Find research datasets worth reusing

Figs. 1–16 in Scirtothrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) described from Mangifera indica (Anacardiaceae) in Mexico

Figs. 1–16. Scirtothrips pronota (1–15, copied from Johansen & Mojica-Guzman 1999). 1, citri; 2, mangonoxius; 3, danieltelizi; 4, mangoaffinis; 5, willihennigi; 6, mangofrequentis; 7, mangiferaffinis; 8, mangoinfestans; 9, apatzinganensis; 10, martingonzalezi; 11, novomangorum; 12, dieterenkerlini; 13, mangorum; 14, dieterenkerlini; 15, mangorum; 16, citri.

Figs. 17–28. Scirtothrips pronota. 17–22 in Scirtothrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) described from Mangifera indica (Anacardiaceae) in Mexico

Figs. 17–28. Scirtothrips pronota. 17–22 Paratype females on loan from Johansen: 17, danieltelizi; 18, mangoaffinis; 19, willihennigi; 20, mangofrequentis; 21, mangiferaffinis; 22, mangoinfestans. 23–28 Recent slide mounts: 23, citri from citrus at Riverside, California; 24–25, citri from mango at Riverside, California; 26-28, citri from mango at Chiapas, Mexico.

Figs. 7 A-H in Efeito fitotóxico de Mangifera indica L. (Anacardiaceae) em diferentes Horários de coletA

Figs. 7 A-H. Alterações cromossômicas observadas nas diversas concentrações do extrato aquoso bruto de manga preparado com folhas coletadas às 12h. A. Célula binucleada; B. Pontes anafásicas; C. Célula portadora de micronúcleo; D, E. Metáfase com aderência e perdas cromossômicas; F. Ponte telofásica; G. Anáfase multipolar com pontes anafásicas; H. Célula com micronúcleo. Barra = 1 µm

Figs. 8 A-D in Efeito fitotóxico de Mangifera indica L. (Anacardiaceae) em diferentes Horários de coletA

Figs. 8 A-D. Divisões celulares do controle nos experimentos 7h30min e 12h. A. Prófase; B. Metáfase; C. Anáfase; D. Telófase. Barra = 1 µm

Figs. 6 A-T in Efeito fitotóxico de Mangifera indica L. (Anacardiaceae) em diferentes Horários de coletA

Figs. 6 A-T. Anomalias cromossômicas observadas nas diversas concentrações do extrato aquoso bruto de manga com folhas coletadas às 7h30min. A. Separação precoce de cromátides; B. Célula interfásica com um micronúcleo; C. Pontes anafásicas; D. Pró-metáfase com perda de cromossomos; E. Anáfase multipolar; F. Célula interfásica com perda de material genético; G. Perda cromossômica; H. Quebra do fuso acromático; I. Anáfase com desorganização dos cromossomos; J. Célula em C-metáfase; K. Perda cromossômica e aderência; L. Ponte anafásica e quebras de cromossomos; M. Metáfase desorganizada com aderência cromossômica; N. Metáfase com atraso cromossômico; O. Perda de vários cromossomos na metáfase; P. Anáfase multipolar com ponte anafásica; Q. Metáfase com atraso cromossômico; R. Anáfase com micronúcleo; S. Pontes anafásicas; T. Ponte telofásica. Barra = 1 µm

Fig. 5 in Efeito fitotóxico de Mangifera indica L. (Anacardiaceae) em diferentes Horários de coletA

Fig. 5. Índice mitótico das células de alface sobre o efeito das diferentes concentrações do do extrato aquoso bruto de M. indica coletadas em dois horários. (**) significativo ao nível de 1% de probabilidade (p<0,01). As médias seguidas pela mesma letra não diferem estatisticamente entre si pelo teste de Tukey a 5% de probabilidade.

Fig. 3 in Efeito fitotóxico de Mangifera indica L. (Anacardiaceae) em diferentes Horários de coletA

Fig. 3. Biometria dos caulículos de alface sobre o efeito das diferentes concentrações do extrato aquoso bruto de M. indica coletadas em dois horários. (**) significativo ao nível de 1% de probabilidade (p<0,01). As médias seguidas pela mesma letra não diferem estatisticamente entre si pelo teste de Tukey a 5% de probabilidade.

Fig. 2 in Efeito fitotóxico de Mangifera indica L. (Anacardiaceae) em diferentes Horários de coletA

Fig. 2. Índice de velocidade de germinação das sementes de Lactuca sativa L. (alface) submetidas às diversas concentrações do extrato aquoso bruto de M. indica coletadas em dois horários. (**) significativo ao nível de 1% de probabilidade (p<0,01). As médias seguidas pela mesma letra não diferem estatisticamente entre si pelo teste de Tukey a 5% de probabilidade.

Fig. 1 in Efeito fitotóxico de Mangifera indica L. (Anacardiaceae) em diferentes Horários de coletA

Fig. 1. Número de sementes germinadas das sementes de Lactuca sativa L. (alface) submetidas às diversas concentrações do extrato aquoso bruto de M. indica coletadas em dois horários. (**): significativo ao nível de 1% de probabilidade (p<0,01). As médias seguidas pela mesma letra não diferem estatisticamente entre si pelo teste de Tukey a 5% de probabilidade.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Figure 2 in Effect of the essential oil from the latex of the fruit Mangifera indica L. on Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari, Tetranychidae)

Figure 2 Egg laying preference (mean ± SE) ofTetranychus urticaeexposed toMangifera indica oils and selected constituents for 48 hours. *significantly different (p<0.05).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →

Figure 1 in Biodiversity of mites in mango orchards (Mangifera indica L.) and evaluation of some mineral and essential oils against Cisaberoptus kenyae Keifer (Acari: Eriophyidae) management

Figure 1 The homogenous of some species during 2020–2021 year.

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →

Advancing Wood Quality with Convective Vacuum Drying and its Influence on Multiple Properties of Mangifera Indica L. Timber

This study explores the impact of convective vacuum drying on the quality of Mangifera indica L. timber, focusing on key parameters such as drying rate, time, and alterations in mechanical, physical, and anatomical properties. By significantly reducing moisture content, this method aims to enhance basic density, reduce volumetric shrinkage, and improve mechanical strength. Additionally, the study examines potential anatomical changes, including vessel and fiber dimensions, and assesses the overall suitability of convective vacuum drying for improving timber quality for industrial applications.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Table 2 in Effects of different combinations of N, P and K at different time interval on vegetative, reproductive, yield and quality traits of mango (Mangifera Indica. L) cv. Dusehri

Table 2. Effect of different fertilizer combinations of N, P and K on reproductive physiology of mango cv. Dusehri.<table><tbody><tr><th>Treatments</th><th>Growth size (mm)</th><th>Total No. of Panicle/Tree</th><th>Total no. of flowers / Panicle</th><th>Sex Ratio (%)</th><th>Fruit Drop (%)</th><th>Fruit Retention (%)</th><th>Total no. of fruit/tree</th><th>Yield (Kg/Tree)</th><th>Fruit Length (cm)</th><th>Fruit Weight (g)</th><th>Pulp Weight (g)</th><th>Stone Weight (g)</th><th>Peel Weight (g)</th><th>TSS (%)</th><th>Total Acidity (%)</th><th>TSS/Acid Ratio</th><th>Vit. C (mg/100 mL)</th><th>Total Sugar (%)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>T1 (Control)</th><td>149.34d ± 3.89</td><td>397.67h ± 3.51</td><td>543.21h ± 3.61</td><td>51.17c ± 2.10</td><td>94.85a ± 1.40</td><td>1.83e ± 0.15</td><td>186.72g ± 4.51</td><td>40.01e ± 4.51</td><td>15.4b ± 3.17</td><td>155.15e ± 6.34</td><td>76.30g ± 2.22</td><td>24.14f ± 2.02</td><td>28.61f ± 1.86</td><td>20.29d ± 1.05</td><td>0.52a ± 0.005</td><td>22.43</td><td>31.26f ± 0.92</td><td>14.52c ± 0.25</td></tr><tr><th>T2 (N)</th><td>166.67b ± 4.47</td><td>508.57f ± 4.51</td><td>612.47f ± 4.58</td><td>54.42bc ± 1.05</td><td>94.86a ± 2.41</td><td>5.57d ± 0.57</td><td>213.34f ± 3.06</td><td>52.70cd ± 4.50</td><td>16.4b ± 3.11</td><td>175.50bc ± 5.50</td><td>82.41f ±1.90</td><td>30.04de ± 2.21</td><td>33.70e ± 1.38</td><td>21.06cd ± 0.95</td><td>0.49b ± 0.004</td><td>25.16</td><td>42.22c ± 1.18</td><td>15.24bc ± 0.41</td></tr><tr><th>T3 (P)</th><td>156.26cd ± 4.85</td><td>467.33g ± 4.04</td><td>593.34g ± 3.61</td><td>53.57bc ± 1.01</td><td>91.72ab± 2.51</td><td>8.82bc ± 0.72</td><td>241.40e ± 4.04</td><td>50.14d ± 5.03</td><td>18.3ab ± 2.75</td><td>169.24cd ± 5.41</td><td>85.23f ± 1.96</td><td>28.50e ± 2.00</td><td>35.62de ±1.94</td><td>22.07bc ± 1.10</td><td>0.45c ± 0.005</td><td>29.13</td><td>39.37d ± 0.98</td><td>15.82bc ± 0.29</td></tr><tr><th>T4 (K)</th><td>164.80bc ± 4.95</td><td>634.57c ± 4.51</td><td>730.19c ± 4.56</td><td>57.39bc ± 2.38</td><td>94.26ab ± 1.79</td><td>5.83d ± 0.48</td><td>278.33d ± 3.51</td><td>55.23cd ± 4.50</td><td>19.3ab ± 2.99</td><td>182.01b ± 5.47</td><td>99.92e ± 1.89</td><td>31.26e ± 1.76</td><td>40.84c ± 1.35</td><td>21.41cd ± 1.25</td><td>0.37d ± 0.002</td><td>43.27</td><td>36.62e ± 1.21</td><td>16.89b ± 0.55</td></tr><tr><th>T5 (NP)</th><td>166.48b ± 4.98</td><td>584.47d ± 3.51</td><td>639e.46 ± 4.04</td><td>56.61bc ± 1.59</td><td>93.34ab ± 2.15</td><td>6.92cd ± 0.33</td><td>288.62c ± 4.51</td><td>57.31c ± 5.03</td><td>17.2b ± 3.29</td><td>160.46de ±4.86</td><td>107.34c ± 2.11</td><td>35.63bc ± 2.02</td><td>37.81d ± 1.88</td><td>23.43ab ± 0.93</td><td>0.35d ± 0.001</td><td>40.48</td><td>42.09b ± 0.47</td><td>16.65b ± 0.61</td></tr><tr><th>T6 (NK)</th><td>160.75bc ± 5.05</td><td>684.66b ± 4.50</td><td>810.62b ± 4.59</td><td>60.17b ± 2.53</td><td>90.28cd ± 2.71</td><td>9.74ab ± 0.66</td><td>320.32b ± 3.05</td><td>66.61b ± 4.49</td><td>18.5ab ± 2.73</td><td>180.32b ± 5.35</td><td>118.04b ± 1.94</td><td>37.21b ± 1.81</td><td>46.92b ± 1.65</td><td>23.30ab ± 0.08</td><td>0.32e ± 0.002</td><td>51.28</td><td>51.48b ±1.07</td><td>16.07b ± 0.71</td></tr><tr><th>T7 (PK)</th><td>159.42bc ± 4.98</td><td>559.71e ± 3.49</td><td>701.17d ± 3.61</td><td>55.31bc ± 1.02</td><td>92.96ab ± 2.56</td><td>7.49bcd ± 0.52</td><td>274.37d ± 2.52</td><td>54.85cd ± 4.51</td><td>18.1b ± 3.01</td><td>178.24bc ± 6.53</td><td>103.51d ± 1.79</td><td>33.07cd ± 1.95</td><td>42.14c ± 1.43</td><td>2.35bc ± 0.05</td><td>0.31e ± 0.002</td><td>52.41</td><td>51.55b ± 0.95</td><td>15.01b ± 0.37</td></tr><tr><th>T8 (NPK)</th><td>177.51a ± 4.92</td><td>845.64a ± 3.61</td><td>974.52a ± 4.58</td><td>69.18a ± 2.87</td><td>86.10e ± 2.85</td><td>13.85a ± 0.43</td><td>379.05a ± 3.00</td><td>82.35a ± 3.51</td><td>23.3a ± 3.10</td><td>197.05a ± 5.62</td><td>135.32a ± 2.09</td><td>43.53a ± 2.07</td><td>52.09a ± 1.77</td><td>24.53a ± 0.06</td><td>0.26f ± 0.001</td><td>73.53</td><td>57.63a ± 0.07</td><td>20.48a ± 0.53</td></tr></tbody></table>Values within each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P <0.5 level.Values within each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P <0.05 level.Values within each column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P <0.05 level.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Figure 1 in Effect of the essential oil from the latex of the fruit Mangifera indica L. on Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari, Tetranychidae)

Figure 1 Feeding preference (mean ± SE) ofTetranychus urticaeexposed toMangifera indicaoils

FIGURE 2 in Environmental Management And Biological Aspects Of Two Eriophyid Mango Mites In Egypt: Aceria Mangiferae And Metaculus Mangiferae

FIGURE 2: Population trends of the mango rust mite, Metaculus mangiferae and the phytoseiid predators on Alphonse mango leaves in relation to temperature and relative humidity over a two-year period (2003-2004).

FIGURE 1 in Environmental Management And Biological Aspects Of Two Eriophyid Mango Mites In Egypt: Aceria Mangiferae And Metaculus Mangiferae

FIGURE 1: Population trends of eriophyids and their predatory mites associated with mango trees in relation to temperature and relative humidity over a two-year period (2003-2004).

FIGURE 4 in Environmental Management And Biological Aspects Of Two Eriophyid Mango Mites In Egypt: Aceria Mangiferae And Metaculus Mangiferae

FIGURE 4: Population density of Metaculus mangiferae on terminal and lateral buds and leaves of sunny and shady zones of Alphonse mango trees during summer seasons in abandoned orchard.

FIGURE 7 in Environmental Management And Biological Aspects Of Two Eriophyid Mango Mites In Egypt: Aceria Mangiferae And Metaculus Mangiferae

FIGURE 7: Population trends of, Metaculus mangiferae on upper and lower leave surfaces of Alphonso mango trees in abandoned orchard from January to December and weather records.

FIGURE 6 in Environmental Management And Biological Aspects Of Two Eriophyid Mango Mites In Egypt: Aceria Mangiferae And Metaculus Mangiferae

FIGURE 6: Population trends of, Metaculus mangiferae on terminal and lateral buds of Alphonse mango trees in abandoned orchard from January to December and weather records.

FIGURE 5 in Environmental Management And Biological Aspects Of Two Eriophyid Mango Mites In Egypt: Aceria Mangiferae And Metaculus Mangiferae

FIGURE 5: Population trends of, Aceria mangiferae on terminal and lateral buds of Alphonse mango trees in abandoned orchard from January to December and weather records.