Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
127
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
127 results for “CHESTNUT”
Long-Term Dynamics of Oak and Chestnut in Central Massachusetts from 3500 BP to Present
Despite decades of study we have limited insights into the nature of the pre-European landscape of the northeastern USA and the forces and changes that shaped modern forest patterns. Information on such long-term forest dynamics would provide critical insights into the relationships among environmental change, land-use history and biotic responses and is greatly needed for conservation planning. To address these issues we used modern, historical, and paleoecological approaches to reconstruct the 3500-year history of a New England upland region dominated by oak and (formerly) chestnut forests and to interpret the interactions among climate change, natural and human disturbance, and site factors in controlling vegetation patterns and dynamics at different spatial scales. The results indicate that stand, landscape and regional forest dynamics were most strongly driven by climate, notably an apparent cooling and increase in moisture availability c. 1500 yr BP, and European land-use activities commencing 260 yr BP. However, the abundance of oak and chestnut (fire-tolerant, sprouting species) and the distribution of hemlock (fire-intolerant) at a stand to landscape scale were also influenced by fire, which, in turn, varied with climate and human activity. Despite, or perhaps as a consequence of ongoing disturbance by fire and presumably windstorms in this hurricane-prone region, the pre-European period was marked by two 1000+ year periods of remarkably stable forest composition, separated by an abrupt compositional shift. In contrast, over the past 260 years the vegetation has changed rather continuously in response to human activity, producing stand, landscape and regional patterns that are novel as well as recent in origin. Chestnut was a major component of some pre-European landscapes in New England, in part because of occasional fire, and that cultural and physical factors have interacted over millennia to control vegetation patterns and dynamics. Our analyses also su
Annotated checklist of the beetles of chestnut agroforestry systems in Aspromonte, Southern Italy
<p>The checklist contains 255 species of beetles which belong to 49 families. The species were collected during a field study carried out in the years 2017 and aimed at describing the community of beetles. The collection methods consisted of window flight traps. The study area included 3 sites, two coppice stands, young and mature (38.180221 N, 15.784308 E), and a traditional fruit orchard (38.06018 N, 15.781616 E), located in the Italian Southern Apennines on the borders of the Aspromonte National Park.</p> <p>The checklist is annotated with information on the taxonomy of the species (order and family), number of individuals, locality, habitat type (following EUNIS habitat classification 2017), sampling protocol, collector name, specialist name, IUCN Red List categories of the saproxylic species (Carpaneto et al. 2015). </p> <p>The terms used for the dataset fields follows the Darwin Core Maintenance Group. 2020. List of Darwin Core terms. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG). <a href="https://dwc.tdwg.org/list/">https://dwc.tdwg.org/list/</a></p> <p>The Diversity of saproxylic beetle communities have been analysed and published (Parisi et al. 2020).</p> <p>The harmonization of the dataset to the point of view of taxa, authorship, LSID and the massive upgrading of the related identifiers in Zenodo record was performed by the use of R script using respectively dplyr, taxize (Chamberlain and Szöcs, 2013) and zen4r (Blondel and Barde, 2020) packages.</p>
Potential and realized distribution at 30m for Sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) in Europe for 2000 - 2020
<p>Probability and uncertainty maps showing the potential and realized distribution for the sweet chestnut (<em>Castanea sativa, Mill.</em>) for Europe from the dataset prepared by <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5818021">Bonannella et al. (2022)</a> and predicted using Ensemble Machine Learning (EML). Potential distribution map cover the period 2018 - 2020; realized distribution cover the period 2000 - 2020, split in the following time periods:</p> <ul> <li>2000 - 2002,</li> <li>2002 - 2006,</li> <li>2006 - 2010,</li> <li>2010 - 2014,</li> <li>2014 - 2018,</li> <li>2018 - 2020.</li> </ul> <p>Files are named according to the following naming convention, e.g:</p> <ul> <li>veg_castanea.sativa_anv.eml_md_30m_0..0cm_2000..2002_eumap_epsg3035_v0.3</li> </ul> <p>with the following fields:</p> <ul> <li>theme: e.g. <strong>veg</strong>,</li> <li>species code: e.g. <strong>castanea.sativa</strong>,</li> <li>species distribution type: e.g. <strong>anv</strong> (= actual natural vegetation),</li> <li>species estimation method: e.g. <strong>eml</strong>,</li> <li>species estimation type: e.g. <strong>md</strong> ( = model deviation),</li> <li>resolution in meters e.g. <strong>30m</strong>,</li> <li>reference depths (vertical dimension): e.g. <strong>0..0cm</strong>,</li> <li>reference period begin end: e.g. <strong>2000..2002</strong>,</li> <li>reference area: e.g. <strong>eumap</strong>,</li> <li>coordinate system: e.g. <strong>epsg3035</strong>,</li> <li>data set version: e.g. <strong>v0.3</strong>.</li> </ul> <p>For each species is then easy to identify probability and uncertainty distribution maps:</p> <ul> <li>veg_castanea.sativa_<strong>anv</strong>.eml_<strong>md</strong>: model uncertainty for realized distribution</li> <li>veg_castanea.sativa_<strong>anv</strong>.eml_<strong>p</strong>: probability for realized distribution</li> <li>veg_castanea.sativa_<strong>pnv</strong>.eml_<strong>md</strong>: model uncertainty for potential distribution</li> <li>veg_castanea.sativa_<strong>pnv</strong>.eml_<strong>p</strong>: probability for potential distribution</li> </ul> <p>Files are provided as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs</a> and projected in the Coordinate Reference System ETRS89 / LAEA Europe (= EPSG code 3035). Styling files are provided in both <em>SLD</em> and <em>QML</em> format.</p> <p>If you would like to know more about the creation of the maps and the modeling:</p> <ul> <li><strong>watch</strong> the talk at Open Data Science Workshop 2021 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5446/55256">TIB AV-PORTAL</a>)</li> <li><strong>access </strong>the repository with our R/Python scripts and follow the instructions (<a href="https://gitlab.com/geoharmonizer_inea/spatial-layers/-/tree/master/veg_mapping">GitLab</a>)</li> <li><strong>access </strong>the repository with the training dataset (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5818021">Zenodo</a>)</li> <li><strong>read </strong>the tutorial with executable code on our <a href="https://opengeohub.github.io/spatial-prediction-eml/spatiotemporal-ml.html#spatiotemporal-distribution-of-fagus-sylvatica">GitBook</a></li> </ul> <p>A publication describing, in detail, all processing steps, accuracy assessment and general analysis of species distribution maps is available on <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13728">PeerJ</a>. To suggest any improvement/fix use <a href="https://gitlab.com/geoharmonizer_inea/spatial-layers/-/issues">https://gitlab.com/geoharmonizer_inea/spatial-layers/-/issues</a>.</p>
Data and R code for “Individual-level variation in reproductive effort in chestnut oak (Quercus montana Willd.) and black oak (Q. velutina Lam.)”, Forest Ecology and Management, 2022
Masting is a population-level reproductive strategy, where individuals synchronize large but intermittent seed production. Despite the high degree of synchrony at the population level, there can be considerable variation in reproduction among individuals (intraspecific variation). Here, we use 18 years of acorn production data from individual chestnut oak and black oak from control and thinned stands, to understand what factors influence individual differences in reproductive effort and variability. We included a variety of tree-level measurements, environmental characteristics, and measurements from tree cores to determine if certain characteristics were associated variations in reproduction. We considered both mean annual acorn production per m2 crown and interannual variation in acorn production (CV) as response variables. We also classified individuals as super producers (i.e., those that consistently produce more acorns than others), good, fair and poor producers (i.e., those that consistently produce less or have a higher number of failure years). In chestnut oak, 14% of the individuals were classified as super producers and contributed 34% of the total acorns, while poor producers made up 35% of the trees and contributed only 16% to total acorn production. In black oak, super producers (14% of the individuals) contributed 31% of total acorns and poor producers (24% of the individuals) contributed only 9% of the acorns. Diameter at breast height (DBH) was the most consistent variable for explaining intraspecific variation in reproductive effort and variability (i.e., larger individuals had higher mean acorn production for both chestnut oak and black oak, and lower CV for black oak). Other variables that influenced reproduction and variation included elevation and clay content for chestnut oak, and slope for black oak. We found no significant effect from the thinning treatment on acorn production. Our results illustrate how tree-level and environmental characte
Рис. 5. Зависимость межΔу цветом и размером цист Heterodera glycines. ГраΔации цвета цист: 1 — моΛочный, 2 — жеΛтый и светΛо-коричневый, 3 — коричневый, 4 — каштановый, 5 — темно-коричневый. Размер цист — в баΛΛах Fig. 5. Relationship between the color and size of Heterodera glycines cysts. Color gradations of cysts: 1 — milky, 2 — yellow and light brown, 3 — brown, 4 — chestnut, 5 — dark brown. The size of cysts — in classes in Reproductive potential of Soybean Cyst Nematode Heterodera glycines - quarantine pest of soybean - in Primorsky Region conditions
Рис. 5. Зависимость межΔу цветом и размером цист Heterodera glycines. ГраΔации цвета цист: 1 — моΛочный, 2 — жеΛтый и светΛо-коричневый, 3 — коричневый, 4 — каштановый, 5 — темно-коричневый. Размер цист — в баΛΛах Fig. 5. Relationship between the color and size of Heterodera glycines cysts. Color gradations of cysts: 1 — milky, 2 — yellow and light brown, 3 — brown, 4 — chestnut, 5 — dark brown. The size of cysts — in classes
Figure 8 in The distribution, specimens and status of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum and Albertine Owlet G. (c.) albertinum
Figure 8. Mean number of pale tail bars plotted against mean length of folded wing for the different taxa in the African Barred Owlet Glaucidium capense complex. Sample sizes shown in Table 4.
Figure 5 in The distribution, specimens and status of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum and Albertine Owlet G. (c.) albertinum
Figure 5. Dorsal view of Barred Owlet Glaucidium capense scheffleri specimens from Tanzania, held in NHMUK, showing variation in pattern and coloration; note similarities between the two specimens on the left and castaneum (Fig. 3). Left to right: male Mafia Island, NHMUK 1938.2.11.70; female, Kibungo Forest, East Uluguru, NHMUK 1937.12.27.212; female, Kandoa-Irangi, NHMUK 1929.8.17.24; male, Mombo, Amani, NHMUK 1933.6.1.17 (L. D. C. Fishpool, © Natural History Museum, London)
Figure 6 in The distribution, specimens and status of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum and Albertine Owlet G. (c.) albertinum
Figure 6. Tail length plotted against length of folded wing for specimens of the different taxa in the African Barred Owlet Glaucidium capense complex.
Figure 4a in The distribution, specimens and status of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum and Albertine Owlet G. (c.) albertinum
Figure 4a. Lateral view of male Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum, Bwamba, Uganda, NHMUK 1980.20.1 (L. D. C. Fishpool, © Natural History Museum, London) Figure 4b. Lateral oblique view of head of female Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum, Ntandi, Uganda, LACM 70119 (G. Davies)
Figure 2 in The distribution, specimens and status of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum and Albertine Owlet G. (c.) albertinum
Figure 2. Lateral views of Albertine Owlet Glaucidium (capense) albertinum showing variation in colour of pale spots on scapulars and greater wing-coverts: (a) female, Lundjulu, DR Congo, RMCA 50988; (b) male, Musangakye, DR Congo, RMCA 114546 (holotype); (c) female, Munga, DR Congo, RBINS 69998 (L. D. C. Fishpool)
Figure 1a in The distribution, specimens and status of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum and Albertine Owlet G. (c.) albertinum
Figure 1a. Dorsal view of female Albertine Owlet Glaucidium (capense) albertinum, Lundjulu, DR Congo, RMCA 50988 (L. D. C. Fishpool) Figure 1b. Lateral view of head of female Albertine Owlet Glaucidium (capense) albertinum, Munga, DR Congo, RBINS 69998 (L. D. C. Fishpool) Figure 1c. Dorsal view of tail of male Albertine Owlet Glaucidium (capense) albertinum, Musangakye, DR Congo, RMCA 114546 (holotype) (L. D. C. Fishpool)
Figure 3 in The distribution, specimens and status of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum and Albertine Owlet G. (c.) albertinum
Figure 3. Dorsal views of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum: (a) female, Ntandi, Uganda, LACM 70119 (G. Davies); (b) male, Andundi, DR Congo, ZMB 5094 (holotype) (N. J. Collar); (c) male, Bwamba, Uganda, NHMUK 1980.20.1 (L. D. C. Fishpool, © Natural History Museum, London). Note pale barring on the back of (a) and (b), absent in (c): see text.
Figure 7 in The distribution, specimens and status of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum and Albertine Owlet G. (c.) albertinum
Figure 7. Tail length as a proportion of the length of folded wing for the taxa in the African Barred Owlet Glaucidium capense complex. Percentages calculated per specimen and expressed as mean and range by taxon. Sample sizes shown in Table 4.
Figure 1 in A bagworm damaging chestnut trees in Vietnam
Figure 1. Symptoms of Acanthoecia larminati attack in chestnut trees: a. Castanopsis boisii tree; b, c, d. Castanea mollissima trees; a. damaged tree in Luc Nam, Bac Giang with larval chambers on the branch; b. damaged tree in Kon Plong, Kon Tum with larval chambers on the branch; c. damaged trees in Trung Khanh, Cao Bang; d. damaged trees in Tan Lac, Hoa Binh with a net cage used for rearing this pest.
Figure 2. Photographs a in First records of Narcissus Flycatcher (Ficedula narcissina) and Chestnut-winged Cuckoo (Clamator coromandus) for the Mariana Islands
Figure 2. Photographs a) and b) of adult male Narcissus Flycatcher (Ficedula narcissina), c) adult Chestnut-winged cuckoo (Clamator coromandus) on Guam, Mariana Islands. Photographs a) and c) by RCL, b) by JWS.
Figure 1 in First records of Narcissus Flycatcher (Ficedula narcissina) and Chestnut-winged Cuckoo (Clamator coromandus) for the Mariana Islands
Figure 1. Map showing the locations of the new records of Narcissus Flycatcher and Chestnutwinged Cuckoo on Guam, Mariana Islands. Inset, top left: location of the Mariana Islands within the Western Pacific. Left: Location of Guam within the southern Mariana Islands and box showing the general location of the sightings. Right: Satellite image (2018) of northern Guam (Map data: Google, CNES/Airbus, NOAA) showing the specific locations of the sightings (marked by asterisks).
TABLE 3 in The distribution, specimens and status of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum and Albertine Owlet G. (c.) albertinum
<p>TABLE 3 Details of museum specimens of Albertine Owlet <i>Glaucidium</i> (<i>capense</i>) <i>albertinum</i> and Chestnut Owlet <i>G.</i> (<i>c.</i>) <i>castaneum</i>. Institution acronyms explained in Acknowledgements. M = Male, F = Female.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Taxon</th><th>Institution</th><th>. no. Reg</th><th>Country</th><th>Region</th><th>Locality</th><th>Mountain range</th><th>Coordinates</th><th>of Elevation Date</th><th>of collection Date</th><th>Collector Sex</th><th>) mm) mm ((Wing Tail</th><th>tail pale. bars No</th><th>pale Predominant of on scapulars colour spots</th><th>on Predominant of spots wing-coverts colour pale</th><th>Notes</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td>RMCA</td><td>50988</td><td>DR Congo</td><td>N Kivu</td><td>Lundjulu</td><td>West L. Edward</td><td>00°20’S, 28°36’E</td><td>1,120 m</td><td>14/1/50</td><td>Prigogine</td><td>F 131</td><td>72.7</td><td>7 White</td><td>White</td><td>Paratype; bears label with name <i>castaneum</i> 1,2</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>RMCA</td><td>64954</td><td>DR Congo</td><td>N Kivu</td><td>Lundjulu</td><td>West L. Edward</td><td>00°20’S, 28°36’E</td><td>?</td><td>13/1/53</td><td>Schepens</td><td>F 136</td><td>70.8</td><td>8 Buff</td><td>White</td><td>Paratype; bears label with name <i>castaneum</i> 2</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>RMCA</td><td>69589</td><td>Rwanda</td><td>Western Prov.</td><td>Rugege (= Nyungwe)</td><td>Nyungwe)</td><td>02°30’S, 29°09’E</td><td>?</td><td>10/9/53</td><td>Aurélian</td><td>? 129</td><td>69</td><td>8 White</td><td>Buff</td><td>Paratype; bears label with name <i>castaneum</i> 2</td></tr><tr><th><i>albertinum</i></th><td>RMCA</td><td>114546</td><td>DR Congo</td><td>S Kivu</td><td>Musang- akye</td><td>Itombwe</td><td>03°34’S, 28°16’E</td><td>1,690 m</td><td>26/8/66</td><td>Prigogine</td><td>M 130</td><td>68.8</td><td>6 Buff and white</td><td>Buff and white</td><td>Holotype; bears label with name <i>castaneum</i> 3</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>RBINS</td><td>66893</td><td>DR Congo</td><td>S Kivu</td><td>Munga</td><td>Itombwe</td><td>03°35’S, 28°13’E</td><td>?</td><td>26/6/81</td><td>Prigogine</td><td>M 124</td><td>64.7</td><td>7 Buff</td><td>Buff</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>RBINS</td><td>69998</td><td>DR Congo</td><td>S Kivu</td><td>Munga</td><td>Itombwe</td><td>03°35’S, 28°13’E</td><td>1,960 m</td><td>18/8/87</td><td>Prigogine</td><td>F 132</td><td>?</td><td>? Buff</td><td>Buff</td><td>Tail damaged</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>RBINS</td><td>70229</td><td>DR Congo</td><td>S Kivu</td><td>Munga</td><td>Itombwe</td><td>03°35’S, 28°13’E</td><td>1,870 m</td><td>8/8/87</td><td>Prigogine</td><td>M 126</td><td>70.7</td><td>7 Buff</td><td>Buff</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>ZMB</td><td>5094</td><td>DR Congo</td><td>N Kivu, Semliki</td><td>Andundi</td><td>-</td><td>00°50’N, 29°54’E</td><td>710 m</td><td>22/12/ 1891</td><td>Stuhlmann</td><td>M 131</td><td>79</td><td>10 White</td><td>White</td><td>Holotype. Specimen examined and measured by N. J. Collar</td></tr><tr><th><i>castaneum</i></th><td>LACM</td><td>70119</td><td>Uganda</td><td>Bwamba</td><td>Ntandi</td><td>-</td><td>00 30 ° ° 49 09 ’ ’ N E,</td><td>700 2,300 m ft (as.)</td><td>as.) 8/12/68</td><td>Glen</td><td>F 130</td><td>76</td><td>10 White</td><td>White</td><td>and Davies Specimen measured examined by G.</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>NHMUK</td><td>1980.20.</td><td>.1 Uganda</td><td>Bwamba</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>915 m (as 3,000 ft.)</td><td>as 17/9/58.)</td><td>?</td><td>M 132</td><td>83.8</td><td>11 White</td><td>White</td><td>ex Coryndon Mus, Nairobi (B4385)</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>NMK</td><td>B4386</td><td>Uganda</td><td>Bwamba</td><td>Ntotoro</td><td>-</td><td>00°48’N, 30°07’E</td><td>730 m (as 2,400 ft.)</td><td>as 30/5/56.)</td><td>Mitton</td><td>M 134 imm?</td><td>81</td><td>10 White</td><td>White</td><td>Specimen examined and measured by P. Njoroge and A. S. Kennedy</td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>1</sup> Schouteden (1950) gave a redescription of <i>castaneum</i> based on this specimen (see text).</p><p><sup>2</sup> Appears as <i>castaneum</i> in Schouteden (1968).</p><p><sup>3</sup> Appears as <i>castaneum</i> in Schouteden (1966).</p><p><sup>5</sup> Coordinates given are for Kamiranzovu Swamp.</p>
TABLE 1 in The distribution, specimens and status of Chestnut Owlet Glaucidium (capense) castaneum and Albertine Owlet G. (c.) albertinum
<p>TABLE 1 Recent taxonomic treatments of the African Barred Owlet <i>Glaucidium capense</i> complex.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Source</th><th>Genus</th><th>Species</th><th>Subspecies</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Kemp (1988)</th><td>Glaucidium</td><td>capense</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Gill <i>et al</i>. (2022)</th><td></td><td></td><td><i>ngamiense</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>scheffleri</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>castaneum</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>etchecopari</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td><i>albertinum</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Holt <i>et al</i>. (1999, 2020)</th><td>Glaucidium</td><td>capense</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Clements <i>et al.</i> (2021)</th><td></td><td></td><td><i>ngamiense</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>scheffleri</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td><i>castaneum</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>etchecopari</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td><i>albertinum</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Dickinson & Remsen (2013)</th><td>Glaucidium</td><td>capense</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>ngamiense</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>scheffleri</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>castaneum</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>etchecopari</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>albertinum</i></td></tr><tr><th>König <i>et al</i>. (1999)</th><td>Glaucidium</td><td>capense</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>del Hoyo & Collar (2014)</th><td></td><td></td><td><i>ngamiense</i></td></tr><tr><th>BirdLife International (2022a,b)*</th><td></td><td></td><td><i>scheffleri</i></td></tr><tr><th>Holt <i>et al</i>. (2016)</th><td></td><td></td><td><i>etchecopari</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td><i>castaneum</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td><i>albertinum</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>König <i>et al</i>. (2008)</th><td>Taenioglaux</td><td>capense</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Mikkola (2013)</th><td></td><td></td><td><i>ngamiense</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td><i>scheffleri</i></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td><i>castanea</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td><i>etchecopari</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td><i>albertina</i></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table><p>All sources treat races <i>robertsi</i> and <i>clanceyi</i> as synonyms of <i>ngamiense</i>, explicitly or otherwise.</p><p>*Treatment of <i>etchecopari</i> confused: listed under both <i>castaneum</i> and nominate.</p>
Present and future distribution models for chestnut in the Iberian Peninsula
<p>Current and future distribution of chestnut trees in the Iberian Peninsula developed in the manuscript "<strong>Impact of climate change over distribution and potential range of chestnut in the Iberian Peninsula</strong>"</p> <p>These predictions were derived through computational modeling utilizing various environmental parameters. Specifically, the model integrated topographical features such as slope, northness (cosine of aspect), or eastness (sine of aspect), soil attributes including pH and soil organic carbon content (SOC), and bioclimatic variables sourced from the CHELSA V.2.1 dataset.</p> <p><br>File Naming Convention Explanation:</p> <p>"C_sativa_current.tif" denotes the model representing the current distribution of C. sativa.</p> <p>In other instances, such as "C_sativa_md_ensemble_ssp370_2011-2040.tif":</p> <ul> <li>"md_ensemble" indicates the median ensemble, while "mn_ensemble" signifies the mean ensemble.</li> <li>In cases where the model is solely based on a General Circulation Model (GCM), the term "md_ensemble" or "mn_ensemble" is replaced by the specific model used.</li> <li>"ssp370" or "ssp585" corresponds to the climate change scenario derived from CMIP6 GCMs.</li> <li>The timeframe "2011-2040," "2041-2070," or "2071-2100" denotes the period under evaluation.</li> </ul>
Figure 4 in Morphology and vocalization support specific status of the Chestnut-headed Chachalacaı Ortalis motmot ruficeps (Waglerı 1830) (Aves; Galliformes; Cracidae)
Figure 4. Distribution of O. motmot (blue and light blue) and of O. ruficeps (orange and red). Circles: measured specimens; triangles: vocalizations; diamonds: skins not measured; squares: photographs.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.