Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
30
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
30 results for “Microtus arvalis”
Fig. 1 in Interspecific Interactions as a Factor of Limitation of Geographical Distribution: Evidence Obtained by Modeling Home Ranges of Vole Twin Species Microtus Arvalis – M. Levis (Rodentia, Microtidae)
Fig. 1. Potential distribution of the Common vole Microtus arvalis. White circles are georeferenced occurrences of genetically identified individuals; black indicates areas of maximum habitat suitability, white are areas of lowest suitability.
Figure 7 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash
Figure 7. GLMM diagrams illustrating the effect of the main and alternative prey taxa and the two derived indices on the number of fledglings (A: Common vole, B: Apodemus genus, C: Microtinae/Murinae ratio, D: Trophic level index).
Figure 5 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash
Figure 5. GLMM diagrams illustrating the effect of the main and alternative prey taxa and the two derived indices on clutch size (A: Common vole, B–C: Apodemus genus, D–E: Microtinae/Murinae ratio, F: Trophic level index).
Figure 4 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash
Figure 4. Box plots of the relative frequency of the main and alternative prey taxa. The bottom and top limits of each box are the lower and upper quartiles; error bars equal ±1.5 times the interquartile range; the horizontal black band within each box is the median; and the red triangle is the mean.
Figure 6 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash
Figure 6. GLMM diagrams illustrating the effect of the main and alternative prey taxa and the two derived indices on the number of hatchlings (A: Common vole, B: Apodemus genus, C: Microtinae/Murinae ratio, D: Trophic level index).
Figure 3 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash
Figure 3. Rank abundance curves of the prey composition of the common barn-owl in different outbreak and crash years, and cumulative results of these two periods.
Figure 2 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash
Figure 2. Box plots of barn owls' breeding parameters (A: clutch size; B: number of hatchlings; C: number of fledglings). The bottom and top limits of each box are the lower and upper quartiles; error bars equal ±1.5 times the interquartile range; the horizontal black band within each box is the median; and the red triangle is the mean.
Figure 1 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash
Figure 1. Study area in Baranya County (Hungary), showing the location of sampled nesting pairs (settlements).
Figure S2 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure S2. ABGD results of COXI gene. The histogram shows distribution of genetic distances among M. arvalis samples; yellow columns show mean intralineage distances and red columns show interlineage distances. The diagram implies the lineages according to initial partitions = Group 1 (n: 21): Anatolia, China, Asian and European parts of Russia; Group 2 (n: 16): Serbia, Hungary.
Figure S1 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure S1. ABGD results of CYTB gene region. The histogram shows distribution of genetic distances among M. arvalis samples; yellow columns show mean intralineage distances and red columns show interlineage distances. The diagram implies the lineages according to initial partitions = Group 1 (n: 56): Anatolia, Georgia, Armenia, Iran, Siberia, China, Asian parts of Russia and one sample from Ukraine; Group 2 (n: 31): European parts of Russia, three samples from Ukraine, Western, Central and Eastern Europe.
Figure 7 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure 7. Bayesian tree obtained from IRBP sequences based on HKY + G parameter (Hasegawa et al., 1985). Numbers on branches show posterior probability (pb) values above 50%.
Figure 6 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure 6. Median-joining network obtained from IRBP haplotypes of Anatolian, Asian and European populations of M. arvalis. Number of mutations are shown by black lines on the branches.
Figure 5 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure 5. Bayesian tree obtained from COXI sequences based on HKY + I parameter (Hasegawa et al., 1985). Numbers on branches show posterior probability (pb) values above 50%.
Figure 4 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure 4. Median-joining network obtained from COXI haplotypes of Anatolian, Asian and European populations of M. arvalis. Number of mutations are shown by black lines on the branches.
Figure S3 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure S3. ABGD results of IRBP gene region. The histogram shows distribution of genetic distances among M. arvalis samples; yellow columns show mean intralineage distances and red columns show interlineage distances. The diagram implies the lineages according to initial partitions = Group 1 (n: 28): Anatolia, Serbia, Hungary, Iberian Peninsula; Group 2 (n: 1): one sample from Anatolia.
Figure 3 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure 3. Bayesian tree obtained from CYTB sequences based on HKY+I+G parameter (Hasegawa et al., 1985). Numbers on branches show posterior probability (pb) values above 50%.
Figure 1. Figure 1 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure 1. Figure 1. Location map of AUMAC samples and GenBank Sequences (modified from Yiğit et al. 20161). Black line is the border of arvalis and obscurus forms; dotted lines show possible hybridization zone of the two forms. Western Europe (1: Orkney Island, 2: Spain, 3: France, 4: Belgium), Central Europe (5: Germany, 6: Switzerland, 7: Czech Republic), Eastern Europe (8: Austria, 9: Slovenia, 10: Bosnia, 11: Montenegro, 12: Serbia, 13: Hungary, 14: Poland, 15: Ukraine, 16: European Russia/Vladimir, 17: European Russia/ Arkhangelsk Oblast) groups are 'arvalis' form. Anatolia and its surroundings (18: Anatolia/Ardahan, Kars and Erzurum provinces, 19: Iran, 20: Armenia) and Asia (21: Russia/Orenburg Oblast, 22: Russia/ Chelyabinsk Oblast, 23: China/Xinjiang, 24: Siberia) belong to 'obscurus' form.
Text-fig. 4. Small mammals from Middle Pleistocene site of Yenişarbademli (Central Turkey). a–e – Microtus ex gr. arvalis-socialis: a – m1 and fragmentary m2 sin., EUNHM PV-13210; b – fragmentary m3 sin., EUNHM PV-13211; c – M3 dex., EUNHM PV- 13212a; d, e – fragmentary M3 dex., EUNHM PV-13212b, EUNHM PV-13212c; f – cf. Chionomys nivalis, M3 dex., EUNHM PV-13213; g–j – Lagurus transiens: g, h – fragmentary m1 sin., EUNHM PV-13214-13215; i – m2 sin., EUNHM PV-13216; j – fragmentary M2 dex., EUNHM PV-13217; k – Clethrionomys cf. acrorhiza, fragmentary m3 sin., EUNHM PV-13218 in labial (k2) and lingual (k3) views; l – Ochotona sp., non-pussiloid form, p3 dex., EUNHM PV-13219; m–o – Microtus cf. guentheri: m – fragmentary m1 sin., EUNHM PV-13220; n – m3 sin., EUNHM PV-13221; o – M3 dex., EUNHM PV-13222. Scales for occlusal (larger), and lateral (smaller) views equal 1 mm. in Plio-Pleistocene Amphibians And Reptiles From Central Turkey: New Faunas And Faunal Records With Comments On Their Biochronological Position Based On Small Mammals
Text-fig. 4. Small mammals from Middle Pleistocene site of Yenişarbademli (Central Turkey). a–e – Microtus ex gr. arvalis-socialis: a – m1 and fragmentary m2 sin., EUNHM PV-13210; b – fragmentary m3 sin., EUNHM PV-13211; c – M3 dex., EUNHM PV- 13212a; d, e – fragmentary M3 dex., EUNHM PV-13212b, EUNHM PV-13212c; f – cf. Chionomys nivalis, M3 dex., EUNHM PV-13213; g–j – Lagurus transiens: g, h – fragmentary m1 sin., EUNHM PV-13214-13215; i – m2 sin., EUNHM PV-13216; j – fragmentary M2 dex., EUNHM PV-13217; k – Clethrionomys cf. acrorhiza, fragmentary m3 sin., EUNHM PV-13218 in labial (k2) and lingual (k3) views; l – Ochotona sp., non-pussiloid form, p3 dex., EUNHM PV-13219; m–o – Microtus cf. guentheri: m – fragmentary m1 sin., EUNHM PV-13220; n – m3 sin., EUNHM PV-13221; o – M3 dex., EUNHM PV-13222. Scales for occlusal (larger), and lateral (smaller) views equal 1 mm.
Fig. 2 in Interspecific Interactions as a Factor of Limitation of Geographical Distribution: Evidence Obtained by Modeling Home Ranges of Vole Twin Species Microtus Arvalis – M. Levis (Rodentia, Microtidae)
Fig. 2. Potential distribution of the East European vole (Microtus levis). Captions as in fig.1.
Data from: Assessing the effects of land‑use intensity on small mammal community composition and genetic variation in Myodesglareolus and Microtus arvalis across grassland and forest habitats
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.