Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
8
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
8 results for “Land suitability”
Land use-based Adaptation and Mitigation Solution (LAMS) suitability maps final version
<div>These maps provide the suitable area (maximum available area) for the potential implementation of the specific proposed LAMS. The suitability map includes 4 classes: not suitable (0), least suitable (1), moderately suitable (2) and most suitable (3). Maps for 13 different LAMS (from the LAMS catalogue V1-1) have been developed for the six RethinkAction case studies, when possible. This v2 includes the metadata.</div> <div>The codes and the names of the LAMS are the following:</div> <div>LAMS03-EstGra: Establishment (conversion to) of permanent grassland</div> <div>LAMS14-SpaPla: Spatial planning for the sustainable deployment of energy on land</div> <div>LAMS15-PhoPla: Photovoltaic plants</div> <div>LAMS21-AgrPla: Agrovoltaic farms</div> <div>LAMS22-IncFor: Increased portion of forests included under protected areas</div> <div>LAMS23-RefAff: Reforestation/afforestation</div> <div>LAMS31-UrbSpr: Limiting urban sprawl</div> <div>LAMS32-GreUrb: Establishment and maintenance of green urban ecosystems</div> <div>LAMS44-IncCul: Increase in cultivated area</div> <div>LAMS49-FloSol: Floating solar photovoltaic panels in water bodies</div> <div>LAMS50-SolPan: Solar panels in rooftops/buildings</div> <div>LAMS55-WatHar: Water harvesting: collect and store rain water in reservoirs</div> <div>LAMS59-LanMan: Land management of solar photovoltaic systems land</div>
Global Agricultural Land Resources – A High Resolution Suitability Evaluation and Its Perspectives until 2100 under Climate Change Conditions (v3.0)
<p><strong>Agricultural land resources – a global suitability evaluation (v3.0)</strong></p> <p>Local climate, soil and topography determine the conditions under which agricultural crops are suitable for growth or not. The methodology uses a fuzzy logic approach that is described in Zabel et al. (2014). The approach is based on Liebig's law of the minimum. Accordingly, plant suitability is determined not by total available resources, but by the scarcest resource. The limiting factor depends on the local environmental conditions and the crop-specific requirements, that are taken from literature. </p> <p><strong>Determining Agricultural Suitability</strong></p> <p>Agricultural suitability is calculated for each of 5 climate models (GFDL, HadGEM2, IPSL, MIROC and NorESM1) from the AR5 ISIMIP fast track protocol. Daily climate model data for temperature, precipitation and solar radiation are statistically downscaled to 30 arc seconds spatial resolution. A monthly bias-correction is applied using WorldClim data. The provided suitability data refers to the model median over the 5 climate simulations. Soil data is taken from the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) v1.21. Considered soil properties are texture, proportion of coarse fragments and gypsum, base saturation, pH content, organic carbon content, salinity, sodicity. Soil depth is taken into account according to Pelletier et al. (2015). Topography data is applied from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). Irrigation has strong impact on the suitability of crops and is considered in this approach.</p> <p><strong>Agricultural Suitability</strong></p> <p>The agricultural suitability data is provided at a spatial resolution of 30 arc seconds (approximately 1 km<sup>2</sup> at the equator). The dataset contains four time periods (1980-2009, 2010-2039, 2040-2069, 2070-2099) and two climate change scenarios (RCP2.6 and RCP 8.5). Agricultural suitability is provided for rainfed conditions and for irrigated conditions seperately. Additionally, we provide a dataset in which the current irrigation areas according to Maier et al. (2018) are applied. The suitability is provided for 23 food, feed, fibre, and 1st and 2nd generation bio-energy crops. An 'overall suitability' is provided for all crops that considers the most suitable crop on each pixel. Additionally, we provide a dataset excluding 2nd generation bioenergy crops (18-23) from the overall aggregation of crops.</p> <table> <caption><strong>Food, feed, fiber and first-generation bioenergy crops</strong></caption> <tbody> <tr> <td>Barley</td> <td>Potato</td> <td>Sugarbeet</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Cassava</td> <td>Rapeseed</td> <td>Sugarcane</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Groundnut</td> <td>Rice</td> <td>Sunflower</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Maize</td> <td>Rye</td> <td>Summer wheat</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Millet</td> <td>Sorghum</td> <td>Winter wheat</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Oilpalm</td> <td>Soybean</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <caption> <p><strong>Second-generation bioenergy crops</strong></p> </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td>Jatropha</td> <td>Reed canary grass</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Miscanthus</td> <td>Eucalyptus</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Switchgrass</td> <td>Willow</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Growing Season Adaptation</strong></p> <p>The agricultural suitability considers the adaptation of the growing season. For each pixel and crop, the growing season is optimized throughout the year, taking the annual course of precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation as well as their interplay, into account.</p> <p><strong>Most Suitable Crop</strong></p> <p>The most suitable crop for each pixel is provided in the data. Please note that a value of 126 means that no crop suitable and 127 means that multiple crops have the same suitability.</p> <p><strong>Further information</strong></p> <p>Detailled information are available in the following publications:</p> <p>Zabel F, Putzenlechner B, Mauser W (2014) Global Agricultural Land Resources – A High Resolution Suitability Evaluation and Its Perspectives until 2100 under Climate Change Conditions. PLOS ONE 9(9): e107522. doi: <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107522">10.1371/journal.pone.0107522</a></p> <p>Cronin, J., Zabel, F., Dessens, O., Anandarajah, G. (2020): Land suitability for energy crops under scenarios of climate change and land-use. GCB Bioenergy, 12(8). doi: <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gcbb.12697">10.1111/gcbb.12697</a></p> <p>Schneider. J.M., Zabel, F., Mauser, W. (2022): Global inventory of suitable, cultivable and available cropland under different scenarios and policies. Scientific Data 9, 527. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01632-8">10.1038/s41597-022-01632-8</a></p> <p>Meier, J., Zabel, F., Mauser, W. (2018): A global approach to estimate irrigated areas – a comparison between different data and statistics. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1119–1133, 2018. doi: <a href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/1119/2018/">10.5194/hess-22-1119-201</a></p> <p>Pelletier, J. D., Broxton, P. D., Hazenberg, P., Zeng, X., Troch, P. A., Niu, G.-Y., Williams, Z., Brunke, M. A., and Gochis, D. (2016), A gridded global data set of soil, immobile regolith, and sedimentary deposit thicknesses for regional and global land surface modeling, <em>J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.</em>, 8, 41– 65, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000526">10.1002/2015MS000526</a>.</p> <p><strong>Improvements in v3.0</strong></p> <p>Compared to the previous version (<a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3748350">v2.0</a>), this version (v3.0) <em>uses updated input data for soil (HWSD v1.21) and high resolution irrigated areas (Maier et al. 2018), and additionally considers soil depth (Pelletier et al. 2016). Moreover, the suitability is calculated for an ensemble of 5 climate models, and is available for more crops, including a number of second generation bioenergy crops.</em></p> <p><strong>Contact</strong></p> <p>Please contact: Dr. Florian Zabel, <a href="mailto:f.zabel@lmu.de">f.zabel@lmu.de</a>, Department of Geography, LMU München (<a href="http://www.geografie.uni-muenchen.de">www.geografie.uni-muenchen.de</a>)</p>
Data from: Northern pikas experience reduced occupancy due to surrounding human land use despite the occurrence of suitable microclimates
<p>Aim: Despite warming temperatures, some species are found persisting at the trailing edge of their distribution. Microclimates provided by complex topography are considered a key factor in these cases of range stationarity, buffering stress from exposure to warming and enabling persistence. However, for species with trailing-edges located in human-modified landscapes, refugial conditions provided by microclimates could be disrupted by human activities. Here, we aimed to understand the determinants of trailing-edge occupancy for a small lagomorph found in rocky patches harboring cool microclimates.</p> <p>Location: Hokkaido Island, Japan</p> <p>Taxon: Northern pika (<em>Ochotona hyperborea</em>)</p> <p>Methods: We surveyed the occupancy of northern pikas across a wide elevational gradient (350–2200 m) for two consecutive summers. Ambient air and microhabitat (i.e., rock interstices) thermal conditions were measured to assess their relationship. We then analyzed their effects on occupancy at two nested spatial scales: (1) whole-distribution, and (2) at identified trailing-edge sites where we explored the effects of microclimates and surrounding human activities (i,e., distance to nearest road and area of human land use such as plantation forests or agricultural fields).</p> <p>Results: Overall, rock interstices exhibited cooler conditions than ambient air with temperature differences of 1–2 ºC. The overall distribution of northern pikas was affected by both mean ambient temperature and microhabitat availability, with warmer (lower elevation) sites with less microhabitats corresponding to the trailing edge of its distribution. Interestingly, trailing edge occupancy patterns were best explained by the negative effect of surrounding human land despite the existence of suitable microclimates in the rocky patches.</p> <p>Main conclusions: Our findings suggest that the local refugial conditions supported by cool microclimates are likely to be disrupted by the effects of human land at the larger landscape scale. This result highlights the importance of considering the effects of human activities and landscape alteration for effective microrefugia conservation. --</p>
Data from: Northern pikas experience reduced occupancy due to surrounding human land use despite the occurrence of suitable microclimates
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Long-term human land-use change throughout Southeast Asia reshapes the distribution of suitable habitat for a human-commensal bird species
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Global Agricultural Land Resources – A High Resolution Suitability Evaluation and Its Perspectives until 2100 under Climate Change Conditions (v2.0)
<p><strong>Agricultural land resources – a global suitability evaluation</strong></p> <p><em>An inventory is required on the changing potentially suitable areas for agriculture under changing climate conditions. Within the context of the GLUES project, researchers at the Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU) investigated the global agricultural suitability of land under changing climate conditions at high spatial resolution. The growing demand for food, feed, fiber and bioenergy increases pressure on land and causes land use/cover change and trade-offs between different uses of land and ecosystem services. In order to ensure food security, agricultural potentials need to be used more efficiently in the future. Therefore, the agricultural suitability of land are important information e.g. in order to identify todays suitable areas and possible future changes. The potential suitability of todays forested and protected areas can be used to identify possible hotspots of land use/cover change. Therefore, LMU is working on improving the knowledge of global agricultural potentials of land and better understanding the interdependencies between ecological and socio-economic systems which are driving land use/cover change.</em></p> <p><strong>Determining Agricultural Suitability</strong></p> <p>Local climate, soil and topography determine the available energy, water and nutrient supply for agricultural crops and thus their natural suitability. In order to allow for computing the natural agricultural constraints on the globe at 30 arc seconds (1km) spatial resolution, the following high resolution data were applied:</p> <p>Daily data for temperature, precipitation and solar radiation from the global climate model ECHAM5. Soil data comes from the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD). Considered soil properties are texture, proportion of coarse fragments and gypsum, base saturation, pH content, organic carbon content, salinity, sodicity. Topography data was applied from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). Irrigation has strong impact on the crop’s suitability. It is considered on todays irrigated areas as given by the FAO Aquastat Global Maps of Irrigated Areas (GMIA) dataset. The determinant factors are contrasted with the crop-specific requirements, using a fuzzy-logic approach. The crop requirements are taken from literature.</p> <p><strong>Agricultural Suitability</strong></p> <p>General agricultural suitability at a spatial resolution of 30 arcsec, considering rainfed conditions and irrigation on currently irrigated areas. The agricultural suitability represents for each pixel the maximum suitability value of the considered 16 plants. The dataset contains four time periods (1961-1990, 1981-2010, 2011-2040, 2071-2100).</p> <p><strong>Suitability Change due to Climate until 2100</strong></p> <p>Change in agricultural suitability and crop suitability due to climate change for SRES A1B scenario conditions for 16 crops between 1981-2010 and 2071-2100 at a spatial resolution of 30 arcsec.</p> <p><strong>Multiple Cropping</strong></p> <p>Potential number of suitable crop cycles for 16 crops at a spatial resolution of 30 arcsec, considering rainfed conditions and irrigation on currently irrigated areas. The dataset contains four time periods (1961-1990, 1981-2010, 2011-2040, 2071-2100).</p> <p><strong>Growing Cycle</strong></p> <p>Start of the growing cycle for 16 crops at a spatial resolution of 30 arcsec, considering rainfed conditions and irrigation on currently irrigated areas. In case of multiple cropping, the start of the first growing cycle is shown. The dataset contains four time periods (1961-1990, 1981-2010, 2011-2040, 2071-2100).</p> <p><strong>Further information</strong></p> <p>Detailled information are available in the following publication:<br> Zabel F., Putzenlechner B., Mauser W. (2014): <strong>Global agricultural land resources – a high resolution suitability evaluation and its perspectives until 2100 under climate change conditions. </strong> Online available: <a href="http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107522">PLOS ONE</a>. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107522</p> <p><strong>Improvements in v2.0</strong></p> <p>Compared to previous versions, v2.0 uses updated input data for soil and minor improvements of the statistical downscaling and the bias correction of the climate model data.</p> <p><strong>Contact</strong></p> <p>Please contact: Dr. Florian Zabel, <a href="mailto:f.zabel@lmu.de">f.zabel@lmu.de</a>, Department für Geographie, LMU München (<a href="http://www.geografie.uni-muenchen.de">www.geografie.uni-muenchen.de</a>)</p>
Supplementary data: "Evaluación de Tierras: Elaboración de un modelo de aptitud de uso agrícola para Kernza (Thinopyrum intermedium) en agroecosistemas con distinto grado de artificialización en el Partido de Azul, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina"/"Land Evaluation: an agricultural suitability model for Kernza (Thinopyrum intermedium) in agroecosystems with different land uses intensities in Azul distric, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
<p>This is the data generated for the achievement of the objectives of my thesis and publications.</p>
Supplementary data: "Evaluación de Tierras: Elaboración de un modelo de aptitud de uso agrícola para Kernza (Thinopyrum intermedium) en agroecosistemas con distinto grado de artificialización en el Partido de Azul, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina" (II) /"Land Evaluation: an agricultural suitability model for Kernza (Thinopyrum intermedium) in agroecosystems with different land uses intensities in Azul distric, Buenos Aires, Argentina. (II)
<p>Decision trees for the land suitability model for Kernza.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.