Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Fig.5 in Genetic And Morphological Variability Of Small Vendace (Coregonus Albula (Linnaeus, 1758)) Population In Three Latvian Lakes

Fig.5. Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of the genetic structuring among the three vendace populations. A). PC1 and PC2 explain 25.50% and 21.88% of the total variation, respectively (by allozyme markers); B). PC1 and PC2 explain 19.52% and 13.73% of the total variation, respectively (by RAPD markers).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Fig. 4 in Genetic And Morphological Variability Of Small Vendace (Coregonus Albula (Linnaeus, 1758)) Population In Three Latvian Lakes

Fig. 4. Number of RAPD loci and gene diversity of Coregonus albula in three Latvian lakes, based on RAPD markers.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Fig.3 in Genetic And Morphological Variability Of Small Vendace (Coregonus Albula (Linnaeus, 1758)) Population In Three Latvian Lakes

Fig.3. Allelic richness and polymorphism in Coregonus albula populations in studied lakes based on allozyme markers.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

Рис. 2. МежгоΔовое соотношение чисΛенного обиΛия семейств герпетобионтных жесткокрыΛых в пойме (2008–2011 гг.) Fig. 2. Inter-annual ratio of numerical abundance of herpetobiont beetle families in the floodplain (2008–2011) in Population Dynamics For Herpetobiont Beetles (Coleoptera) In The Floodplain Of A Small Tributary In The Lower Reaches Of The Irtysh

Рис. 2. МежгоΔовое соотношение чисΛенного обиΛия семейств герпетобионтных жесткокрыΛых в пойме (2008–2011 гг.) Fig. 2. Inter-annual ratio of numerical abundance of herpetobiont beetle families in the floodplain (2008–2011)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

Рис. 1. ÀенΔрограмма схоΔства (коэффициент Жаккара) состава насеΛения герпетобионтных жесткокрыΛых поймы разных Λет (2008–2011 гг.) Fig. 1. The dendrogram of faunistic similarity (Jacquard coefficient) for the population composition of herpetobiont beetles in different years (2008–2011) in Population Dynamics For Herpetobiont Beetles (Coleoptera) In The Floodplain Of A Small Tributary In The Lower Reaches Of The Irtysh

Рис. 1. ÀенΔрограмма схоΔства (коэффициент Жаккара) состава насеΛения герпетобионтных жесткокрыΛых поймы разных Λет (2008–2011 гг.) Fig. 1. The dendrogram of faunistic similarity (Jacquard coefficient) for the population composition of herpetobiont beetles in different years (2008–2011)

Рис. 1. Δинамика чисΛенности меΛких мΛекопитающих в Цасучейском бору: 1 — суммарная чисΛенность (особей / 100 циΛинΑро-суток); Αоминирующие виΑы: 2 — забайкаΛьский хомячок, 3 — бурозубка тунΑряная, 4 — бурозубка крошечная, 5 — поΛёвка монгоΛьская, 6 — поΛёвка РаΑΑе, 7 — красная поΛёвка; A — остепнённый сосняк, B — первичная гарь, С — старая гарь, D — повторная гарь; стреΛка указывает время прохожΑения пожара. Ось X — гг., ось Y — чисΛенность Fig. 1. Population dynamics of small mammals in the Tsasucheysky Pine Forest: 1 — total abundance (individuals / 100 cylinder-days); dominant species: 2 — Cricetulus pseudogriseus, 3 — Sorex tundrensis, 4 — S. minutissimus, 5 — Alexandromys mongolicus, 6 — Lasiopodomys raddei, 7 — Myodes rutilus; A — steppe pine forest, B — primary burns site, С — old burns site; D — repeated burns site; the arrow indicates the time of the fire. The X-axis shows years; the Y-axis shows population density in Population dynamics of small mammals after spring fires in steppe pine forest

Рис. 1. Δинамика чисΛенности меΛких мΛекопитающих в Цасучейском бору: 1 — суммарная чисΛенность (особей / 100 циΛинΑро-суток); Αоминирующие виΑы: 2 — забайкаΛьский хомячок, 3 — бурозубка тунΑряная, 4 — бурозубка крошечная, 5 — поΛёвка монгоΛьская, 6 — поΛёвка РаΑΑе, 7 — красная поΛёвка; A — остепнённый сосняк, B — первичная гарь, С — старая гарь, D — повторная гарь; стреΛка указывает время прохожΑения пожара. Ось X — гг., ось Y — чисΛенность Fig. 1. Population dynamics of small mammals in the Tsasucheysky Pine Forest: 1 — total abundance (individuals / 100 cylinder-days); dominant species: 2 — Cricetulus pseudogriseus, 3 — Sorex tundrensis, 4 — S. minutissimus, 5 — Alexandromys mongolicus, 6 — Lasiopodomys raddei, 7 — Myodes rutilus; A — steppe pine forest, B — primary burns site, С — old burns site; D — repeated burns site; the arrow indicates the time of the fire. The X-axis shows years; the Y-axis shows population density

Figure 2 in Characterization of a Small Population of the Orangeblack Hawaiian Damselfly (Megalagrion xanthomelas) in Anchialine Pools at Kaloko-Honokōhau National Historical Park, Hawai'i Island

Figure 2. Male Megalagrion xanthomelas perched on pickleweed (A), a tandem pair of M. xanthomelas perched on a small branch (B), and four of the core pools where M. xanthomelas were surveyed (C–F). Note that the female M. xanthomelas (B) is probing the tip of her abdomen on the side of a branch that is above the surface of the water. The wetness of the branch suggests that it will be submerged during high tide.

Figure 1 in Characterization of a Small Population of the Orangeblack Hawaiian Damselfly (Megalagrion xanthomelas) in Anchialine Pools at Kaloko-Honokōhau National Historical Park, Hawai'i Island

Figure 1. Location of Kaloko-Honokōhau National Historical Park along the Kona Coast of Hawai'i. Anchialine pools supporting Megalagrion xanthomelas are located centrally in the Park between Kaloko and 'Aimakapā Fishponds.

Figure 4 in Characterization of a Small Population of the Orangeblack Hawaiian Damselfly (Megalagrion xanthomelas) in Anchialine Pools at Kaloko-Honokōhau National Historical Park, Hawai'i Island

Figure 4. Frequency of ovipositing behavior on substrates relative to the water surface in the five core pools where most observations were made and in all seven core pools combined. Ovipositing behavior was rarely observed at two core pools (7 and 58) and those data are not displayed individually.

Figure 5 in Diurnal activity pattern of age-sex groups of a small and fragmented population of Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra L.) in Western Haryana, India

Figure 5. Behavioural activities recorded for sub adult male vs. total time spent during different season(s).

Figure 6 in Diurnal activity pattern of age-sex groups of a small and fragmented population of Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra L.) in Western Haryana, India

Figure 6. Behavioural activities recorded for sub adult female vs. total time spent during different season(s).

Figure 3 in Diurnal activity pattern of age-sex groups of a small and fragmented population of Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra L.) in Western Haryana, India

Figure 3. Behavioural activities recorded for adult male vs. total time spent during different season(s).

Figure 4 in Diurnal activity pattern of age-sex groups of a small and fragmented population of Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra L.) in Western Haryana, India

Figure 4. Behavioural activities recorded for adult female vs. total time spent during different season(s).

Figure 8 in Diurnal activity pattern of age-sex groups of a small and fragmented population of Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra L.) in Western Haryana, India

Figure 8. Average % time spent annually versus activities by different age sex group (Error bars with standard error and treatment bars with different letters differ significantly at P ≤ 0.05 based on Duncan Multiple Range Test).