Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
12
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
12 results for “Compsognathidae”
Figure 11 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 11. Right manus, ventral view, with some left elements in the Paris (Canjuers) specimen of Compsognathus longipes NMNH CNJ 79, largely preserved as impressions. Identifiable elements labelled in drawing are as follows: 1, r. mc I; 2, r. mc II; 3, r. mc III; 4, r. ph I-1; 5, r. ph I-2; 6, r. ph II-1; 7, r. ph III-1?; 8, l. mc II; 9, l. mc III; 10, l. ph II-1; 11, l. ph III-1?; 12, r. dc1 +2?; 13, r. radiale; 14, r. radius; 15, r. ulna; 16, l. ulna.
Figure 8 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 8. Unguals preserved on Compsognathus slab. A, left digit I ungual, showing robust, deep flexor tubercle. B, right digit I ungual (in articulation) showing deep, robust flexor tubercle as in A. C, left digit II ungual (in articulation) showing more gracile flexor tubercle. D, right digit II ungual medial impression (mirrored for comparison) showing shallow, gracile flexor tubercle as in C.
Figure 12 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 12. Comparison of hands of various coelurosaurs. A, Allosaurus fragilis (reconstructed from Madsen, 1976); B, Scipionyx samnictus; C, Nqwebisaurus thwazi (after DeKlerk et al., 2000); D, Huaxiagnathus orientalis (after Hwang et al., 2004); E, Sinosauropteryx sp. NGMC 21124; F, Sinosauropteryx prima (reconstructed from Currie & Chen, 2001); G, Compsognathus longipes.
Figure 7. A, left digit II phalanges 2 and 3 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 7. A, left digit II phalanges 2 and 3 (ungual) shown in near articulation. Arrow shows subcircular articular condyles typical of theropod II-2. B, right digit II, phalanx 2 lateral impression.
Figure 6. A in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 6. A, left second digit, first phalanx ventral impression. B, right second digit first phalanx lateral impression.
Figure 3 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 3. Left first digit, first phalanx shown in proximal oblique view. Arrowheads in drawing show articular facets, highlighted in grey.
Figure 2 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 2. Right first digit, first and second (ungual) phalanges. Hash marks in drawing represent broken surface; stipples, obscured bone. Arrow shows flattened proximoventral extension of articular condyles typical of theropod I-1.
Figure 1 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 1. Overview of the preserved manual material in the Munich holotype of Compsognathus longipes, drawing isolates manual elements with lines representing preserved bone and dotted lines representing element impressions (inset: metacarpal I from top of slab, shown in preserved orientation relative to other manual elements). Differing author's interpretations of element identity labelled as follows: 1, l. metacarpal I (this paper), mystery bone (Ostrom, 1978); 2, l. metacarpal II (this paper; von Huene, 1925), l. metacarpal I (Ostrom, 1978), l. metacarpal III (Gauthier et al., 1988); 3, l. metacarpal III (this paper; von Huene, 1925; Ostrom, 1978), l. metacarpal IV (Gauthier et al., 1988); 4, l. ph I-1 (this paper), l. metacarpal II (von Huene, 1925), l. metacarpal II (Ostrom, 1978; Gauthier et al., 1988); 5, l. ph I-2 (this paper), r. ph II-2 (Ostrom, 1978), r. ph II-3 (von Huene, 1925); 6, l. ph II-1 (this paper; von Huene, 1925), l. ph I-1 (Ostrom, 1978); 7, l. ph II-2 (this paper), l. ph I-1 (von Huene, 1925), l. ph II-1 (Ostrom, 1978); 8, l. ph II-3 (this paper), l. ph I-2 (von Huene, 1925), l. ph II-2 (Ostrom, 1978); 9, ph III-1?; 10, r. metacarpal II (this paper; von Huene, 1925; Ostrom, 1978), r. metacarpal III (Gauthier et al., 1988); 11, r. metacarpal III (this paper; von Huene, 1925; Ostrom, 1978); r. metacarpal IV (Gauthier et al., 1988); 12, r. ph I-1 (this paper; von Huene, 1925), r. mc I (Ostrom, 1978); 13, r. ph I-2 (this paper; von Huene, 1925; Ostrom, 1978); 14, r. ph II-1 (this paper; von Huene, 1925), r. ph I-1 (Ostrom, 1978); 15, r. ph II-2 (this paper; von Huene, 1925), r. ph II-1 (Ostrom, 1978); 16, r. ph II-3 (this paper), l. ph I-1 (Ostrom, 1978), l. ph II-3 (von Huene, 1925); 17, l. dc 1?.
Figure 10 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 10. Left manus of Compsognathus longipes (holotype), articulated by camera lucida.
Figure 9 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 9. Isolated elements that may be referable to first phalanges of digit III.
Figure 5. Left metacarpal I in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 5. Left metacarpal I ('mystery bone'). Black arrowheads show subequal, poorly developed articular condyles. Open arrowhead shows proximo-radial process.
Figure 4. Metacarpals II and III. A, left metacarpals II in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae
Figure 4. Metacarpals II and III. A, left metacarpals II and III; arrowhead shows collateral ligament pit negative impression on metacarpal III. B, right metacarpals II and III shown in articulation; proximal ends are obscured by overlying matrix and left ulna.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.