Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
236
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
236 results for “Patient-reported outcomes;”
Patient-reported outcomes predict return to work and health-related quality of life 6 months after cardiac rehabilitation: Results from a German multi-centre registry (OutCaRe): dataset
<p>This is the resulting data set from the prospective observational study (available cases at the time of follow up monitoring) OutCaRe, that is the basis of all results presented in the article "Patient-reported outcomes predict return to work and health-related quality of life 6 months after cardiac rehabilitation: Results from a German multi-centre registry (OutCaRe)".</p> <p>OutCaRe is a registered study (https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00011418).</p>
Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-tablet regimens (STR) have become the golden standard in antiretroviral therapy. However, there are calls to reintroduce (generic) components as multi-tablet regimens (MTR) because of cost-savings. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) are an important touchstone to support or to renounce this proposal. As such, our aim was to compare PROs of people living with HIV taking an STR versus a MTR in a real world setting.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>188 people living with HIV participated in a longitudinal study. 132 remained on their MTR and 56 switched to an STR. At baseline, months 1-3-6-12-18 and 24, participants filled in questionnaires on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), depressive symptoms, HIV symptoms, neurocognitive complaints (NCC) treatment satisfaction and adherence. Generalized linear mixed models and generalized estimation equations mixed models were built.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the two groups did not differ in clinical parameters and PROs. The mixed models revealed differences among the groups regarding neurocognitive complaints and treatment satisfaction. The odds of having NCC increased by 4,1% per month in the STR-group as compared to the MTR-group (p=0.035). Nonetheless, treatment satisfaction also increased in the STR-group: at month 6, median change score was highly positive: 24 (IQR 7,5-29). Treatment satisfaction showed a significantly different evolution in the groups: the estimated state score increased by 3,3 in the STR-group while it decreased by 0,2 in the MTR-group (p=0.003). HRQoL measures, HIV symptoms, depressive symptoms and adherence did not differ between the groups over time.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neurocognitive complaints and treatment satisfaction differed between the two groups. More people on an STR reported NCC over time compared to the MTR-group. Contrarily, treatment satisfaction in the STR-group increased significantly over time. It should be further investigated to which extent treatment satisfaction is a predictor for long-term treatment persistence and health outcomes.</p>
Content Validity and Reliability of the Italian Language Version of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE®)
<p><strong>ABSTRACT </strong></p> <p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The US National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE<sup>®</sup>) is a library of 78 symptom terms and 124 items enabling patient reporting of symptomatic adverse events in cancer trials. This multicenter study used mixed methods to develop an Italian language version of this widely accepted measure, and evaluate content validity and reliability in a diverse sample of Italian-speaking patients.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>All PRO-CTCAE items were translated in accordance with international guidelines. Subsequently, the content validity of the PRO-CTCAE-Italian was examined and iteratively refined through cognitive debriefing interviews. Participants (n=96; 52% male; median age 64 years; 26% older adults; 18% lower educational attainment) completed a PRO-CTCAE survey and participated in a semi-structured interview to determine if the translation captured the concepts of the original English language PRO-CTCAE, and to evaluate comprehension, clarity and ease of judgement. Test-retest reliability of the finalized measure was evaluated in a second sample (n=135).</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Four rounds of cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted. The majority of PRO-CTCAE symptom terms, attributes and associated response choices were well-understood, and respondents found the items easy to judge. To improve comprehension and clarity, the symptom terms for nausea and pain were rephrased and retested in subsequent interview rounds. Test-retest reliability was excellent for 41/49 items (84%); the median intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83 (range 0.64-0.94).</p> <p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results support the semantic, conceptual and pragmatic equivalence of PRO-CTCAE-Italian to the original English version, and provide preliminary evidence of content validity and reliability.</p>
Patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal vs. telephone: process and retention data in a pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy
<p>Objective: To close gaps between research and clinical practice, tools are needed for efficient pragmatic trial recruitment and patient-reported outcome(PROM) collection. The objective was to assess feasibility and process measures for patient-reported outcome collection in a randomized trial comparing electronic health record(EHR) patient portal questionnaires to telephone interview among adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms.</p> <p>Results: Participants were 60% women, 77% White/non-Hispanic, with mean age 42.5 years. Among 15 individuals randomized to EHR portal, 10(67%, CI 41.7-84.8%) met the 6-month retention endpoint, versus 100%(CI 79.6-100%) in the telephone group(p=0.04). EHR outcome collection at 6 months required 11.8 minutes less research staff time per participant than telephone (5.9, CI 3.3-7.7 vs. 17.7, CI 14.1-20.2). Subsequent telephone contact after unsuccessful EHR attempts enabled near complete data collection and still saved staff time.</p> <p>Discussion: Data from this randomized pilot study of pragmatic outcome collection methods for patients with anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy includes baseline participant characteristics, recruitment flow resulting from a novel EHR-based, care-embedded recruitment process, and data on retention along with various process measures at 6-months.</p>
Assessment of Fast-Track pathway in hip and knee replacement surgery by propensity score matching on patient-reported outcomes
<p>This is the dataset accompanying the publication "Assessment of Fast-Track pathway in hip and knee replacement surgery by propensity score matching on patient-reported outcomes" published on the Diagnostics journal.</p>
Patient-Reported Erectile Recovery and Quality of Life Outcomes With Lyopreserved Placental Tissue Applied Directly Over Neurovascular Bundle During Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Standard
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05366842. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Assessing Patient-reported & Patient-related Outcomes in Randomized Cancer Trials for Older Adults
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03676218. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Real-world Evidence Study EvaLuating PAtient-Reported Outcomes With XERMELO
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03223428. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Enabling Patient-Reported Outcomes Through Innovative Care - ACS (EPIC-ACS)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07390006. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Sacroiliac (SI) Screws: The Effect of SI Screw Removal on Patient-Reported Pain and Functional Outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02652611. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 12.
Remote Monitoring of Lung Cancer Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Moovcare®
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05011890. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Integration Into Rheumatology Clinical Practice
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05026853. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Evaluating Lorecivivint (SM04690) for Moderate to Severe Knee Osteoarthritis (STRIDES-1)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04385303. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Project of HCV-TARGET
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02601820. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Patient-Reported Outcomes In Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With Tofacitinib Or Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) In Real Life Conditions
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03073109. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 2. Publications: 2.
Patient-reported Outcomes in Vericiguat-treated Patients With HFpEF
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03547583. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 21. Publications: 4.
A Trial Comparing the Efficacy, Patient-reported Outcomes and Safety of Insulin Degludec 200 U/mL vs Insulin Glargine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Requiring High-dose Insulin
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01570751. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 2. Publications: 2.
Remote Symptom Monitoring on Patient-Reported Outcomes With Nudge Strategies Among Patients With Tumor in China
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06938945. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Improving Quality of Life After Thoracic Surgery Using Patient-Reported Outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04342260. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Validation of Patient-reported Outcomes Measures for the Assessment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Symptoms
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00703534. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.