Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,620
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,620 results for “Molecular Phylogeny”
Figure 4 from: Wang P, Che J, Liu Q, Li K, Jin JQ, Jiang K, Shi L, Guo P (2020) A revised taxonomy of Asian snail-eating snakes Pareas (Squamata, Pareidae): evidence from morphological comparison and molecular phylogeny. ZooKeys 939: 45-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.939.49309
Figure 4 Holotype of Pareas menglaensis sp. nov. (YBU 14124). General view(A); dorsal (B), ventral (C), lateral (D) and frontal (E) views of the head; dorsal (F) and ventral (G) views of the median body.
Figure 5 from: Wang P, Che J, Liu Q, Li K, Jin JQ, Jiang K, Shi L, Guo P (2020) A revised taxonomy of Asian snail-eating snakes Pareas (Squamata, Pareidae): evidence from morphological comparison and molecular phylogeny. ZooKeys 939: 45-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.939.49309
Figure 5 Holotype of Pareas mengziensis sp. nov. (YBU 14252). Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) of general views; dorsal (C), ventral (D), and lateral (E) views of the head.
Figure 2 from: Palacios-Aguilar R, García-Vázquez UO (2020) A partial molecular phylogeny of Rhadinaea and related genera (Squamata, Dipsadidae) with comments on the generic assignment of Rhadinaea eduardoi. ZooKeys 943: 145-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.943.50738
Figure 2 Adult male Coniophanes fissidens (MZFC-HE34194) from East of Río Santiago, Guerrero, Mexico. This specimen was obtained approximately 60 kilometers WNW of the type locality of C. f. dispersus. Compare this specimen with images 2, 3, and 4 from Mata-Silva et al. (2019).
Figure 1 from: Palacios-Aguilar R, García-Vázquez UO (2020) A partial molecular phylogeny of Rhadinaea and related genera (Squamata, Dipsadidae) with comments on the generic assignment of Rhadinaea eduardoi. ZooKeys 943: 145-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.943.50738
Figure 1 Phylogenetic relationships and phylogenetic position of holotype of Rhadinaea eduardoi based on partial sequences of the mitochondrial gene Cytochrome b (cyt b). Numbers indicate the Bayesian posterior probabilities for each node.
Supplementary material 1 from: Palacios-Aguilar R, García-Vázquez UO (2020) A partial molecular phylogeny of Rhadinaea and related genera (Squamata, Dipsadidae) with comments on the generic assignment of Rhadinaea eduardoi. ZooKeys 943: 145-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.943.50738
Table S1. Specimens examined
Figure 1 from: Nxele TC, Plisko JD, Mwabvu T, Zishiri OT (2020) Molecular phylogeny of Kazimierzus Plisko, 2006 (Clitellata, Kazimierzidae) from the Western and Northern Cape Province inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. African Invertebrates 61(2): 83-92. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.61.53380
Figure 1 COI gene phylogram showing relationships amongst Kazimierzus species. Numbers above nodes are bootstrap support/posterior probabilities from Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian analyses. Letters A–F represents different clades.
Data from: Phylogeny of Tetillidae (Porifera, Demospongiae, Spirophorida) based on three molecular markers
Tetillidae are spherical to elliptical cosmopolitan demosponges. The family comprises eight genera: namely, Acanthotetilla Burton, 1959, Amphitethya Lendenfeld, 1907, Cinachyra Sollas, 1886, Cinachyrella Wilson, 1925, Craniella Schmidt, 1870, Fangophilina Schmidt, 1880, Paratetilla Dendy, 1905, and Tetilla Schmidt, 1868. These genera are characterized by few conflicting morphological characters, resulting in an ambiguity of phylogenetic relationships. The phylogeny of tetillid genera was investigated using the cox1, 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA (C1-D2 domains) genes in 88 specimens (8 genera, 28 species). Five clades were identified: (i) Cinachyrella, Paratetilla and Amphitethya species, (ii) Cinachyrella levantinensis, (iii) Tetilla, (iv) Craniella, Cinachyra and Fangophilina and (v) Acanthotetilla. Consequently, the phylogenetic analysis supports the monophyly of Tetilla, a genus lacking any known morphological synapomorphy. Acanthotetilla is also recovered. In contrast, within the first clade, species of the genera Paratetilla and Amphitethya were nested within Cinachyrella. Similarly, within the fourth clade, species of the genera Cinachyra and Fangophilina were nested within Craniella. As previously postulated by taxonomists, the loss of ectodermal specialization (i.e., a cortex) has occurred several times independently. Nevertheless, the presence or absence of a cortex and its features carry a phylogenetic signal. Surprisingly, the common view that assumes close relationships among sponges with porocalices (i.e., surface depressions) is refuted.
Figure 9 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 9. Bayesian inference tree for the new genus, based on 621 bp of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase c subunit I gene (CO-I). Numbers above branches indicate support values> 0.8/60 for Bayesian posterior probability (BPP)/bootstrap – for maximum likelihood (ML); those located below represent the percentage of evolutionary divergence between clades. Asterisk indicates support <0.80/60 for BPP and ML, respectively.
Figure 8 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 8. Scanning electron micrographs of Locharcha opportuna pupa: (A) clypeal and mandibular areas (open arrows indicate microsetae), ventral view; (B) abdominal segments seven and eight (small arrow and arrow head indicate abdominal spiracles seven and eight, respectively), laterodorsal view; (C) microtrichia of abdominal segment A5, dorsolateral view; (D) setae of seventh abdominal segment posterior margin, dorsal view; (E) pseudopodium scar of abdominal segment A6, ventral view; (F) distal portion of abdomen, dorsal view; (G) apical portion of cremaster seta, dorsolateral view. Scale bars = 50, 100, 10, 20, 50, 100, 10 µm, respectively.
Figure 6 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs of Locharcha opportuna last larval instar: (A) head and prothorax, lateral view; (B) labrum and mandibles, frontal view; (C) stemmata; (D) antenna, lateral view; (E) labium and spinneret, ventral view; (F) maxilla, anterolateral view; (G) distal portion of mesothoracic leg, posterolateral view (arrow indicates spatulate seta); (H) prothoracic spiracle, lateral view; (I) pseudopodium abdominal A6, mesoventral view. Scale bars = 200, 100, 100, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 100 µm, respectively.
Figure 5 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 5. Locharcha opportuna last larval instar: (A) head chaetotaxy, frontal view; (B) thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy, lateral view; (C) head and prothoracic shield, dorsal view; (D) body, lateral view. Scale bars = 50 µm and 1 mm, respectively.
Figure 3 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 3. Male genital morphology of Locharcha opportuna under light and scanning electron microscopy: (A) genitalia (aedeagus removed), oblique view (slide preparation GRPM 50–63); (B) gnathos, lateral view; (C) left valve (= glandiductor) detached from tegumen, lateral view; (D) sicae with anchored aedeagus (pointed by arrow), lateroposterior view; (E) dissected aedeagus (asterisk indicates everted vesica), lateral view. Scale bars = 1 mm, 50, 100, 100, 200 µm, respectively.
Figure 2 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 2. Locharcha opportuna adult morphology: (A) wings; (B) male genitalia (arrow indicates glandiductor), lateral view; (C) female genitalia, lateral view; (D) detail of tergal process (asterisk), dorsal view. Scale bars = 1, 0.2 and 0.5 mm, respectively.
Figure 1 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 1. Locharcha opportuna adult, dorsal view: (A) wings spread, pinned; (B) head and thorax, in detail; (C) wings folded, on Tibouchina sellowiana leaf. Scale bars = 2, 1 and 2 mm, respectively.
Figure 11 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 11. Variation in green colour intensity of Tibouchina sellowiana galls (median and corresponding quartiles) in relation to larval ontogeny, when considered the presence of larva either of the cecidogenous insect (A; = 10, 81 and 64 individuals, respectively, for instar II to IV) or the kleptoparasite (B; = 29, 38, 32, 64 individuals, respectively for instars I to IV) larvae inside. Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically (Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn's multiple comparison tests).
Figure 4 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 4. Female genital morphology of Locharcha opportuna under light microscopy: (A) genitalia, oblique view (slide preparation GRPM 50–65); (B) female signum, internal view. Scale bars = 250 and 500 µm, respectively.
Figure 10 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 10. Galls induced by Palaeomystella fernandesi on Tibouchina sellowiana plants, free from (A–D) and attacked by (E–H) the kleptoparasite Locharcha opportuna. (A) general aspect of two young, green galls inhabited by cecidogenous larvae, as indicated by the absence of external orifices; (B) dissected gall showing a cecidogenous larva inside; (C) dehiscent, violet gall on the ground, bearing a cecidogenous late-instar larva; (D) operculum (indicated by closed arrow) made by a last instar of the cecidogenous larva on a dehiscent gall before pupation, external view; (E) violet gall inhabited by a kleptoparasite larva, as indicated by the presence of two orifices (open arrows); (F) dissected gall showing a kleptoparasite larva inside; (G) dissected gall showing a kleptoparasite pupal cocoon inside (covered by larval faecal pellets, indicated by asterisk); (H) old, empty gall, left attached to a T. sellowiana plant after the kleptoparasite emergence. Scale bars = 4, 2, 2, 2, 4, 4, 4, 4 mm, respectively.
Figure 12 in Description, molecular phylogeny, and natural history of a new kleptoparasitic species of gelechiid moth (Lepidoptera) associated with Melastomataceae galls in Brazil
Figure 12. Variation in colour and size among galls induced by Palaeomystella fernandesi on Tibouchina sellowiana plants, and corresponding use by either cecidogenous or kleptoparasite moths at CPCN Pró-Mata (April 2012 to June 2013). (A) Gradient from green- to violetcoloured for galls that were studied; (B, C) abundance of cecidogenous larvae (closed bars; total = 155 individuals) and kleptoparasite (open bars; total = 163 individuals) inside in relation to intensity of green colour and size of green galls, respectively; (D) linear regression between size and intensity of green colour on galls (y = 0.67x + 8.77, R2 = 0.152, p <0.0001, n = 348).
Fig. 6 in Five new Palaearctic species of Docosia (Diptera: Mycetophilidae), with updated molecular phylogeny of the genus
Fig. 6. Docosia svanetica Kurina sp. nov., ♂, terminalia. A. Lateral view. B. Posterior view. C. Ventral view of gonostylus. D. Dorsal view of cerci. E. Dorsal view of tergite 9. F. Ventral view of aedeagal complex. G. Lateral view of aedeagal complex. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.
Fig. 4 in Five new Palaearctic species of Docosia (Diptera: Mycetophilidae), with updated molecular phylogeny of the genus
Fig. 4. Docosia peloponnensis Ševčík sp. nov., ♂, terminalia. A. Lateral view. B. Posterior view. C. Ventral view of gonostylus. D. Dorsal view of cerci. E. Dorsal view of tergite 9. F. Ventral view of aedeagal complex. G. Lateral view of aedeagal complex. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.