Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
38
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
38 results for “Asellus”
Data from: Building on 150 years of knowledge: the freshwater isopod Asellus aquaticus as an integrative eco-evolutionary model system
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p> <p>This is a literature database with reference information of all papers that use the freshwater isopod <em>Asellus aquaticus</em>; published between the years 1867 and 2020. This database is intended as a starting point for scientists interested in conducting research on and with this organism. The database is currently only available as a single CSV file; future versions may be made available through a more frequently updated SQL database. The database includes specific information about the subject area and content of each paper, as well as bibliographic information. This repository is associated with the paper "Building on 150 years of knowledge: the freshwater isopod<em> Asellus aquaticus</em> as an integrative eco-evolutionary model system", published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.</p> <p><strong>Details on Methods from the electronic supplement:</strong></p> <p>We used the we online search tools of Web of Science (WOS; Clarivate analytics) by searching for the term "asellus aquaticus" in six relevant databases (BIOSIS, CABI, FSTA, Medline, WOS Core Collection and Zoological Records). The database was accessed with a University License (Lund University). We manually downloaded the results and combined them to a single CSV file in Excel (Microsoft). All further processing was done in the statistical programming language R, version 4.0.2 (R Core Team 2020).</p> <p>From the 1238 obtained records we discarded three papers that were published after the year 2020 to work with completed years only. We used the subject areas assigned by WOS to provide an overview of the fields of science in which A. aquaticus has been most studied. Each paper had between one and ten subject areas assigned by WOS (2845 assignments to 1235 papers, meaning 2.3 assignments per paper, on average). To represent these multiple assignments in relation to the actual number of papers per year, we calculated "fractional assignments" by adding up all assignments to a field per year, divided by the total number of assignments in that year, and then multiplied by the number of papers. For example, if there were 12 assignments to "toxicology" in 1993, and 133 assignments in 1993, but only 21 papers published, "toxicology" would get a score of 1.9 papers in 1993 (as calculated by = (12/133)*21). In Figure 1, we represent these "fractional assignments" in the top panel, and the total number of assignments in the lower panel.</p> <p><strong>Caption for figure (1) in publication:</strong></p> <p>FIGURE 1 | Over 150 years of research on and with Asellus aquaticus. The figure summarizes published scientific literature on A. aquaticus. We conducted a quantitative literature survey with the search tools of Web of Science (WOS; Clarivate analytics) by searching for the term "asellus aquaticus" in six databases (i.e., BIOSIS, CABI, FSTA, Medline, WOS Core Collection, and Zoological Records). We found 1235 records, published between 1867 and 2020. (A) The graph shows the number of publications per year within a given subject area, as designated by WOS. (B) The graph shows the total number of publications assigned to a specific subject area. The top 10 fields account for 72.58% of all publications, and are indicated by color coding in A and B (multiple assignments are possible, summing up to 2845 assignments). The inset in B shows a wordcloud with the 100 most used keywords from all A. aquaticus’ publications. Furthermore, we compiled all records with relevant information (e.g., title, keywords, research areas, and abstract) to a single file which is available online. More details can be found in the Supplementary Material.</p>
Figure 4 in First Field Collection of the Rough Sweetpotato Weevil, Blosyrus asellus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), on Hawaii Island, with Notes on Detection Methods
Figure 4. Average (+ SEM) catch of adult rough sweetpotato weevils/trap/day in green light traps with and without added attractant(s). Treatments having the same letter above the error bar are not significantly different at the α = 0.05 level. Only results of treatments which included green light (Treatments 5–9) are presented here because there was no catch in this trial in traps of any of the treatments where the green light was off (Treatments 1–4).
Figure 2 in First Field Collection of the Rough Sweetpotato Weevil, Blosyrus asellus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), on Hawaii Island, with Notes on Detection Methods
Figure 2. Locations on Hawaii island (marked with filled circles) where adult rough sweetpotato weevils have been recovered (map developed using ArcGIS [ESRI 2012]).
Figure 3 in First Field Collection of the Rough Sweetpotato Weevil, Blosyrus asellus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), on Hawaii Island, with Notes on Detection Methods
Figure 3. Trap used for rough sweetpotato weevil detection ('Treatment 9'). (A) Flash picture taken at night to show the sweetpotato root section held underneath the green light and the water container inside the trap holding a sweetpotato leaf. (B) Picture taken without flash to show the appearance of the trap at night.
Data from: Parallels between two geographically and ecologically disparate cave invasions by the same species, Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda, Crustacea)
Caves are long-known examples of evolutionary replications where similar morphologies (troglomorphies) evolve independently as the result of strong natural selection of the extreme environment. Recently, this paradigm has been challenged based on observations that troglomorphies are inconsistent across taxa and different subterranean habitats. We investigated the degree of replicated phenotypic change in two independent cave invasions by the freshwater isopod Asellus aquaticus; the first in a sulphidic aquifer in Romania, the second in a sinking river in the Dinaric Karst in Slovenia. Both ancestral surface populations still live alongside the subterranean ones. Phylogenetic analyses show independence of the two colonization events, and microsatellite analysis shows no evidence of ongoing genetic exchange between surface and subterranean ecomorphs. The overall morphology has changed dramatically at both sites (50 of 62 morphometric traits). The amount of phenotypic change did not reflect differences in genetic diversity between the two ancestral populations. Multivariate analyses revealed divergent evolution in caves, not parallel or convergent as predicted by the current paradigm. Still, 18 traits changed in a parallel fashion, including eye and pigment loss and antennal elongation. These changes might be a consequence of darkness as the only common ecological feature, because Romanian caves are chemoautotrophic and rich in food, whereas Slovenian caves are not. Overall, these results show that morphologically alike surface populations can diverge after invading different subterranean habitats, and that only about one-third of all changing traits behave as troglomorphies in the traditional sense.
Subspecies and Distribution. L. c. californicus Gray, 1837 — SW Oregon, and NW California (W USA). L. c. altamirae Nelson, 1904 — SE Tamaulipas (NE Mexico). L. c. asellus Miller, 1899 — SE Coahuila, NE, S Nuevo Leon, E & SE Zacatecas, San Luis Potosi, Aguascalientes, NE tip ofJalisco, N Guanajuato, and NW Querétaro (NC Mexico). L. c. bennettiz Gray, 1843 — SW California (SW USA), and NW Baja California (NW Mexico). L. c. curts Hall, 1951 — Is along the coast of Tamaulipas (NE Mexico). L. c. deserticola Mearns, 1896 — SE Oregon, S Idaho, SW Montana, NE & E California, Nevada, Utah except SE, and NW, W & SW Arizona (W & SW USA), and NW Sonora and NE Baja California (NW Mexico). The population in SW Montanais isolated. L. c. eremicus J. A. Allen, 1894 — S Arizona (SW USA), N Sonora except extreme NW, NW Chihuahua (N Mexico). L. c. festinus Nelson, 1904 — S Querétaro, Hidalgo, and N State of Mexico (C Mexico). L. c. magdalenae Nelson, 1907 — Magdalena I, Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. martirensis Stowell, 1895 —Baja California except NW & NE and NE Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. melanotis Mearns, 1890 — S South Dakota, SE Wyoming, Nebraska, E Colorado, Kansas, W Missouri, NE New Mexico, Oklahoma, W Arkansas, and N Texas (C USA). An isolated population exists in E Oklahoma. L. c. merriami Mearns, 1896 — S Texas (S USA), and NE Coahuila, N Tamaulipas, and N Nuevo Leon (NE Mexico). L. c. richardsonii Bachman, 1839 — C California (SW USA). L. c. sheldoni Burt, 1933 — Isla del Carmen, Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. texianus Waterhouse, 1848 — SE Utah, SW Colorado, NE Arizona, New Mexico except the NE, and W Texas (C USA), Chihuahua except the NW, W, & SW extremes, W Coahuila, E Durango, and NW Zacatecas (NC Mexico). L. c. wallawalla Merriam, 1904 — S Washington, C & W Oregon, NE California, and NW Nevada (NW USA). L. ¢. xanti Thomas, 1898 — Baja California Sur except the NE (NW Mexico). in Leporidae
Subspecies and Distribution. L. c. californicus Gray, 1837 — SW Oregon, and NW California (W USA). L. c. altamirae Nelson, 1904 — SE Tamaulipas (NE Mexico). L. c. asellus Miller, 1899 — SE Coahuila, NE, S Nuevo Leon, E & SE Zacatecas, San Luis Potosi, Aguascalientes, NE tip ofJalisco, N Guanajuato, and NW Querétaro (NC Mexico). L. c. bennettiz Gray, 1843 — SW California (SW USA), and NW Baja California (NW Mexico). L. c. curts Hall, 1951 — Is along the coast of Tamaulipas (NE Mexico). L. c. deserticola Mearns, 1896 — SE Oregon, S Idaho, SW Montana, NE & E California, Nevada, Utah except SE, and NW, W & SW Arizona (W & SW USA), and NW Sonora and NE Baja California (NW Mexico). The population in SW Montanais isolated. L. c. eremicus J. A. Allen, 1894 — S Arizona (SW USA), N Sonora except extreme NW, NW Chihuahua (N Mexico). L. c. festinus Nelson, 1904 — S Querétaro, Hidalgo, and N State of Mexico (C Mexico). L. c. magdalenae Nelson, 1907 — Magdalena I, Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. martirensis Stowell, 1895 —Baja California except NW & NE and NE Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. melanotis Mearns, 1890 — S South Dakota, SE Wyoming, Nebraska, E Colorado, Kansas, W Missouri, NE New Mexico, Oklahoma, W Arkansas, and N Texas (C USA). An isolated population exists in E Oklahoma. L. c. merriami Mearns, 1896 — S Texas (S USA), and NE Coahuila, N Tamaulipas, and N Nuevo Leon (NE Mexico). L. c. richardsonii Bachman, 1839 — C California (SW USA). L. c. sheldoni Burt, 1933 — Isla del Carmen, Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. texianus Waterhouse, 1848 — SE Utah, SW Colorado, NE Arizona, New Mexico except the NE, and W Texas (C USA), Chihuahua except the NW, W, & SW extremes, W Coahuila, E Durango, and NW Zacatecas (NC Mexico). L. c. wallawalla Merriam, 1904 — S Washington, C & W Oregon, NE California, and NW Nevada (NW USA). L. ¢. xanti Thomas, 1898 — Baja California Sur except the NE (NW Mexico).
Subspecies and Distribution. L. c. californicus Gray, 1837 — SW Oregon, and NW California (W USA). L. c. altamirae Nelson, 1904 — SE Tamaulipas (NE Mexico). L. c. asellus Miller, 1899 — SE Coahuila, NE, S Nuevo Leon, E & SE Zacatecas, San Luis Potosi, Aguascalientes, NE tip ofJalisco, N Guanajuato, and NW Querétaro (NC Mexico). L. c. bennettiz Gray, 1843 — SW California (SW USA), and NW Baja California (NW Mexico). L. c. curts Hall, 1951 — Is along the coast of Tamaulipas (NE Mexico). L. c. deserticola Mearns, 1896 — SE Oregon, S Idaho, SW Montana, NE & E California, Nevada, Utah except SE, and NW, W & SW Arizona (W & SW USA), and NW Sonora and NE Baja California (NW Mexico). The population in SW Montanais isolated. L. c. eremicus J. A. Allen, 1894 — S Arizona (SW USA), N Sonora except extreme NW, NW Chihuahua (N Mexico). L. c. festinus Nelson, 1904 — S Querétaro, Hidalgo, and N State of Mexico (C Mexico). L. c. magdalenae Nelson, 1907 — Magdalena I, Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. martirensis Stowell, 1895 —Baja California except NW & NE and NE Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. melanotis Mearns, 1890 — S South Dakota, SE Wyoming, Nebraska, E Colorado, Kansas, W Missouri, NE New Mexico, Oklahoma, W Arkansas, and N Texas (C USA). An isolated population exists in E Oklahoma. L. c. merriami Mearns, 1896 — S Texas (S USA), and NE Coahuila, N Tamaulipas, and N Nuevo Leon (NE Mexico). L. c. richardsonii Bachman, 1839 — C California (SW USA). L. c. sheldoni Burt, 1933 — Isla del Carmen, Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. texianus Waterhouse, 1848 — SE Utah, SW Colorado, NE Arizona, New Mexico except the NE, and W Texas (C USA), Chihuahua except the NW, W, & SW extremes, W Coahuila, E Durango, and NW Zacatecas (NC Mexico). L. c. wallawalla Merriam, 1904 — S Washington, C & W Oregon, NE California, and NW Nevada (NW USA). L. ¢. xanti Thomas, 1898 — Baja California Sur except the NE (NW Mexico). The Black-tailed Jackrabbit has been introduced into Massachusetts, NewJersey, Maryland, Virginia, and S Florida. in Leporidae
Subspecies and Distribution. L. c. californicus Gray, 1837 — SW Oregon, and NW California (W USA). L. c. altamirae Nelson, 1904 — SE Tamaulipas (NE Mexico). L. c. asellus Miller, 1899 — SE Coahuila, NE, S Nuevo Leon, E & SE Zacatecas, San Luis Potosi, Aguascalientes, NE tip ofJalisco, N Guanajuato, and NW Querétaro (NC Mexico). L. c. bennettiz Gray, 1843 — SW California (SW USA), and NW Baja California (NW Mexico). L. c. curts Hall, 1951 — Is along the coast of Tamaulipas (NE Mexico). L. c. deserticola Mearns, 1896 — SE Oregon, S Idaho, SW Montana, NE & E California, Nevada, Utah except SE, and NW, W & SW Arizona (W & SW USA), and NW Sonora and NE Baja California (NW Mexico). The population in SW Montanais isolated. L. c. eremicus J. A. Allen, 1894 — S Arizona (SW USA), N Sonora except extreme NW, NW Chihuahua (N Mexico). L. c. festinus Nelson, 1904 — S Querétaro, Hidalgo, and N State of Mexico (C Mexico). L. c. magdalenae Nelson, 1907 — Magdalena I, Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. martirensis Stowell, 1895 —Baja California except NW & NE and NE Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. melanotis Mearns, 1890 — S South Dakota, SE Wyoming, Nebraska, E Colorado, Kansas, W Missouri, NE New Mexico, Oklahoma, W Arkansas, and N Texas (C USA). An isolated population exists in E Oklahoma. L. c. merriami Mearns, 1896 — S Texas (S USA), and NE Coahuila, N Tamaulipas, and N Nuevo Leon (NE Mexico). L. c. richardsonii Bachman, 1839 — C California (SW USA). L. c. sheldoni Burt, 1933 — Isla del Carmen, Baja California Sur (NW Mexico). L. c. texianus Waterhouse, 1848 — SE Utah, SW Colorado, NE Arizona, New Mexico except the NE, and W Texas (C USA), Chihuahua except the NW, W, & SW extremes, W Coahuila, E Durango, and NW Zacatecas (NC Mexico). L. c. wallawalla Merriam, 1904 — S Washington, C & W Oregon, NE California, and NW Nevada (NW USA). L. ¢. xanti Thomas, 1898 — Baja California Sur except the NE (NW Mexico). The Black-tailed Jackrabbit has been introduced into Massachusetts, NewJersey, Maryland, Virginia, and S Florida.
Morphological measurements of six cave and nine surface Asellus aquaticus populations
<p>The dataset contains data of 17 functional morphological traits measured on 656 individuals from the <i>Asellus aquaticus</i> species complex from six cave and nine surface populations from four countries. The measured traits are covering a wide range of functionalities including locomotion, fecundity and sensing. By including individuals from both sex, and from surface and cave habitats questions concerning troglomorphic adaptation and sexual dimorphism and their interaction can be addressed.</p>
Figure 9 in Metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) from Amazon River, in Brazil: an ecological, annual and seasonal study
Figure 9. Species accumulation curve for metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus from the Amazon River, in the eastern Amazon region, Brazil, during the rainy and dry seasons.
Figure 5 in Metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) from Amazon River, in Brazil: an ecological, annual and seasonal study
Figure 5. Species accumulation curve for metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus from the Amazon River, in the state of Amapá, Brazil, collected in 2020 and 2021.
Figure 8 in Metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) from Amazon River, in Brazil: an ecological, annual and seasonal study
Figure 8. Diversity parameters of metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus from the Amazon River, in the eastern Amazon region, Brazil, during the rainy and dry seasons (box plots represent medians, interquartile ranges, minimum–maximum ranges and outliers). Different letters indicate differences between the medians according to Dunn̍ s test (p <0.001).
Figure 2 in Metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) from Amazon River, in Brazil: an ecological, annual and seasonal study
Figure 2. Species richness of metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus from the Amazon River, Brazil, during the two years of sample collection.
Figure 7 in Metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) from Amazon River, in Brazil: an ecological, annual and seasonal study
Figure 7. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using a Bray-Curtis distance matrix for communities of metazoan parasites of Colomesus asellus from the Amazon River, in the eastern Amazon region, Brazil, during the rainy and dry seasons. The percentage of the variation explained by the plotted principal coordinates is indicated on the axes.
Figure 4 in Metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) from Amazon River, in Brazil: an ecological, annual and seasonal study
Figure 4. Diversity parameters for metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus from the Amazon River, in the eastern Amazon region, Brazil, collected in 2020 and 2021 (box plots show medians, interquartile ranges, minimum–maximum ranges and outliers). Different letters indicate differences between the medians according to Dunn̍s test (p <0.001).
Figure 1 in Metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) from Amazon River, in Brazil: an ecological, annual and seasonal study
Figure 1. Collection area for Colomesus asellus in the Amazon River, in the state of Amapá, in the eastern Amazon region, Brazil.
Figure 6 in Metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) from Amazon River, in Brazil: an ecological, annual and seasonal study
Figure 6. Species richness of metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus from the Amazon River during the rainy and dry seasons.
Figure 3 in Metazoan parasites in Colomesus asellus (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) from Amazon River, in Brazil: an ecological, annual and seasonal study
Figure 3. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using a Bray-Curtis distance matrix for communities of metazoan parasites of Colomesus asellus from the Amazon River, in the state of Amapá, Brazil, during 2020 and 2021. The percentage of the variation explained by the plotted principal coordinates is indicated on the axes.
Data from: Parallels between two geographically and ecologically disparate cave invasions by the same species, Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda, Crustacea)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Asellus aquaticus genome and VCF file from samples obtained on Gotland, Sweden
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Morphological measurements of six cave and nine surface Asellus aquaticus populations
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.