Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

7

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

7 results for “Keyword Search”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo44/100

Dataset: Comparative evaluation of a keyword based search and semantic search in a data portal for biodiversity research.

<p>Supplementary material for a comparative evaluation of a keyword based search and semantic search in a data portal for biodiversity research. We conducted a relevance evaluation with 6 users over 19 search questions in two search interfaces.</p> <p>The users provided up to five search questions and relevant keywords from their research background. We setup a dataset search over a corpus of ~92,000 randomly selected metadata files from GFBio (<a href="https://www.gfbio.org">https://www.gfbio.org</a>). For each of their own search queries, the users got two result sets presented. The first one displayed results obtained from a keyword search. The second panel contained dataset results from a prototypical semantic search. Instead of results with exact mentions of the query terms, the semantic search also presented related results with synonyms and more specific terms or terms obtained from concept nodes of a higher hierarchy level.</p> <p>Each user rated the relevance of his/her own search queries on a 7-point Likert scale for both search results.<br> In addition, users also assessed the expanded keywords for each question.</p> <p>More information can be found in our publication:</p> <p>L&ouml;ffler, F. and Klan, F. (2016): Does Term Expansion Matter for the Retrieval of Biodiversity Data? in Joint Proceedings of the Posters and Demos Track of the 12th International Conference on Semantic Systems - SEMANTiCS2016 and the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Change &amp; Evolving Semantics (SuCCESS&#39;16), co-located with the 12th International Conference on Semantic Systems (SEMANTiCS 2016),2016, <a href="http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1695/paper2.pdf">http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1695/paper2.pdf</a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →
zenodo36/100

Transparency in Keyword Faceted Search: a dataset of Google Shopping html pages

<p>This dataset contains a collection of around 2,000 HTML pages: these web pages contain the search results obtained in return to queries for different products, searched by a set of synthetic users surfing Google Shopping (US version) from different locations, in July, 2016.</p> <p>Each file in the collection has a name where there is indicated the location from where the search has been done, the userID, and the searched product: &nbsp; <em>no_email_LOCATION_USERID.PRODUCT.shopping_testing.#.html</em></p> <p>The locations&nbsp; are Philippines (PHI), United States (US), India (IN). The userIDs: 26 to 30 for users searching from Philippines, 1 to 5 from US, 11 to 15 from India.</p> <p>Products have been choice following 130 keywords (e.g., MP3 player, MP4 Watch, Personal organizer, Television, etc.).</p> <p>In the following, we describe how the search results have been collected.</p> <p>Each user has a fresh profile. The creation of a new profile corresponds to launch a new, isolated, web browser client instance and open the Google Shopping&nbsp;US web page.</p> <p>To mimic real users, the synthetic users can browse, scroll pages, stay on a&nbsp; page, and click on links.</p> <p>A fully-fledged web browser is used to get the correct desktop version of the website under investigation. This is because websites could be designed to behave according to user agents, as witnessed by the differences between the mobile and desktop versions of the same website.</p> <p>The prices are the retail ones displayed by Google Shopping in US dollars (thus, excluding shipping fees).</p> <p>Several frameworks have been proposed for interacting with web browsers and analysing results from search engines. This research adopts OpenWPM. OpenWPM is automatised with <a href="http://www.seleniumhq.org/">Selenium</a>&nbsp;to efficiently create and manage&nbsp;different users with isolated Firefox and Chrome client instances, each of them with their own associated cookies.</p> <p>The experiments run, on average, 24 hours. In each of them, the software runs on our local server, but the browser&#39;s traffic is redirected to the designated&nbsp;remote servers (i.e., to India), via tunneling in SOCKS proxies. This way, all commands are simultaneously distributed over all proxies. The experiments adopt the Mozilla Firefox browser (version 45.0) for&nbsp; the web browsing tasks and run&nbsp; under Ubuntu 14.04. Also, for each query,&nbsp; we consider the first page of results, counting 40 products. Among them, the focus of the experiments is mostly on the top 10 and top 3 results.</p> <p>Due to connection errors, one of the Philippine profiles have no associated results. Also, for Philippines, a few keywords did not lead to any results: videocassette recorders, totes, umbrellas. Similarly, for US,&nbsp; no results were for totes and umbrellas.</p> <p>The search results have been analyzed in order to check if there were evidence of price steering, based on users&#39; location.</p> <p><strong>One term of usage applies:</strong></p> <p>In any research product whose findings are based on this&nbsp;dataset, please cite</p> <pre>@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/ircdl/CozzaHPN19, author = {Vittoria Cozza and Van Tien Hoang and Marinella Petrocchi and Rocco {De Nicola}}, title = {Transparency in Keyword Faceted Search: An Investigation on Google Shopping}, booktitle = {Digital Libraries: Supporting Open Science - 15th Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries, {IRCDL} 2019, Pisa, Italy, January 31 - February 1, 2019, Proceedings}, pages = {29--43}, year = {2019}, crossref = {DBLP:conf/ircdl/2019}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11226-4\_3}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-11226-4\_3}, timestamp = {Fri, 18 Jan 2019 23:22:50 +0100}, biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/bib/conf/ircdl/CozzaHPN19}, bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org} } </pre> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →
zenodo32/100

Research Data for Beyond Keywords: Intent-Driven Semantic Code Search in Software Ecosystems

<p>This contains the software repository for the intent-enhanced code search engine as well as the baseline code search engine used in the Master Thesis: &#39;Beyond Keywords: Intent-Driven Semantic Code Search in Software Ecosystems&#39;</p>

openJun 2023View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co-occurrence networks

1. Systematic review, meta-analysis, and other forms of evidence synthesis are critical to strengthen the evidence base concerning conservation issues and to answer ecological and evolutionary questions. Synthesis lags behind the pace of scientific publishing, however, due to time and resource costs which partial automation of evidence synthesis tasks could reduce. Additionally, current methods of retrieving evidence for synthesis are susceptible to bias towards studies with which researchers are familiar. In fields that lack standardized terminology encoded in an ontology, including ecology and evolution, research teams can unintentionally exclude articles from the review by omitting synonymous phrases in their search terms. 2. To combat these problems, we developed a quick, objective, reproducible method for generating search strategies that uses text mining and keyword co-occurrence networks to identify the most important terms for a review. The method reduces bias in search strategy development because it does not rely on a predetermined set of articles and can improve search recall by identifying synonymous terms that research teams might otherwise omit. 3. When tested against the search strategies used in published environmental systematic reviews, our method performs as well as the published searches and retrieves gold-standard hits that replicated versions of the original searches do not. Because the method is quasi-automated, the amount of time required to develop a search strategy, conduct searches, and assemble results is reduced from approximately 17-34 hours to under 2 hours. 4. To facilitate use of the method for environmental evidence synthesis, we implemented the method in the R package litsearchr, which also contains a suite of functions to improve efficiency of systematic reviews by automatically deduplicating and assembling results from separate databases.

opencc-zeroJul 2019View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co-occurrence networks

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2019View details →
nasa20/100

KEYWORD SEARCH IN TEXT CUBE: FINDING TOP-K RELEVANT CELLS

KEYWORD SEARCH IN TEXT CUBE: FINDING TOP-K RELEVANT CELLS BOLIN DING*, YINTAO YU*, BO ZHAO*, CINDY XIDE LIN*, JIAWEI HAN*, AND CHENGXIANG ZHAI* Abstract. We study the problem of keyword search in a data cube with text-rich dimension(s) (so-called text cube). The text cube is built on a multidimensional text database, where each row is associated with some text data (e.g., a document) and other structural dimensions (attributes). A cell in the text cube aggregates a set of documents with matching attribute values in a subset of dimensions. A cell document is the concatenation of all documents in a cell. Given a keyword query, our goal is to find the top-k most relevant cells (ranked according to the relevance scores of cell documents w.r.t. the given query) in the text cube. We define a keyword-based query language and apply IR-style relevance model for scoring and ranking cell documents in the text cube. We propose two efficient approaches to find the top-k answers. The proposed approaches support a general class of IR-style relevance scoring formulas that satisfy certain basic and common properties. One of them uses more time for pre-processing and less time for answering online queries; and the other one is more efficient in pre-processing and consumes more time for online queries. Experimental studies on the ASRS dataset are conducted to verify the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approaches.

restrictednotspecifiedApr 2025View details →
nasa20/100

Efficient Keyword-Based Search for Top-K Cells in Text Cube

Previous studies on supporting free-form keyword queries over RDBMSs provide users with linked-structures (e.g.,a set of joined tuples) that are relevant to a given keyword query. Most of them focus on ranking individual tuples from one table or joins of multiple tables containing a set of keywords. In this paper, we study the problem of keyword search in a data cube with text-rich dimension(s) (so-called text cube). The text cube is built on a multidimensional text database, where each row is associated with some text data (a document) and other structural dimensions (attributes). A cell in the text cube aggregates a set of documents with matching attribute values in a subset of dimensions. We define a keyword-based query language and an IR-style relevance model for coring/ranking cells in the text cube. Given a keyword query, our goal is to find the top-k most relevant cells. We propose four approaches, inverted-index one-scan, document sorted-scan, bottom-up dynamic programming, and search-space ordering. The search-space ordering algorithm explores only a small portion of the text cube for finding the top-k answers, and enables early termination. Extensive experimental studies are conducted to verify the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approaches. Citation: B. Ding, B. Zhao, C. X. Lin, J. Han, C. Zhai, A. N. Srivastava, and N. C. Oza, “Efficient Keyword-Based Search for Top-K Cells in Text Cube,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2011.

restrictednotspecifiedMar 2025View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record