural (A3, B3) views.
Fig. 3 in Multispecies leatherback turtle assemblage from the Oligocene Chandler Bridge and Ashley formations of South Carolina, USA
Fig. 3. Ossicles of leatherback turtle Natemys sp. 2 from Oligocene of South Carolina, USA. CCNHM 4287.1 (A), CCNHM 4287.2 (B), and CCNHM 4910 (C), in dorsal (A1–C1), visceral (A2–C2), and sutural (A3–C3) views. Arrows indicate the fissure on the visceral and sutural surfaces of CCNHM 4287.2, and note the stratified internal structure of CCNHM 4287.1.
Fig. 2 in Growth dynamics and body size evolution of South American long-necked chelid turtles: A bone histology approach
Fig. 2. Stylopodial bones of chelid turtles sampled in this study, showing the position where the thin sections were obtained (gray bar) and the complete shaft section in each element. A–D. Hydromedusa tectifera Cope, 1869; Recent, La Plata, Buenos Aires province, Argentina. A. MLPR-6291, dorsal view of the left humerus (A1), cross section (A2). B. MLPR-6291, dorsal view of the left femur (B1), cross section (B2). C. MLPR-6411, dorsal view of the right humerus (C1), cross section (C2). D. MLPR-6411, dorsal view of the right femur (D1), cross section (D2). E–G. Yaminuechelys maior (Staesche, 1929); Cerro Hansen, Danian of Salamanca Formation, Chubut Province, Argentina. E. MPEFPV-599, dorsal view of the right humerus (E1), cross section (E2). F. MPEFPV-599, dorsal view of the left femur (F1), cross section (F2). G. MLP-14-9-23-1, dorsal view of the left humerus (G1), cross section (G2). Note that the expansion of the medullary region is higher in Y. maior than in H. tectifera (see discussion in the text).
Fig. 3 in Growth dynamics and body size evolution of South American long-necked chelid turtles: A bone histology approach
Fig. 3. Stylopodial bone histology of chelid turtle Yaminuechelys maior (Staesche, 1929), Cerro Hansen, Danian, Paleocene of Salamanca Formation, Chubut Province, Argentina (Bona and De la Fuente 2005). A. MPEFPV-599, humerus: dorsal (A1), dorsomedial (A2), dorsolateral (A3), and lateral (A4) areas. B. MLP-14-9-23-1, humerus: lateral (B1), dorsal (B2), medial (B3), and ventral (B4) areas. Arrowheads in A1 and B4 indicate lines of arrested growth. C. MPEFPV-599, femur: dorsal (C1), dorsolateral (C2), and ventral (C3, C4) areas. Photographs under normal light (A1, A4, B3), under polarized light (C4), under polarized light with lambda compensator (A2, A3, B1, B2, B4, C1–C3). Abbreviations: LVC, simple longitudinal vascular canals; PFB, parallel-fibered bone; RS, resorption cavities; RVC, simple radial vascular canals; SF, Sharpey's fibres.
Fig. 4 in Growth dynamics and body size evolution of South American long-necked chelid turtles: A bone histology approach
Fig. 4. Stylopodial bone histology of chelid turtle Hydromedusa tectifera Cope, 1869; Recent, La Plata, Buenos Aires province, Argentina. A. MLPR-6474, humerus: dorsolateral (A1) and ventral (A2) areas. B. MLPR-6474, femur: ventral (B1) and dorsal (B2) areas. C. MLPR-6291, humerus: dorsal (C1) and ventral (C2) areas. D. MLPR-6291, femur: lateral (D1) and ventrolateral (D2) areas; annuli, yellow A; zones, green Z. E. MLPR-6411, humerus: dorsal (E1) and ventral (E2) areas. F. MLPR-6411, femur: lateral areas (F1, F2). Arrowheads in E2 and F2 indicate lines of arrested growth. Photographs under normal light (B1, B2, D1, E1, F2), under polarized light (E2), under polarized light with lambda compensator (A1, A2, C1, C2, D2, F1). Abbreviations: LVC, simple longitudinal vascular canals; PFB, parallel-fibered bone; RS, resorption cavities; SF, Sharpey's fibers.
Fig. 1 in Growth dynamics and body size evolution of South American long-necked chelid turtles: A bone histology approach
Fig. 1. Size distribution of chelid turtles represented in two different phylogenetic hypotheses from Maniel et al. (2018). Both topologies recover two alternative hypotheses (orange): the monophyly of the South American chelid clade (A) and the monophyly of the of the long necked chelid turtles (B) see Maniel et al. 2018, for more information). Grey, species smaller than 20 cm; green, 20–60 cm; blue and bold, larger than 60 cm. The size is based on the carapace length.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.