Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 13 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 13. Right pes of Adasaurus mongoliensis (IGM 100/20). A, anterolateral view; B, detail of digit II. The ''reduced'' ungual phalanx on digit II is autapomorphic for Adasaurus.

Fig. 8 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 8. Select postcranial remains of Achillobator giganticus (MNUFR 15). A, femur in posterior view; B, tibia in anterior view; C, illustration of pubis and ischium.

Fig. 43 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 43. Referred material of Utahraptor ostrommaysorum. A, left premaxilla (BYU 7510 14585) in lateral (top) and medial (bottom) views; B, right femur (BYU 7510 14281) in lateral view. In B, the arrow indicates the notch between the greater and lesser trochanter, which is characteristic of Utahraptor ostrommaysorum.

Fig. 54 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 54. Select postcranial material of Unenlagia paynemili. A, left humerus (MUCPv 349) in anterior view; B, manual ungual (II?) (MUCPv 343); C, pedal phalanx II-1 (MUCPv 415) and phalanx II-2 (MUCPv 1066) in articulation in medial view; D, pedal phalanx II-2 (MUCPv 1066) in proximal view; E, pedal phalanx II-2 (MUCPv 1066) in ventral view.

Fig. 48 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 48. Select hindlimb material of Neuquenraptor argentinus (MCF PVPH 77). A, left femur in lateral view; B, distal end of left tibiotarsus in anterior view; C, distal end of left tibiotarsus in posterior view; D, distal end of left tibiotarsus in lateral view; E, distal end of left tibiotarsus in medial view.

Fig. 50 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 50. Select elements of Unenlagia comahuensis (MCF PVPH 78). A, right scapula in lateral view; B, left humerus in anterior view; C, close-up of proximal end of humerus in dorsal view. Arrow indicates the laterally oriented glenoid fossa (char. 138.1) characteristic of paravians.

Fig. 59. Cladogram summarizing the 23 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 59. Cladogram summarizing the 23 alternate positions that Pyroraptor olympius can take among dromaeosaurids.

Fig. 52 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 52. Select hindlimb elements of Unenlagia comahuensis (MCF PVPH 78). A, left tibia in anterior view; B, left femur in anterior view; C, closeup of proximal end of left femur in lateral view; D, close-up of proximal end of left femur in posterior view. Arrow indicates the posterior trochanter of the femur.

Fig. 56 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 56. Select pedal elements of Rahonavis ostromi (UA 8656). A, left metatarsus in anterior view; B, left phalanx II-2 in ventral and lateral views; C, ungual phalanx of digit two in lateral view.

Fig. 5 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 5. Summary cladogram showing the broad pattern of relationships within Avialae. Adapted from Clarke (2004) and Chiappe (2002).

Fig. 6 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 6. Generalized cladograms showing the clade names and taxonomic conventions employed in the current study. A, clade names within nonavialan Coelurosauria; B, clade names within Avialae. Open circles denote node-based names; curves, stem-based names.

Fig. 2 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 2. Illustration of the foot of Deinonychus antirrhopus showing the derived pedal morphology characteristic of Deinonychosauria. Adapted from Ostrom (1969a).

Fig. 4 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 4. Strict consensus topologies from recent phylogenetic analyses of coelurosaur relationships that used a version of the TWiG matrix as a backbone. A, Zanno (2010); B, Choiniere et al. (2010); C, Senter (2007).

Fig. 3 in A Review Of Dromaeosaurid Systematics And Paravian Phylogeny

Fig. 3. Strict consensus topologies from previous versions of the Theropod Working Group (TWiG) matrix. A, Norell et al. (2001); B, Hwang et al. (2002); C, Makovicky et al. (2005); D, Norell et al. (2006).

Figure 9 in The osteology and phylogeny of the Hawaiian finch radiation (Fringillidae: Drepanidini), including extinct taxa

Figure 9. Distribution of measurements of the angle of the mandibular symphysis to the internal ramus. See character 31.

Figure 8 in The osteology and phylogeny of the Hawaiian finch radiation (Fringillidae: Drepanidini), including extinct taxa

Figure 8. Method of measuring the angle of the mandibular symphysis to the internal ramus. Mandibles, in lateral view, are of Telespiza ypsilon USNM 254736 – subparallel (A), Vangulifer mirandus USNM 445808 – deflected (B), and Aidemedia zanclops BBM-X 155160 holotype – deflected (C). See character 31.

Figure 11 in The osteology and phylogeny of the Hawaiian finch radiation (Fringillidae: Drepanidini), including extinct taxa

Figure 11. Illustration of states for mandible characters 38, 40, 43, and 44. Mandibles of Passer domesticus USNM 561838 (A) and Telespiza cantans USNM 289278 (B) in lateral view, illustrating the concave vs. straight dorsal profile (character 38). The articular end of the mandible in Oreomystis bairdi USNM 553183 (C) and Sicalis flaveola USNM 556091 (D) in dorsal view, illustrating presence (D) vs. absence (C) of lateral inflation anterior to the lateral cotyla (character 40). The articular end of the mandible in Pooecetes gramineus USNM 555444 (E) and Leucosticte tephrocotis USNM 501466 (F) in dorsal view, illustrating the deep vs. shallow development of bone below the lateral cotyla (character 43). The articular end of the mandible in Cardinalis cardinalis USNM 554219 (G) and Telespiza cantans USNM 561510 (H) in anterodorsal view, illustrating a prominent intercotylar tubercle vs. a weakly developed one (character 44).

Figure 4 in The osteology and phylogeny of the Hawaiian finch radiation (Fringillidae: Drepanidini), including extinct taxa

Figure 4. Method of measuring degrees of arc of the premaxilla, illustrated on the skull of Himatione sanguinea (MVZ 118858). See character 5.

Figure 14 in The osteology and phylogeny of the Hawaiian finch radiation (Fringillidae: Drepanidini), including extinct taxa

Figure 14. Phylogram showing one of two optimal trees for matrix B (length 193 steps, consistency index 0.42). Eleven clades are identified, and illustrated in Figures 14 and 15. Bremer support (roman numbers) and bootstrap support>50% (italic numbers in parentheses) are indicated. Daggers identify taxa that became extinct in historic times; double daggers identify extinct fossil taxa. The branch lengths were determined with accelerated transformation of states. *These taxa may also be extinct.

Figure 7 in The osteology and phylogeny of the Hawaiian finch radiation (Fringillidae: Drepanidini), including extinct taxa

Figure 7. Distribution of logarithmic ratios of the length to height of the narial opening. See character 22.