Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
38
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
38 results for “Estimation Process”
Processing and Data for "Estimating ocean net primary productivity from daily cycles of carbon biomass measured by profiling floats"
<p><strong>Description: </strong></p> <p>These files contain processed BGC-Argo float data, figure data, the radiocarbon productivity subset, bootstrapping results, and the associated Python/Matlab code to calculate net primary productivity from daily cycles of optical backscatter and dissolved oxygen.</p> <p>The raw float data used in this study are available from the Argo Global Data Assembly Centers in Brest, France (ftp://ftp.ifremer.fr/ifremer/argo/dac/coriolis) and Monterey, California (ftp://usgodae.org/pub/outgoing/argo/dac/coriolis). The raw MODIS satellite-based productivity data is available from the Oregon State University Ocean Productivity site (<a href="http://orca.science.oregonstate.edu/npp_products.php">http://orca.science.oregonstate.edu/npp_products.php</a>). The raw MODIS satellite-based euphotic depth estimates are available from the NASA L3 browser (<a href="https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/l3/">https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/l3/</a>). The original ship-based estimates of net primary productivity are available from the Pangaea (<a href="https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.932417">https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.932417</a>) and the British Oceanography Data Centre (<a href="https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/814803">https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/814803</a>).</p> <p><strong>Please cite as: </strong></p> <p>Stoer, A., and Fennel, K. 2022. Processing and Data for Estimating ocean net primary productivity from daily cycles of carbon biomass measured by profiling floats. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6977161.</p> <p><strong>Python/MATLAB Software Description: </strong></p> <p>dielFit_GOPeqCR.m: This code is from Johnson and Bif (2021). We have added outputs for standard errors for linear and PvE models and sunrise/sunset times. To run this code with the associated Python software a MATLAB engine needs to be installed. Please see: <a href="https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab-engine-for-python.html">https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab-engine-for-python.html</a></p> <p>argo_so_processing_20220815.py: This code is the first of two pieces of software for estimating net primary productivity from floats in the Southern Ocean. The program below obtains the data from the BGC Argo database (Argo, 2021) and processes it. Simple data quality control, interpolation, biogeochemical calculations, and data binning occur. The processed float data is located in the folder 'Processed Argo Transects'.</p> <p>argo_daily_npp_20220815.py: This code using processed Argo float data that contains oxygen and particle backscatter measurements to infer net primary production. The code combines the float that meet the criteria of sampling at all local hours of the day throughout its lifetime. Then, it constructs diel cycles from this data by finding the median value of each hour and uses the code from Johnson and Bif (2021), which is a modified version from Barone et al. (2019). The algorithm used to convert particle backscatter to particulate organic carbon is from Graff et al. (2015). We assume that dissolved primary productivity accounts for 30% of total primary productivity (Moran et al., 2022).</p> <p>argo_daily_npp_bootstrap_20220815.py: This code using processed Argo float data that contains co-located oxygen and particle backscatter measurements to infer net primary production. This code is very similar to argo_daily_npp_20220815.py but randomly samples a subset of the co-located profiles at different sample sizes before calculating net primary productivity. Productivity is calculated at each sample size 1000 times. The results of this analysis is located in the folder 'Bootstrapped Results'. </p> <p>More details can be found in the code itself. </p> <p><strong>Data Descriptions: </strong></p> Data from 'Processed Argo Transects' Folder | Description for each variable <table><tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>depth</td> <td>Average depth of depth bin</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>mid_depth</td> <td>Center of depth bin</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>pressure</td> <td>Average pressure in depth bin</td> <td>dbar</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_index</td> <td>Profile number or index</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_longitude</td> <td>Average longitude of profile</td> <td>degE</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_latitude</td> <td>Average latitude of profile</td> <td>degN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_time</td> <td>Average UTC time of profile</td> <td>yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_local_time</td> <td>Average local time of profile</td> <td>yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_local_hour</td> <td>The hour of the local timestamp</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>salinity</td> <td>Seawater salinity</td> <td>PSU</td> </tr> <tr> <td>temperature </td> <td>Seawater temperature</td> <td>degC</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen</td> <td>Dissolved oxygen concentration</td> <td>umol kg-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen_saturation</td> <td>Saturated dissolved oxygen concentration calculated from the Garcia and Gordon (1992) equation.</td> <td>umol kg-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen_anom</td> <td>The difference between observed dissolved oxygen concentration and saturated oxygen </td> <td>umol kg-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>bbp470</td> <td>Optical backscatter coefficient at 470 nm. Particulate organic carbon is calculated in argo_daily_npp_20220815.py</td> <td>m-1</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>wmo</td> <td>WMO number of float</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_index</td> <td>Profile index or profile number taken by float</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_latitude</td> <td>Average profile latitude</td> <td>degN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_longitude</td> <td>Average profile longitude</td> <td>degE</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>fod</td> <td>Fraction of day</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy</td> <td>Sinusoidal curve fit to oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>poc</td> <td>Sinusoidal curve fit to particulate organic carbon</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_med</td> <td>Hourly median oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_sem</td> <td>Hourly standard error of oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>poc_med</td> <td>Hourly median particulate organic carbon</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>poc_sem</td> <td>Hourly standard error of particulate organic carbon</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>region</td> <td>Name of data subset (e.g., 30-40 deg N, co-located)</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>region</td> <td>Name of data subset (e.g., 30-40 deg N) </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>depth</td> <td>Depth of profile</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>zeu</td> <td>1% euphotic depth from Lee et al. (2013) algorithm from NASA (2022) L3 satellite products. </td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_profiles_bpp</td> <td>Number of backscatter profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_profiles_oxy</td> <td>Number of oxygen profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_floats_bbp</td> <td>Number of floats with backscatter measurements</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_floats_oxy</td> <td>Number of floats with oxygen measurements</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do</td> <td>Gross oxygen productivity estimated from dissolved oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_serr</td> <td>Standard error of gross oxygen productivity estimated from dissolved oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_p</td> <td>p-value of curve fit to hourly oxygen data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_r2</td> <td>r-squared value of curve to hourly oxygen data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_sr</td> <td>The calculated sunrise time as a fraction of the day</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_ss</td> <td>The calculated sunset time as a fraction of the day</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gpp_bbp</td> <td>Gross carbon productivity estimated from optical backscatter</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gpp_bbp_serr</td> <td>Standard error of gross carbon productivity estimated from optical backscatter</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_p</td> <td>p-value of curve fit to hourly particulate organic carbon data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_r2</td> <td>r-squared value of curve to hourly particulate organic carbon data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_bbp</td> <td>Gross oxygen productivity calculated from gross carbon productivity (gpp_bbp)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_bbp_serr</td> <td>Standard error of gross oxygen productivity calculated from gross carbon productivity (gpp_bbp_serr)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_bbp</td> <td>Net primary productivity calculated from backscatter-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_bbp)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_bbp_serr</td> <td>Standard error of net primary productivity calculated from backscatter-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_bbp_serr)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_do</td> <td>Net primary productivity calculated from oxygen-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_do)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_do_serr</td> <td>Standard error of net primary productivity calculated from oxygen-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_do_serr)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> </table> Data for Fig. S1 | Description for number_of_bbp_profiles_in_each_year.csv and number_of_oxy_profiles_in_each_year.csv <table><tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>year</td> <td>Year</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>bbp470</td> <td>Number of backscatter profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen_anom</td> <td>Number of oxygen profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> </table> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>mid_depth</td> <td>Depth of NPP profile</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>mean</td> <td>Mean volumetric 14C-NPP at depth</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>median</td> <td>Median volumetric 14C-NPP at depth</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>min</td> <td>Minimum volumetric 14C-NPP at depth</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>maximum</td> <td>Maximum volumetric 14C-NPP</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th><strong>Variable</strong></th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>subset</td> <td>Number of profiles randomly sampled from the co-located dataset</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>int_npp_do</td> <td>Euphotic-depth-integrated net primary productivity calculated from oxygen-based gross oxygen productivity</td> <td>mol m-2 y-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>int_npp_bbp</td> <td>Euphotic-depth-integrated net primary productivity calculated from backscatter-based gross oxygen productivity</td> <td>mol m-2 y-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_r2</td> <td>R-squared of the sinusoidal curve to the diel cycle of oxygen anomaly</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gpp_bbp_r2</td> <td>R-squared of sinusoidal curve to the diel cycle of particulate organic carbon</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>ROSE</td> <td>Topographic (negative values are below sea level)</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ETOPO05_Y</td> <td>Latitude</td> <td>degN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ETOPO05_X</td> <td>Longitude</td> <td>degE</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>database</td> <td>Database the data was extracted from</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Month</td> <td>Month of NPP measurement</td> <td>month of year</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_14c</td> <td>Net primary productivity estimated from the radiocarbon method</td> <td>mmol m-3 y-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>depth</td> <td>depth of 14C-NPP measurement</td> <td>m</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> </table>
Global topsoil SOC stock from 1981 to 2018 estimated by combining process-based model and space-for-time digital soil mapping
<p>This dataset include the topsoil (0-30cm) soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in mineral soils under major land classes (forest, grassland, shrub land, savannas, cropland, cropland/natural vegetation mosaic, and sparely vegetated land) from 1981 to 2018. The long-time series of SOC stocks were estimated by using a space-for-time digital soil mapping (DSMst) model where the RothC-simulated SOC stocks were incorporated as one of the dynamic covariates of the DSMst model.</p> <p>The detail information on the products were given below:</p> <p>Name: DSMst-RothC 5-km global topsoil SOC stock products</p> <p>Period: 1981-2018</p> <p>Spatial resolution: 0.041666667 degree</p> <p>Temporal resolution: 1 year</p> <p>CRS: geographic latitude/longitude (EPSG:4326 - WGS 84 – Geographic)</p> <p>Extent: -180°, -90°: 180°, 90°</p> <p>Data format: GeoTIFF</p> <p>Compression: LZW</p> <p>Data type: Float32</p> <p>Unit: t C ha<sup>-1</sup></p>
Simulation data for Doubly Robust Estimation of Business Process Intervention
<p>Event logs of simulated execution of two variants of the same process.</p> <p>A case matrix that contain the outcome, the intervention, and the confounders.</p>
Primary production estimates from 14C uptake (in situ), determined by the incorporation of inorganic carbon into particulate organic carbon (POC) due to photosynthesis at selected light levels from CCE LTER process cruises in the California Current System, 2006 - 2021 (ongoing).
Primary productivity samples of seawater are taken each day shortly before noon on the CTD rosette up-cast during the CCE Process crusies (since 2006, ongoing). Light penetration below the surface is estimated from the Secchi disk depth. Niskin bottles from depths with ambient light intensities corresponding to light levels simulated by on-deck incubators are identified and sampled. Primary production is estimated from 14C uptake using this simulated in situ technique (followed by filtering) by which the assimilation of dissolved inorganic carbon by phytoplankton yields a measure (in µg/L/day) of the rate of photosynthetic primary production (particulate organic carbon, POC) at selected light levels in the euphotic zone within the CCE study area.
Dataset of processed Sentinel-2 images for chlorophyll-a estimation in high-altitude lakes in the Sierra Nevada, Spain
<p>This dataset contains Sentinel 2 satellite images clipped to 5 high-altitude lakes in the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range, Spain. The images were processed with the following atmospheric correction algorithms:</p><ul><li><a href="https://c2rcc.org/">C2RCC</a> (<a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ESASP.740E..54B/abstract">Brockmann et al. 2016</a>)</li><li><a href="https://github.com/MarcYin/SIAC">SIAC</a> (<a href=" https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7933-2022">Yin et al. 2022)</a></li><li><a href="https://github.com/acolite/acolite/releases/tag/20221114.0">ACOLITE</a> (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.07.015">Vanhellemont & Ruddick, 2018</a>)</li><li><a href="https://grass.osgeo.org/grass83/manuals/i.atcorr.html">6SV</a> (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.581987">Vermote et al. 2006</a>)</li></ul><p><strong>Included Lakes and and their IDs:</strong></p><ul><li>Laguna de la Caldera (ID = P-2)</li><li>Laguna-embalse de las Yeguas (ID = D-6)</li><li>Laguna de Río Seco (ID = P-8)</li><li>Laguna Larga (ID = G-7)</li><li>Laguna de la Mosca (ID = G-11)</li></ul>
Processed data and trained models for "HOISDF: Constraining 3D Hand-Object Pose Estimation with Global Signed Distance Fields"
<p>#############</p> <p>HOISDF: Constraining 3D Hand-Object Pose Estimation with Global Signed Distance Fields, CVPR 2024</p> <p>#############</p> <p>Haozhe Qi, Chen Zhao, Mathieu Salzmann, Alexander Mathis.</p> <p>Affiliation: EPFL</p> <p>Date: June, 2024</p> <p>Link to the CVPR article: <a href="https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2024/papers/Qi_HOISDF_Constraining_3D_Hand-Object_Pose_Estimation_with_Global_Signed_Distance_CVPR_2024_paper.pdf">https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2024/papers/Qi_HOISDF_Constraining_3D_Hand-Object_Pose_Estimation_with_Global_Signed_Distance_CVPR_2024_paper.pdf</a></p> <p>Link to the Arxiv article: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17062">https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17062</a></p> <p>--------------------------------</p> <div> <div>Here we provide the data of our article "HOISDF: Constraining 3D Hand-Object Pose Estimation with Global Signed Distance Fields". It contains the preprocessed data of the interacting objects and SDF samples. Meanwhile, we also include the trained model weights here.</div> <br> <div>The overall structure of the data is:</div> <br> <div>├── <a href="../api/records/11668766/draft/files/ckpts.zip/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ckpts.zip</a> - Contains the trained weights model on different datasets (DexYCB and HO3Dv2)</div> <div>├── <a href="../api/records/11668766/draft/files/annotations.zip/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">annotations.zip</a> - Contains the preprocessed annotations of DexYCB and HO3Dv2 for efficient data loading.</div> <div>├── <a href="../api/records/11668766/draft/files/simple_ycb_models.zip/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">simple_ycb_models.zip</a> - Contains the preprocessed YCB objects for batched evaluation.</div> <div>├── <a href="../api/records/11668766/draft/files/test.zip/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">test.zip</a> - Contains the processed SDF files for DexYCB test set.</div> <div>├── <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/14190951/draft/files/ho3d_release.zip/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ho3d_release.zip</a> - Contains the HO3Dv2 submission trained with HO3D training set.</div> <div>├── <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/14190951/draft/files/ho3d_render_release.zip/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ho3d_render_release.zip</a> - Contains the HO3Dv2 submission trained with HO3D training set and rendering set.</div> <div> </div> <br> <div>The code to reproduce the results is available at: <a href="https://github.com/amathislab/HOISDF">https://github.com/amathislab/HOISDF</a></div> <div> </div> <div>--------------------------------</div> </div> <p>If you find our code, weights, predictions or ideas useful, please cite:</p> <p>@inproceedings{qi2024hoisdf,<br> title={HOISDF: Constraining 3D Hand-Object Pose Estimation with Global Signed Distance Fields},<br> author={Qi, Haozhe and Zhao, Chen and Salzmann, Mathieu and Mathis, Alexander},<br> booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},<br> pages={10392--10402},<br> year={2024}<br>}</p>
Estimation of reinforced urn processes under left-truncation and right-censoring
<p>We propose a nonparametric estimator for bivariate left-truncated and right-censored (LTRC) observations that combines the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm and the Reinforced Urn Process (RUP). The resulting Expectation-Reinforcement (ER) algorithm allows for the inclusion of experts' knowledge in the form of a prior distribution, thus belonging to the class of Bayesian models. This can be relevant in applications where the data is incomplete, due to biases in the sampling process, as in the case of left-truncation and right-censoring. With this new approach, the distribution of the truncation variables is also recovered, granting further insight into those biases, and playing an important role in applications like prevalent cohort studies. The estimators are tested numerically using artificial and empirical datasets and compared with other methodologies such as copula models and the Kaplan-Meier estimator.</p>
Supporting data sets for "Estimating Carbon Fixation of Plant Organs for Afforestation Monitoring using a Process-based Ecosystem Model and Ecophysiological Parameter Optimization". (the survey of tree breast diameter and tree height in 11-year old Eucommia ulmoides plantation, values of simulation results used in figures and tables.)
<p>Supporting data sets for Miyauchi et al., Ecology and Evolution, 2019 (accepted).</p> <p>The files store: </p> <p>(1) The survey of tree breast diameter and tree height in <em>Eucommia ulmoides</em> plantation<em>.</em> The ring and stem analysis and dry weight of seven harvested sample trees in the plantation.</p> <p>(2) Values of optimization result used fig.7.</p> <p>(3) Values of prediction result used fig.8. and table 4.</p> <p>(4) Values of optimized parameters by optimization methods, parameter range and constrain.</p>
Wastewater Treatment Unit Processes Datasets: Pollutant removal efficiencies, evaluation criteria and cost estimations
<p>This dataset provides data on typical pollutant removal efficiencies, evaluation critera and cost estimation for 37 common wastewater treatment unit processes. The data is based on literature research, expert workshops and estimations.</p> <p>The following files are available:</p> <ul> <li>Pollutant removal efficiencies, evaluation criteria and cost estimations for wastewater treatment unit processes (dataset) - Microsoft Excel:<br> Database of pollutant removal efficiencies for 11 paramameters, cost estimation and evaluation criteria.</li> <li>Pollutant Removal Efficiencies for Wastewater Treatment Unit Processes (Dataset) - pdf</li> <li>Evaluation Criteria for Wastewater Treatment Unit Processes (Dataset) - pdf</li> <li>Cost Estimation for Wastewater Treatment Unit Processes (Dataset) - pdf</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Estimation of reinforced urn processes under left-truncation and right-censoring
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Custom made python script using network assignment and scoring to estimate the impact of biological processes.
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data From: Estimation of genome-wide coupling in rattlesnake hybrids provides insight into the process of speciation and its progress
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Dynamic inferential NOx emission prediction model with delay estimation for SCR de-NOx process in coal-fired power plants
<p><span><span>The selective catalytic reduction (SCR) de</span><span>-</span><span>NO<sub>x</sub> </span><span>process in coal-fired power plants not only displays nonlinearity, large inertia, and time variation but also a lag in NO<sub>x</sub> analysis; </span><span>hence,</span><span> it is difficult to obtain an accurate model </span><span>that </span><span>can be used to control NH<sub>3</sub> injection </span><span>during changes in the </span><span>operating state. </span><span>In this work,</span><span> a novel dynamic inferential model with delay estimation was proposed for NO<sub>x</sub> emission prediction. First, k-nearest neighbour mutual information (knnMI) was used to estimate the time-delay of the descriptor variables, followed by reconstruction of the phase space of the model data. Second, multi-scale wavelet kernel partial least square (mwKPLS) was</span><span> used</span><span> to improve the prediction ability, </span><span>and this was followed by verification using </span><span>benchmark dataset experiments. Finally, the delay-time difference (DTD) method and feedback correction strategy </span><span>were </span><span>proposed to deal with the time variation of the SCR de</span><span>-</span><span>NO<sub>x</sub> process.</span> <span>Through the analysis of the </span><span>experimental field data </span><span>in the</span> <span>steady state, </span><span>the variable</span><span> state and </span><span>the </span>NO<sub>x</sub> analyser blowback process<span>, the results proved that</span><span> this dynamic model has </span><span>high prediction accuracy</span><span> during</span><span> state changes and can </span><span>realize</span><span> advance prediction of the NO<sub>x</sub> emission. </span></span></p>
Mapping Deformation Processes using InSAR PS+DS Timeseries Estimation in Northern California, U.S.
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
A Black-Box Physics-Informed Estimator based on Gaussian Process Regression for Robot Inverse Dynamics Identification
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p> <p>The Robot Inverse Dynamics Dataset is a collection of trajectories and joint torque measurements of two robotic manipulators, a 7 DoF Franka Emika Panda, and a 6 DOF MELFA RV4FL. Additionally, the dataset contains the inverse dynamical models and other useful quantities learned to reproduce the results reported on our reference paper "A Black-Box Physics-Informed Estimator based on Gaussian Process Regression for Robot Inverse Dynamics Identification". The proposed model relies on a novel multidimensional kernel, called Lagrangian Inspired Polynomial (LIP) kernel.</p> <p><strong>At a Glance</strong></p> <ul> <li>The size of the unzipped dataset is ~700MB.</li> <li>The dataset contains</li> <ul> <li>collections of joint trajectories and joint torque measurements of two robot manipulators: a 7 DoF Franka Emika Panda, and a 6 DOF MELFA RV4FL.</li> <li>models of the inverse dynamics of the two manipulators learned on the datasets</li> </ul> <li>The main directories are</li> <ul> <li>Simulated_PANDA/ contains the trajectories, models and results obtained on different configurations of a Franka Emika PANDA robot, simulated in sympybotics.</li> <li>Robots/ contains the data, models and results obtained on two real robots, a Franka Emika PANDA and a Mitsubishi Electric MELFA RV4FRL</li> </ul> <li>See the README.md file for a detailed description of the directories.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Other Resources</strong></p> <p>Python code to train the models and reproduce the results in the paper are available <a href="https://github.com/merlresearch/LIP4RobotInverseDynamics">here</a>.</p> <p><strong>Citation</strong></p> <p>If you use the Robot Inverse Dynamics dataset in your research, please cite our contribution:</p> <pre><code>@InProceedings{ title={A Black-Box Physics-Informed Estimator based on Gaussian Process Regression for Robot Inverse Dynamics Identification}, author={Giacomuzzo, G., Dalla Libera, A., Romeres, D.,}, booktitle={IEEE Transaction on Robotics}, year={2024} } </code></pre> <p><strong>License</strong></p> <p>The Robot Inverse Dynamics dataset is released under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC-BY-SA-4.0 license</a>.</p> <p>All data:</p> <pre><code>Created by Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories (MERL), 2024 SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0</code></pre>
FPCA - From mobile app-based crowdsourcing to crowd-trusted food price estimates in Nigeria: pre-processing and post-sampling strategy for optimal statistical inference
<p>Timely and reliable monitoring of commodity food prices is an essential requirement for the assessment of market and food security risks and the establishment of early warning systems, especially in developing economies. However, data from regional or national systems for tracking changes of food prices in sub-Saharan Africa lacks the temporal or spatial richness and is often insufficient to inform targeted interventions. In addition to limited opportunity for [near-]real-time assessment of food prices, various stages in the commodity supply chain are mostly unrepresented, thereby limiting insights on stage-related price evolution. Yet, governments and market stakeholders rely on commodity price data to make decisions on appropriate interventions or commodity-focused investments. Recent rapid technological development indicates that digital devices and connectivity services are becoming affordable for many, including in remote areas of developing economies. This offers a great opportunity both for the harvesting of price data (via new data collection methodologies, such as crowdsourcing/crowdsensing — i.e. citizen-generated data — using mobile apps/devices), and for disseminating it (via web dashboards or other means) to provide real-time data that can support decisions at various levels and related policy-making processes. However, market information that aims at improving the functioning of markets and supply chains requires a continuous data flow as well as quality, accessibility and trust. More data does not necessarily translate into better information. Citizen-based data-generation systems are often confronted by challenges related to data quality and citizen participation, which may be further complicated by the volume of data generated compared to traditional approaches. Following the food price hikes during the first noughties of the 21st century, the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) started working on innovative methodologies for real-time food price data collection and analysis in developing countries. The work carried out so far includes a pilot initiative to crowdsource data from selected markets across several African countries, two workshops (with relevant stakeholders and experts), and the development of a spatial statistical quality methodology to facilitate the best possible exploitation of geo-located data. Based on the latter, the JRC designed the Food Price Crowdsourcing Africa (FPCA) project and implemented it within two states in Northern Nigeria. The FPCA is a credible methodology, based on the voluntary provision of data by a crowd (people living in urban, suburban, and rural areas) using a mobile app, leveraging monetary and non-monetary incentives to enhance contribution, which makes it possible to collect, analyse and validate, and disseminate staple food price data in real time across market segments. The granularity and high frequency of the crowdsourcing data open the door to real-time space-time analysis, which can be essential for policy and decision making and rapid response on specific geographic regions. <a href="https://datam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/datam/perm/news/870?rdr=1666109837893">Link to the project</a></p>
Including a spatial predictive process in band recovery models improves inference for Lincoln estimates of animal abundance
<p>Abundance estimation is a critical component of conservation planning, particularly for exploited species where managers set regulations to restrict harvest based on current population size. An increasingly common approach for abundance estimation is through integrated population modeling (IPM), which uses multiple data sources in a joint likelihood to estimate abundance and additional demographic parameters. Lincoln estimators are one commonly used IPM component for harvested species, which combine information on the rate and the total number of individuals harvested within an integrated band-recovery framework to estimate abundance at large scales.</p> <p>A major assumption of the Lincoln estimator is that banding and recoveries are representative of the whole population, which may be violated if major sources of spatial heterogeneity in survival or harvest rates are not incorporated into the model. We developed an approach to account for spatial variation in harvest rates using a spatial predictive process, which we incorporated into a Lincoln estimator IPM.</p> <p>We simulated data under different configurations of sample sizes, harvest rates, and sources of spatial heterogeneity in harvest rate to assess potential model bias in parameter estimates. We then applied the model to data collected from a field study of wild turkeys (<em>Meleagris gallapavo</em>) to estimate local and statewide abundance in Maine, USA.</p> <p>We found that the band recovery model that incorporated a spatial predictive process consistently provided estimates of adult and juvenile abundance with low bias across a variety of spatial configurations of harvest rate and sampling intensities. When applied to data collected on wild turkeys, a model that did not incorporate spatial heterogeneity underestimated the harvest rate in some sub-regions. Consistent with simulation results, this led to over-estimation of both local and statewide abundance.</p> <p>Our work demonstrates that a spatial predictive process is a viable mechanism to account for spatial variation in harvest rates and limit bias in abundance estimates. This approach could be extended to large-scale band recovery datasets and has applicability for the estimation of population parameters in other ecological models as well.</p>
Including a spatial predictive process in band recovery models improves inference for Lincoln estimates of animal abundance
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Dynamic inferential NOx emission prediction model with delay estimation for SCR de-NOx process in coal-fired power plants
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Natural language processing systems for pathology parsing in limited data environments with uncertainty estimation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.