Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
35
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
35 results for “Laeta”
Fig. 3 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Fig. 3. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov. A–B. ♂, holotype (MNHNCL 7946). A. Habitus, dorsal. B. Carapace, dorsal. C–D. ♀, paratype (MACN-Ar 30185). C. Carapace, dorsal. D. Left palp, prolateral.
Fig. 2. Loxosceles coquimbo Gertsch, 1967 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Fig. 2. Loxosceles coquimbo Gertsch, 1967, ♂, Los Choros, La Higuera, Elqui (LEULS). A. Palp, prolateral. B. Bulb, prolateral.
Fig. 8 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Fig. 8. Spermathecae, dorsal view (except D, ventral), cleared. A. Loxosceles surca Gertsch, 1967, ♀, Zapahuira, Parinacota, Tarapacá (AMNH). B. Loxosceles coquimbo Gertsch, 1967, ♀, Lomas de Peñuelas, Coquimbo (AMNH). C. Loxosceles pallalla sp. nov., ♀, 6 km S of Cruz Grande, Elqui (AMNH). D. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♀, paratype (MACN-Ar 30185). E. Loxosceles vallenar sp. nov., ♀, holotype (AMNH). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 9 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Fig. 9. Scanning electron microscopy, ♂ metatarsus I. A. Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet, 1849), ♂, Antofagasta, Antofagasta (IBSP 4663). B. Loxosceles surca Gertsch, 1967, ♂, Parinacota, 24 km S of Zapahuira (AMNH). C–D. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♂, Taltal, 4 km E of Paposo, Antofagasta (AMNH).
Fig. 1. Male palps, prolateral. A in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Fig. 1. Male palps, prolateral. A. Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet, 1849), ♂, Antofagasta, Antofagasta (IBSP 4663). B–D. Loxosceles surca Gertsch, 1967. B. ♂, Chusmiza, Huara, Tamarugal, Tarapacá (AMNH). C. Same, bulb, prolateral. D. Same, palp, prolateral. Scale bars A–B = 1 mm.
Fig. 7 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Fig. 7. Loxosceles pallalla sp. nov., ♂, holotype, La Herradura, Elqui, IV Región de Coquimbo, Chile (AMNH). A. Palp, prolateral. B. Palp, retrolateral. C. Bulb, prolateral. D. Bulb, subventral.
Fig. 6 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Fig. 6. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♂, Taltal, 4 km E of Paposo, Antofagasta (AMNH), SEM. A–D. Left palp. A. Prolateral. B. Detail of embolus, prolateral. C. Bulb, retrolateral. D. Cymbium, retrolateral.
Fig. 4 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Fig. 4. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♂, holotype (MNHNCL 7946). A–D. Left palp. A. Prolateral. B. Dorsal. C. Bulb, prolateral. D. Bulb, retrolateral.
Fig. 10 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Fig. 10. Geographic distribution records of species of Loxosceles in Chile. Records of L. laeta (Nicolet, 1849) are based on the material examined in this study and on Gertsch (1967). Stars under L. surca Gertsch, 1967 and L. coquimbo Gertsch, 1967 are records from Gertsch (1967).
Fig. 5 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Fig. 5. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♀, paratype (MACN-Ar 30185). A–B. Spermathecae. A. Dorsal. B. Ventral.
Linked collectors and determiners for: On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/d5b314e8-8740-4134-b113-03bfa693b3c0">https://bionomia.net/dataset/d5b314e8-8740-4134-b113-03bfa693b3c0</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/d5b314e8-8740-4134-b113-03bfa693b3c0">https://gbif.org/dataset/d5b314e8-8740-4134-b113-03bfa693b3c0</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Even more oak species in Mexico? Genetic structure and morphological differentiation support the presence of at least two specific entities within Quercus laeta
<p>Differentiation among populations, sometimes despite ongoing gene exchange, is a key step in speciation. Therefore, comparison of intra- and interspecific differentiation patterns is of great significance to understanding speciation. The genus <em>Quercus </em>is an interesting system to test speciation models in the presence of gene flow, due to its weak interspecific reproductive barriers. The aim of the present study was to characterize the degree and pattern of morphological and genetic differentiation among different morphotypes in the white oak <em>Quercus laeta</em>, some corresponding to the previously described species <em>Q</em>. <em>centralis</em>, <em>Q</em>. <em>laeta</em>, <em>Q</em>. <em>prinopsis </em>and <em>Q</em>. <em>transmontana</em>, as well as geographically structured variation within <em>Q</em>. <em>transmontana </em>not previously described. Our goal was to evaluate if some of these can be considered distinct specific entities or are rather part of a continuum of variation. Nine microsatellite loci and two intergenic regions of chloroplast DNA were analyzed. Morphological differences were evaluated using geometric morphometrics. Chloroplast DNA showed low differentiation, suggesting introgression or sharing of ancestral haplotypes among the <em>Q</em>. <em>laeta </em>morphotypes. Nuclear microsatellites indicated differentiation into two distinct main genetic groups, which were congruent with morphological differentiation. In conclusion, nuclear markers and morphological variation suggest the existence of at least two different entities within <em>Q</em>. <em>laeta</em>.</p>
Fig. 6. Scolia laeta Eversmann, 1849 in The types of Scoliidae (Hymenoptera), described by Eduard Eversmann, with some taxonomic notes and checklist of Russian Scoliidae
Fig. 6. Scolia laeta Eversmann, 1849, holotype, ♂. Habitus and labels.
Fig. 1 in Sobre la presencia de la araña de rincón Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet, 1849) (Araneae: Sicariidae) en Magallanes (Chile).
Fig. 1.- Ejemplar hembra de L. laeta colectado en Punta Arenas, habitus.
Figs. 4-5 in Sobre la presencia de la araña de rincón Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet, 1849) (Araneae: Sicariidae) en Magallanes (Chile).
Figs. 4-5.- Habitus de: 4.- Tegenaria domestica. 5.- Tomopisthes horrendus.
Even more oak species in Mexico? Genetic structure and morphological differentiation support the presence of at least two specific entities within Quercus laeta
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
FIGURES 1–5 in A new species of Loxosceles of the laeta group from Brazil (Araneae: Sicariidae)
FIGURES 1–5. Loxosceles puortoi. (1–2) Carapace. 1, paratype female; 2, holotype male. (3–4) right male palp (holotype). 3, retrolateral view; 4, prolateral view. 5, female paratype, spermathecae. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figure 2 in Discovery of the male of Loxaulus hyalinus, and implications for the sympatric species Loxaulus laeta (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Cynipini): an integrative taxonomical case of species delimitation
Figure 2. Overview of molecular results. Left: best maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on three genes (COI, cytb and 28SD2). Black squares at nodes indicate both ≥95% posterior probability (Bayesian inference) and ≥80% bootstrap (ML) node support. White squares at nodes indicate both <95% posterior probability (Bayesian inference) and ≥80% bootstrap (ML) node support. Right: Sexual generation for each terminal indicated; grey bars indicate the assignations of individuals to candidate species for the ABGD, bPTP, BPP, and BFD approaches. Striped grey bars indicate the omission of the signalled taxa in some of the analyses.
Figure 1 in Discovery of the male of Loxaulus hyalinus, and implications for the sympatric species Loxaulus laeta (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Cynipini): an integrative taxonomical case of species delimitation
Figure 1. SEM pictures of Loxaulus hyalinus male: (a) head in frontal view, (b) head in dorsal view, (c) head in posterior view, (d) antenna, (e) mesosoma in dorsal view, (f) head and mesosoma in lateral view, (g) radial cell, (h) metasoma.
Figure 3 in Discovery of the male of Loxaulus hyalinus, and implications for the sympatric species Loxaulus laeta (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Cynipini): an integrative taxonomical case of species delimitation
Figure 3. Summarised tree of the terminals (A–D) and nodes (I–III) recovered from the BPP analyses. Results of the BPP analyses for the three subsets used (1–3). For each subset, the four models of priors (M1–M4) are given, with varying values of population size (θ) and divergence time (τ). Each model was iterated by changing between two algorithms, A0 and A1. The first rows correspond to the best trees recovered for each analysis. The last rows for each subset show the posterior probability support for every node (I–III) in the given subset.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.