Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

34

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

34 results for “Prey density”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
edi56/100

Data from “Larval and juvenile Longfin Smelt diets as a function of fish size and prey density in the San Francisco Estuary”

This publication includes the raw data from the manuscript: Lojkovic Burris, Z. P., R. D. Baxter, and C. E. Burdi. 2022. Larval and juvenile Longfin Smelt diets as a function of fish size and prey density in the San Francisco Estuary. California Fish and Wildlife Journal 108:e11. http://www.doi.org/10.51492/cfwj.108.11 Data includes the diets of larval and juvenile Longfin Smelt in the San Francisco Estuary from 2005 to 2008 in the form of diet by number, diet by weight, macroinvertebrate prey lengths, prey length-weight equations, and prey weight conversions.

openCC (other)Feb 2026View details →
edi56/100

Red knot occurrence, prey density, island morphology, and climate change in the Virginia Barrier Islands (2009-2023)

Global climate change is reshaping dynamic coastal ecosystems, with uncertain consequences for migratory shorebirds such as the federally threatened red knot (Calidris canutus rufa) that rely on coastal staging sites during migration. Understanding how sea-level rise and changing climate drivers affect red knot foraging ecology is critical for informing conservation and management at coastal staging sites. We integrated long-term biological, geomorphological, and climatological data to examine the direct and indirect pathways influencing red knots and their prey at intertidal foraging sites on the Virginia Barrier Islands during spring migration (May 21 - 28, 2009-2023). Using piecewise structural equation modeling, we tested hypothesized two causal networks linking 1) red knot occurrence and 2) densities of their main invertebrate prey to habitat characteristics, island morphology, geomorphic change, and climate drivers of ecosystem change. Red knots were indirectly affected by geomorphic change and climate drivers through bottom-up effects on invertebrate communities mediated by island morphology. Accelerated shoreline change narrowed islands, reducing invertebrate density and richness and indirectly decreasing red knot occurrence. Storms interacted with global climate oscillations to drive erosion or accretion of beaches, with variable effects on invertebrate density and red knot occurrence. Invertebrate responses were taxon-specific: shoreline change directly increased blue mussel density but indirectly reduced coquina clam and crustacean densities by narrowing island width, while storms impacts on crustacean density were mediated by beach width. Our findings suggest that accelerated ecosystem change under future climate scenarios may alter foraging conditions for red knots and other migratory shorebirds in the Virginia Barrier Islands, with broader implications for long-term population resilience.

openCustomSep 2025View details →
zenodo48/100

Density independent prey choice, taxonomy, life history and web characteristics determine the diet and biocontrol potential of spiders (Linyphiidae and Lycosidae) in cereal crops - Dataset

<p>Materials and Methods</p> <p>Fieldwork</p> <p>Money spiders (Araneae: Linyphiidae) and wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) were the two most common families present in these field surveys, so were prioritised for collection. Spiders were visually located along transects in two adjacent barley fields at Burdons Farm, Wenvoe in South Wales (51&deg;26&#39;24.8&quot;N, 3&deg;16&#39;17.9&quot;W) and collected from occupied webs and the ground, between April and September 2018. Surveys and sampling were conducted five days per week across this period. Each transect was adjacent to a randomly selected tramline and they were distributed across the entire field. The areas searched were 4 m<sup>2</sup> quadrats at least 10 m apart and all observed linyphiids and lycosids were collected in approximately 15-minute searches. The spiders included in this study were taken from 64 locations across 24 days (Supplementary Table 3) along the aforementioned transects. Spiders were individually placed into 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes containing 100 % ethanol using an aspirator, regularly changing meshing, at least every five spiders, to limit potential cross-contamination between spiders (spiders were also subsequently washed during transferral to fresh ethanol at the identification and, separately, dissection stages). Linyphiids occupying webs were prioritised for collection, but ground-active linyphiid spiders were also collected. For each spider taken from a web, the height of the web from the ground and its approximate dimensions were recorded, the latter calculated as approximate web area. Spiders were taken to Cardiff University, transferred to fresh ethanol, adults identified to species-level and juveniles to genus, and stored at -80 &deg;C in 100 % ethanol until subsequent DNA extraction. To obtain data on local prey density, 4 m<sup>2</sup> of ground and crop stems were suction sampled using a &lsquo;G-vac&rsquo; for 30 seconds at each quadrat from which spiders were collected, with the collected material emptied into a bag, any organisms immediately killed with ethyl-acetate and material frozen for storage before sorting into 70 % ethanol in the lab.</p> <p>All invertebrates were identified to family level due to the restriction of many of the metabarcoding-derived dietary data to this level, and the difficulty associated with finer taxonomic resolution of many taxa. Exceptions included springtails of the superfamily Sminthuroidea (Sminthuridae and Bourletiellidae, which were often indistinguishable following suction sampling and preservation due to the fine features necessary to distinguish them) which were left at super-family, mites (many of which were immature or in poor condition) which were identified to order level and wasps of the superfamily Ichneumonoidea (which were identified no further due to obscurity of wing venation due to damage).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Extraction and high-throughput sequencing of spider gut DNA</p> <p>Given their prevalence in field collections, dietary analysis was carried out for the linyphiid genera <em>Erigone</em>, <em>Tenuiphantes</em>, <em>Bathyphantes</em> and <em>Microlinyphia </em>(Araneae: Linyphiidae), and the Lycosidae genus <em>Pardosa</em>. Spiders were transferred to and washed in fresh 100 % ethanol to reduce external contaminants prior to identification via morphological key <sup>1</sup>. Abdomens were removed from spiders and again washed in and transferred to fresh 100 % ethanol. DNA was extracted from the abdomens via Qiagen TissueLyser II and DNeasy Blood &amp; Tissue Kit (Qiagen) as per the manufacturer protocol, but with an extended lysis time of 12 hours to account for the complex and branched gut system in spider abdomens <sup>2</sup>. At least one extraction negative (blank tubes treated identically to samples) was included per 12 spiders (each extraction typically contained 24 spiders, thus two extraction negatives), which was included in subsequent PCR and high-throughput sequencing to detect instances of lab/reagent contamination.</p> <p>For amplification of DNA, two primer pairs were used. BerenF-LuthienR <sup>3</sup> amplified a broad range of invertebrates including spiders, and TelperionF-LaureR, amplified a range of invertebrates but fewer spiders (modified from TelperionF-LaurelinR <sup>3</sup> via one base-pair change from Laurelin; 5&rsquo;-ggrtawacwgttcawccagt-3&rsquo;). Primers were labelled with unique 10 bp molecular identifier tags (MID-tags) so that each individual had a unique pairing of forward and reverse tags for identification of each spider post-sequencing. PCR reactions of 25 &micro;l contained 12.5 &micro;l Qiagen PCR Multiplex kit, 0.2 &micro;mol (2.5 &micro;l of 2 &micro;M) of each primer and 5 &micro;l template DNA. Reactions were carried out in the same thermocycler, optimised via temperature gradient, with an initial 15 minutes at 95 &deg;C, 35 cycles of 95 &deg;C for 30 seconds, the primer-specific annealing temperature for 90 seconds and 72 &deg;C for 90 seconds, respectively, followed by a final extension at 72 &deg;C for 10 minutes. BerenF-LuthienR and TelperionF-LaureR used annealing temperatures of 52 &deg;C and 42 &deg;C, respectively.</p> <p>Within each PCR 96-well plate, 12 negative controls (extraction and PCR), 2 blank controls and 2 positive controls were included (i.e. 80 samples per plate), based on Taberlet <em>et al. </em>(2018). Positive controls were mixtures of invertebrate DNA comprised of non-native Asiatic species in four different proportions (Supplementary Table 1) and blanks were empty wells within each plate to identify tag-jumping into unused MID-tag combinations. PCR negative controls were DNase-free water treated identically to DNA samples. A negative control was present for each MID-tag to identify any contamination of primers. All PCR products were visualised in a 2 % agarose gel with SYBRSafe (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paisley, UK) and placed in categories based on their relative brightness. The concentration of these brightness categories was quantified via Qubit dsDNA High-sensitivity Assay Kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with at least three representatives of each category per plate. The PCR products were then proportionally pooled according to these concentrations. Each pool was cleaned via SPRIselect beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, USA), with a left-side size selection using a 1:1 ratio (retaining ~300-1000 bp fragments). The concentration of the pooled DNA was then determined via Qubit dsDNA High-sensitivity Assay Kits and pooled together into one library per primer pair. Library preparation for Illumina sequencing was carried out on the cleaned libraries via NEXTflex Rapid DNA-Seq Kit (Bioo Scientific, Austin, USA) and samples were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq via a V3 chip with 300-bp paired-end reads (expected capacity &le;25,000,000 reads). Bioinformatic analysis followed (Drake et al., 2021; Supplementary Information 1).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Statistical analysis</p> <p>All analyses were conducted in R v4.0.0 <sup>6</sup>. Initial multivariate analyses used binary data (i.e., presence/absence) given the various problems inherent to quantifying metabarcoding data <sup>7,8</sup>. Prey species that occurred only once across all of the dietary samples were removed before further analyses to prevent outliers skewing the results, which is particularly problematic for non-metric multidimensional scaling. Spider diets were compared between variables using multivariate generalized linear models (MGLMs) via &lsquo;manyglm&rsquo; in the &lsquo;mvabund&rsquo; package <sup>9</sup> with a binomial error family and Monte Carlo resampling. Model independent variables included spider genus, spider life stage (juvenile or adult, the latter defined by fully developed genitalia), spider sex and all two-way interactions between these variables. Pairwise two-way interactions were also included between the aforementioned variables and Julian day to account for how seasonality may affect these relationships.</p> <p>Coarse dietary differences were visualised by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) via metaMDS in the &lsquo;vegan&rsquo; package <sup>10</sup> with Jaccard distance in two dimensions and 999 tries. For NMDS, outliers (usually samples containing rare taxa) were identified by plotting and subsequently removed to facilitate separation of samples and achieve minimum stress. For visualisation of the effect of categorical variables against the dietary NMDS, spider plots were created using &lsquo;ordispider&rsquo; with &lsquo;ggplot&rsquo; and the &lsquo;RColorBrewer&rsquo; &lsquo;Accent&rsquo; colour palette <sup>11</sup>. Spider diet was compared against web characteristics for spiders for which both data were available using the MGLM process outlined above, but with starting models containing web height, web area, an interaction between the two, and pairwise interactions between genus, life stage and sex with the two web variables. This model used the same binomial error family as above, but with a &lsquo;cloglog&rsquo; link function. For visualisation of the effect of continuous variables against the NMDS, surf plots were created with scaled coloured contours using the function &ldquo;ordisurf&rdquo; of the &ldquo;ggplot&rdquo; package in R.</p> <p>All prey taxa were classified as agricultural pests, natural enemies or excluded from subsequent analyses of intraguild predation and biocontrol (Supplementary Table 2). Intraguild predation and biocontrol variables were created by counting the number of natural enemy taxa, and, separately, of agriculturally relevant &ldquo;pest&rdquo; taxa (taxa containing species that commonly adversely affect agricultural productivity; Supplementary Table 2) in each spider&rsquo;s diet. These resultant count data (effectively the diversity of pests and natural enemies predated by each individual spider) were separately analysed against spider genus, life stage and sex via GLM. &ldquo;Site&rdquo; (denoting the 4 m<sup>2</sup> area from which spiders were collected within fields) was initially included as a random effect in generalized linear mixed-models, but no significant effect was observed when comparing this model against a standard GLM via a likelihood ratio test of nested models using the &lsquo;lrtest&rsquo; command in the &lsquo;lmtest&rsquo; package <sup>12</sup>. Standard GLMs were thus used to avoid issues relating to singularity in the mixed models. The assumptions for the resultant Poisson error family GLMs were tested using the &ldquo;testResiduals&rdquo; function of the &lsquo;DHARMa&rsquo; package <sup>13</sup>. Intraguild predation and biocontrol differences between significant terms were visualised using violin plots with the quartiles, median and 95 % upper limit annotated using the &lsquo;geom_violin&rsquo; function in &lsquo;ggplot2&rsquo;.</p> <p><em>In situ</em> spider prey choice was analysed using network-based null models in the &lsquo;econullnetr&rsquo; package <sup>14</sup> with the &lsquo;generate_null_net&rsquo; command, visually represented with the &lsquo;plot_preferences&rsquo; command. Binary dietary data were used alongside suction sample count data to represent prey availability. These suction sample data, as described above, were collected at the same sites as the spiders three days after spider collection. Prior to the taxonomic prey choice analysis, an hemipteran identified no further than order level through dietary analysis was removed due to the inability to pair it to any present prey taxa with certainty. Standardised effect sizes (SES) were extracted for all comparisons for each individual spider and compared between genera, life stages and sexes using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PerMANOVA) using the &lsquo;adonis&rsquo; function of the &rsquo;vegan&rsquo; package with 9999 permutations and a Euclidean distance matrix to determine overall differences in prey choice.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>References</p> <p>1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Roberts, M. J. <em>The Spiders of Great Britain and Ireland (Compact Edition)</em>. (Harley Books, 1993).</p> <p>2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Krehenwinkel, H., Kennedy, S., Pek&aacute;r, S. &amp; Gillespie, R. G. A cost-efficient and simple protocol to enrich prey DNA from extractions of predatory arthropods for large-scale gut content analysis by Illumina sequencing. <em>Methods Ecol. Evol.</em> <strong>8</strong>, 126&ndash;134 (2017).</p> <p>3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Cuff, J. P. <em>et al.</em> Money spider dietary choice in pre- and post-harvest cereal crops using metabarcoding. <em>Ecol. Entomol.</em> <strong>46</strong>, 249&ndash;261 (2021).</p> <p>4.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Taberlet, P., Bonin, A., Zinger, L. &amp; Coissac, E. <em>Environmental DNA</em>. (Oxford University Press, 2018).</p> <p>5.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Drake, L. E. <em>et al.</em> An assessment of minimum sequence copy thresholds for identifying and reducing the prevalence of artefacts in dietary metabarcoding data. <em>Methods Ecol. Evol.</em> <strong>in press</strong>, (2021).</p> <p>6.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2020).</p> <p>7.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Deagle, B. E., Thomas, A. C., Shaffer, A. K. &amp; Trites, A. W. Quantifying sequence proportions in a DNA-based diet study using Ion Torrent amplicon sequencing: which counts count? <em>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</em> <strong>13</strong>, 620&ndash;633 (2013).</p> <p>8.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Deagle, B. E. <em>et al.</em> Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data? <em>Mol. Ecol.</em> <strong>28</strong>, 391&ndash;406 (2019).</p> <p>9.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Wang, Y., Naumann, U., Wright, S. T. &amp; Warton, D. I. mvabund &ndash; an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. <em>Methods Ecol. Evol.</em> <strong>3</strong>, 471&ndash;474 (2012).</p> <p>10.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Oksanen, J. <em>et al.</em> vegan: Community Ecology Package. (2016).</p> <p>11.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Neuwirth, E. RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer palettes. (2014).</p> <p>12.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Zeileis, A. &amp; Hothorn, T. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. <em>R News</em> <strong>2</strong>, 7&ndash;10 (2002).</p> <p>13.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Hartig, F. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. (2020).</p> <p>14.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Vaughan, I. P. <em>et al.</em> econullnetr: an r package using null models to analyse the structure of ecological networks and identify resource selection. <em>Methods Ecol. Evol.</em> <strong>9</strong>, 728&ndash;733 (2018).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2021View details →
edi48/100

Predator effects on metamorphosis: The effects of scaring versus thinning at high prey densities.

Organisms with complex life cycles face the challenge of when to switch between habitats and foraging strategies over ontogeny in ways that improve their fitness. Metamorphosis is a well-studied life history event in animals and ecologists have spent decades trying to understand how the size at and time to metamorphosis are altered by natural stressors such as competition and predation. The challenges in interpreting the effects of predators on metamorphic decisions include the need to compare predator species that pose different levels of risk, compare the roles of predators inducing fear versus thinning of the density of prey, and examine prey life history traits and behavior over ontogeny. We addressed these challenges in a mesocosm experiment in which we introduced a high initial density of hatchling Northern Leopard Frogs (Rana pipiens) and exposed them to three different species of caged predators (to induce three different levels of fear), three rates of hand-thinning (to mimic the thinning effect of each predator), or three species of lethal predators (to cause induction and thinning). Under these initial high densities, we found that caged predators had no effects on tadpole activity, growth, and development. This outcome was likely due to the high density of tadpoles causing high competition, which can inhibit anti-predator responses. High rates of hand thinning caused decreased tadpole activity, greater mass, and faster development. Interestingly, lethal predators caused phenotypic changes that were largely in line with the hand thinning effects alone. These results suggest that at high initial prey densities, the thinning process of predation appears plays a much more important role in prey metamorphosis than induction from predatory chemical cues.

openCC (other)Jul 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

The influence of prey density and pollen on the predation and oviposition rate of Amblyseius swirskii on Echinothrips americanus

<p>Data set of the research: &quot;The influence of prey density and pollen on the predation and oviposition rate of Amblyseius swirskii on Echinothrips americanus&quot;. The dataset contains observations of predation and oviposition of Amblyseius swirskii on Echinothrips americanus. The different conditions were leaf area and prey density.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2023View details →
dryad40/100

Predator-prey time series: Monthly densities of least Killifish and Eastern Mosquitofish over five years

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Rapid evolution of consumptive and non-consumptive predator effects on prey population densities, bioenergetics and stoichiometry

<p>Predators can strongly influence prey populations not only through consumptive effects (CE) but also through non-consumptive effects (NCE) imposed by predation risk. Yet, the impact of NCE on bioenergetic and stoichiometric body contents of prey, traits that are shaping life histories, population and food web dynamics, is largely unknown. Moreover, the degree to which NCE can evolve and can drive evolution in prey populations is rarely studied. A 6-week outdoor mesocosm experiment with Caged-Fish (NCE) and Free-Ranging-Fish (CE and NCE) treatments was conducted to quantify and compare the effects of CE and NCE on population densities, bioenergetic and stoichiometric body contents of Daphnia magna, a keystone species in freshwater ecosystems. We tested for evolution of CE and NCE by using experimental populations consisting of D. magna clones from two periods of a resurrected natural pond population: a pre-fish period without fish and a high-fish period with high predation pressure.  Both Caged-Fish and Free-Ranging-Fish treatments decreased the body size and population densities, especially in Daphnia from the high-fish period. Only the Free-Ranging-Fish treatment affected bioenergetic variables, while both the Caged-Fish and Free-Ranging-Fish treatments shaped body stoichiometry. The effects of CE and NCE were different between both periods indicating their rapid evolution in the natural resurrected population. Both the Caged-Fish and Free-Ranging-Fish treatments changed the clonal frequencies of the experimental Daphnia populations of the pre-fish as well as the high-fish period, indicating that not only CE but also NCE induced clonal sorting, hence rapid evolution during the mesocosm experiment in both periods. Our results demonstrate that CE as well as NCE have the potential to change not only the body size and population density but also the bioenergetic and stoichiometric characteristics of prey populations. Moreover, we show that these responses not only evolved in the studied resurrected population, but that CE and NCE also caused differential rapid evolution in a time frame of 6 weeks (ca. 4-6 generations). As NCE can evolve as well as can drive evolution, they may play an important role in shaping eco-evolutionary dynamics in predator-prey interactions.</p>

opencc-zeroMar 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Quantifying the relationship between prey density, livestock and illegal killing of leopards

<p>Many large mammalian carnivores are facing population declines due to illegal killing (e.g., shooting) and habitat modification (e.g., livestock farming). Illegal killing occurs cryptically and hence is difficult to detect. However, reducing illegal killing requires a solid understanding of its magnitude and underlying drivers, while accounting for the imperfect detection of illegal killing events. Despite the importance of illegal killing of large carnivores in comparison with other causes of mortality, its relationship with <span>potential</span> drivers such as livestock density and wild prey abundance is rarely described.</p> <p>Using ranger-collected data (2007-2019) of leopard killing events and data on covariates (livestock density, wild prey abundance, road length, protected area size, elevation) across Iran, we applied a single-visit N-mixture model to jointly model variation in detection probability and expected annualized number of leopard killing events.</p> <p>Over the study period, we estimated 428 leopard mortalities (95% CI 184–1014), which was 45% larger than the observed number. Expected intensity of leopard killing was positively related to protected area size, livestock density and wild prey abundance. Detection of leopard killing was higher in areas with more developed road networks.</p> <p><strong>Synthesis and applications</strong></p> <p>Ranger based monitoring data on poaching of carnivores are cost-effective, but traditional analysis does not take into account imperfect detection. We show that innovative statistics (single-visit N-mixture modeling) can reliably quantify poaching events and address their drivers, at large geographical scales. We used the example of the Persian leopard across Iran, but our approach is also applicable to understand killing dynamics of other species. Results suggest that a high frequency of leopard killing is likely to occur in areas with &gt; 100 livestock per km<sup>2</sup> and &gt; 450 individuals of wild prey per km<sup>2</sup>. This highlights the need for improved management of livestock grazing and effective measures around high-risk protected areas to mitigate human-leopard conflict and reduce killing of leopards.</p>

opencc-zeroMar 2022View details →
dryad36/100

Cross-continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide-ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density

<p><span>Parasites are integral to ecosystem functioning yet often overlooked. Improved understanding of host-parasite associations is important, particularly for wide-ranging species for which host range shifts and climate change could alter host-parasite interactions and their effects on ecosystem function. </span></p> <p><span>Among the most widely distributed mammals with diverse diets, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>) host parasites that are transmitted among canids and via prey species. Grey wolf-parasite associations may therefore influence the population dynamics and ecological functions of both wolves and their prey. Our goal was to identify large-scale processes that shape host-parasite interactions across populations, with the grey wolf as a model organism. </span></p> <p><span>By compiling data from various studies, we examined the faecal prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in six wolf populations from two continents in relation to wolf density, diet diversity, and other ecological conditions.</span></p> <p><span>As expected, we found that the faecal prevalence of parasites transmitted directly to wolves via contact with other canids or their excreta was positively associated with wolf density. Contrary to our expectations, the faecal prevalence of parasites transmitted via prey was negatively associated with prey diversity. We also found that parasite communities reflected landscape characteristics and specific prey items available to wolves. </span></p> <p><span>Several parasite taxa identified in this study, including hookworms and coccidian protozoans, can cause morbidity and mortality in canids, especially in pups, or in combination with other stressors. The density-prevalence relationship for parasites with simple lifecycles may reflect a regulatory role of gastrointestinal parasites on wolf populations. Our result that faecal prevalence of parasites was lower in wolves with more diverse diets could provide insight into the mechanisms by which biodiversity may regulate disease. A diverse suite of predator-prey interactions could regulate the effects of parasitism on prey populations and mitigate the transmission of infectious agents, including zoonoses, spread via trophic interactions. </span></p>

opencc-zeroJun 2022View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Evaluating consumptive and nonconsumptive predator effects on prey density using field times series data

Determining the degree to which predation affects prey abundance in natural communities constitutes a key goal of ecological research. Predators can affect prey through both consumptive effects (CEs) and nonconsumptive effects (NCEs), although the contributions of each mechanism to the density of prey populations remain largely hypothetical in most systems. Common statistical methods applied to time series data cannot elucidate the mechanisms responsible for hypothesized predator effects on prey density (e.g., differentiate CEs from NCEs), nor provide parameters for predictive models. State space models (SSMs) applied to time series data offer a way to meet these goals. Here, we employ SSMs to assess effects of an invasive predatory zooplankter, Bythotrephes longimanus, on an important prey species, Daphnia mendotae, in Lake Michigan. We fit mechanistic models in a SSM framework to seasonal time series (1994-2012) using a recently developed, maximum likelihood-based optimization method, iterated filtering, which can overcome challenges in ecological data (e.g. nonlinearities, measurement error, and irregular sampling intervals). Our results indicate that B. longimanus strongly influences D. mendotae dynamics, with mean annual peak densities of B. longimanus observed in Lake Michigan estimated to cause a 61% reduction in D. mendotae population growth rate and a 59% reduction in peak biomass density. Further, the mechanism underlying the B. longimanus effect is most consistent with an NCE via reduced birth rates. The SSM approach also provided estimates for key biological parameters (e.g., demographic rates) and the contribution of dynamic stochasticity and measurement error. Our study therefore highlights the utility of SSMs to enhance inference for species interactions from time series data. In particular, our findings provide evidence derived directly from survey data that the invasive zooplankter B. longimanus is affecting zooplankton demographics and offer parameter estimates needed to inform predictive models that explore the effect of B. longimanus under different scenarios such as climate change.

opencc-zeroDec 2017View details →
dryad36/100

Data and code for: A healthy but depleted herd: predators decrease prey disease and density

<p>The healthy herds hypothesis proposes that predators can reduce parasite prevalence and thereby increase density of their prey. However, evidence for such predator-driven reductions in prevalence in prey remains mixed. Furthermore, even less evidence supports increases in prey density during epidemics. Here, we used a planktonic predator-prey-parasite system to experimentally test the healthy herds hypothesis. We manipulated density of a predator (the phantom midge, <em>Chaoborus</em> <em>punctipennis</em>) and parasitism (the virulent fungus <em>Metschnikowia</em> <em>bicuspidata</em>) in experimental assemblages. Because we know natural populations of the prey (<em>Daphnia</em> <em>dentifera</em>) vary in susceptibility to both predator and parasite, we stocked experimental populations with nine genotypes spanning a broad range of susceptibility to both enemies. Predation significantly reduced infection prevalence, eliminating infection at the highest predation level. However, lower parasitism did not increase densities of prey; instead, prey density decreased substantially at the highest predation levels (a major density cost of healthy herds predation). This density result was predicted by <span>a model parameterized for this system. The model specifies three conditions for predation to increase prey density during epidemics: (i) predators selectively feed on infected prey, (ii) consumed infected prey release fewer infectious propagules than unconsumed prey, and (iii) sufficiently low infection prevalence. While the system satisfied the first two conditions, prevalence remained too high to see an increase in prey density with predation. </span>Low prey densities caused by high predation drove increases in algal resources of the prey, fueling greater reproduction, indicating that consumer-resource interactions can complicate predator-prey-parasite dynamics. Overall, in our experiment, predation reduced prevalence of a virulent parasite but, at the highest levels, also reduced prey density. Hence, while healthy herds predation is possible under some conditions, our empirical results make it clear that manipulation of predators to reduce parasite prevalence may harm prey density.</p>

opencc-zeroMar 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Bottom trawling affects fish condition through changes in the ratio of prey availability to density of competitors

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2017View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Neighbor density and post-contact immobility duration as antipredator behavior: Antlion larvae do not fit the selfish prey hypothesis

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Cross-continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide-ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2022View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Evaluating consumptive and nonconsumptive predator effects on prey density using field times series data

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2018View details →
dryad36/100

Quantifying the relationship between prey density, livestock and illegal killing of leopards

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2022View details →
dryad36/100

Rapid evolution of consumptive and non-consumptive predator effects on prey population densities, bioenergetics and stoichiometry

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Data and code for: A healthy but depleted herd: predators decrease prey disease and density

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2023View details →
dryad32/100

Prey density affects predator foraging strategy in an Antarctic ecosystem

Studying the effects of prey distribution on predator behaviour is complex in systems where there are multiple prey species. The role of prey density in predator behaviour is rarely studied in closed ecosystems of one predator species and one prey species, despite these being an ideal opportunity to test these hypotheses. In this study, we investigate the effect of prey density on the foraging behaviour of a predatory species in an isolated Antarctic ecosystem of effectively a single predatory species, and a single prey species. We use resource selection models to compare prey density in areas utilised by predators (obtained from fine-scale GPS telemetry data) to prey density at randomly generated points (pseudo-absences) throughout the available area. We demonstrate that prey density of breeding Antarctic petrels (Thalassoica antarctica) is negatively associated with the probability of habitat use in its only predator, the south polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki). Skuas are less likely to utilise habitats with higher petrel densities, reducing predation in these areas but these effects are present during chick rearing only, but not during incubation. We suggest that this might be caused by successful group defense strategies employed by petrel chicks, primarily spitting oil at predators.

opencc-zeroDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

FIG. 1 in Foraging by the flower-dwelling spider, Misumenops argenteus (Thomisidae), at high prey density sites

FIG. 1. Manly's index of habitat preference for (A) M. argenteus and of (B) potential prey for each phase of T. adenantha flowerheads (F1 to F5, see Methods) along the Mirante track, during the rainy season. Values above and below 0.20 (1/total number of flowerhead phases) indicate a preference for and avoidance of flowerhead types by the spiders, respectively. The distribution of the spiders in the dry season was not assessed because of the low number of animals encountered. In the dry season the prey and adult females were not considered because their distribution among the different flowerheads was not significant (see Results).

opennotspecifiedMay 2004View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record