Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
169
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
169 results for “Epibiont”
Fig. 2 in First Report of Colacium vesiculosum Ehrenberg 1853 (Euglenophyceae), as Epibiont on Planktonic Copepods (Crustacea, Copepoda), in a Brazilian Floodplain Lake
Fig. 2. Mean abundance of hosts and mean infestation prevalence on the total or on each live stage of the copepods. A represents those aspects of the epibiotic relationship on N. amazonicus and on B, those on T. minutus.
Figure 1 in First report of Epibiont ciliates (Ciliophora: Peritrichia) living in Brinkhurstia americanus (Oligochaeta: Alluroididae) in a Neotropical river
Figure 1. Brinkhurstia americanus. (A) Anterior ventral chaetae; (B) epibiont ciliates associated in the posterior region; and (C) epibiont ciliates. Scale bars: (A) and (B) 100 μm; (C) 10 μm.
Figure 1 in First record of Epibiont ciliates (Ciliophora: Peritrichia) associated with Dero digitata Müller, 1773 (Oligochaeta: Naididae) in Brazil
Figure 1. Dero digitata. (A) brachial fossa; (B) epibiont ciliates associated with the posterior region. Scale bars: (A) 100 Μm and (B) 10 Μm.
Fig. 1 in Influence of environmental factors and sessile biota on vagile epibionts: The case of amphipods in marinas across a regional scale Abstract
Fig. 1: Composition (percentage of total abundance) of amphipod assemblages occurred on pontoons of each marina (CHI = Chipiona, AME = Puerto. América, BAR = Barbate, LIN= La Línea, FUE = Fuengirola, ALM = Almería. Numbers represents the three pontoons). Exotic species are represented by red textures.
Fig. 6 in Influence of environmental factors and sessile biota on vagile epibionts: The case of amphipods in marinas across a regional scale Abstract
Fig. 6: RDA graphic showing the similarity between the amphipod community present in each marina and its relationship with the physical-chemical parameters (CHI = Chipiona, AME = Puerto. América, BAR = Barbate, LIN= La Línea, FUE = Fuengirola, ALM = Almería; Green = Atlantic; Orange = Mediterranean)..
Fig. 4. Epistylis semiciculus n in Morphological and molecular identification of epibiontic sessilid Epistylis semiciculus n. sp. (ciliophora, Peritrichia) from Procambarus clarkia (Crustacea, Decapoda) in China
Fig. 4. Epistylis semiciculus n. sp. drawing from vivo and stained specimens. A. Morphotype I of Epistylis semiciculus n. sp. in vivo. B, C. Morphotype II of Epistylis semiciculus n. sp. in vivo. D. Oral infraciliature Oral. E. Transverse striations. G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; P, polykinety; P1–3, infundibular polykineties 1–3. Scale bars: A = 20 μm; B = 400 μm; C = 20 μm.
Fig. 3 in Morphological and molecular identification of epibiontic sessilid Epistylis semiciculus n. sp. (ciliophora, Peritrichia) from Procambarus clarkia (Crustacea, Decapoda) in China
Fig. 3. Microphotographs of stained Epistylis semiciculus n. sp. with protargol stain (A–F) and silver nitrate (G–I). A. Pattern of infraciliature. B. Macronucleus with transverse orientation. C. Macronucleus with longitudinal orientation. D, E, F. Terminate of infundibular polykineties 1–3. G, H. Silver nitrate impregnated transverse striations, arrow shows the pores. I. Macronucleus after silver nitrate impregnated. ATB, aboral trochal band; G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; P, polykinety; P1–3, infundibular polykineties 1–3. Scale bars: A, B, C, H, I = 20 μm; D, E, F = 10 μm; G = 5 μm.
Fig. 2 in Morphological and molecular identification of epibiontic sessilid Epistylis semiciculus n. sp. (ciliophora, Peritrichia) from Procambarus clarkia (Crustacea, Decapoda) in China
Fig. 2. Telotrochs of morphotype II of Epistylis semiciculus n. sp. in vivo. A. Apical view of telotroch. B. Oral of telotroch (arrow). C. Oral infraciliature (arrow). D. Transverse striations on oral pellicle (arrow). E. Macronucleus and infraciliature. F. Macronucleus (arrow). ATB, aboral trochal band; CV, Contractile vacuole; Ma, macronucleus; P, polykinety. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Fig. 6 in Morphological and molecular identification of epibiontic sessilid Epistylis semiciculus n. sp. (ciliophora, Peritrichia) from Procambarus clarkia (Crustacea, Decapoda) in China
Fig. 6. Consensus tree constructed from both trees generated by phylogenetic analyses of nuclear ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequence. The sequences investigated in the present study are in bold. Numbers on branches indicate the posterior probability (BI) and bootstrap (ML) values, respectively. 1, morphotype I; 2 and 3, morphotype II; 4, Telotrochs of morphotype II.
Fig. 5 in Morphological and molecular identification of epibiontic sessilid Epistylis semiciculus n. sp. (ciliophora, Peritrichia) from Procambarus clarkia (Crustacea, Decapoda) in China
Fig. 5. Consensus tree constructed from both trees generated by phylogenetic analyses of nuclear SSU rDNA sequences. The sequences investigated in the present study are formatted in bold. Numbers at nodes of branches indicate the posterior probability (BI) and bootstrap (ML) values, respectively. 1 and 2, morphotype I; 3, morphotype II; 4, Telotrochs of morphotype II.
Figure 1 in Marine protozoan epibionts on the copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis, parasite of the Atlantic salmon
Figure 1. Ephelota gemmipara. (a) Schematic diagram of the body. ct, capitate tentacles; pt, prehensile tentacles; cv, contractile vacuole; ls, longitudinal striations; Ma, macronucleus; Mi, micronucleus; s, stalk; ts, tranversal striations. (b) Schematic diagram of a bud of Ephelota gemmipara. rcf, right ciliar field; lcf, left ciliar field; Ma, macronucleus.
Figures 2–7 in Marine protozoan epibionts on the copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis, parasite of the Atlantic salmon
Figures 2–7. (2) A specimen of the copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis showing the suctoria attached to its surface (×11). (3) Two individuals of Ephelota gemmipara showing the lobulate macronucleus, the tentacles and the stalk (×112). (4) Ephelota gemmipara. SEM photomicrography showing buds (×224). (5) Ephelota gemmipara. SEM photomicrography showing the distal part of the stalk and the body (×224). (6) Ephelota gigantea. General view of the body (×108). (7) Ephelota gigantea. Aspect of the anterior area of the body (×149).
Figure 8 in Marine protozoan epibionts on the copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis, parasite of the Atlantic salmon
Figure 8. Ephelota gigantea. (a) Schematic diagram of the body. pt, prehensile tentacles; ct, capitate tentacles; cv, contractile vacuole; Ma, macronucleus; Mi, micronucleus; ls, longitudinal striations; s, stalk. (b) Schematic diagram of the fibrillar bands of the suprastylar area of the stalk. afb, anterior fibrillar band; ifb, intermediate fibrillar band; pfb, posterior fibrillar band.
Figure 2 in Protozoan ciliate epibionts on the freshwater shrimp Caridina (Crustacea, Decapoda, Atyidae) from the Malili lake system on Sulawesi (Indonesia)
Figure 2. (a) Acineta; (b) Thuricola; (c) Cothurnia; (d) Vorticella; (e) Opercularia; (f) Zoothamnium. l, lorica; ma, macronucleus; mi, micronucleus; my, myoneme; o, operculum; s, stalk; sa, suprastylar area; t, tentacles.
Figure 1 in Protozoan ciliate epibionts on the freshwater shrimp Caridina (Crustacea, Decapoda, Atyidae) from the Malili lake system on Sulawesi (Indonesia)
Figure 1. The Malili lake system on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi with its three main lakes: Lake Towuti, Lake Mahalona, and Lake Matano.
Figure 24 in Epibiontic communities on the freshwater shrimp Caridina ensifera (Crustacea, Decapoda, Atyidae) from Lake Poso (Sulawesi, Indonesia)
Figure 24. Distribution of each epibiont species (mean densities) along the anterioposterior axis of Caridina ensifera. Anatomical units are considered individually. per, pereiopod; ple, pleopod; uro, uropod.
Figure 21 in Epibiontic communities on the freshwater shrimp Caridina ensifera (Crustacea, Decapoda, Atyidae) from Lake Poso (Sulawesi, Indonesia)
Figure 21. Dendrogram of the Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (anatomical units) performed using the mean densities of epibionts on the different anatomical units of the shrimps analysed (metric distance: City Block (Manhattan); method: Ward).
Figure 2 in Epibiontic communities on the freshwater shrimp Caridina ensifera (Crustacea, Decapoda, Atyidae) from Lake Poso (Sulawesi, Indonesia)
Figure 2. The epibiont species. (a) Acineta sulawesiensis; (b) Podophrya maupasi; (c) Spelaeophrya polypoides; (d) Zoothamnium intermedium; (e) Vorticella globosa; (f) Cothurnia compressa; (g) Amphileptus fusidens; (h) Embata laticeps; (i) Embata laticeps, the trophi. bd, basal disc; bl, basal lorica; c, cloaca; cv, contractile vacuole; l, lorica; ma, macronucleus; mi, micronucleus; my, myoneme; r, rostrum; s, stalk; st, stomach; t, tentacles; td, trochal discs; to, toes; v, vitellarium.
Figures 11–19 in Epibiontic communities on the freshwater shrimp Caridina ensifera (Crustacea, Decapoda, Atyidae) from Lake Poso (Sulawesi, Indonesia)
Figures 11–19. (11) Zoothamnium intermedium, area of stalk confluence for attachment to the shrimp surface (silver carbonate, ×400). (12) Vorticella globosa, a specimen with the contracted stalk (silver carbonate, ×710). (13) Cothurnia compressa, individual showing the lorica (silver carbonate, ×820). (14) Amphileptus fusidens, the body shape and the arrangement of the kineties (silver carbonate, ×770). (15–19) Embata laticeps: (15) the entire individual showing the trochal discs, rostrum, and toes (methyl green, ×200); (16) the anterior area of the body with the trochal discs and the rostrum (methyl green, ×410); (17) detail of the rostrum (methyl green, ×410); (18, 19) the trophi of the mastax, showing the unci and the teeth (×520).
Figure 20 in Epibiontic communities on the freshwater shrimp Caridina ensifera (Crustacea, Decapoda, Atyidae) from Lake Poso (Sulawesi, Indonesia)
Figure 20. Two first principal components of the Principal Component Analysis performed using the mean density of epibionts on each anatomical unit of the different shrimps analysed.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.