Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in Rediscovery of the rare Star Mountains Worm-eating Snake, Toxicocalamus ernstmayri O'Shea et al., 2015 (Serpentes: Elapidae: Hydrophiinae) with the description of its coloration in life

Fig. 5. Distinguishing Toxicocalamus from Micropechis. (A, A')Holotype of T. ernstmayri (MCZ R-145946) from Wangbin, Western Province, PNG. (B, B') Holotype of T. grandis (BMNH 1946.1.18.34) from Setakwa River, Papua Province, Indonesian New Guinea. (C, C') Yellow phase of Micropechis ikaheka (BMNH 1909.4.30.12) from the FakFak Peninsula, West Papua Province, Indonesian New Guinea. Color-coding of head scalation includes six supralabials (orange), a single anterior temporal (yellow), two posterior temporals (blue), and a temporolabial (red). The individual we report here clearly has the same head scute arrangement as T. ernstmayri.

Fig. 2 in Rediscovery of the rare Star Mountains Worm-eating Snake, Toxicocalamus ernstmayri O'Shea et al., 2015 (Serpentes: Elapidae: Hydrophiinae) with the description of its coloration in life

Fig. 2. The first live individual of Toxicocalamus ernstmayri, observed and photographed in broad daylight at the Ok Tedi Mine, North Fly District, Western Province, Papua New Guinea. (A) The individual's serendipitous crossing of a 747 mm wide tire track allowed an approximation of its total length as near 850 mm. (B) The snake moves in a straight line across open ground. (C) Slower movement across a rubble pile allowed a more detailed examination of head and body scales (see Fig. 4). (D) The individual moving under the tracks of a stationary digger. Photos by Blaise Paivu.

Fig. 3 in Rediscovery of the rare Star Mountains Worm-eating Snake, Toxicocalamus ernstmayri O'Shea et al., 2015 (Serpentes: Elapidae: Hydrophiinae) with the description of its coloration in life

Fig. 3. View of an actively worked area of the Ok Tedi Mine. The observed individual of Toxicocalamus ernstmayri eventually disappeared into the vegetation on the slope in the top left of the photograph. Photo by Blaise Paivu.

Fig. 1 in Rediscovery of the rare Star Mountains Worm-eating Snake, Toxicocalamus ernstmayri O'Shea et al., 2015 (Serpentes: Elapidae: Hydrophiinae) with the description of its coloration in life

Fig. 1. Satellite map (derived from Google Earth) of the southern Star Mountains, North Fly District, Western Province, Papua New Guinea, with yellow dots on the larger map indicating two localities (Wangbin and Ok Tedi Mine), approximately 13 km apart, where Toxicocalamus ernstmayri has been recorded. The main town is Tabubil at the confluence of the Ok Tedi and Ok Mani, which flow into the Fly River. Scale = 5 km. The inset map illustrates the location of the larger map in relationship to the rest of New Guinea.

Fig. 4 in Rediscovery of the rare Star Mountains Worm-eating Snake, Toxicocalamus ernstmayri O'Shea et al., 2015 (Serpentes: Elapidae: Hydrophiinae) with the description of its coloration in life

Fig. 4. Confirming the individual's identification as Toxicocalamus ernstmayri. (A) Close-up of the snake shown in Fig. 2C with insets B, C, and D indicated. (B, B') Head and neck in extreme close-up. Color coding of head scalation includes six supralabials (orange), one anterior temporal (yellow), and two posterior temporals (blue), but no temporolabial (see Fig. 5). The head scutes appear to comply with the colubrid-elapid nine dorsal scute arrangement (i.e., two internasals, two prefrontals, one frontal, two supraoculars, and two parietals; therefore lacking any head scute fusion, although this is difficult to discern from the magnified image with accuracy. (C, C') Based on the visible dorsal scales, the dorsal scale count on the anterior body is 15. The count is achieved by locating the vertebral scale row and counting down to the lowest dorsal scale row (eight scales), doubling the count, and subtracting one scale to account for the single vertebral scale row. (D, D') The dorsal scale count at midbody, performed as described for the previous panel, is also 15.

Figure 15 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 15. Geographical distribution of Pseudonaja nuchalis specimens examined in this study (closed circles) and/or included in Skinner et al.'s (2005) phylogenetic analysis (open circles represent specimens not included in the morphometric analyses). Codes for geographical groups correspond with those in Table 2.

Figure 14 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 14. Geographical distribution of Pseudonaja mengdeni specimens examined in this study (closed circles) and/or included in Skinner et al.'s (2005) phylogenetic analysis (open circles represent specimens not included in the morphometric analyses). Codes for geographical groups correspond with those in Table 2.

Figure 7 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 7. Plot of scores for first and second canonical roots extracted in a discriminant function analysis including all male specimens.

Figure 11 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 11. Geographical distribution of Pseudonaja aspidorhyncha specimens examined in this study (closed circles) and/or included in Skinner et al.'s (2005) phylogenetic analysis (open circles represent specimens not included in the morphometric analyses). Codes for geographical groups correspond with those in Table 2.

Figure 6 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 6. Plots of scores for first and second, and first and third canonical roots extracted in a discriminant function analysis including female P. affinis, P. nuchalis 'Darwin', P. nuchalis 'Orange with black head'-'Pale head, grey nape' and P. nuchalis 'Southern' clade group specimens.

Figure 2 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 2. Pseudonaja mengdeni (SAMA R20981), lateral perspective of head; see Table 1 for abbreviations.

Figure 5 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 5. Plot of scores for first and second canonical roots extracted in a discriminant function analysis including all female specimens.

Figure 9 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 9. Plot of scores for first and second canonical roots extracted in a discriminant function analysis including male P. affinis, P. inframacula and P. textilis clade group specimens.

Figure 13 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 13. Geographical distribution of Pseudonaja inframacula specimens examined in this study (closed circles) and/or included in Skinner et al.'s (2005) phylogenetic analysis (open circles represent specimens not included in the morphometric analyses). Codes for geographical groups correspond with those in Table 2.

Figure 12 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 12. Pseudonaja inframacula (SAMA R38606), ventrolateral perspective of midbody illustrating contrasting sectorial markings on ventrals laterally.

Figure 16 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 16. Geographical distribution of Pseudonaja textilis specimens examined in this study (closed circles) and/or included in Skinner et al.'s (2005) phylogenetic analysis (open circles represent specimens not included in the morphometric analyses). Skinner et al.'s (2005) analysis also included two specimens from Merauke, West Papua (not shown). Codes for geographical groups correspond with those in Table 2.