Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 10 in Capoeta Svanetica (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), A New Species From The Luchunis River (Rioni River Drainage) In Georgia

Fig. 10. Live specimen of C. banarescui juvenile sample general body appearance (a), Chorokh River and its lower lip structure (b).

Fig. 9 in Capoeta Svanetica (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), A New Species From The Luchunis River (Rioni River Drainage) In Georgia

Fig. 9. Live specimen of C. banarescui adult sample general body appearance (a), Gubistskali River and its lower lip structure (b).

Fig. 8. a–c in Capoeta Svanetica (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), A New Species From The Luchunis River (Rioni River Drainage) In Georgia

Fig. 8. a–c: C. tinca, general body appearance, FFR 718, 129 mm SL; Turkey: Koca River (a); female lower lip, 129 mm SL (b) and male lower lip, 136 mm SL (c), after Turan et al, 2006 b; d–f: C. oguzelii, holotype, FCME 2017-05a, 109 mm SL; Ezine Stream (d); lower lip (e); dorsal fin with soft last unbranched fin ray (f), after Elp et al., 2018.

Fig. 7. a–c in Capoeta Svanetica (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), A New Species From The Luchunis River (Rioni River Drainage) In Georgia

Fig. 7. a–c: C. banarescui, holotype, ESFM-PISI/2004-072, 177 mm SL; Turkey, Chorokh drainage at Torum (a); female lower lip, 192 mm SL (b) and male lower lip, 178 mm SL (c), after Turan et al, 2006 b; d–f: C. baliki, holotype, ESFM-PISI/2004-74, 202 mm SL; Turkey, Sakarya drainage at Kızılcahamam; female lower lip, 176 mm SL (e) and male lower lip, 164 mm SL (f), after Turan et al, 2006 b.

Fig. 5 in Capoeta Svanetica (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), A New Species From The Luchunis River (Rioni River Drainage) In Georgia

Fig. 5. Epithelial tubercles on each scale and anal fin rays of C. svanetica sp. n. males during the second half summer season.

Fig. 4 in Capoeta Svanetica (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), A New Species From The Luchunis River (Rioni River Drainage) In Georgia

Fig. 4. Last simple (unbranched) dorsal fin rays: a — C. tinca, 139 mm SL, female (after Turan et al., 2006 b); b — C. banarescui, 144 mm SL, female (after Turan et al., 2006 b); c — C. baliki, 148 mm SL, female (after Turan et al., 2006 b) and d —C. svanetica sp. n. 118 mm SL, female — only 7 serrae are present.

Fig. 6 in Capoeta Svanetica (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), A New Species From The Luchunis River (Rioni River Drainage) In Georgia

Fig. 6. Type habitats of juvenile Capoeta svanetica sp. n. (a) and adult (b) with detailed river bed structure (c).

Fig. 2 in Capoeta Svanetica (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), A New Species From The Luchunis River (Rioni River Drainage) In Georgia

Fig. 2. The general body appearance of C. svanetica sp. n. (male — top, SL = 136 mm and female — bottom, SL = 118 mm).

Fig. 4 in Capoeta shajariani Jouladeh-Roudbar, Eagderi, Murillo-Ramos, Ghanavi and Doadrio 2017

Fig. 4. Scatter plot of wing digits for the 97 Neotropical bat species. Figures include (a) correlation between LD3 and FL, exploring the correlation of hand-wing length and bat size; (b) correlation between LD5 and FL, assessing the correlation of wing width and bat size; and (c) correlation between LD3 and LD5, showing the correlation of hand-wing length and wing width. Acronyms for bat species are defined in table 1.

Fig. 1 in Capoeta shajariani Jouladeh-Roudbar, Eagderi, Murillo-Ramos, Ghanavi and Doadrio 2017

Fig. 1. Wing traits measured from bat specimens. Wing structures (metacarpals and phalanges) are represented in the figure. Wing digit length is the sum of metacarpals and phalanges of each digit.

Fig. 8 in Capoeta saadii

Fig. 8. Stream tributary to the Grande river drainage, Rio Paraiba do Sul basin, inside the advanced campus of Instituto Vital Brazil in São Lourenço road, the type locality of Trichomycterus vitalbrazili.

Fig. 7 in Capoeta saadii

Fig. 7. Geographical distribution of Trichomycterus vitalbrazili and T. albinotatus. Black circle with a white cross inside indicates type locality.

Fig. 6 in Capoeta saadii

Fig. 6. Ontogenetic variation in Trichomycterus vitalbrazili. (a), UFRJ 10924, 75.0 mm SL (preserved paratype), left lateral view; (b), UFRJ 5979, 49.5 mm SL (preserved paratype), left lateral view; (c), UFRJ 5979, 38.2 mm SL (preserved paratype), left lateral view; (d), UFRJ 5979, 32.7 mm SL (preserved paratype), left lateral view; (e), UFRJ 7210, 25.0 mm SL (preserved paratype), left lateral view.

Fig. 5 in Capoeta saadii

Fig. 5. Trichomycterus albinotatus. Brazil: Rio de Janeiro State: Itatiaia Municipality: Rio Paraíba do Sul basin. (a) UFRJ 11668, 42.8 mm SL (live adult specimen), left lateral view; and (b) UFRJ 11658, 29.0 mm SL (live juvenile specimen), left lateral view. Table 1. Morphometric data of Trichomycterus vitalbrazili sp. nov.

Fig. 4 in Capoeta saadii

Fig. 4. Osteological features of Trichomycterus vitalbrazili. (a), UFRJ 12128, 55.4 mm SL, mesenthmoidal region and adjacent structures, middle and left portion, dorsal view; (b), UFRJ 12150, 36.2 mm SL, left suspensorium and opercular apparatus, lateral view; (c), UFRJ 12128, 55.4 mm SL, middle and left portion of branchial arches, ventral view of dorsal elements on left, dorsal view of ventral elements on right. Larger stippling represents cartilages. Abbreviations: ae4, accessory element of ceratobranchial 4; b2–3, basibranchials 2–3; bc4, cartilaginous basibranchial 4; c1–5, ceratobranchials 1–5; e1–4, epibranchials 1–4; h1–3, hypobranchials 1–3; p3, pharyngobranchial 3; pt4, pharyngobranchial 4 tooth-plate. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 3 in Capoeta saadii

Fig. 3. Trichomycterus vitalbrazili. Brazil: Rio de Janeiro State: Nova Friburgo Municipality: Rio Paraíba do Sul basin. (a), UFRJ 12125, 24.1 mm SL (live juvenile paratype), left lateral view; (b) UFRJ 12125, 29.1 mm SL (live juvenile paratype), left lateral view; and (c) UFRJ 12125, 29.1 mm SL (live juvenile paratype), dorsal view. Arrow indicates the midline row with white spots, which is not visible in left lateral view of figure 3b due to the light angle.

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships among 20 in Capoeta saadii

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships among 20 species of Trichomycterus inferred by Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference, from the analysis of a multigene data set (3062 bp). Numbers on each node are bootstrap percentages from ML followed by posterior probability from BI; asterisks indicate maximum support value and hyphens, values under 0.95 for BI and 65 for ML.

Fig. 3 in Capoeta shajariani Jouladeh-Roudbar, Eagderi, Murillo-Ramos, Ghanavi and Doadrio 2017

Fig. 3. Principal wing variables of 97 Neotropical bat species. Variables include (a) wing length (LD3/ FL ratio) and (b) wing width (LD5/FL ratio). Acronyms for bat species are defined in table 1.

Fig. 2 in Capoeta saadii

Fig. 2. Histology of the Müllerian duct in embryos exposed to E2 or PPT. (A–D) Representative cross-sections of HE stained Müllerian (arrows) ducts at stage 26 for control female (A), E2-exposed male (B), PPT-exposed males (C) and PPT-exposed females (D). Note the glandular development in the Müllerian duct of embryos exposed to PPT. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Fig. 2 in Capoeta shajariani Jouladeh-Roudbar, Eagderi, Murillo-Ramos, Ghanavi and Doadrio 2017

Fig. 2. Frequency histograms of wing variables for 97 Neotropical bat species. Variables include (a) forearm length (b) length of the third digit (c) length of the fourth digit and (d) length of the fifth digit.