Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Morphological and molecular identification of Cryptocotyle lingua metacercariae isolated from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) from Danish seas and whiting (Merlangius merlangus) from the English Channel

Fig. 4 Phylogenetic trees based on cox1 mtDNA (left tree) and ITS rDNA (right tree) sequences using the ML method with 1000 bootstraps

Fig. 3 in Morphological and molecular identification of Cryptocotyle lingua metacercariae isolated from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) from Danish seas and whiting (Merlangius merlangus) from the English Channel

Fig. 3 Excysted Cryptocotyle lingua metacercariae at different degrees of contraction a in whiting from the English Channel, b in cod from Danish waters

Fig. 2 in Morphological and molecular identification of Cryptocotyle lingua metacercariae isolated from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) from Danish seas and whiting (Merlangius merlangus) from the English Channel

Fig. 2 Morphology of excysted Cryptocotyle lingua metacercariae (ventral view) from Gadus morhua and Merlangius merlangius. Abbreviations: bi.i, bifurcation of intestine; e, oesophagus; ex.c, excretory canal; ex.p, excretory pore; ic, intestinal caecum; pp, prepharynx; ph, pharynx; ov, ovary; os, oral sucker; s.r, seminal receptacle; t, testis; vg.c, ventrogenital complex; vi, vitellaria; ① distance from oral sucker to end of pharynx; ② distance from oral sucker to intestinal branches; ③ width 1; ④ width 2; ⑤ oral sucker diameter; ⑥ ventrogenital complex diameter; ⑦ total length

Fig. 1 in Morphological and molecular identification of Cryptocotyle lingua metacercariae isolated from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) from Danish seas and whiting (Merlangius merlangus) from the English Channel

Fig. 1 Infected Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) (a) and microscope observation of encysted metacercariae in caudal fin (b)

Figure S4 in Spatiotemporal patterns in marine fish and cephalopods communities across scales: using an autoregressive spatiotemporal clustering model. A study of fish and cephalopods of the Eastern English Channel

Figure S4. – Spatial-temporal correlation matrix at a 782 km2 (A) and 1043 km2 (B) scale displaying correlation from strongly negative (dark blue) to strongly positive (dark red).

Figure S2 in Spatiotemporal patterns in marine fish and cephalopods communities across scales: using an autoregressive spatiotemporal clustering model. A study of fish and cephalopods of the Eastern English Channel

Figure S2. – Spatial hierarchical clustering at a 782 km2 (A) and 1043 km2 (B) scale. The rectangle outlines the communities that where find statistically significant by ASTEC given the approximately unbiased p-values expressed as proportion (red).

Figure 2 in Spatiotemporal patterns in marine fish and cephalopods communities across scales: using an autoregressive spatiotemporal clustering model. A study of fish and cephalopods of the Eastern English Channel

Figure 2. – Spatial correlation matrix at a 522 km2 scale displaying correlation from strongly negative (dark blue) to strongly positive (dark red).

Figure 11 in Spatiotemporal patterns in marine fish and cephalopods communities across scales: using an autoregressive spatiotemporal clustering model. A study of fish and cephalopods of the Eastern English Channel

Figure 11. – Scophthalmus rhombus from low (blue) to high (red) median densities of numbers/ km2 in log scale for 522 km2 for the Eastern English Channel.

Figure S5 in Spatiotemporal patterns in marine fish and cephalopods communities across scales: using an autoregressive spatiotemporal clustering model. A study of fish and cephalopods of the Eastern English Channel

Figure S5. – Spatial-temporal hierarchical clustering at a 782 km2 (A) and 1043 km2 (B) scale. The rectangle outlines the communities that where find statistically significant by ASTEC given the approximately unbiased p-values expressed as proportion (red).

Figure 11 in Range expansion of some non-indigenous seaweeds along the coasts of Brittany - English Channel

Figure 11: (a) Main regions of interest for nonindigenous species dispersion along the coast of Brittany. Main ports with pontoons (circles in shades of red). Dataset from www. portsdebretagne.fr. Main oyster farming areas in blue (Magallana gigas). Dataset "Cadastre conchylicole" obtained on the site geo.data. gouv.fr. Data were updated in 2020 for Finistère and Morbihan, in 2017 for Côtes d'Armor, in 2016 for Ille-et-Vilaine, in 2011 for LoireAtlantique. (b) Main vectors for nonindigenous species along the coast of Brittany. Some presumed examples of dispersion for maritime traffic in light blue (e.g. Symphyocladiella dendroidea), oyster transfer in orange (e.g. Polyopes lancifolius), marginal dispersion in dark blue (e.g. Pachymeniopsis lanceolata or Solieria sp.).

Figure 10 in Range expansion of some non-indigenous seaweeds along the coasts of Brittany - English Channel

Figure 10: Symphyocladiella dendroidea from Brittany: (a) general habit showing alternate branches and ultimate proliferations; (b) dried specimen from Brest marina (Herbarium of the European Institute for Marine Studies); (c) apex with characteristic pyramidal outline aspect; (d) branches bearing cystocarps; (e) series of tetrasporangia in branchlets. Scale bars: (a and b) 500 µm; (c–e) 200 µm.

Figure 8 in Range expansion of some non-indigenous seaweeds along the coasts of Brittany - English Channel

Figure 8: Polysiphonia morrowii from Brittany: (a) dried specimen from Brest marina (Herbarium M. Helias); (b) general habit showing characteristic spike branches; (c) apex with secondary branches giving a spike aspect; (d) transverse section with four pericentral cells; (e) rhizoid with open section; (f) variation in branch tips; (g) tetrasporangia. Scale bars: (a) 5 cm; (b) 500 µm; (c) 100 µm; (d–g) 20 µm.

Figure 5 in Range expansion of some non-indigenous seaweeds along the coasts of Brittany - English Channel

Figure 5: Botryocladia wrightii from Brittany: (a) in situ material from Tréveneuc (picture by F. Gully and M. Cochu); (b) general habit; (c) cortex and subcortex in transverse section; (d) immature cystocarp lacking carpostome in surface view. Scale bars: (a and b) 2 cm; (c and d) 100 µm.

Figure 6 in Range expansion of some non-indigenous seaweeds along the coasts of Brittany - English Channel

Figure 6: Pachymeniopsis lanceolata from Brittany: (a) general habit; (b) tetrasporophyte with numerous marginal proliferations (Herbarium T. Burel); (c) longitudinal section. Scale bars: (a–c) 2 cm; (d) 100 µm.

Figure 7 in Range expansion of some non-indigenous seaweeds along the coasts of Brittany - English Channel

Figure 7: Polyopes lancifolius from Brittany: (a) general habit showing characteristic proliferations; (b) in situ material from Bréhat (picture by T. Burel); (c) dried specimen from the Gulf of Morbihan (Herbarium A. Le Roux), winter form lacking proliferations; (d) vertical section through old axis showing a thick cortex. Scale bars: (a–c) 2 cm; (d) 50 µm.

Figure 1 in Range expansion of some non-indigenous seaweeds along the coasts of Brittany - English Channel

Figure 1: Map of Brittany showing the sites examined during the study, ca. 2018–2022. Blue squares represent sites visited during the citizen science program or during courses at the university, black dots represent sites visited during the monitoring program.

Figure 3 in Range expansion of some non-indigenous seaweeds along the coasts of Brittany - English Channel

Figure 3: Antithamnion hubbsii from Brittany: (a) dried specimen from Brest marina (herbarium of the European Institute for Marine Studies); (b) general habit; (c) characteristic segment showing a cell of the main axis, the opposite distichous branching and the opposite branchlets bearing glandular cells; (d) portion of axis with tetrasporangia; (e) branches and branchlets bearing glandular cells (arrowheads). Scale bars: (a) 5 mm; (b) 2 mm; (c–e) 50 µm.