Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
20
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
20 results for “European hare”
Fig. 2 in Allozyme Variability Of Brown Hares (Lepus Europaeus) From The Vojvodina (Serbia), Compared To Central And Southeastern European Populations
Fig. 2. Scatterplots of population-specific dimension stimulus coordinates as obtained from multidimensional scaling (three-dimensional model); A (up): plot of first and second dimensions, B (down): plot of first and third dimensions. Convex polygons encompass the 20 Austrian (black circles and light grey area) and the eight Bulgarian (white circles and dark grey area) populations, respectively. Black cross indicates the Vojvodina (VOJ) population; for acronymes of Austrian populations see
Fig. 1 in Allozyme Variability Of Brown Hares (Lepus Europaeus) From The Vojvodina (Serbia), Compared To Central And Southeastern European Populations
Fig. 1. Unrooted Wagner dendogram based on modified Roger's distances (WRIGHT 1978), representing genetic relationships among brown hares from the Vojvodina (VOJ), 20 Austrian (population acronyme – A), and eight Bulgarian (population acronyme – BL) populations. For acronymes of the Austrian populations see HARTL et al. (1993) and for Bulgarian populations see SUCHENTRUNK et
Fig. 3 in Allozyme Variability Of Brown Hares (Lepus Europaeus) From The Vojvodina (Serbia), Compared To Central And Southeastern European Populations
Fig. 3. Stepwise discriminant analysis (DA): box plots of discriminant scores for the Austrian and Bulgarian populations as well as the discriminant score of the initially unclassified Vojvodina population (cross, VOJ), as obtained from DA of stimulus coordinates from the multidimensional scaling (three-dimensional model). The stippled horizontal line indicates classification of VOJ to the Aus-
Fig. 1 in Spatial, Temporal And Individual Variability In The Autumn Diet Of European Hare (Lepus Europaeus) In Hungary
Fig. 1. Localities of the study areas. Study areas are shown as gray patches, the capital (Budapest) by striped gray area, Lake Balaton and Lake Tisza by black ones. Black lines are Hungarian rivers and
Older than 4 Fig. 1 in Comparison Of Two Age Determination Methods Of The European Hares (Lepus Europaeus Pallas, 1778) In Southwest Lithuania
Older than 4 Fig. 1. The measurements of ulna-radius of the years European hares. 3-4 year old 18 a – juvenile, b- adult; 1 - length of epiphyses ossification in ulna; 2- width of epiphysis cartilage 2-3 year old 8 in ulna; 3- high of epiphyses in in ulna-radius; 4 - width of ulna-radius at the thickest part. Juvenile (under 1 year old)
Figure 5 in The taxonomic status and geographic distribution of the European hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) in Turkey (Mammalia: Lagomorpha)
Figure 5. The group centroids obtained from discriminant functions: 1 = Thracian specimen, 2 = Southwest Anatolian population, 3 = Central and East-Central Anatolian population, 4 = Northeast Anatolian population, 5 = Southeast Anatolian population.
Native forest and proximity to humans are stronger drivers of Brazilian cottontail habitat use than invasive European hare
<p>Human activities and biological invasions have caused unprecedented biodiversity loss over the past 500 years. Proximity to humans drives the spatial distribution of species toward less disturbed habitats. Invasive species can competitively exclude native species, but species may coexist due to different habitat preferences. Here, we investigated how proximity to farms and the presence of the non-native European hare (<em>Lepus europaeus</em>) influence the habitat use by the Brazilian cottontail (<em>Sylvilagus minensis</em>) in southeastern Brazil. We found that the probability of cottontail site use increased with native forest cover and decreased with farmhouse proximity, ranging from 0.05 (<em>SE</em> = 0.02) at sites close to farmhouses (≅ 900 m) with no native forest to 0.70 (<em>SE</em> = 0.15) at sites far from farmhouses (≅ 2500 m) dominated by native forest. Higher risk of harassment and predation by free-roaming dogs and cats may explain the negative effect of farmhouse proximity on cottontail habitat use. We found little evidence for competitive exclusion by the European hare. Instead, our results suggest that the two species spatially segregate due to different habitat preferences. While the European hare more likely uses farmland in its native and non-native range, our results suggest that the Brazilian cottontail is a forest dweller. Although we found only weak evidence of competitive exclusion, we advise caution because invasive species may delay the onset of detrimental effects due to initial low population densities in newly invaded areas as is the case of the European hare in southeastern Brazil.</p>
Influence of multiple predators decreases body condition and fecundity of European hares
<p>We assessed the hypothesised negative correlation between the influence of multiple predators and body condition and fecundity of the European hare, from 13 areas in the Netherlands.</p> <p>Year-round abundance of predators was estimated by hunters. We quantified predator influence as the sum of their field metabolic rates, as this sum reflects the daily food requirements of multiple individuals. We determined the ratio between body mass and hindfoot length of hares as an index of body condition, and the weight of their adrenal gland as a measure of chronic exposure to stress, and we counted the number of placental scars to estimate the fecundity of hares.</p> <p>As hypothesised, we found that the sum of field metabolic rate of predators was negatively correlated with body condition and the number of placental scars, whereas it was positively related to the weight of the adrenal glands. In contrast to the sum of the field metabolic rate, the total number of predators did not affect the investigated risk responses.</p> <p>The sum of the field metabolic rate can be a useful proxy for the influence of multiple predators and takes into account predator abundance, type, body weight, and food requirements of multiple predators.</p> <p>With our findings, our paper contributes to a better understanding of the risk effects of multiple predators on prey fitness. Additionally, we identify a potential contributor to the decline of European hare populations.</p>
Figure 4 in The taxonomic status and geographic distribution of the European hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) in Turkey (Mammalia: Lagomorpha)
Figure 4. Hair scale structure of L. europaeus in Turkey.
Influence of multiple predators decreases body condition and fecundity of European hares
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Native forest and proximity to humans are stronger drivers of Brazilian cottontail habitat use than invasive European hare
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Agroecosystem quality as an essential driver of European hare (<em>Lepus europaeus</em>) population density in contrasting farmlands
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Year-round evaluation of the conservation potential of seed-rich field margins under agri-environmental schemes for farmland birds, European hares, and common hamsters
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
On following pages: 51. Tehuantepec Jackrabbit (Lepus flavigularis); 52. Iberian Hare (Lepus granatensis); 53. European Hare (Lepus europaeus); 54. Broom Hare (Lepus castroviejoi); 55. Corsican Hare (Lepus corsicanus); 56. White-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus townsendii); 57. Arctic Hare (Lepus arcticus); 58. Alaskan Hare (Lepus othus); 59. Mountain Hare (Lepus timidus); 60. Japanese Hare (Lepus brachyurus); 61. Manchurian Hare (Lepus mandshuricus); 62. Korean Hare Lepus coreanus); 63. Chinese Hare (Lepus sinensis). in Leporidae
On following pages: 51. Tehuantepec Jackrabbit (Lepus flavigularis); 52. Iberian Hare (Lepus granatensis); 53. European Hare (Lepus europaeus); 54. Broom Hare (Lepus castroviejoi); 55. Corsican Hare (Lepus corsicanus); 56. White-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus townsendii); 57. Arctic Hare (Lepus arcticus); 58. Alaskan Hare (Lepus othus); 59. Mountain Hare (Lepus timidus); 60. Japanese Hare (Lepus brachyurus); 61. Manchurian Hare (Lepus mandshuricus); 62. Korean Hare Lepus coreanus); 63. Chinese Hare (Lepus sinensis).
On following pages: 18. Omilteme Cottontail (Sylvilagus insonus); 19. Common Tapeti (Sylvilagus brasiliensis); 20 Cottontail (Sylvilagus dice); 23. Mexican Cottontail (Sylvilagus cunicularius); 24. Tres Marias Cottontail (Sylvilagus Robust Cottontail (Sylvilagus robustus); 28. Manzano Mountain Cottontail (Sylvilagus cognatus); 29. Hispid Hare (. Central American Tapeti (Sylvilagus gabbi); 21. Venezuelan Lowland Rabbit (Sylvilagus varynaensis), 22. Dice's graysoni); 25. Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus); 26. Appalachian Cottontail (Sylvilagus obscurus); 27. Caprolagus hispidus); 30. Bunyoro Rabbit (Poelagus marjorita); 31. European Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). in Leporidae
On following pages: 18. Omilteme Cottontail (Sylvilagus insonus); 19. Common Tapeti (Sylvilagus brasiliensis); 20 Cottontail (Sylvilagus dice); 23. Mexican Cottontail (Sylvilagus cunicularius); 24. Tres Marias Cottontail (Sylvilagus Robust Cottontail (Sylvilagus robustus); 28. Manzano Mountain Cottontail (Sylvilagus cognatus); 29. Hispid Hare (. Central American Tapeti (Sylvilagus gabbi); 21. Venezuelan Lowland Rabbit (Sylvilagus varynaensis), 22. Dice's graysoni); 25. Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus); 26. Appalachian Cottontail (Sylvilagus obscurus); 27. Caprolagus hispidus); 30. Bunyoro Rabbit (Poelagus marjorita); 31. European Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).
Figure 6 in The taxonomic status and geographic distribution of the European hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) in Turkey (Mammalia: Lagomorpha)
Figure 6. The dendrogram obtained by results of cluster analysis. Figures indicate the groups: 1 = Thracian specimen 2 = Southwest Anatolian population, 3 = Central and East-Central Anatolian population, 4 = Northeast Anatolian population, 5 = Southeast Anatolian population.
Figure 3 in The taxonomic status and geographic distribution of the European hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) in Turkey (Mammalia: Lagomorpha)
Figure 3. The phallus morphology of Lepus europaeus in Turkey: A) dorsal, B) ventral, C) lateral view.
Figure 2 in The taxonomic status and geographic distribution of the European hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) in Turkey (Mammalia: Lagomorpha)
Figure 2. Characters measured on the skull and the mandible of Turkish hares (L. europaeus). A) dorsal view of skull, B) ventral view of skull, C) lateral view of skull, D) lateral view of the mandible. (A-A'): ONL, (B-B'): PFL, (C-C'): CBL, (D-D'): BL, (E-E'): NL, (F-F'): DL, (G-G'): UML, (H-H'): ZL, (I-I'): PL, (J-J'): FIL, (K-K'): LML, (L-L'): MAL, (M-M'): RB, (N-N'): NB, (O-O'): ZB, (P-P'): MAB, (R-R'): BTB, (S-S'): BBC, (T-T'): HBC (U-U'): MAH.
Figure 1. Collection localities for Turkish hares and 5 in The taxonomic status and geographic distribution of the European hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) in Turkey (Mammalia: Lagomorpha)
Figure 1. Collection localities for Turkish hares and 5 regional populations according to physiography/orography of the study area (□: Thracian population, Δ: Southwest Anatolian population, ●: Central and East-Central Anatolian population, ○: Southeast Anatolian population, ×: Northeast Anatolian population).
On following pages: 51. Tehuantepec Jackrabbit (Lepus flavigularis); 52. Iberian Hare (Lepus granatensis); 53. European Hare (Lepus europaeus); 54. Broom Hare (Lepus castroviejoi); 55. Corsican Hare (Lepus corsicanus); 56. White-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus townsendii); 57. Arctic Hare (Lepus arcticus); 58. Alaskan Hare (Lepus othus); 59. Mountain Hare (Lepus timidus); 60. Japanese Hare (Lepus brachyurus); 61. Manchurian Hare (Lepus in Leporidae
On following pages: 51. Tehuantepec Jackrabbit (Lepus flavigularis); 52. Iberian Hare (Lepus granatensis); 53. European Hare (Lepus europaeus); 54. Broom Hare (Lepus castroviejoi); 55. Corsican Hare (Lepus corsicanus); 56. White-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus townsendii); 57. Arctic Hare (Lepus arcticus); 58. Alaskan Hare (Lepus othus); 59. Mountain Hare (Lepus timidus); 60. Japanese Hare (Lepus brachyurus); 61. Manchurian Hare (Lepus
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.