Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
390
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
390 results for “Character Analysis”
Player Experience in Video Game Character Analysis: A Study of Female Characters
<h3><span>Overview</span></h3> <p><span>This dataset is part of the study titled "Player Experience in Video Game Character Analysis: A Study of Female Characters", conducted at </span>Mapúa University. The research aims to integrate player experience into an existing framework for video game character analysis. </p> <h3><span>Content</span></h3> <p><span>The dataset includes:</span></p> <ul> <li><span>A partial transcript of 5 semi-structured interviews with the key informants. Originally, 8 interviews were conducted, but the audio/video recordings for 3 interviews were lost and thus their transcripts are not available.</span></li> <li><span>Significant codes presented in tabulated form.</span></li> </ul> <h3><span>Data Collection Method</span></h3> <p><span>Data were collected through in-depth interviews conducted via Facebook Messenger and Discord from March to April 2024. Participants were various video game players from different backgrounds and age groups, ranging from 20 to 40 years old. Due to technical issues, the recordings of 3 interviews were lost, resulting in only 5 available transcripts. </span></p> <h3><span>Data Processing and Analysis</span></h3> <p><span>The 5 available interviews were transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed </span><span>using thematic analysis, involving initial coding, theme development, and refinement.</span></p> <h3><span>Usage data</span></h3> <p><span>The dataset is organized into several sections within a single Word document (.docx). This word document has headings for navigation and a definition of terms.</span></p> <h3><span>Limitations</span></h3> <p><span>The dataset only includes 5 out of 8 due to technical difficulties encountered after the recording of the interview. This may impact the comprehensiveness of the findings.</span></p> <h3><span>Contextual Reference</span></h3> <p><span>The manuscript associated with this dataset heavily references the works "<span>A Structural Model for Player-Characters as Semiotic Constructs." (DOI: https://doi.org/10.26503/TODIGRA.V2I2.37) and "Object, me, symbiote, other: A social typology of player-avatar relationships." (DOI:https://doi.org/10.5210/FM.V20I2.5433) which explore the foundational frameworks on video game character analysis.</span></span></p> <p><span> For any further information or clarifications, please contact wbdg2000@gmail.com</span></p>
Fig. 1. Morphological characters used for the phylogenetic analysis and key. A–C. Terminal maxillary palpomere. D–E. Eyes. F–H. Pronotum. I–J. Leg. K–L in Taxonomic revision of the Lycocerus hanatanii species group (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), with the description of new species from Taiwan
Fig. 1. Morphological characters used for the phylogenetic analysis and key. A–C. Terminal maxillary palpomere. D–E. Eyes. F–H. Pronotum. I–J. Leg. K–L. Inner margin of dorsal plate of aedeagus.
Figure 4. Results from the phylogenetic analysis using discrete data only. A in Exploring phylogenetic relationships of Pteraspidiformes heterostracans (stem-gnathostomes) using continuous and discrete characters
Figure 4. Results from the phylogenetic analysis using discrete data only. A, strict consensus of 275 most parsimonious trees with equal character weights; length 276 steps, consistency index (CI) = 0.35, retention index (RI) = 0.59, and rescaled consistency index (RC) = 0.22. B, strict consensus of four most parsimonious trees with implied character weighting (k = 3) (tree length 23.11). Psammosteidae taxa in bold.
Extraction and Analysis of Fictional Character Networks: A Survey
<p><strong>Description. </strong>Resources used in our survey of character network extraction and analysis methods. This version of the resources does not correspond to the published paper, but to a later update used in the (longer) arXiv/HAL version of the paper. The resources used in the original published paper are provided in v1.0.0.</p> <p><strong>Updates. </strong>The latest version of the data (especially the bibliographic table) is available on a GitHub page, which is easier to update: <a href="https://compnet.github.io/CharNetReview/">https://compnet.github.io/CharNetReview/</a>. This Zenodo repository is no longer updated.</p> <p><strong>Citation. </strong>If you use these data or figures, please cite the following paper:</p> <ul> <li>V. Labatut and X. Bost, “<em>Extraction and Analysis of Fictional Character Networks: A Survey</em>,” ACM Computing Surveys 52(5):89, 2019. ⟨<a href="https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02173918">hal-02173918</a>⟩ DOI: <a href="http://doi.org/10.1145/3344548">10.1145/3344548</a></li> </ul> <p><br><code>@Article{Labatut2019,</code><br><code> author = {Labatut, Vincent and Bost, Xavier},</code><br><code> title = {Extraction and Analysis of Fictional Character Networks: A Survey},</code><br><code> journal = {ACM Computing Surveys},</code><br><code> year = {2019},</code><br><code> volume = {52},</code><br><code> number = {5},</code><br><code> pages = {89},</code><br><code> doi = {10.1145/3344548},</code><br><code>}</code></p>
Fig. 1. A in "A character does not make a genus, but the genus makes the character ": three-taxon statement analysis and intuitive taxonomy
Fig. 1. A. Strict consensus of 61 most parsimonious phylogenetic trees; tree length = 90 steps; CI = 0.6000; RI = 0.8302, recovered from a standard cladistic analysis (MP) (Fitch Parsimony) of the complete conventionalmorphologicalmatrixof Atraphaxis s. l. (TableS1).All 27 unordered (non-additive) characters are parsimony informative. B. Strict consensus of two nested most parsimonious hierarchies of patterns; length = 8328 steps; CI = 0.8521; RI = 0.8264), recovered from a MP analysis of the three-taxon statement representation of the complete conventional 27 characters' morphological matrix of Atraphaxis s. l. (Table S1). The number of 3TSs (characters) is equal to 7096, all are parsimony-informative. C. Strict consensus of six most parsimonious phylogenetic trees; tree length = 56 steps; CI = 0.6071; RI = 0.8370, recovered from a MP analysis of the reduced conventional 18 characters' morphological matrix of Atraphaxis s. l. (Table S1) with the characters one, two, four, eight, 12, 16, 18, 19, and 26 excluded. D. Strict consensus of two nested, most parsimonious hierarchies of patterns; length = 5844 steps; CI = 0.8665; RI = 0.8460), recovered from a MP analysis of the three-taxon statement representation of the reduced conventional 18 characters' morphological matrix of Atraphaxis s. l. (Table S1) with characters 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 18, 19 and 26 excluded. The number of 3TSs (characters) is equal to 5064, all are parsimony-informative. All MP analyses as in PAUP* 4.0a150 (Swofford 2002) were conducted using either conventional matrices or TAXODIUM's output 3TS NEXUS files with a heuristic search of 1000 random addition replicates (saving no more than 100 trees per replicate), and the TBR branch swapping/MulTrees option into effect. Branches with a minimum length of zero were collapsed. The three-taxon statement analysis (3TA) of the unordered morphological matrix was established after it three-taxon (3TS) Williams-Siebert (WS) representation (Williams & Siebert 2000) using TAXODIUM v. 1.2 (Mavrodiev & Madorsky 2012). The 3TS permutations were performed with the following command: taxodium input_file_name. csv –ium –ob –og –nex The value of the operational outgroup was fixed as a value of Bactria lazkovii. All 3TSs were weighted uniformly and treated as ''ordered'' (Wagner Parsimony). The bootstrap resampling of both conventional and 3TS matrices have been performed as described in Mavrodiev & Madorsky (2012). The diagnostic traits are optimized using Mesquite (Maddison & Maddison 2011).
Fig. 1. Morphological characters used for the analysis. A–B. Head. C–D. Mandible. E–H. Apical maxillary palpomere. I–K in The world fauna of Synchroidae Lacordaire, 1859 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea, Synchroidae)
Fig. 1. Morphological characters used for the analysis. A–B. Head. C–D. Mandible. E–H. Apical maxillary palpomere. I–K. Antenna.
Fig. 2. Morphological characters used for the analysis and key. A–D. Pronotum. E–F. Prosternal process. G–H. Mesoventral cavity. I. Elytral striae. J. Aedeagus. K in The world fauna of Synchroidae Lacordaire, 1859 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea, Synchroidae)
Fig. 2. Morphological characters used for the analysis and key. A–D. Pronotum. E–F. Prosternal process. G–H. Mesoventral cavity. I. Elytral striae. J. Aedeagus. K. Ovipositor.
Text-fig. 1. D&E tree of Endress and Doyle (2009), from the combined morphological and molecular analysis of Doyle and Endress (2000), with modifications based on more recent data, showing the inferred evolution of the reticulum grading character (39). Boxes under names of taxa indicate their character state; shading of branches indicates their reconstructed state based on parsimony optimization with MacClade (Maddison and Maddison 2003). Nymph = Nymphaeales, Aust = Austrobaileyales, Chlor = Chloranthaceae, Piper = Piperales, Ca = Canellales, Magnol = Magnoliales. in Early Cretaceous Monocots: A Phylogenetic Evaluation
Text-fig. 1. D&E tree of Endress and Doyle (2009), from the combined morphological and molecular analysis of Doyle and Endress (2000), with modifications based on more recent data, showing the inferred evolution of the reticulum grading character (39). Boxes under names of taxa indicate their character state; shading of branches indicates their reconstructed state based on parsimony optimization with MacClade (Maddison and Maddison 2003). Nymph = Nymphaeales, Aust = Austrobaileyales, Chlor = Chloranthaceae, Piper = Piperales, Ca = Canellales, Magnol = Magnoliales.
Fig. 3 in The brachyopoid Hadrokkosaurus bradyi from the early Middle Triassic of Arizona, and a phylogenetic analysis of lower jaw characters in temnospondyl amphibians
Fig. 3. Temnospondyl amphibian Hadrokkosaurus bradyi (Welles, 1947), holotype (UCMP 36199), early Anisian, northeastern Arizona. Stereopairs of the posterior part of the lower jaw in dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views. Note buttresses for articular (missing) projecting from prearticular and surangular, and proportions of postglenoid area.
Fig. 6 in The brachyopoid Hadrokkosaurus bradyi from the early Middle Triassic of Arizona, and a phylogenetic analysis of lower jaw characters in temnospondyl amphibians
Fig. 6. Strict consensus of 38 most parsimonious trees with bootstrap percentages based upon 10,000 replicates.
Fig. 2 in The brachyopoid Hadrokkosaurus bradyi from the early Middle Triassic of Arizona, and a phylogenetic analysis of lower jaw characters in temnospondyl amphibians
Fig. 2. Temnospondyl amphibian Hadrokkosaurus bradyi (Welles, 1947), holotype (UCMP 36199), early Anisian, northeastern Arizona. Stereopair of anterior part of lower jaw in mesial view; note large postsymphyseal foramen.
Fig. 5. A, B in The brachyopoid Hadrokkosaurus bradyi from the early Middle Triassic of Arizona, and a phylogenetic analysis of lower jaw characters in temnospondyl amphibians
Fig. 5. A, B. Comparisons between the skull of Vigilius wellesi Warren and Marsicano, 2000 (A) and the lower jaw of Hadrokkosaurus bradyi (Welles, 1947) (B) drawn to the same proportions; arrows point to changes in degree of curvature of the skull and jaw (skull modified from Warren and Marsicano 2000). C. Right lower jaw ramus of Hadrokkosaurus bradyi (Welles, 1947) in dorsal view showing lengths of segments used for calculating the degree of curvature of the ramus (see text for details). D. Close−up view of posterior part of UCMP 36199, early Anisian, northeastern Arizona.
Fig. 4. A in The brachyopoid Hadrokkosaurus bradyi from the early Middle Triassic of Arizona, and a phylogenetic analysis of lower jaw characters in temnospondyl amphibians
Fig. 4. A. Stereopair of UCMP 36205, early Anisian, northeastern Arizona; incomplete prearticular in dorsal view attributed to Hadrokkosaurus bradyi; arrows mark position and extent of lateral edge of contact area for articular. B. Stereopair of UCMP 36210, early Anisian, northeastern Arizona; broken angular in dorsal view presumably incorrectly attributed to Hadrokkosaurus bradyi; note pronounced boss−like adductor process.
Fig. 1 in First Mesozoic record of the stingray Myliobatis wurnoensis from Mali and a phylogenetic analysis of Myliobatidae incorporating dental characters
Fig. 1. Map of Mali indicating three localities discovered in the 1999 CNRST−SUNY expedition. Boundary between the Illummeden and Tauodeni basins in northern Mali is outlined in light gray. Mali−8 marks localities yielding fossils of Myliobatidae. Dark Gray marks exposed basement rocks in the Adrar des Iforas Mountains; white marks Proterozoic structure that connected the two light gray basin periodically during the Cretaceous– Paleogene.
Fig. 6 in First Mesozoic record of the stingray Myliobatis wurnoensis from Mali and a phylogenetic analysis of Myliobatidae incorporating dental characters
Fig. 6. Phylogenetic relationships and stratigraphic distribution of Myliobatidae. Epochs are not drawn to scale.
Fig. 3. The fossil stingray Myliobatis wurnoensis White, 1934 in First Mesozoic record of the stingray Myliobatis wurnoensis from Mali and a phylogenetic analysis of Myliobatidae incorporating dental characters
Fig. 3. The fossil stingray Myliobatis wurnoensis White, 1934 from Maastrichtian of Mali. A, B. Partial upper dental plates. A. CNRST−SUNY−5 in posterior (A1), occlusal (A2), and basal (A3) views. B. CNRST−SUNY−37 in posterior (B1), occlusal (B2), and basal (B3) views. C. Partial lower dental plate, CNRST− SUNY−3 in occlusal (C1) and basal (C2) views. Anterior is to top of page for all images except A1 and B1, which are in posterior view. Scale bars 10 mm.
Fig. 2 in First Mesozoic record of the stingray Myliobatis wurnoensis from Mali and a phylogenetic analysis of Myliobatidae incorporating dental characters
Fig. 2. Composite stratigraphic sections of localities Mali−7, −8, and −10. Relative stratigraphic positions of index fossils and inferred depositional settings supporting age of Myliobatis wurnoensis (Mali−8). Index fossils from Mali−7, −8, and −10. Lower gray line is the inferred KT boundary in this section and the upper gray line is the inferred position of the Paleocene–Eocene boundary in this section. Abbreviations: CG, conglomerate; LS, limestone; MS, shale; SS, sandstone.
Fig. 5 in First Mesozoic record of the stingray Myliobatis wurnoensis from Mali and a phylogenetic analysis of Myliobatidae incorporating dental characters
Fig. 5. Summary of unambiguous character transformations across Myliobatidae (node−B) that were optimized on all most parsimonious trees. Black boxes have a CI = 1.0 and white boxes have a lower CI value. Bold face denotes extinct taxa.
Fig. 8 in First Mesozoic record of the stingray Myliobatis wurnoensis from Mali and a phylogenetic analysis of Myliobatidae incorporating dental characters
Fig. 8. Comparative extinct taxa of Myliobatiformes; known ages mapped onto Fig. 6. A. Hypolophites myliobatoides Stromer, 1910, NHM P18781; A1, occlusal view, anterior to top; A2, lateral view, anterior to left; A3, root view, anterior to top. B. Brachyrhizodus wichitaensis Romer, 1942, NHM P89095; B1, occlusal view; anterior undetermined; B2, root view; anterior undetermined. C. Apocopodon sericius, NHM P24670, C1, occlusal view, anterior to top; C2, lateral view, anterior to left; C3, root view, anterior to top. D. Igdabatis sigmodon, TMM 45892−1; D1, occlusal view, anterior to top; D2, posterior view; D3, root view, anterior to bottom; D4, lateral view, anterior to left. E. Myliobatis striatus, NHM P.66859; E1, occlusal view, anterior to top; E2, root view, anterior to top; E3, posterior view; E4, lateral view, anterior to left. F. Aetobatus arcuatus, SMNH 12656−3; F1, occlusal view, anterior to top; F2, root view, anterior to top; F3, anterior view; F4, lateral view, anterior to left. Scale bars 10 mm.
Fig. 4 in First Mesozoic record of the stingray Myliobatis wurnoensis from Mali and a phylogenetic analysis of Myliobatidae incorporating dental characters
Fig. 4. Strict consensus of eight most parsimonious trees (MPT). A. Tree from full analysis with Myliobatidae condensed as single terminal taxon in gray box labeled "B". B. Expanded Myliobatidae portion of tree, which is identical on all eight MPTs. TL = 141, CI = 0.6312, HI = 0.3688, RI = 0.8844, RC = 0.5583. Bold face in B denotes extinct taxa.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.