Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in Urban biodiversity: Cuterebriasis in free-ranging Robinson's mouse opossum (Marmosa robinsoni) in the suburbs of Barranquilla, Colombia

Fig. 5. Second instar of Cuterebra sp. from M. robinsoni. Note the body spines appear evenly distributed in the larva's body.

Fig. 4 in Urban biodiversity: Cuterebriasis in free-ranging Robinson's mouse opossum (Marmosa robinsoni) in the suburbs of Barranquilla, Colombia

Fig. 4. Development stages of Cuterebra sp. found in different hosts of M. robinsoni. A. Second instar. B. Third instar.

Fig. 2 in Urban biodiversity: Cuterebriasis in free-ranging Robinson's mouse opossum (Marmosa robinsoni) in the suburbs of Barranquilla, Colombia

Fig. 2. Primers used to amplify and sequence the mitochondrial cytochrome Oxidase subunit I gene (COX1) of Cuterebra sp. List of primers: Droso-mt1490 5′- TTTCWACWAATCATAAAGATATYGG-3′, Droso-mt1729 5′-GGAGCYCCTGAYATRGCATTYCC-3′, Droso-mt1819 5′-GTRCCAGCYCCRTTTTCTAC-3′, Droso-mt2162 5′- CAACATTTATTYTGATTYTTTGG-3′, Droso-mt2169 5′-TAAACTTCAGGRTGWCCAAARAATCA-3′ y Droso-mt2680 5′-GYTAATCCWGTAAATAAWGG-3′.

Fig. 1 in Urban biodiversity: Cuterebriasis in free-ranging Robinson's mouse opossum (Marmosa robinsoni) in the suburbs of Barranquilla, Colombia

Fig. 1. Map of the Atlantic department of Colombia showing the four areas (red dots) of study of M. robinsoni: Palomar, Carreto, Luriza, and Zona Franca Celsia (visualized with Google Earth Pro). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 3. Free range M. robinsoni with interscapular wounds. A in Urban biodiversity: Cuterebriasis in free-ranging Robinson's mouse opossum (Marmosa robinsoni) in the suburbs of Barranquilla, Colombia

Fig. 3. Free range M. robinsoni with interscapular wounds. A. External appearance of bot fly larva wound. B. Extraction of Cuterebra sp. larvae.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2020View details →

FIG. 3 in On the Identity of Victoria's Mouse Opossum, Marmosa regina Thomas, 1898

FIG. 3. Dorsal view of holotype skin of Marmosa regina (BMNH 98.5.15.4). A white arrow indicates the welldeveloped gular gland of this adult male specimen.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2010View details →

Fig. 1 in Molecular Systematics of Mouse Opossums (Didelphidae: Marmosa): Assessing Species Limits using Mitochondrial DNA Sequences, with Comments on Phylogenetic Relationships and Biogeography

Fig. 1. Provenance of sequenced specimens of Marmosa (localities of sequenced outgroup specimens are not shown). Numbers refer to entries in the Gazetteer (appendix).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2010View details →

Fig. 3 in Molecular Systematics of Mouse Opossums (Didelphidae: Marmosa): Assessing Species Limits using Mitochondrial DNA Sequences, with Comments on Phylogenetic Relationships and Biogeography

Fig. 3. The maximum-likelihood tree inferred from the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution (table 4). ML bootstrap support values and Bayesian posterior probabilities are indicated above and below branches, respectively. Branch and terminal labels follow the same conventions explained in the caption to figure 2.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2010View details →

Fig. 2 in Molecular Systematics of Mouse Opossums (Didelphidae: Marmosa): Assessing Species Limits using Mitochondrial DNA Sequences, with Comments on Phylogenetic Relationships and Biogeography

Fig. 2. Strict consensus of 96 equally most-parsimonious trees (L 5 2198; CI 5 0.36; RI 5 0.80). Bootstrap support values are indicated above branches subtending species and conspecific haplogroups discussed in the text. For each terminal, country of origin, next-largest political unit (state, department, province, etc.), and an alphanumeric specimen identifier (from table 2) are provided. Numbers in parentheses refer to localities mapped in figure 1 and listed in the Gazetteer (appendix).

Fig. 4 in On the Relationships of ''Marmosa'' formosa Shamel, 1930 (Marsupialia: Didelphidae), a Phylogenetic Puzzle from the Chaco of Northern Argentina

Fig. 4. Strict consensus of 18 equally mostparsimonious trees obtained by a heuristic analysis of the combined (nonmolecular + IRBP) dataset. Only ingroup (didelphine) terminal taxa are illustrated; ''caluromyine'' outgroups (Glironia venusta, Caluromysiops irrupta, Caluromys lanatus, and C. philan der) are not shown. Bremer support and bootstrap values are shown above and below each branch, respectively. See table 2 for other tree statistics. Labelled clades (C, F, G, H, I) are defined and discussed in the text.

Fig. 1 in On the Relationships of ''Marmosa'' formosa Shamel, 1930 (Marsupialia: Didelphidae), a Phylogenetic Puzzle from the Chaco of Northern Argentina

Fig. 1. Dorsal and ventral views of the skin of the holotype of Chacodelphys formosa (Shamel), both approximately life size.

Fig. 3 in On the Relationships of ''Marmosa'' formosa Shamel, 1930 (Marsupialia: Didelphidae), a Phylogenetic Puzzle from the Chaco of Northern Argentina

Fig. 3. Strict consensus of four equally mostparsimonious trees obtained by a heuristic analysis of nonmolecular characters. Only ingroup (didelphine) terminal taxa are illustrated; ''caluromyine'' outgroups (Glironia venusta, Caluromysiops irrupta, Caluromys lanatus, and C. philander) are not shown. Bremer support and bootstrap values are shown above and below each branch, respectively. See table 2 for other tree statistics.

Fig. 6 in On the Relationships of ''Marmosa'' formosa Shamel, 1930 (Marsupialia: Didelphidae), a Phylogenetic Puzzle from the Chaco of Northern Argentina

Fig. 6. The savannawoodland border at Linda Vista near the Riacho Pilaga´, Provincia Formosa, Argentina, type locality of Chacodelphys formosa. Photographed by Alexander Wetmore in August 1920 (courtesy of the Smithsonian Institution Archives).

Fig. 2 in On the Relationships of ''Marmosa'' formosa Shamel, 1930 (Marsupialia: Didelphidae), a Phylogenetic Puzzle from the Chaco of Northern Argentina

Fig. 2. Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull of Chacodelphys formosa (Shamel), all approximately four times life size.

Fig. 5 in On the Relationships of ''Marmosa'' formosa Shamel, 1930 (Marsupialia: Didelphidae), a Phylogenetic Puzzle from the Chaco of Northern Argentina

Fig. 5. Strict consensus of all MPTs recovered from heuristic analyses of 100 simulated datasets in which the missing molecular data for Chacodelphys formosa were replaced by random nucleotide sequences (see text). ''Caluromyine'' outgroups (Glironia venusta, Caluromysiops irrupta, Caluromys lanatus, and C. philander) are not shown. Labelled clades (F, I) are defined and discussed in the text.

FIG. 8 in A Revision of the Didelphid Marsupial Genus Marmosa Part 3. A New Species from Western Amazonia, with Redescriptions of M. perplexa Anthony, 1922, and M. germana Thomas, 1904

FIG. 8. White-sand vegetation (varillal) at the Reserva Nacional Allpahuayo-Mishana, Loreto, Peru, habitat of Marmosa germana (photo by Christine L. Hice).

FIG. 3 in A Revision of the Didelphid Marsupial Genus Marmosa Part 3. A New Species from Western Amazonia, with Redescriptions of M. perplexa Anthony, 1922, and M. germana Thomas, 1904

FIG. 3. Dorsal and ventral views of skins of Marmosa jansae (ROM 118880), M. perplexa (USNM 513425), and M. germana (FMNH 43179).

FIG. 4 in A Revision of the Didelphid Marsupial Genus Marmosa Part 3. A New Species from Western Amazonia, with Redescriptions of M. perplexa Anthony, 1922, and M. germana Thomas, 1904

FIG. 4. Dorsal and ventral cranial views (×1.75) of Marmosa jansae (A, D; ROM 118880), M. perplexa (B, E; USNM 513425), and M. germana (C, F; TTU 101236).

FIG. 7 in A Revision of the Didelphid Marsupial Genus Marmosa Part 3. A New Species from Western Amazonia, with Redescriptions of M. perplexa Anthony, 1922, and M. germana Thomas, 1904

FIG. 7. Semideciduous forest understory near Quebrada El Faical, Tumbes department, Peru, habitat of Marmosa perplexa (photo by Elizabeth Escobar).

FIG. 2 in A Revision of the Didelphid Marsupial Genus Marmosa Part 3. A New Species from Western Amazonia, with Redescriptions of M. perplexa Anthony, 1922, and M. germana Thomas, 1904

FIG. 2. Collection localities of examined specimens of Marmosa germana, M. jansae, and M. perplexa. Numbers are keyed to entries in our gazetteer (appendix 1).