Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
205
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
205 results for “wing pattern”
Figure 6 from: Winterton SL, Wang Y (2016) Revision of the genus Gryposmylus Krüger, 1913 (Neuroptera, Osmylidae) with a remarkable example of convergence in wing disruptive patterning. ZooKeys 617: 31-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.10165
Figure 6 - Female genitalia of Gryposmylus pennyi sp. n.: Additional abbreviations: gx9, gonocoxite 9; gp9, gonopophysis 9; gs9, gonostylus 9. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.
Figure 5 from: Winterton SL, Wang Y (2016) Revision of the genus Gryposmylus Krüger, 1913 (Neuroptera, Osmylidae) with a remarkable example of convergence in wing disruptive patterning. ZooKeys 617: 31-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.10165
Figure 5 - Male genitalia of Gryposmylus pennyi sp. n.: A lateral view B dorsal view C oblique view. Colour key: gonarcus (red), ectoprocessus (blue), mediuncus (purple), parameres (green), hypandrium internum (orange). Abbreviations: t8, tergite 8; s8, sternite 8; t9, tergite 9; s9, sternite 9; ect, ectoproct; c, callus cercus. Scale bar: 0.2 mm.
Figure 4 from: Winterton SL, Wang Y (2016) Revision of the genus Gryposmylus Krüger, 1913 (Neuroptera, Osmylidae) with a remarkable example of convergence in wing disruptive patterning. ZooKeys 617: 31-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.10165
Figure 4 - Wing venation of Gryposmylus pennyi sp. n.: A forewing B hind wing. Major wing veins are colour coded.
Figure 7 from: Winterton SL, Wang Y (2016) Revision of the genus Gryposmylus Krüger, 1913 (Neuroptera, Osmylidae) with a remarkable example of convergence in wing disruptive patterning. ZooKeys 617: 31-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.10165
Figure 7 - Comparison of Gryposmylus pennyi sp. n. (A) (Oriental) and Vieira leschenaulti Navás (B) (Chrysopidae) (Neotropical) (photograph credits: A Stephen D. Gaimari B Arthur Anker).
Fig. 6 in Change Of Morphometric And Allometric Patterns On Wings Of Banded Demoiselle (Calopteryx Splendens) Males In Case Of Ecologically Different Watercourse Types
Fig. 6. Patterns of allometric features at different watercourse types. White bars = no allometry, grey bars = isoallometry, black bars = hyperallometry
FIGURE 2 in Phylogeography, genetic structure and wing pattern variation of Erebia pronoe (Esper, 1780) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Europe
FIGURE 2. Landmark digitization of Erebia pronoe. (a) forewings; (b) hindwings in tpsDig2 software.
Fig. 3 in 'Species' from two different butterfly genera combined into one: description of a new genus of Euptychiina (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) with unusually variable wing pattern
Fig. 3. Male and female genitalia of Sepona punctata. A, male genitalia in lateral view; B, male genitalia in dorsal view; C, male genitalia in ventral view; D, male aedeagus (lateral view); E, female genitalia in ventral view; F. female genitalia: detail of the signa in corpus bursae. (sa) saccus, (te) tegumen, (un) uncus, (va) valva, (bu) corpus bursae, (st) sterigma.
Fig. 2 in 'Species' from two different butterfly genera combined into one: description of a new genus of Euptychiina (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) with unusually variable wing pattern
Fig. 2. Morphological characters of Sepona punctata. A, male wing venation – forewing above and hind wing below; B, female wing venation – forewing above and hind wing below; C, male palpus; D, male foreleg; E, male midleg; F female foreleg.
The roles of wing color pattern and geography in the evolution of Neotropical Preponini butterflies
<p>Diversification rates and evolutionary trajectories are known to be influenced by phenotypic traits and the geographic history of the landscapes that organisms inhabit. One of the most conspicuous traits in butterflies is their wing color pattern, which has been shown to be important in speciation. The evolution of many taxa in the Neotropics has also been influenced by major geological events. Using a dated, species-level molecular phylogenetic hypothesis for Preponini, a colorful Neotropical butterfly tribe, we evaluated if diversification rates were constant or varied through time, and how they were influenced by color pattern evolution and biogeographic events. We found that Preponini originated approximately 28 million years ago and that diversification has increased through time consistent with major periods of Andean uplift. Even though some clades show evolutionarily rapid transitions in coloration, contrary to our expectations, these shifts were not correlated with shifts in diversification. Involvement in mimicry with other butterfly groups might explain the rapid changes in dorsal color patterns in this tribe, but such changes have not increased species diversification in this group. However, we found evidence for an influence of major Miocene and Pliocene geological events on the tribe's evolution. Preponini apparently originated within South America and range evolution has since been dynamic, congruent with Andean geologic activity, closure of the Panama Isthmus and Miocene climate variability.</p>
Figures 56-65 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 56-65 - Achrysocharoides maieri sp. nov.: 56 Head frontal, female 57 Ditto, male 58 Antenna lateral, female 59 Ditto, male 60 Mesosoma dorsal, female 61 Ditto, male 62 Mesosoma lateral, female 63 Ditto, male 64 Wing interference pattern (WIP), female 65 Ditto, male.
Figures 38-45 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 38-45 - Achrysocharoides butus (Walker), wing interference patterns (WIPs): 38–43 Males 44–45 Females. Wings on Figs 38, 40–45 from Wales, 1976 39 from Sweden, Skåne, 2010.
Figures 28-37 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 28-37 - Achrysocharoides spp., wing interference patterns (WIPs): 28–35 Achrysocharoides robiniae Hansson & Shevtsova 28–33 Males 34–35 Females 36–37 Achrysocharoides robinicolus Hansson & Shevtsova 36 Male 37 Female. Wings on Figs 28–31, 34–37 from USA, Connecticut, 2002 32, 33, from Hungary, Vas Co., 2002.
Figures 18-27 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 18-27 - Achrysocharoides spp., wing interference patterns (WIPs): 18–23 Achrysocharoides platanoidae Hansson & Shevtsova 18–21 Males 22–23 Females 24–27 Achrysocharoides acerianus (Askew) 24–25 Males 26–27 Females. All wings from specimens from Sweden, Skåne, 2010.
Figures 66-71 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 66-71 - Achrysocharoides maieri sp. n.: 66 Head frontal, female 67 Ditto, male 68 Vertex, female 69 Ditto, male 70 Mesosoma dorsal, female. 71 Ditto, male.
Figures 46-55 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 46-55 - Achrysocharoides spp., wing interference patterns (WIPs): 46–51 Achrysocharoides latreilleii (Curtis) 46–49 Males 50–51 Females 52–55 Achrysocharoides albiscapus (Delucchi), males. Wings on Figs 46, 47, 49–51 from England, Surrey 1986–2004 48 from Sweden, Skåne, 2010; 52, 53, 55 from Greece, Crete, 1997 54 from France, 1984.
Figures 10-17 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 10-17 - Achrysocharoides spp., males, wing interference patterns (WIPs) to the left, scanning electron micrographs from uncoated wings to the right: 10–11 Achrysocharoides robiniae Hansson & Shevtsova 12–13 Achrysocharoides butus (Walker) 14–15 Achrysocharoides latreilleii (Curtis) 16–17 Achrysocharoides albiscapus (Delucchi).
Figures 82-87 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 82-87 - Achrysocharoides serotinae sp. n.: 82 Head frontal, female 83 Ditto, male 84 Vertex, female 85 Ditto, male 86 Mesosoma dorsal, female 87 Ditto, male.
Figures 7-9 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 7-9 - Achrysocharoides spp.: 7 Achrysocharoides zwoelferi (Delucchi), male, from Sweden, Blekinge, 1956 8 Undescribed species from USA, Arizona, 1982, male, wing interference pattern (WIP) 9 The same wings as in Fig. 8 in transparent mode.
Figures 72-81 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 72-81 - Achrysocharoides serotinae sp. n.: 72 Head frontal, female 73 Ditto, male 74 Antenna lateral, female 75 Ditto, male 76 Mesosoma dorsal, female 77 Ditto, male 78 Mesosoma lateral, female 79 Ditto, male 80 Wing interference pattern (WIP), female 81 Ditto, male.
Figures 1-6 from: Shevtsova E, Hansson C (2011) Species recognition through wing interference patterns (WIPs) in Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) including two new species. ZooKeys 154: 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.154.2158
Figures 1-6 - Achrysocharoides spp., transparent wings: 1 Achrysocharoides acerianus (Askew), male 2 Ditto, female 3 Achrysocharoides platanoidae Hansson & Shevtsova, male 4 Ditto, female 5 Achrysocharoides butus (Walker), male 6 Ditto, female. Wings on Figs 1–4 from Sweden, Skåne, 2010 5–6 from Wales, 1976.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.