Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
21
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
21 results for “FAIR assessment”
[Supplementary Information] Can LCA be FAIR? – Assessing the status quo and opportunities for FAIR data sharing
<p>This is the supplementary information related to a the manuscript - 'Can LCA be FAIR?' - Assessing the status quo and opportunities for FAIR data sharing. The purpose of this study is to assess the status quo of data sharing in LCA in relation to the FAIR data principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Re-use).</p><p>The supplementary information consists of three files:</p><p><strong>SI 1</strong> - How the life cycle inventory is shared in relation to the FAIR data principles in 25 peer reviewed LCA journal articles between 2018 -2022.</p><p><strong>SI 2</strong> - Review of ten data management plans of EU Horizon Europe projects in relation to LCA to assess the recommendations on the implementation of FAIR principles.</p>
Scores for calculating automated FAIR assessments in the low carbon energy domain
<p>Results for an automated FAIR assessment of 80 databases from the low carbon energy domain. The assessment was performed with the help of the FAIR maturity evaluation service of Wilkinson et al. The FAIR status with respect to 16 FAIR criteria is listed. The scores are defined to be consistent with the FAIR assessment tool of the Australian Research Data Commons. More details can be found in an additional publication on Zenodo as well as in an upcoming publication by Schwanitz et al.</p>
FAIRness Assessment of Biomedical Data Using Automated Tools (Dataset)
<p>The data were collected as part of a Master's thesis project aimed at evaluating various automated FAIR assessment tools, applying them to biomedical data. The data sets identifiers were gathered as part of the Open Data LoM and IoM incentivization at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, available at <a title="Dataset of the results of data validation for articles from 2021" href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8249758">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8249758</a>, and reused in this project.</p> <p>The data represents cleaned, aggregated, and transformed results obtained from the API services of the following FAIR assessment tools: F-UJI, FAIR Enough, FAIR-Checker, and FAIR EVA.</p> <p>The raw data in .Rdata format will be shared on GitHub repository at <a title="FAIR Tools Analysis" href="https://github.com/anastasiabright/fair-tools-analysis">https://github.com/anastasiabright/fair-tools-analysis</a>.</p>
Assessment of Fair Trade education programs in France: data 2022 from the control group and those from the two experimental fields (the Fair Generation scheme and the Fair Trade Universities Label)
<p><span>see the technical report (period 2019-2021) on researchgate:</span></p> <p><span><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380823820_Evaluation_of_the_fair-trade_education_programs_Results_of_the_first_phase_of_the_Fair_Future_program">(PDF) Evaluation of the fair-trade education programs. Results of the first phase of the Fair Future program (researchgate.net)</a></span></p>
Assessment of Fair Trade education programs in France: high school data (2019-2022)
<p>see the technical report (period 2019-2021) on researchgate:</p> <p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380823820_Evaluation_of_the_fair-trade_education_programs_Results_of_the_first_phase_of_the_Fair_Future_program">(PDF) Evaluation of the fair-trade education programs. Results of the first phase of the Fair Future program (researchgate.net)</a></p> <p> </p>
Assessment of Fair Trade education programs in France: data 2021 from the control group and those from the two experimental fields (the Fair Generation scheme and the Fair Trade Universities Label)
<p><span>see the technical report (period 2019-2021) on researchgate:</span></p> <p><span><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380823820_Evaluation_of_the_fair-trade_education_programs_Results_of_the_first_phase_of_the_Fair_Future_program">(PDF) Evaluation of the fair-trade education programs. Results of the first phase of the Fair Future program (researchgate.net)</a></span></p>
Assessment of Fair Trade education programs in France: control groups for universities (2019-2022)
<p><span>see the technical report (period 2019-2021) on researchgate:</span></p> <p><span><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380823820_Evaluation_of_the_fair-trade_education_programs_Results_of_the_first_phase_of_the_Fair_Future_program">(PDF) Evaluation of the fair-trade education programs. Results of the first phase of the Fair Future program (researchgate.net)</a></span></p>
DATASET ON TEST FAIRNESS IN A MANDATED ASSESSMENT
<p>Data collected for Masters dissertation, as part of the requirements for a Master of Philosophy degree in Measurement and Evaluation at the University of Cape Coast, Ghana.</p>
Assessing Negative Carbon Dioxide Emissions from the Perspective of a National 'Fair Share' of the Remaining Global Carbon Budget: Supplementary Material
<p>Detailed calculations supporting the results in the published paper, <em>Assessing Negative Carbon Dioxide Emissions from the Perspective of a National 'Fair Share' of the Remaining Global Carbon Budget</em>, <a href="https://link.springer.com/journal/11027">Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change</a>, DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09881-6">10.1007/s11027-019-09881-6</a>.</p> <ul> <li><strong>IE-CO2-Quota-2015.ods</strong>: Spreadsheet/workbook in <a href="http://opendocumentformat.org/">Open Document</a> format. Includes table and charts as presented in the paper. Prepared using <a href="http://www.libreoffice.org">LibreOffice</a> (v 5.0+). Should also be accessible also in Microsoft Excel, but some formatting or functionality may be lost.</li> <li><strong>IE-CO2-Quota-2015.ipynb</strong>: Mathematical background and cross-check of detailed calculations in interactive <a href="https://jupyter.org/">Jupyter notebook</a> format (coding in <a href="https://www.python.org/">python</a>).</li> <li><strong>IE-CO2-Quota-2015-ipynb.html</strong>: Static HTML version of the <strong>IE-CO2-Quota-2015.ipynb</strong> suitable for simple viewing/printing.</li> <li><strong>IE-CO2-Quota-2015-ipynb.pdf</strong>: Static version of the <strong>IE-CO2-Quota-2015.ipynb</strong> suitable for simple viewing/printing.</li> </ul>
Datset of the paper entitled "FAIR degree assessment in agriculture datasets using the F-UJI tool".
<p>This is a dataset of our research realised recently, which contains tested results (json files) by F-UJI tool and FAIR assesment reports of tested repositories.</p>
Training Data for "Creating Quality FAIR assessment reports and draft of Data Papers from EML metadata with MetaShRIMPS"
<p>Training Data for "Training Data for "Creating Quality FAIR assessment reports and draft of Data Papers from EML metadata with MetaShRIMPS""</p>
FAIR assessment practices: Experiences from KonsortSWD and BERD@NFDI [Dataset 2 KonsortSWD]
<p>The dataset refers to the poster, which presents FAIR assessment experiences in the context of the two NFDI consortia KonsortSWD and BERD@NFDI, employing the established Research Data Alliance's FAIR Data Maturity Model (RDA-FDMM) and the F-UJI Tool, an automated solution. RDA-FDMM, a manual technique, is more comprehensive, while the automated F-UJI tool effectively detects areas of improvement in metadata presentation that automated means can address. Our experiences highlight the need to examine both machine-readable as well as non-machine-readable elements and acknowledge automated tools' limitations, while valuing their insights. As the research ecosystem advances, metadata representation should be made increasingly machine-readable. We recommend a "FAIR by design" approach from the beginning to ensure alignment with FAIR principles in project outcomes. Continuous assessments during a project’s lifetime promote ongoing research data infrastructure improvements within the NFDI consortia context, contributing to NFDI infrastructure innovation and optimization.</p>
FAIR assessment practices: Experiences from KonsortSWD and BERD@NFDI [Dataset 1 BERD@NFDI]
<p>This dataset evidences the BERD@NFDI results of a poster, which is documented as a related work. The poster presents FAIR assessment experiences in the context of the two NFDI consortia KonsortSWD and BERD@NFDI, employing the established Research Data Alliance's FAIR Data Maturity Model (RDA-FDMM) and the F-UJI Tool, an automated solution. RDA-FDMM, a manual technique, is more comprehensive, while the automated F-UJI tool effectively detects areas of improvement in metadata presentation that automated means can address. Our experiences highlight the need to examine both machine-readable as well as non-machine-readable elements and acknowledge automated tools' limitations, while valuing their insights. As the research ecosystem advances, metadata representation should be made increasingly machine-readable. We recommend a "FAIR by design" approach from the beginning to ensure alignment with FAIR principles in project outcomes. Continuous assessments during a project's lifetime promote ongoing research data infrastructure improvements within the NFDI consortia context, contributing to NFDI infrastructure innovation and optimization.</p>
Assessing the use of HL7 FHIR for implementing the FAIR guiding principles: A case study of the MIMIC-IV emergency department module
<p><strong>Objective</strong> <br>To assess the use of Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR<sup>®</sup>) for implementing the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable guiding principles for scientific data (FAIR). Additionally, present a list of FAIR implementation choices for supporting future FAIR implementations that use FHIR. <br><br><strong>Material and Methods</strong> <br>A case study was conducted on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV Emergency Department dataset (MIMIC-ED), a deidentified clinical dataset converted into FHIR. The FAIRness of this dataset was assessed using a set of common FAIR assessment indicators. <br><br><strong>Results</strong> <br>The FHIR distribution of MIMIC-ED, comprising an implementation guide and demo data, was more FAIR compared to the non-FHIR distribution. The FAIRness score increased from 60 to 82 out of 95 points, a relative improvement of 37%. The most notable improvements were observed in interoperability, with a score increase from 5 to 19 out of 19 points, and reusability, with a score increase from 8 to 14 out of 24 points. A total of 14 FAIR implementation choices were identified. <br><br><strong>Discussion</strong> <br>Our work examined how and to what extent the FHIR standard contributes to FAIR data. Challenges arose from interpreting the FAIR assessment indicators. This study stands out for providing a real-world example of a dataset that was made more FAIR using FHIR. <br><br><strong>Conclusion</strong> <br>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that formally assessed the conformance of a FHIR dataset to the FAIR principles. FHIR improved the accessibility, interoperability, and reusability of MIMIC-ED. Future research should focus on implementing FHIR in research data infrastructures. Keywords: FAIR Guiding Principles, HL7 FHIR, Reusable Data, MIMIC-IV</p>
FAIR Island Community Zenodo Repository Metadata Assessment
<p>A FAIR assessment for the FAIR Island Community Zenodo Repository. </p>
Data of FAIR Assessment in Research Objects with FAIROs
<p>This data has been used to test the FAIRness of Research Objects of the platform ROHub (https://reliance.rohub.org).</p> <p>It is composed by two sets:</p> <p>* Folder research objects: It contains the collection of Research Objects used.</p> <p>* Folder assessment: It contains the assessment of each Research Object using FAIROs.</p>
Assessing the use of HL7 FHIR for implementing the FAIR guiding principles: A case study of the MIMIC-IV emergency department module
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Ferinject® Assessment in Patients With Iron Deficiency and Chronic Heart Failure (FAIR-HF)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00520780. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 10. Publications: 2.
An Assessment of SAFE (Swift Accountable Fair Enforcement) in Cochise County
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01359137. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Angiography-Derived Quantitative Functional Assessment Versus Pressure-Derived FFR and IMR: The FAIR Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06039748. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.