Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →

GC-MS data set for Generation of a chromosome-scale genome assembly of the insect-repellant terpenoid-producing Lamiaceae species, Callicarpa americana

RAW GC/MS data set for characterization of class II terpene synthases from Callicarpa americana

Machine Learning Models and New Computational Tool for the Discovery of Insect Repellents that Interfere with Olfaction

<ul> <li>SI1_Supporting Information file (docx) brings together detailed information on the outstanding models obtained for each dataset analyzed in this study such as statistical and training parameters and outliers. There can be found the responses in spikes/s of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus to the 50 IRs. Besides, there is presented a full table of the up-to-date studies related to QSAR and insect repellency.</li> <li>SI2_EXP1_50IRs from Liu et al (2013) SDF file presents the structures of each of the 50 IRs analyzed.</li> <li>SI3_EXP2_Datasets gathers the four datasets as SDF files from Oliferenko et al. (2013), Gaudin et al. (2008), Omolo et al. (2004), and Paluch et al. (2009) used for the repellency modeling in EXP2.</li> <li>SI4_EXP3_Prospective analysis provides Malaria Box Library (400 compounds) as an SDF file, which were analyzed in our virtual screening to prospect potential virtual hits.</li> <li>SI5_QuBiLS-MIDAS MDs lists contain three TXT lists of 3D molecular descriptors used in QuBiLS-MIDAS to describe the molecules used in the present study.</li> <li>SI6_EXP1_Sensillar Modeling comprises two subfolders: Classification and Regression models for each of the six sensilla. Models built to predict the physiological interaction experimentally obtained from Liu et al. (2013). All of the models are implemented in the software SiLiS-PAPACS. Every single folder compiles a DOCX file with the detailed description of the model, an XLSX file with the output obtained from the training in Weka 3.9.4, an ARFF, and CSV files with the MDs for each molecule, and the SDF of the study dataset.</li> <li>SI7_EXP2_Repellency Modeling encompasses the four datasets in the study: Oliferenko et al. (2013), Gaudin et al. (2008), Omolo et al. (2004), and Paluch et al. (2009). Inside the subfolders, there are three models per type of MDs (duplex, triple, generic, and mix) selected that best predict each dataset. As well as the SI6 folder, each model includes six files: DOCX, XLSX, ARFF, CSV, and an SDF.</li> <li>SI8_Virtual Hits includes the cluster analysis results and physico-chemical properties of new IR virtual leads.</li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →

Fig. 6 in Chemical constituents and toxic, repellent, and oviposition-deterrent effects of ethanol-extracted Myristica fragrans (Myristicaceae) oil on Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)

Fig. 6. Greenhouse experiments testing repellency and oviposition deterrence of nutmeg essential oil against whiteflies. A. Repellency at 24 h, B. repellency at 48 h, C. oviposition at 24 h, D. oviposition at 48 h of exposure. Values are means of 8 replications. The mean numbers of adults or eggs were compared by paired t-tests at a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. Asterisk indicates a significant difference between control and treatment.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →

Fig. 3 in Chemical constituents and toxic, repellent, and oviposition-deterrent effects of ethanol-extracted Myristica fragrans (Myristicaceae) oil on Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)

Fig. 3. Repellency of nutmeg essential oil to whitefly adults in laboratory experiments at 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to concentrations of 10, 5, and 2.5 mg/mL. Values are the means of 8 replications. The mean numbers of adults were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA,with a Tukey HSD post-hoc test at a significance level of P <0.05; means topped by the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 7 in Repellency of two essential oils to Monomorium pharaonis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 7. Percentage of repellency (PR) of Curcuma longa and Litsea cubeba against Monomorium pharaonis in the absence and presence of food at different hours of observation. Values are means of 6 replications, and bars indicate the standard error. The PR values were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test at a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the two plant oils.

Fig. 6 in Repellency of two essential oils to Monomorium pharaonis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 6. Mean numbers of ants present on DMSO-treated and untreated control filter papers in the absence or presence of food at different hours of observation. Values are means of 6 replications, and bars indicate the standard error. The mean numbers of ants were compared by paired t-tests at a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. No significant differences between DMSO and untreated control were found.

Fig. 4 in Repellency of two essential oils to Monomorium pharaonis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 4. Mean numbers of ants present on treatment and control filter papers in tests with essential oils at a concentration of 1,000 ppm in the absence or presence of food at different hours of observation. Values are means of 6 replications, and bars indicate the standard error. The mean numbers of ants were compared by paired t-tests at a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. No significant differences between treatment and control were found.

Fig. 5 in Repellency of two essential oils to Monomorium pharaonis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 5. Mean numbers of ants present on treatment and control filter papers in tests with essential oils at a concentration of 100 ppm in the absence or presence of food at different hours of observation. Values are means of 6 replications, and bars indicate the standard error. The mean numbers of ants were compared by paired t-tests at a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. No significant differences between treatment and control were found.

Fig. 3 in Repellency of two essential oils to Monomorium pharaonis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 3. Percentage of repellency (PR) of Curcuma longa and Litsea cubeba against Monomorium pharaonis in the absence or presence of food at different hours of observation. Values are means of 6 replications, and bars indicate the standard error. The PR values were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test at a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between absence and presence of food.

Fig. 2 in Repellency of two essential oils to Monomorium pharaonis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 2. Mean numbers of ants present on treatment and control filter papers in tests with essential oils at a concentration of 10,000 ppm in the absence or presence of food at different hours of observation. Values are means of 6 replications, and bars indicate the standard error. The mean numbers of ants were compared by paired t-tests at a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between treatment and control.

Fig. 1 in Repellency of two essential oils to Monomorium pharaonis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 1. Experimental setup of the area choice test, with two filter paper half discs fitted in the bottom of a Petri dish. In the "with food" test, food was placed centrally on each half disc.

Fig. 1 in Toxicity, repellency, and laboratory performance of consumer bait products for German cockroach (Blattodea: Ectobiidae) management

Fig. 1. Performance index (PI) relationships for German cockroach bait products and an untreated control determined in Ebeling choice boxes against 7 fieldcollected and 1 susceptible strain. Points represent means of 6 replicate boxes, each containing 20 adult male German cockroaches.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Evaluation of copper hydroxide as a repellent and feeding deterrent for Cuban brown snail (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Pleurodontidae)

Fig. 1. Mean number (± SE) of Zachrysia provisoria snails accessing the lid of their container over a 7-d period when the interior walls of the container were coated with copper sulfate residue, or treated only with tap water (control). Days with statistically significant (P <0.05) differences in snail behavior are marked with an asterisk (*).

Fig. 4 in The effects of three essential oils on adult repellency, larval fumigant toxicity, and egg hatch of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

Fig. 4. Mean red flour beetle egg hatch (± SE) during exposure to rice grains treated with 1 of 3 essential oils at varying exposure times. Means with a different letter for each time interval are significantly different (Tukey's HSD post hoc test, P <0.05).

Fig. 3 in The effects of three essential oils on adult repellency, larval fumigant toxicity, and egg hatch of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

Fig. 3. Mean percent (± SE) repellency of adult red flour beetles at varying intervals of exposure, tested separately to 1 of 3 essential oils. Means with a different letter for each time interval are significantly different (Tukey's HSD post hoc test, P <0.05).

Fig. 2 in The effects of three essential oils on adult repellency, larval fumigant toxicity, and egg hatch of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

Fig. 2. Mean (± SE) repellency of adult red flour beetles at varying intervals of exposure, tested separately to 1 of 3 essential oils. Means with an asterisk for each time interval are significantly different (Chi-square test, P <0.05).

Fig. 1 in The effects of three essential oils on adult repellency, larval fumigant toxicity, and egg hatch of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

Fig. 1. Diagram of adult repellency test apparatus showing cotton wick (source of essential oils) placed at the bottom of both legs, which were half filled with rice grains.

Fig. 5 in The effects of three essential oils on adult repellency, larval fumigant toxicity, and egg hatch of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

Fig. 5. Mean percent (± SE) mortality of red flour beetle larvae during separate exposure, as a fumigant, to 1 of 3 essential oils, at varying exposure times. Means