Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in Middle Cambrian gogiid echinoderms from Northeast Spain: Taxonomy, palaeoecology, and palaeogeographic implications

Fig. 7. Details of element structures in eocrinoidean blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. (SEM photos of latex casts). A. Fragment of a holdfast from the specimen MPZ2004/161, consisting of an aggregate of globular plates (A1), details of specimen (A2, A3). B. Internal view of a plate showing sutural pores of epispires (MPZ2004/225); general view of an isolated plate (B1), detail of the epispire (B2). C. External surface of a plate (MPZ2004/232) (C1), details of the epispires showing the raised rim and stereomic structures (C2, C3). Arrows indicate enlarged details.

Fig. 2 in Middle Cambrian gogiid echinoderms from Northeast Spain: Taxonomy, palaeoecology, and palaeogeographic implications

Fig. 2. Geological setting of the two discussed localities in the Iberian Chains (after Liñán et al. 2008). A. Pre−Hercynian outcrops and tectono−stratigraphic zones of the Iberian Peninsula; the Iberian Chains are framed. Zones: CZ, Cantabrian; WALZ, West Asturian−Leonese; GCZ, Galician−Castilian; ELAZ, East Lusitanian−Alcudian; OMZ, Ossa−Morena Zone; SPZ, South Portuguese. B. Pre−Hercynian outcrops and tectono−stratigraphic zones and units of the Iberian Chains; Murero and Purujosa (indicated by stars) (Modified from Gozalo and Liñán 1988).

Fig. 1 in Middle Cambrian gogiid echinoderms from Northeast Spain: Taxonomy, palaeoecology, and palaeogeographic implications

Fig. 1. Holotype (MGM2005K) of gogiid echinoderm Alanisicystis andalusiae Ubaghs and Vizcaïno, 1991 from the lower Cambrian of the Ossa Morena zone (South Spain). Photograph of latex cast whitened with NH4Cl.

Fig. 8 in Middle Cambrian gogiid echinoderms from Northeast Spain: Taxonomy, palaeoecology, and palaeogeographic implications

Fig. 8. Camera lucida drawings of eocrinoid blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. A. General view of the paratype MPZ2004/161, detached holdfast below. B. Thecal plate, half−epispires with their prominent rim indicated. C. Two brachioles on a single thecal plate. D. Biserial brachiole terminally enrolled. E. Epispire covered by a single domal plate. F. Epispire covered by tiny plates. G. Spiralled brachiole.

Fig. 3 in Middle Cambrian gogiid echinoderms from Northeast Spain: Taxonomy, palaeoecology, and palaeogeographic implications

Fig. 3. Sections of the middle Cambrian Murero Formation in Murero and Purujosa indicating the levels with Gogia sp. and Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov.

Fig. 4. A–E in Middle Cambrian gogiid echinoderms from Northeast Spain: Taxonomy, palaeoecology, and palaeogeographic implications

Fig. 4. A–E. Eocrinoid blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. A. Paratype MPZ2006/556a, b; part (A1) and counterpart (A2) of a slightly disturbed small specimen attached to a free cheek of Eccaparadoxides sp. fragment. The arrow indicates where the holdfast attaches to the trilobite element. B. MPZ2006/559b; accumulation of disarticulated plates from eocrinoids (Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov.) and cinctans. C. Paratype MPZ2006/557a, b; nearly complete specimen with thecal plates slightly disturbed. D. Paratype MPZ2004/215; partial theca with ornamented plates and a very short holdfast (indicated by the arrow). E. Paratype MPZ2004/214; specimen with an almost complete theca. F, G. Gogia sp. F. MPZ2004/194a; partly complete specimen with a possible periproct on the lateral surface (see white arrow). G. MPZ2004/195a, b; partially disarticulated specimen (G1), counterpart of the same specimen (G2), detail of two adjoined plates with epispires (G3). Photographs of latex casts whitened with NH4Cl.

Fig. 6 in Middle Cambrian gogiid echinoderms from Northeast Spain: Taxonomy, palaeoecology, and palaeogeographic implications

Fig. 6. Reconstruction of eocrinoidean blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. (by Santiago Alberto, after a sketch by SZ), based on the holotype MPZ2004/162a. The holdfast, not preserved in the holotype, is reconstructed based on paratypes MPZ2004/161 and MPZ2004/215.

Fig. 5 in Middle Cambrian gogiid echinoderms from Northeast Spain: Taxonomy, palaeoecology, and palaeogeographic implications

Fig. 5. Slab with two nearly complete, articulated and exquisitely preserved specimens of eocrinoid blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov., with some isolated plates belonging to cinctan carpoids. Both specimens probably represent an early mature stage (TH = 12 mm). The left specimen (holotype MPZ2004/162a) shows many of the diagnostic features referred to in the text. The right specimen (paratype MPZ2004/161a) shows the holdfast separated from the theca (indicated by an arrow). Photograph of latex cast whitened with NH4Cl.

Fig. 1 in The taxonomy and anatomy of rauisuchian archosaurs from the Late Triassic of Germany and Poland

Fig. 1. Right maxilla of rauisuchian Teratosaurus suevicus Meyer, 1861 from Mittlerer Stubensandstein, Upper Triassic of Heslach, Germany, NHM 38646, holotype. Photographs in lateral (A), medial (B), and ventral (C) views. Designation "m" refers to maxillary tooth position.

Fig. 2 in The taxonomy and anatomy of rauisuchian archosaurs from the Late Triassic of Germany and Poland

Fig. 2. Right maxilla of rauisuchian Teratosaurus suevicus Meyer, 1861 from Mittlerer Stubensandstein, Upper Triassic of Heslach, Germany, NHM 38646, holotype. Photographs in medial (A) and anterior (B) views. A is a close−up of the medial surface of the anterior end of the maxilla. Designation "m" refers to maxillary tooth position.

Fig. 3 in The taxonomy and anatomy of rauisuchian archosaurs from the Late Triassic of Germany and Poland

Fig. 3. Left maxilla of rauisuchian Polonosuchus silesiacus (Sulej, 2005) from Late Carnian, Upper Triassic of Krasiejów Claypit, Poland, ZPAL AbIII/563, part of holotype. Photographs in lateral (A), medial (B), and ventral (C) views. Designation "m" refers to maxillary tooth position.

Fig. 4. Tetrapod Kinelia broomi Novikov 2002 in Alpha taxonomy of the Russian Permian procolophonoid reptiles

Fig. 4. Tetrapod Kinelia broomi Novikov 2002, Kutlukskaya Svita, uppermost Tatarian; PIN 4538/3 (holotype), partial right dentary. In medial (A) and lateral (B) views.

Fig. 1 in Alpha taxonomy of the Russian Permian procolophonoid reptiles

Fig. 1. Procolophonid reptile Suchonosaurus minimus Tverdokhlebova and Ivakhnenko, 1994, Salarevskaya Svita, uppermost Tatarian; SGU 104B/1326 (holotype), right maxilla. In anterolateral (A), medial (B), and medioocclusal (C) views.

Fig. 7. Seymouriamorph Microphon exiguus Ivakhnenko, 1983 in Alpha taxonomy of the Russian Permian procolophonoid reptiles

Fig. 7. Seymouriamorph Microphon exiguus Ivakhnenko, 1983, Severodvinian Gorizont, Tatarian; PIN 3585/31 (holotype), right maxilla, in lateral view (A), lateral view of the anterior end (B; attached to the maxilla incorrectly in A), and medial view (C).

Fig. 3. Procolophonid reptile Contritosaurus convector Ivakhnenko 1974 in Alpha taxonomy of the Russian Permian procolophonoid reptiles

Fig. 3. Procolophonid reptile Contritosaurus convector Ivakhnenko 1974, Vokhmian Gorizont, Induan, earliest Triassic; PIN 3357/2, partial right maxilla. In lateral (A), medial (B), and occlusal (C) views.

Fig. 2 in Alpha taxonomy of the Russian Permian procolophonoid reptiles

Fig. 2. Procolophonid reptile Suchonosaurus minimus Tverdokhlebova and Ivakhnenko, 1994, Salarevskaya Svita, uppermost Tatarian; SGU 104B/1326 (holotype), right maxilla. In lateral (A), medial (B), and occlusal (C) views.

Fig. 6. Seymouriamorph Microphon exiguus Ivakhnenko, 1983 in Alpha taxonomy of the Russian Permian procolophonoid reptiles

Fig. 6. Seymouriamorph Microphon exiguus Ivakhnenko, 1983, Severodvinian Gorizont, Tatarian; PIN 3585/31 (holotype), right maxilla, in lateral (A) and medial (B) views.

Fig. 5. Tetrapod Kinelia broomi Novikov 2002 in Alpha taxonomy of the Russian Permian procolophonoid reptiles

Fig. 5. Tetrapod Kinelia broomi Novikov 2002, Kutlukskaya Svita, uppermost Tatarian; PIN 4538/3 (holotype), partial right dentary. In medial (A), occlusal (B), and lateral (C) views. D. Schematic representation of the four well−preserved tooth crowns of the dentary teeth from posterior view. Lingual to the right, not to scale.

Fig. 5 in Colour patterns in Early Devonian cephalopods from the Barrandian Area: Taphonomy and taxonomy

Fig. 5. Ptenoceras? sp. Praha−Braník, Pragian, Praha Formation, DvorceProkop Limestone. Specimen NM−L 7644, juvenile shell with preserved colour pattern (A, B) and schematic outlines of colour pattern (C, D), lateral (A) and ventral (B) views.

Fig. 3 in Colour patterns in Early Devonian cephalopods from the Barrandian Area: Taphonomy and taxonomy

Fig. 3. Colour patterns in Devonian cephalopods Ptenoceras. A. Ptenoceras nudum (Barrande, 1865). Praha−Hlubočepy, Dalejan, Daleje−Třebotov Formation, Třebotov Limestone. Specimen NM−L 40727 in lateral (A1) and ventral (A2) views, showing colour bands—zigzags on ventral side of the whorl and a trace of colour band ventrolaterally (indicated by arrow). B. Ptenoceras alatum (Barrande, 1865). Koněprusy, Pragian, Praha Formation, Koněprusy Limestone. Specimen NM−L 40726, in lateral (B1) and frontal (B2) views, exhibiting bifurcating colour bands oblique to axis of the shell.