Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

9

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

9 results for “Scathophaga stercoraria”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 6 in Antennal sensory organs of Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Scathophagidae): ultramorphology and phylogenetic implications

FIGURE 6. Setigerous plaques of different families in Calyptratae (modified from Kutty et al. 2010).

opennotspecifiedDec 2016View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 5 in Antennal sensory organs of Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Scathophagidae): ultramorphology and phylogenetic implications

FIGURE 5. SEM micrographs of sensory pit on the antennal funiculus of male Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758). A. Overview of sensory pit. B. Section of sensory pit, showing basiconic sensilla III and microtrichiae in it. C. Magnification of one cluster of basiconic sensilla III. D. Magnification of basiconic sensilla III in sensory pit. (Abbreviations: Ar (arista); Ba III (basiconic sensillum III); Fn (funiculus); SP (sensory pit). Scale bars: A. 50 µm; B. 10 µm; C. 4 µm; D. 2.5 µm.)

opennotspecifiedDec 2016View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 2 in Antennal sensory organs of Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Scathophagidae): ultramorphology and phylogenetic implications

FIGURE 2. SEM micrographs of setiferous plaque and pedicellar button on the antennal pedicel of male Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758). A. Overview of pedicellar dorsal surface. B. Magnification of setiferous plaque. C. Details of antennal pedicel after removal of antennal funiculus. D. Magnification of pedicellar button. (Abbreviations: AR (annular ridge); Ch (chaetic sensillum); PB (pedicellar button); Pd (pedicel); Pl (plaque); Po (pore). Scale bars: A. 25 µm; B. 2.5 µm; C. 50 µm; D. 5 µm.)

opennotspecifiedDec 2016View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 4 in Antennal sensory organs of Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Scathophagidae): ultramorphology and phylogenetic implications

FIGURE 4. SEM micrographs of coeloconic sensilla and clavate sensilla on the antennal funiculus of male Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758). A. Distribution of coeloconic sensilla in the proximal region of antennal funiculus. B. Overview of distal region of antennal funiculus. C. Magnification of coeloconic sensillum. D. Magnification of clavate sensillum. E. Distal surface of clavate sensillum, showing pores on it. (Abbreviations: Ba I (basiconic sensillum I); Ba II (basiconic sensillum II); Co (coeloconic sensillum); Cl (clavate sensillum); Mt (microtrichia); Tr (trichoid sensillum). Scale bars: A–B. 15 µm; C–E. 2.5 µm.)

opennotspecifiedDec 2016View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in Antennal sensory organs of Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Scathophagidae): ultramorphology and phylogenetic implications

FIGURE 1. Antennal features of male Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758). A. Lateral view of the male head with antennae located between compound eyes. B. Posteroventral and dorsolateral surface of antennal funiculus. C. Anterodorsal and dorsolateral surface of antennal funiculus. D. Anterodorsal surface of antennal pedicel and scape. E. Posteroventral surface of antennal pedicel and scape. F. Antennal arista. G. Magnification of mechanoreceptor on antennal pedicel. (Abbreviations: Ad (anterodorsal surface); Ar (arista); Ch (chaetic sensillum); Dl (dorsolateral surface); Fn (funiculus); Pd (pedicel); Pv (posteroventral surface); Sc (scape); SP (sensory pit). Scale bars: A. 1 mm; B–E. 100 µm; F. 250 µm; G. 100 µm.)

opennotspecifiedDec 2016View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 3 in Antennal sensory organs of Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Scathophagidae): ultramorphology and phylogenetic implications

FIGURE 3. SEM micrographs of trichoid sensilla and basiconic sensilla on the antennal funiculus of male Scathophaga stercoraria (Linnaeus, 1758). A. Magnification of trichoid sensilla and basiconic sensilla within microtrichiae. B. Trichoid sensillum extending above the microtrichiae. C. Magnification of basiconic sensillum. I. D. Magnification of basiconic sensillum II. (Abbreviations: Ba I (basiconic sensillum I); Ba II (basiconic sensillum II); Mt (microtrichia); Tr (trichoid sensillum). Scale bars: A. 15 µm; B. 5 µm; C–D. 2.5 µm.)

opennotspecifiedDec 2016View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1. A. Phylogenetic relationships derived from 18 in Systematic ambiguity in the well-established model system insect Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae): sister species S. soror revealed by molecular evidence

FIGURE 1. A. Phylogenetic relationships derived from 18'002 Bayesian trees based on combined COI, 12S rDNA, 16S rDNA, and ITS2 sequences as established between 21 Scathophagidae species. The tree is a 50% majority rule consensus tree; values of posterior probabilities over 50% are indicated above branches (branches with probabilities less than 50% are collapsed). Scathophaga soror is evidenced in bold. B. Excerpt from a gene tree (Neighbour Joining, Kimura 2 parameters, COI gene) illustrating the sister group relationship between the monophyletic S. stercoraria and S. soror clades. Bootstrap values (for 1000 pseudo-replicates) are indicated above branches.

opennotspecifiedApr 2010View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Size-dependent ejaculation strategies and reproductive success in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria

Theory predicts that sperm competition will favour the production of larger ejaculates. However, because the benefits of greater reproductive investment are balanced by the costs of spermatogenesis, expenditure should depend on male physiology, mating rate and the relationship between additional investment and fertilization gains. In the yellow dung fly, Scathophagastercoraria, males adopt size-dependent alternative mating tactics that are associated with discrete ecological resources (foraging and oviposition substrates), although males switch between these environments throughout their lives. By copulating on foraging substrate (fruit or flowers), males can bypass intense mate competition that occurs at oviposition sites (cow dung), but as a consequence, must occupy a disfavoured mating role (i.e. face a greater risk that their ejaculate will be displaced from storage prior to fertilization). Small males often mate on foraging substrate, whereas large males mate in this environment only during feeding bouts. Optimal ejaculate expenditure should therefore depend on male size and their current mating role. By measuring copula duration (i.e. ejaculate expenditure) of natural matings and assigning paternity to resulting offspring, we confirmed that copulations on dung sire approximately three times as many offspring as those on foraging substrate. Furthermore, large males reduced copula duration on fruit, as predicted, since this strategy enables greater investment into high-payoff matings on dung. Conversely, small males copulated for shorter durations on dung than on foraging substrate, perhaps to minimize the risk of being displaced from copula by a rival. These patterns of ejaculate expenditure translated into greater offspring production for large males on dung and for small males on fruit. We discuss the possible proximate factors driving these size- and context-dependent patterns of ejaculate allocation by yellow dung fly males. Together, our findings shed light on the allocation strategies and reproductive consequences of alternative mating tactics.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Size-dependent ejaculation strategies and reproductive success in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2018View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record