Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
23
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
23 results for “Ethnobiology”
Figure 3 in Biology, trophic chain, and ethnobiological calendar of the mangrove crab, Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae), according to the perception of catchers in Itanhaém, São Paulo, Brazil
Figure 3. Ethnobiological calendar of the mangrove crab (Ucides cordatus) showing the months of occurrence of its biological events according to interviews conducted in 2017 with catchers of the mangrove swamp of the Itanhaém River in Itanhaém city (São Paulo State, Brazil).
Figure 2 in Biology, trophic chain, and ethnobiological calendar of the mangrove crab, Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae), according to the perception of catchers in Itanhaém, São Paulo, Brazil
Figure 2.Representation of a fragment of the mangrove crab trophic chain according to the knowledge of catchers in the Itanhaém- SP mangrove.
Figure 1 in Biology, trophic chain, and ethnobiological calendar of the mangrove crab, Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae), according to the perception of catchers in Itanhaém, São Paulo, Brazil
Figure 1. Photographic maps of the Itanhaém River Estuary (São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil). Source: Modified from Google® Maps 2020 - Image from 19 Mar 2021.
FIG. 15 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 15. — Emys orbicularis Linnaeus, 1758 (young). Both the colour and the long pointed tail may explain the Roman name mus (lit. "mouse"). Photo credit: Katya (CC BY-SA 2.0).
FIG. 11 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 11. — Some of the most popular ostrea (externally shelled molluscs). A, a date mussel (balanus); B, a mussel (musculus – also myax or mitulus); C, a scallop (pectunculus); D, a spiny dye murex (murex or purpura). Detail from a Roman mosaic from Pompeii, 1st century CE (Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Napoli; photo credit: A. Guasparri).
FIG. 7 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 7. — Two mollia (cephalopods), i.e. a sepia (bottom, left) and a polypus (center). Detail from a mosaic in Herculaneum (female thermae floor), Ist century CE. Photo credit: A. Guasparri.
FIG. 10 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 10. — The Roman folk-taxonomy of conchylium2 (i.e. mostly, our externally shelled molluscs). Abbreviations: LF, life-form; LF1+, sublife-form exceeding LF level by one more level; LF2+, sublife-form exceeding LF level by two more levels; LF3+, sublife-form exceeding LF level by three more levels; INT, intermediate;FG, folkgeneric; FS, folk-specific. Symbols: *, prototypical; /, synonymy; (…), ethnotaxonomic ascription only presumed, due to lack of explicit statements in the sources; + (superscript), multiple ethnotaxonomic ascription due to different statements in the sources;?, presumed folk taxon. See each entry in Appendix 1 for details.
FIG. 5 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 5. — Channe (comber). The one depicted is Serranus scriba (Linnaeus, 1758), the painted comber. Detail from a Roman mosaic from Pompeii, 1st century CE (Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Napoli; photo credit: A. Guasparri).
FIG. 2. — A in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 2. — A sparulus (Diplodus annularis (Linnaeus, 1758)), with its "shining golden nape" (Ovid). Photo credit: Waelbi (CC BY-SA 3.0).
FIG. 1 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 1. – Lat. gladius (above) with a detail of the bill (below), i.e. the "referential constraint" encoded in the descriptive name (lit. "sword"). Engraving from Salviani (1554: pl. 39).
FIG. 9. — A in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 9. — A Roman lacertus (in the foreground). The one depicted is a Scomber sp. (Atlantic mackerel). Detail from a Roman mosaic from Pompeii, 1st century CE (Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Napoli; photo credit: A. Guasparri).
FIG. 14 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 14. — The Roman folk-taxonomy of aquatic turtles (mus2, testudo). Abbreviations: FK, folk kingdom; INT, intermediate; FG, folk-generic; FS, folk-specific. Symbols: *, prototypical; /, synonymy; (…), ethnotaxonomic ascription only presumed, due to lack of explicit statements in the sources; […], not in the checklist inasmuch as non-aquatic. See each entry in Appendix 1 for details.
FIG. 17 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 17. — The Roman folk-taxonomy of cete/beluae marinae (lit. "marine beasts"), which comprises various marine animals. Abbreviations: FK, folk kingdom; LF, life-form; FG, folk-generic. Symbols: *, prototypical; /, synonymy; (…), ethnotaxonomic ascription only presumed, due to lack of explicit statements in the sources. See each entry in Appendix 1 for details.
FIG. 13. — A in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 13. — A spiny lobster (locusta), with some externally shelled molluscs: A, a mussel (musculus); B, clams (chemae); C, spiny dye murices (murices or purpurae). Fresco from Herculaneum, 1st century CE (Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Napoli; photo credits: A. Guaspari).
FIG. 16. — A in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 16. — A, European pond turtle Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus, 1758); B, Dermochelys coriacea (Vandelli, 1861). Photo credits: Katya, CC BY-SA 2.0 (A); Claudia Lombard, CC BY 2.0 (B).
FIG. 3. — A in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 3. — A sample of those aquatic animals the Romans would have called piscis, i.e. fish, molluscs and crustaceans. Detail from a Roman mosaic from Pompeii, Ist century CE (Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Napoli; photo credit: A. Guasparri).
FIG. 12 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 12. — The Roman folk-taxonomy of cancer2/crustata (i.e., mostly, our crustaceans). Abbreviations: Abbreviations: LF, life-form; LF1+, sublife-form; INT, intermediate; FG, folk-generic; FS, folk-specific. Symbols: *, prototypical; /, synonymy; (…), ethnotaxonomic ascription only presumed, due to lack of explicit statements in the sources;+ (superscript), multiple ethnotaxonomic ascription due to different statements in the sources. See each entry in Appendix 1 for details.
FIG. 4 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)
FIG. 4. — The Roman folk-taxonomy of mollia (i.e. our cephalopods) and other invertebrates (sponges, jellyfish, etc.). Abbreviations: FK, folk kingdom; LF, lifeform; LF1+, sublife-form; INT, intermediate; FG, folk-generic; FS, folk-specific. Symbols: + (superscript), multiple ethnotaxonomic ascription due to different statements in the sources; /, synonymy;(…), ethnotaxonomic ascription only presumed, due to lack of explicit statements in the sources;?, presumed folk taxon. See each entry in Appendix 1 for details.
Review dataset "Ethnobiology's contributions to sustainability science"
<p><span>This search was performed on April 2023 and allowed us to identify a total of 280 articles published between 2015 and 2022 (Supplementary Material 21). </span></p>
Methodological advances for hypothesis‐driven ethnobiology
<p>Ethnobiology as a discipline has evolved recently to increasingly embrace theory-inspired and hypothesis driven approaches to study why and how local people choose plants and animals they interact with and use for their livelihood. However, testing complex hypotheses or a network of ethnobiological hypotheses is challenging, particularly for datasets with non-independent observations due to species phylogenetic relatedness or socio-relational links between participants. Further, to fully account for the dynamics of local ecological knowledge, it is important to account for the spatially explicit distribution of knowledge, the changes in knowledge, knowledge transmission and use. To promote the use of advanced statistical modeling approaches that address these limitations, we synthesize methodological advances for hypothesis-driven research in ethnobiology while highlighting the need for more figures than tables and more tables than text in ethnobiological literature. We present the ethnobiologicalmotivations for conducting generalized linear mixed-effect modeling, structural equation modeling, phylogenetic generalized least squares, social network analysis, species distribution modeling, and predictive modeling. For each element of the proposed ethnobiologists quantitative toolbox, we present practical applications along with script for a widespread implementation. Because these statistical modeling approaches are rarely taught in most ethnobiological programs but are essential for careers in academia or industry, it is critical to promote specialized workshops organized during annual professional meetings and focused on these advanced methods. By embracing these quantitative modeling techniques without sacrificing qualitative approaches which provide essential context, ethnobiology will further progress toward an expansive interaction with other disciplines.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.