Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 5 in Patterns of Phenotypic Variation in the Mouth Size of Lanternfishes (Teleostei: Myctophiformes)

FIG. 5. Time-calibrated phylogeny of lanternfishes from Davis et al. (2014) based on nuclear and mitochondrial data. Maximum likelihood and parsimony ancestral character-state reconstructions shown at nodes. Where reconstructions differ, parsimony is above the node and likelihood is below the node.

FIG. 4 in Patterns of Phenotypic Variation in the Mouth Size of Lanternfishes (Teleostei: Myctophiformes)

FIG. 4. Relative warp analysis of mouth size in: (A) Lampanyctinae; (B) lampanyctine genera with high morphospace variation; (C–E) examples of lampanyctine genera with separation in morphospace.

FIG. 6 in Patterns of Phenotypic Variation in the Mouth Size of Lanternfishes (Teleostei: Myctophiformes)

FIG. 6. Relative warp analysis of upper-jaw length among species of Diaphus. The two main trends of mouth size are represented by text color and outlines on the circles representing specimens; black text and outlines indicate longer upper jaws and orange text with white outlines indicate shorter upper jaws. The presence of short and long upper jaws are indicated on a summary phylogeny of species within Diaphus (Denton, 2014), with species included in this study indicated by a circle and species coded from an external source indicated by a square (Froese and Pauly, 2015). Circles and squares colored black indicate longer upper jaws, whereas orange indicates shorter upper jaws.

FIG. 3 in Patterns of Phenotypic Variation in the Mouth Size of Lanternfishes (Teleostei: Myctophiformes)

FIG. 3. Relative warp analysis of mouth size in: (A) Myctophinae; (B) myctophine genera with high morphospace variation; (C–E) examples of myctophine genera with separation in morphospace.

FIG. 1 in Patterns of Phenotypic Variation in the Mouth Size of Lanternfishes (Teleostei: Myctophiformes)

FIG. 1. Examples of variation in upper-jaw morphology among lanternfishes. Scale bars represent 5 mm. (A) Myctophum obtusirostre (MCZ 51389); (B) Hygophum macrochir (MCZ 115225); (C) Stenobrachius leucopsarus (FMNH 71832); (D) Nannobrachium cuprarium (MCZ 112776); (E) Neoscopelus macrolepidotus (FMNH 112581); (F) Scopelengys tristis (USNM 201152); (G) Landmark placement sites on lanternfish specimens. Gonichthys tenuiculus (FMNH 71685).

FIGURE 4 in Diving deeper into the taxonomy of the Neoscopelus species complex (Myctophiformes: Neoscopelidae) with the description of Neoscopelus serranoi sp. nov.

FIGURE 4. Map of sampling locations of the Neoscopelus macrolepidotus species complex and the single specimen of Neoscopelus porosus (in purple). The diameter of the circle is indicative of the sample size, and the colours correspond to the MOTUs detected in the phylogenetic analysis.

FIGURE 3 in Diving deeper into the taxonomy of the Neoscopelus species complex (Myctophiformes: Neoscopelidae) with the description of Neoscopelus serranoi sp. nov.

FIGURE 3. Map of sampling locations of the Neoscopelus microchir species complex and the proposed Neoscopelus serranoi sp. nov. in red. The diameter of the circle is indicative of the sample size, and the colours correspond to the MOTUs detected in the phylogenetic analysis.

FIGURE 2 in Diving deeper into the taxonomy of the Neoscopelus species complex (Myctophiformes: Neoscopelidae) with the description of Neoscopelus serranoi sp. nov.

FIGURE 2. Consensus phylogeny (Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference) of Neoscopelus based on COI gene sequences with the results of six different molecular approaches: BIN, Barcode Index Number; ASAP, Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning; bPTP, Bayesian Poisson Tree Process; mPTP, multiple Poisson Tree Process; GMYC, General Mixed Yule-Coalescent model and mGMYC, multiple General Mixed Yule-Coalescent model. The proposed Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) for each analysis are represented as boxes. The colours in the branches indicate the proposed MOTUs in this study. In the first node of each MOTU, both boostrap values (>75) and posterior probabilities (>0.9) are shown. Each individual contains the putative morphospecies, repository and geographic codes: NEA—Northeast Atlantic; JAM— Jamaica; ESA—Eastern South Africa; TWN—Taiwan; WAU—Western Australia; SCS—South China Sea; IO—Indian Ocean; PNG—Papua New Guinea; ESA—Eastern South Africa; TAS—Tasmania; GME—Gulf of Mexico; NZL—New Zealand; NWA—Northwest Atlantic.

zenodo20/100

FIGURE 1 in Diving deeper into the taxonomy of the Neoscopelus species complex (Myctophiformes: Neoscopelidae) with the description of Neoscopelus serranoi sp. nov.

FIGURE 1. Neoscopelus serranoi sp. nov. a holotype MHN USC 25200-2, 236 mm TL; b paratype MHN USC 25200-3, 187 mm TL.