Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
64
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
64 results for “Himachal Pradesh”
Fig. 5 in Factors Affecting Avifaunal Diversity In Selected Agro-Ecosystems Of Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India
Fig. 5. The heatmap transformed data shows the contributions of different feeding guilds of bird species for clustering of habitats. Blue colour represents negative contribution while red represents positive contribution.
Fig. 2 in Late Ordovician scolecodonts and chitinozoans from the Pin Valley in Spiti, Himachal Pradesh, northern India
Fig. 2. Simplified lithological log of the Takche Formation at the Pin River section with the position of samples and the distribution of scolecodont and chitinozoan taxa. Sampling log on the right: solid squares denote productive samples for microfossils, whereas white squares indicate samples barren for scolecodonts and chitinozoans.
Fig. 1. A in Late Ordovician scolecodonts and chitinozoans from the Pin Valley in Spiti, Himachal Pradesh, northern India
Fig. 1. A. Geographic location of the studied area within India. The state of Himachal Pradesh and an enlarged sketch of it with the Lahaul and Spiti district (red) and the Pin Valley (green). B. Geological map of the outcropping area within the Pin Valley in Spiti with the studied section south of Farka Muth indicated. The age of the lithostratigraphic units largely follows Bhargava and Bassi (1998): Haimanta Group (late Proterozoic to middle Cambrian), Sanugba Group including the Thango Formation (Ordovician) and the Tackche Formation (Upper Ordovician to lower Silurian), Kanawar Group (Lower Devonian to lower Permian) with the Lower Devonian Muth Formation at its base, Kuling Group (Permian), Lilang Group (Lower Triassic to Upper Jurassic). C. Photograph of the studied section including the regional lithostratigraphic subdivision to units P/1–P/17. D. Palaeogeographic reconstruction with the assumed position of the Pin River section during the Late Ordovician (redrawn from Scotese 2000).
Fig. 4 in Late Ordovician scolecodonts and chitinozoans from the Pin Valley in Spiti, Himachal Pradesh, northern India
Fig. 4. Photomicrographs of the eunicid polychaete Spitiprion khannai gen. et sp. nov. apparatus preserved on an acetic acid-etched rock surface, CGS PT159_1 (sample P/8/69) from the Katian, Upper Ordovician of the Pin River section (Pin River Valley, Spiti, Himalaya, India). A1, optical microscope photograph; A2, SEM photomicrograph; A3, 3D reconstruction based on images from X-ray micro-computed tomography. The affinity of the maxilla (orange) is yet unknown (could be the second maxilla but diagnostic features are missing). A4, sketch of the maxillary apparatus of the new species of eunicid polychaete Spitiprion khannai. The maxillae white) with dotted lines are assumed according to closely related species but have not been found yet. MI, first maxilla; MII, second maxilla; MIV, fourth maxilla; AL, attachment lamella; BP, basal plate. Scale bars 100 µm.
Figures 1–10 in New records of Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) from Himachal Pradesh, India
Figures 1–10. Adults and labial palp. Adults: 1. Clepsis rurinana Linnaeus, 1758, male; 2. Lumaria probolias (Meyrick, 1907), male; 3. Bactra venosana (Zeller, 1847), male; 4. Bactra furfurana (Haworth, 1811), male; 5. Gibberifera obscura (Diakonoff, 1964), male. Labial palpi, 6. C. rurinana; 7. L. probolias; 8. B. venosana; 9. B. furfurana; 10. G. obscura
Figures 11–15 in New records of Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) from Himachal Pradesh, India
Figures 11–15. Forewing and hind wing venation: 11. Clepsis rurinana Linnaeus, 1758, male; 12. Lumaria probolias (Meyrick, 1907), male; 13. Bactra venosana (Zeller, 1847), male; 14. Bactra furfurana (Haworth, 1811), male; 15. Gibberifera obscura (Diakonoff, 1964), male.
Figures 16–20 in New records of Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) from Himachal Pradesh, India
Figures 16–20. Male genitalia and aedeagus: 16. Clepsis rurinana Linnaeus, 1758; 17. Lumaria probolias (Meyrick, 1907); 18. Bactra venosana (Zeller, 1847); 19. Bactra furfurana (Haworth, 1811); 20. Gibberifera obscura (Diakonoff, 1964)
Figs 1–4 in CYMINDIS (ARROSTUS) BORKINI SP. N., A NEW SPECIES OF GROUND-BEETLES FROM THE HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE, INDIA (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE: LEBIINI)
Figs 1–4. Cymindis (Arrostus) borkini sp. n. 1 – holotype, habitus, dorsal view; 2 – the same, paratype from Spiti Valley; 3 – holotype, median lobe of aedeagus; 4 – the same, paratype from Spiti Valley.
Capture history of Asiatic black bear from Himachal Pradesh, India
<p><span>Robust population estimation of rare or elusive threatened species lacking distinct identifiable features poses a challenge in the field of conservation and management. The Asiatic black bear (<em>Ursus thibetanus</em>) is one such species. Methodological frameworks—such as radiotelemetry, genetic sampling, and camera-trapping—though crucial and advantageous, sometimes require additional information through invasive methods for individual identification</span><span>. </span><span>In this study, w</span><span>e estimated the population density of Asiatic black bear in 2 protected areas in the Indian Himalayan Region without information on individual identification. We conducted the study through a spatial capture–recapture framework using camera traps</span><span> in the summer during May–July 2018 in Daranghati Wildlife Sanctuary (WLS) and May–July 2019 in Rupi Bhaba WLS</span><span>. </span><span>Using the recently developed </span><span>Spatial Presence–Absence model, we estimated g0 (detection probability), σ (scale or movement parameter related to home range of the species), and N (population size) of </span><span>Asiatic black bears</span><span> from the camera-trap data using a Bayesian framework. We estimated a population density of 2.5 individuals/100 km2 (95% Credible Interval = 1.42–9.63 individuals/100 km2) from Daranghati WLS and 0.3 individuals/100 km2 (95% Credible Interval = 0.2–0.7 individuals/100 km2) from Rupi Bhaba WLS. Abundance estimates produced by extrapolating these densities were 11 </span><span>Asiatic black bear</span><span> individuals (95% Credible Interval = 4–27) from Daranghati WLS and 2 </span><span>Asiatic black bear</span><span> individuals (95% Credible Interval = 1–3) from Rupi Bhaba WLS. This is the first population estimate of</span><span> Asiatic black bear</span><span> from the Indian Himalaya without individual identification. </span><span>We recommend that this method, which provides minimal sampling bias and ease of sampling, can be replicated in other mountainous landscapes for a robust density estimation of this species.</span></p>
Figure 1 in New record of Loach fish (Cypriniformes: Nemacheilidae) from Himachal Pradesh, Trans Himalayan Ecosystem, India
Figure 1. Triplophysa tenuicauda (Steindachner, 1866).
Fig. 5 in CYMINDIS (ARROSTUS) BORKINI SP. N., A NEW SPECIES OF GROUND-BEETLES FROM THE HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE, INDIA (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE: LEBIINI)
Fig. 5. The type locality of Cymindis (Arrostus) borkini sp. n. (Photo by L.J. Borkin)
Capture history of Asiatic black bear from Himachal Pradesh, India
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
FIGURE 15–18. Kisaura spp., male genitalia. 15–18, K in Five new species of genus Kisaura Ross (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae) from Himachal Pradesh (India)
FIGURE 15–18. Kisaura spp., male genitalia. 15–18, K. curvata sp. nov.: 15, left lateral; 16, tergum VIII, dorsal; 17, dorsal; 18, right preanal appendage, dorsal.
FIGURE 1–8. Kisaura spp., male genitalia. 1–4, K in Five new species of genus Kisaura Ross (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae) from Himachal Pradesh (India)
FIGURE 1–8. Kisaura spp., male genitalia. 1–4, K. trailaensis sp. nov.: 1, left lateral; 2, tergum VIII, dorsal; 3, dorsal; 4, right preanal appendage, dorsal. 5–8, K. barotensis sp. nov.: 5, left lateral; 6, tergum VIII, dorsal; 7, dorsal; 8, right preanal appendage, dorsal. IX = abdominal segment X; VIII = abdominal segment VIII; X = tergum X.
FIGURE 9–14. Kisaura spp., male genitalia. 9–10, K in Five new species of genus Kisaura Ross (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae) from Himachal Pradesh (India)
FIGURE 9–14. Kisaura spp., male genitalia. 9–10, K. madhyamika Schmid: 9, left lateral; 10, dorsal. 11–12, K. sachensis sp. nov.: 11, left lateral; 12, dorsal. 13–14, K. monospinata sp.nov.: 13, left lateral; 14, dorsal.
Subspecies and Distribution. U. t. thibetanus Cuvier, 1823 — Nepal, NE India, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam. U. t. formosanus Swinhoe, 1864 — Taiwan. U. t. gedrosianus Blanford, 1877 — SE Iran, C & S Pakistan. U. t. japonicus Schlegel, 1857 — Japan. U. t. laniger Pocock, 1932 — Himalayas from Afghanistan to N India (Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh & Uttarakhand). U. t. mupinensis Heude, 1901 — C & S China. U. t. ussuricus Heude, 1901 — Russian Far East, NE China, Korean Peninsula. in Ursidae
Subspecies and Distribution. U. t. thibetanus Cuvier, 1823 — Nepal, NE India, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam. U. t. formosanus Swinhoe, 1864 — Taiwan. U. t. gedrosianus Blanford, 1877 — SE Iran, C & S Pakistan. U. t. japonicus Schlegel, 1857 — Japan. U. t. laniger Pocock, 1932 — Himalayas from Afghanistan to N India (Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh & Uttarakhand). U. t. mupinensis Heude, 1901 — C & S China. U. t. ussuricus Heude, 1901 — Russian Far East, NE China, Korean Peninsula.
Distribution. Verified records based on analyzed specimens are from NE Afghanistan, N Pakistan (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab), and NW & N India (Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, and Sikkim), but distribution likely includes other regions of NW India (Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand) and SW China (S Tibet [= Xizang]); it probably also occurs in Nepal, although further sample comparison is needed. in Vespertilionidae
Distribution. Verified records based on analyzed specimens are from NE Afghanistan, N Pakistan (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab), and NW & N India (Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, and Sikkim), but distribution likely includes other regions of NW India (Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand) and SW China (S Tibet [= Xizang]); it probably also occurs in Nepal, although further sample comparison is needed.
Distribution. WC Afghanistan (Nangarhar and Paktika provinces) and along the S Himalayas of N India (Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand) and W Nepal; it apparently occurs in N Pakistan, but this requires confirmation. in Vespertilionidae
Distribution. WC Afghanistan (Nangarhar and Paktika provinces) and along the S Himalayas of N India (Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand) and W Nepal; it apparently occurs in N Pakistan, but this requires confirmation.
Distribution. Pakistan (Punjab and Sindh) and N India (Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, and West Bengal); it may occur in Maharashtra, WC India. in Vespertilionidae
Distribution. Pakistan (Punjab and Sindh) and N India (Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, and West Bengal); it may occur in Maharashtra, WC India.
Subspecies and Distribution. R.p.pruinosusBlyth,1851—Meghalaya,SAssam,extremeNEArunachalPradesh,Nagaland,Manipur,NTripura,andNMizoram(NEIndia),NWMyanmar,andWYunnan(SWChina). R.p.latoucheiThomas,1915—SEChinaSoftheYangtzeRiver,includingGuizhou,Hunan,Jiangxi,Fujian,Guangxi,andGuangdong. R.p.pannosusThomas,1915—EMyanmar,Thailand,Laos,SCambodia,andVietnam. R.p.senexThomas,1915—NEMyanmarandSYunnan(SWChina). R. p. umbriceps Thomas, 1916 — N Malay Peninsula S to Perak (N Malaysia). Also present in NW India (Himachal Pradesh), but subspecies involved not known. in Spalacidae
Subspecies and Distribution. R.p.pruinosusBlyth,1851—Meghalaya,SAssam,extremeNEArunachalPradesh,Nagaland,Manipur,NTripura,andNMizoram(NEIndia),NWMyanmar,andWYunnan(SWChina). R.p.latoucheiThomas,1915—SEChinaSoftheYangtzeRiver,includingGuizhou,Hunan,Jiangxi,Fujian,Guangxi,andGuangdong. R.p.pannosusThomas,1915—EMyanmar,Thailand,Laos,SCambodia,andVietnam. R.p.senexThomas,1915—NEMyanmarandSYunnan(SWChina). R. p. umbriceps Thomas, 1916 — N Malay Peninsula S to Perak (N Malaysia). Also present in NW India (Himachal Pradesh), but subspecies involved not known.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.