Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

20

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

20 results for “Paridae”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Fig. 4 in Determining Spatial Parameters Of The Ecological Niche Of Parus Major (Passeriformes, Paridae) On The Base Of Remote Sensing Data

Fig. 4. Distribution of resources (light bars) and distribution of resources used by P. major (grey bars).

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 5 in Determining Spatial Parameters Of The Ecological Niche Of Parus Major (Passeriformes, Paridae) On The Base Of Remote Sensing Data

Fig. 5. Distribution of pseudo absence cells: a — the distance to the presence cells is not less than 1000 meters; b — the distance to the presence cells is not less than 500 meters; c — the distance to the presence cells is not less than 250 meters; d — distance to the presence cells is not less than 100 meters.

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →
dryad40/100

Data from: Global patterns of colouration complexity in the Paridae: Effects of climate and species characteristics across body regions

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2025View details →
zenodo36/100

Parus atricapillus (Paridae) - whole organism

Image of Parus atricapillus (Paridae) - whole organism

opencc-by-nc-sa-4.0Dec 2004View details →
zenodo36/100

Parus atricapillus (Paridae) - whole organism - unspecified

Image of Parus atricapillus (Paridae) - whole organism - unspecified

opencc-by-nc-sa-4.0Dec 2004View details →
zenodo36/100

Fig. 2 in Nest Predation In The African Blue Tit, Cyanistes Teneriffae (Aves, Paridae), Using Nest-Boxes And Artificial Nests

Fig. 2. Predation rates versus years, %.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo36/100

Fig. 1 in Nest Predation In The African Blue Tit, Cyanistes Teneriffae (Aves, Paridae), Using Nest-Boxes And Artificial Nests

Fig. 1. Location of the study area.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo36/100

Fig. 3 in Nest Predation In The African Blue Tit, Cyanistes Teneriffae (Aves, Paridae), Using Nest-Boxes And Artificial Nests

Fig. 3. Predation typology in nest-boxes, %.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
dryad32/100

The roles of temperature, nest predators and information parasites for geographical variation in egg covering behaviour of tits (Paridae)

<p><strong>Aim</strong>: Nest building is widespread among animals. Nests may provide receptacles for eggs, developing offspring and the parents, and protect them from adverse environmental conditions. Nests may also indicate the quality of the territory and its owner and can be considered as an extended phenotype of its builder(s). Nests may, thus, function as a sexual and social signal. Here, we examined ecological and abiotic factors—temperature, nest predation and interspecific information utilization—shaping geographical variation in a specific nest structure—hair and feather cover of eggs— and its function as an extended phenotype before incubation in great (Parus major) and blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) across Europe. We also tested whether egg covering is associated with reproductive success of great tits.</p> <p><strong>Location</strong>: Fourteen different study sites and 28 populations across Europe.</p> <p><strong>Taxon</strong>: Parus major, Cyanistes caeruleus.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong>: We recorded clutch coverage estimates and collected egg covering nest material from the tit nests. We also measured nest specific breeding parameters and phenotypic measurements on adults. We tested whether mean spring temperatures, nest predation rates and flycatcher (Ficedula spp) densities in the study areas explain the large-scale geographical variation of clutch coverage and reproductive success of tits.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong>: The degree of egg coverage of great tits increased with lower mean spring temperature, higher nest predation rate and higher flycatcher density. We did not find egg covering of blue tits to be associated with any of the ecological or abiotic factors. Moreover, egg covering of great tits was not associated with reproductive success in our cross-sectional data, yet a rigorous assessment of fitness effects would require long-term data.</p> <p><strong>Main conclusions</strong>: Our findings suggest that, in great tits, egg covering may simultaneously provide thermal insulation against cold temperatures during egg-laying in spring and also represent a counter-adaptation to reduce information parasitism by flycatchers and nest predation. Hence, geographical variation in interspecific interactions, and consequently in co-evolutionary processes, may affect the evolution of nest characteristics besides environmental conditions.</p>

opencc-zeroDec 2019View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in The Palaearctic Titmouse Species (Aves: Paridae: Parus sensu lato) — A current survey *

FIGURE 1. Sympatric population groups of titmice (Parus) in the Palaearctic. The colour intensity corresponds to the density of sympatry. (Map: B. Pätzelt &amp; T. Töpfer).

opennotspecifiedDec 2006View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 1 in Historical biogeography of tits (Aves: Paridae, Remizidae)

Fig. 1 Breeding distribution of extant parid and remizid tit species according to BirdLife International and NatureServe (2011) subdivided into ten areas (A–J) with number of Paroidea species per area and connectivity among areas (Table 1)

opennotspecifiedJul 2012View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 2 in Historical biogeography of tits (Aves: Paridae, Remizidae)

Fig. 2 Molecular phylogeny of Paroidea (tits and penduline tits) based on up to 2035 bp in a 4404-bp alignment of up to four genes (for details see Table S1) reconstructed in BEAST (genes and codon positions partitioned, GTR/HKY models, 100,000,000 generations). At the tips are all extant species recognized in this study for which any sequence was available on GenBank, preceded by distributional areas (see Table 1) in parentheses; at the nodes are posterior probabilities and ancestral-area reconstructions from S-DIVA (maxarea 0 7) as pie charts (color does not refer to a certain area, but to percentage of area combinations in decreasing order)

opennotspecifiedJul 2012View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Nest building in titmice Paridae: Selectivity in bryophyte use

<p><span>In many bird species, reproductive success is dependent on nest quality. However, detailed data on nest composition are scarce, and quantitative analyses have generally used only rough categories, without species identification. Bryophytes dominate the nests of many </span><span>passerine bird species, </span><span>but little is known about whether birds have preferences for certain species. In this study, we determined the bryophyte species composition in nests of blue tits <em>Cyanistes caeruleus</em> and great tits <em>Parus major</em> in a forest near Oslo, Norway. We also sampled the abundance of the bryophyte species in plots on the forest floor surrounding a subset of the great tit nests. Blue tits and great tits both used 15 bryophyte species as nest materials, mainly the same pleurocarpous species but in different proportions. The tits preferred highly branched bryophyte species, i.e. <em>Pleurozium schreberi</em>, <em>Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus</em> and <em>Sanionia uncinata</em>, but avoided common forest-floor bryophyte species that are sparsely branched. Great tits clearly collected bryophyte species selectively. We also found that bryophyte species content in great tit nests in the same nest box in different years was very similar. Our results also indicated that the great tits collected bryophyte nest materials close to their nests, mostly within 5 m, supporting the view that collecting nest materials is costly. We review several hypotheses to explain why the tits prefer certain species of bryophytes as nest materials. These include handling costs and their suitability as structural materials. We recommend field experiments to test specific hypotheses, and to study whether preferences are heritable.</span></p>

opencc-zeroFeb 2023View details →
dryad32/100

The roles of temperature, nest predators and information parasites for geographical variation in egg covering behaviour of tits (Paridae)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Causes and consequences of individual variation in the extent of post-juvenile moult in the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus (Passeriformes: Paridae)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2015View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Nest building in titmice Paridae: Selectivity in bryophyte use

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2023View details →
dryad28/100

Do phylogeny and habitat influence admixture among four North American chickadee (family: Paridae) species

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2021View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Variation in laying date in relation to spring temperature in three species of tits (Paridae) and pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in southernmost Sweden

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2016View details →
dryad28/100

Genetic divergence, admixture and subspecific boundaries in a peripheral population of great tit, Parus major (Aves, Paridae)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2021View details →
zenodo20/100

Fig. 3 in Historical biogeography of tits (Aves: Paridae, Remizidae)

Fig. 3 Molecular phylogeny of Paroidea (tits and penduline tits) as in Fig. 2, but with ancestral-area reconstructions according to Lagrange and WAAA (in this order if different) indicated at the nodes

opennotspecifiedJul 2012View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record