Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
9
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
9 results for “Matching Research”
Annex 1 – Actions and measures relevant to research integrity matched to the UK Concordat
<p>The present dataset is an Annex to the Discussion Document entitled “<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6827947">Indicators of Research Integrity: An initial exploration of the landscape, opportunities and challenges</a>”. </p> <p>It consists in a longlist of actions and measures that organisations may put in place to support research integrity, building on a set of documents that we considered to represent the perspectives of the stakeholder groups mentioned in the UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity, including: </p> <ul> <li> <p>researchers; </p> </li> <li> <p>employers of researchers (i.e. bodies that conduct or host research; employ, support or host researchers; teach research students; or allow research to be carried out under their auspices); </p> </li> <li> <p>research funders; and </p> </li> <li> <p>other organisations (e.g. professional, statutory and regulatory bodies; academies and learned societies; professional and subject-specific representative bodies; journals and publishers; and organisations offering advice, guidance and support). </p> </li> </ul> <p>The table below provides an overview of the documents covered in the dataset. It should be noted that our selection of documents is not meant to imply that other efforts are of lesser importance: it is only a starting point for discussion and seeks to represent a breadth of stakeholder views. </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p>Document </p> </td> <td> <p>Lead </p> </td> <td> <p>Main perspective(s) </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><a href="https://ukrio.org/wp-content/uploads/UKRIO-Self-Assessment-Tool-for-The-Concordat-to-Support-Research-Integrity-V2.pdf">UKRIO Self-Assessment Tool for The Concordat to Support Research Integrity</a> </p> </td> <td> <p>UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO) </p> </td> <td> <p>Employers of researchers </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737">The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity</a> </p> </td> <td> <p>Moher et al. (academic article) </p> </td> <td> <p>Researchers, Employers of researchers, Research funders </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><a href="https://www.vitae.ac.uk/vitae-publications/reports/research-integrity-a-landscape-study">Research integrity: a landscape study</a> </p> </td> <td> <p>UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), Vitae, UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO), UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN) </p> </td> <td> <p>All stakeholders </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><a href="https://wellcome.org/reports/what-researchers-think-about-research-culture">What Researchers Think About the Culture They Work In</a> </p> </td> <td> <p>Wellcome </p> </td> <td> <p>Researchers, Employers of researchers, Research funders </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><a href="https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf">The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity</a> </p> </td> <td> <p>All European Academies (ALLEA) </p> </td> <td> <p>All stakeholders </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><a href="http://www.enrio.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/INV-Handbook_ENRIO_web_final.pdf">Handbook on Research Integrity</a> </p> </td> <td> <p>European Network for Research Ethics and Integrity (ENERI) </p> </td> <td> <p>Researchers, Employers of researchers, Research funders </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><a href="https://sops4ri.eu/wp-content/uploads/Guideline-for-Promoting-RI-in-RFOs_final.pdf">Guideline for Promoting Research Integrity in Research Funding Organisations</a> </p> </td> <td> <p>Standard Operating Procedures for Research Integrity (SOPs4RI) </p> </td> <td> <p>Research funders </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><a href="https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/guideline-for-promoting-research-integrity-in-research-performing-organisations_horizon_en.pdf">Guideline for Promoting Research Integrity in Research Performing Organisations</a> </p> </td> <td> <p>Standard Operating Procedures for Research Integrity (SOPs4RI) </p> </td> <td> <p>Employers of researchers </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><a href="https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2018.1.3">Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics</a> </p> </td> <td> <p>Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) </p> </td> <td> <p>Publishers and Employers of researchers </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><a href="https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.4">COPE Retraction Guidelines</a> </p> </td> <td> <p>Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) </p> </td> <td> <p>Publishers </p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Find more outputs of this project in the <a href="https://zenodo.org/communities/research-integrity-indicators/">dedicated Zenodo community</a>. </p>
Dataset: Problem-centred interviews results for Matching Data Life Cycle and Research Processes in Engineering Sciences
<p>The authors would like to thank the Federal Government and the Heads of Government of the Länder, as well as the Joint Science Conference (GWK), for their funding and support within the framework of the NFDI4Ing consortium. Funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) - project number 442146713.</p>
High conservation priority of range-edge plant populations not matched by habitat protection or research effort
<p>Data and code for Caissy et al. 2020, Biological Conservation. Dataset excludes geographical data to avoid violating data sharing policies.</p>
A Research Study of Bone Marrow Transplantation From Unrelated or Partially Matched Related Donors
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01349101. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Figure 4 from: Islam S, Papale D, Vaira L, Rosati I, Peterseil J, Pichot C (2024) Navigating taxonomic complexity: A use-case report on FAIR scientific name-matching service usage in ENVRI Research Infrastructures. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e121871. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e121871
Figure 4 LifeWatch web service taxon match list. Screenshot captured 10 Jan 2024.
Figure 3 from: Islam S, Papale D, Vaira L, Rosati I, Peterseil J, Pichot C (2024) Navigating taxonomic complexity: A use-case report on FAIR scientific name-matching service usage in ENVRI Research Infrastructures. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e121871. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e121871
Figure 3 LifeWatch web service data upload screen. Screenshot captured 10 Jan 2024.
Figure 1 from: Islam S, Papale D, Vaira L, Rosati I, Peterseil J, Pichot C (2024) Navigating taxonomic complexity: A use-case report on FAIR scientific name-matching service usage in ENVRI Research Infrastructures. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e121871. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e121871
Figure 1 COL Checklistbank cross dataset search. Screenshot captured 10 Jan 2024.
Figure 2 from: Islam S, Papale D, Vaira L, Rosati I, Peterseil J, Pichot C (2024) Navigating taxonomic complexity: A use-case report on FAIR scientific name-matching service usage in ENVRI Research Infrastructures. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e121871. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e121871
Figure 2 COL name match tool for bulk input. Screenshot captured 10 Jan 2024.
Validation of the Effectiveness of the CFIR - ERIC Matching Tool in Implementation Research
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07184489. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.