Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
15
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
15 results for “Orycteropodidae”
Figure 3 in Phylogeny and systematics of the Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata)
Figure 3. Strict consensus tree of eight most parsimonious trees. Tree length = 45, consistency index (CI) = 0.69, and retention index (RI) = 0.60 (modified after Lehmann et al., 2005).
Figure 2 in Phylogeny and systematics of the Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata)
Figure 2. Stratigraphic distribution of different tubulidentates (modified after van der Made, 2003). Localities and their approximate ages in Mya on the left. Thick lines indicate possible ancestor–descendant relationships and arrows indicate possible dispersal events.
Figure 1 in Phylogeny and systematics of the Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata)
Figure 1. Suggested relationships of the known Tubulidentata genera (modified after Patterson, 1975).
Figure 7 in Phylogeny and systematics of the Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata)
Figure 7. Phylogeny of the order Tubulidentata. Legend: Arr., Arrisdrift; Asa., Asa Koma; Laet., Laetoli; Lai., Lainyamok; Lang., Langebaanweg; L. L., Lothagam Lower Nawata; L. U., Lothagam Upper Nawata; Luk., Lukeino; Ma., Maragheh; Maka., Makapansgat; Mont., Monticino; Pa., Paşalar; Roo., Rooilepel; Sait., Saitune Dora; Sin., Sinap; Sw., Swartkrans. Undetermined taxa referred to Orycteropodinae sp. are represented by balloons: Chi., Chinji; F. T., Fort Ternan; Kak., Karara; Koru; Pro., Prochoma. See text for details.
Figure 6 in Phylogeny and systematics of the Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata)
Figure 6. Details of the strict consensus tree showing intergeneric relationships. The distribution of the characters supporting node D (Plio–Pleistocene Orycteropus) and node F (Miocene Orycteropus) in the strict consensus tree is highlighted. The numbered boxes indicate character state changes: homoplasies are represented by white boxes; apomorphies are represented by black boxes; character states derived and unique in the ingroup (apomorphies within Orycteropodidae), but convergent or plesiomorphic when compared with the outgroup are represented by striped boxes; and unknown character states are represented by dashed boxes. The character state is given underneath the box.
Figure 7 in A new species of Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata) in the Mio-Pliocene of northern Chad
Figure 7. Comparative set of hands. A, Orycteropus afer (after Colbert, 1941); B, Orycteropus gaudryi (after Colbert, 1941); C, Orycteropus abundulafus sp. nov. Note that A and B are scaled approximately relative to C. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Figure 3 in A new species of Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata) in the Mio-Pliocene of northern Chad
Figure 3. Cranium of Orycteropus abundulafus sp. nov. in lateral view (right side) showing detail of the infratemporal region. lcpt, lateral crest on the pterygoid wall; of, oval foramen. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 10 in A new species of Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata) in the Mio-Pliocene of northern Chad
Figure 10. Strict consensus three of eight most parsimonious trees resulting from a heuristic search, PAUP version 4. Tree length = 45, CI = 0.69 and RI = 0.60. Apomorphies are marked with black bars, convergences are marked with white bars, reversions are marked with crossed circles, and apomorphies discussed in the text are marked with black bars and question marks. The character number and direction of state change are given next to the bar.
Figure 9 in A new species of Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata) in the Mio-Pliocene of northern Chad
Figure 9. Comparative set of feet. A, Orycteropus afer (after Colbert, 1941); B, Orycteropus gaudryi (after Colbert, 1941); C, Orycteropus abundulafus sp. nov. Note that A and B are scaled approximately relative to C. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Figure 6 in A new species of Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata) in the Mio-Pliocene of northern Chad
Figure 6. Comparative set of radio-ulna. A, Orycteropus afer (after Colbert, 1941); B, Orycteropus gaudryi (after Colbert, 1941); C, Orycteropus abundulafus sp. nov. *Blunt oblique rim. Note that A and B are scaled approximately relative to C. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Figure 5 in A new species of Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata) in the Mio-Pliocene of northern Chad
Figure 5. Comparative set of humeri. A, B and C in dorsal view; D in ventral view. A, Orycteropus afer (after Colbert, 1941); B, Orycteropus gaudryi (after Colbert, 1941); C, D, Orycteropus abundulafus sp. nov. *No projection of the deltoid crest. Note that A and B are scaled approximately relative to C and D. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Figure 4 in Phylogeny and systematics of the Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata)
Figure 4. Strict consensus tree of three most parsimonious trees resulting from a branch-and-bound search, PAUP version 4b10. Tree length = 77, consistency index (CI) = 0.6494, and retention index (RI) = 0.6932. The bootstrap values (10 000 replications) for the most robust clades (> 50%) and the decay indices are given above and below the branches, respectively.
Figure 8 in A new species of Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata) in the Mio-Pliocene of northern Chad
Figure 8. Proximal epiphysis of the right femur of Orycteropus abundulafus sp. nov. in ventral (A) and dorsal (B) view. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Figure 4 in A new species of Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata) in the Mio-Pliocene of northern Chad
Figure 4. Mandible of Orycteropus abundulafus sp. nov. in lateral (left) and dorsal (right) view. M2, second lower molar; sP2, socket for P2. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Figure 11 in A new species of Orycteropodidae (Mammalia, Tubulidentata) in the Mio-Pliocene of northern Chad
Figure 11. Skeleton in situ of Orycteropus abundulafus sp. nov. Scale bar = 5 cm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.