Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Nine new species and new records of euryglossiform Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) from South Africa

Fig. 4. Scrapter hergi Kuhlmann sp. nov., ♂, holotype (RCMK). A. Lateral view. B. Genitalia (dorsal view). C. Metasoma (dorsal view). D. Genitalia (lateral view). E. Head. F. S7 (dorsal view). G. Hind tibia. H. S8, apical end.

Fig. 9 in Nine new species and new records of euryglossiform Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) from South Africa

Fig. 9. Scrapter oubergensis Kuhlmann sp. nov., ♀, holotype (RCMK). A. Lateral view. B. Head. C. Scutum and scutellum (dorsal view). D. Metanotum and propodeum (dorsal view). E. Metasoma (dorsal view).

Fig. 1 in Nine new species and new records of euryglossiform Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) from South Africa

Fig. 1. Scrapter avontuurensis Kuhlmann sp. nov., ♀, holotype (RCMK). A. Lateral view. B. Head. C. Scutum and scutellum (dorsal view). D. Metanotum and propodeum (dorsal view). E. Metasoma (dorsal view).

Fig. 4 in Two new genera and three new subterranean species of Hydrobiidae (Caenogastropoda: Truncatelloidea) from Tunisia

Fig. 4. Anatomy of Belgrandiellopsis chorfensis gen. et sp. nov. (paratypes, UGSB 17663). A. Ctenidium and osphradium. B. Stomach. C. Head of male and penis. D. Detail of penis and penis lobes (observed by transmitted light in E). F. Pallial oviduct. G. Bursa copulatrix and seminal receptacles. H. Ditto, observed by transmitted light. Anatomical abbreviations explained in the text.

Fig. 13 in A new species of Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae) from the Western Urals (Russia)

Fig. 13. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of the partial small subunit rDNA (SSU rDNA) and large subunit ribosomal DNA (LSU rDNA) combined data set. The Bayesian posterior probability (left) and maximum likelihood bootstrap value (right) are shown. Scale bar represents estimated number of substitution per site.

Fig. 2 in Two new genera and three new subterranean species of Hydrobiidae (Caenogastropoda: Truncatelloidea) from Tunisia

Fig. 2. Bayesian inference based on the COI and 18S datasets. Bootstrap values and BPP's for branches are given when Ż 70% and Ż 0.90, respectively. Scale bar = expected change per site.

Fig. 4. A–D in Descriptions of species of Stegelleta Thorne, 1938 (Nematoda, Rhabditida, Cephalobidae) from California, New Zealand and Senegal, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 4. A–D. Stegelleta ophioglossa Andrássy, 1967. A. Pharyngeal region. B. Anterior end, surface view. C. Female gonad. D. Female tail. E–G. Stegelleta tuarua Yeates, 1967. E. Pharyngeal region. F. Anterior end, surface view. G. Male tail. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 2 in Descriptions of species of Stegelleta Thorne, 1938 (Nematoda, Rhabditida, Cephalobidae) from California, New Zealand and Senegal, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 2. Stegelleta incisa (Thorne, 1937), SEM micrographs. A–B. Anterior end, left lateral view. C. Anterior part of lateral field. D. Deirid (arrow). E. Vulval region. F. Female tail, subventral view. G. Female tail, left sublateral view (arrow points at phasmid). H. Female tail, lateral view. Scale bars = 5 µm.

Fig. 3 in Descriptions of species of Stegelleta Thorne, 1938 (Nematoda, Rhabditida, Cephalobidae) from California, New Zealand and Senegal, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 3. Stegelleta laterocornuta sp. nov., SEM micrographs. A. Vulval opening. B. Anal opening. C–D. Anterior end, left subventral view. E. Anterior end, left lateral view (arrows in C–E point at the long acute tine extending along the primary axil on the lateral lips). Scale bars = 2 µm.

Fig. 1. A–E in Descriptions of species of Stegelleta Thorne, 1938 (Nematoda, Rhabditida, Cephalobidae) from California, New Zealand and Senegal, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 1. A–E. Stegelleta incisa (Thorne, 1937). A. Pharyngeal region. B. Female gonad. C. Anterior end, surface view. D. Female tail. E. Male tail. F–J. Stegelleta laterocornuta sp. nov. F. Pharyngeal region. G. Female gonad. H. Anterior end, surface view. I. Female tail. J. Male tail. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 6. A–B in The millipede genus Solaenodolichopus Verhoeff, 1924 (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae). 1. New genus diagnosis and redescriptions of named species

Fig. 6. A–B. Solaenodolichopus pruvoti (Brolemann, 1931); left gonopod solenomere, posterior views. A. Syntype, from fig. 32 in Brolemann (1931). B. QM S74841. — C. Solaenodolichopus?pruvoti; left gonopod solenomere, posterolateral view, from fig. 3 in Jeekel (1982). Scale bar: 1 mm.

Fig. 1 in A new species of Casmaria H. Adams & A. Adams, 1853 (Gastropoda, Cassidae) from the Philippines identified by molecular data

Fig. 1. Bayesian phylogenetic trees of studied members of the genus Casmaria obtained with standard genetic markers. Posterior probabilities when greater than 0.80 are indicated for each node. A. Phylogenetic tree based on the CO1 gene; for specimens underlined, vouchers are illustrated on the right. B. Phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene. C. Phylogenetic tree based on the 12S rRNA gene.

Fig. 3. — A–B. Solaenodolichopus rubriventris Verhoeff, 1928 in The millipede genus Solaenodolichopus Verhoeff, 1924 (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae). 1. New genus diagnosis and redescriptions of named species

Fig. 3. — A–B. Solaenodolichopus rubriventris Verhoeff, 1928, ♂, QM S74690. A. Right ventrolateral view of ring 7 showing swelling (arrow) just anterolateral to aperture. B. Ventral view of aperture showing gently convex extensions (arrows) on either side of medial extension on anterior margin of aperture. — C. S. walesius Verhoeff, 1928, ♀, AM KS.16152, posteroventral view of epigyne showing raised end (arrow). — D. S. teres (Verhoeff, 1924), paralectotype ♀, NHRS KAS1000000007, left ventrolateral view of anterior rings showing distolateral process on leg 2 coxa (arrow) just medial to raised end of epigyne. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 3 in A taxonomic review of the genus Asterostegus (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), with the description of a new species

Fig. 3. Asterostegus sabineae sp. nov., holotype (MNHN IE-2013-8012) (A–F). A. Aboral basal portion of arm. B. Aboral middle portion of arm. C. Aboral and lateral distal portion of arm. D. Oral proximal portion of arm. E. Oral middle portion of arm. F. Lateral distal portion of arm. Abbreviations: AS = arm spine, LAP = lateral arm plate, Ten = tentacles, Tu = tubercle.

Fig. 9 in The millipede genus Solaenodolichopus Verhoeff, 1924 (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae). 1. New genus diagnosis and redescriptions of named species

Fig. 9. Solaenodolichopus sulcatus (Verhoeff, 1928) ♂. A. Right lateral view of midbody rings, AM KS.77379. B–C. Lateral (B) and posterior (C) views of gonopods in situ, lectotype, AM KS.76503. D. Posterior and slightly medial view of right gonopod solenomere, possibly of missing paralectotype, from fig. 11 in Verhoeff (1928). E–H. Lateral (E), anterior (F), medial (G) and posterior (H) views of left gonopod solenomere, QM S75836. Arrows in A point to longitudinal grooves, dotted line in F marks course of prostatic groove. Scale bars: A–C = 2 mm, D–H = 1 mm.

Fig. 5 in A taxonomic review of the genus Asterostegus (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), with the description of a new species

Fig. 5. Asterostegus sabineae sp. nov., paratype (SMNH-Type-8536), SEM photographs. A. Lateral arm plate from middle portion of arm, abradial view. B. Lateral arm plate from distal portion of arm, adradial view. C. Lateral arm plate from distal portion of arm, oral view. D-F. Arm spines: from proximal portion of arm (D), middle portion of arm (E), distal portion of arm, an arc indicates lamina (F). Abbreviations: MO = muscle opening, NO = nerve opening, ST = secondary tooth.

Fig. 10. Asterostegus tuberculatus Mortensen, 1933 in A taxonomic review of the genus Asterostegus (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), with the description of a new species

Fig. 10. Asterostegus tuberculatus Mortensen, 1933 (SMNH 123461), SEM photographs. A-D. Vertebra from middle portion of arm: distal view (A), aboral view (B), oral view (C) and lateral view (D). E-H. Vertebrae from distal portion of arm: distal view (E), aboral view (F), oral view (G) and lateral view (H). Abbreviations: K = knob, OB = oral bridge.

Fig. 7. Asterostegus tuberculatus Mortensen, 1933 in A taxonomic review of the genus Asterostegus (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), with the description of a new species

Fig. 7. Asterostegus tuberculatus Mortensen, 1933 (SMNH 123461). A. Aboral disc and proximal portion of arm. B. Aboral periphery of disc. C. Aboral central disc. D. Oral disc. E. Jaws. F. Oral periphery of disc. G. Oral periphery of disc, skin removed to observe internal ossicles, oral interradial plates of the same row are connected by black bars. H. Lateral disc, an arrow indicates madreporite. I. Aboral proximal portion of arm. Abbreviations: ADS = adoral shield, GEO = granule-shaped external ossicle, GS = genital slit, LB = lateral bar, OIP = oral interradial plate, OP = oral papillae, Te = teeth, Ten = tentacle, Tu = tubercle.

Fig. 2 in The millipede genus Solaenodolichopus Verhoeff, 1924 (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae). 1. New genus diagnosis and redescriptions of named species

Fig. 2. Posterior views of sternal lamella in ♂♂. — A. Solaenodolichopus pruvoti (Brolemann, 1931), QM S74856. — B. S. rubriventris Verhoeff, 1928, QM S74690. — C. S. sulcatus (Verhoeff, 1928), lectotype, AM KS.76503. — D. S. teres (Verhoeff, 1924), lectotype in alcohol, ZSM A20052188. — E. S. vittatus (Verhoeff, 1924), QM S74829. — F. S. walesius Verhoeff, 1928, lectotype, AM KS.76508. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.