Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
175
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
175 results for “Somatosensory”
PsPM-FSS6B: SCR and PSR measurements in a delay fear conditioning task with somatosensory CS and electrical US
<p>This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR) and pupil size response (PSR) measurements. Also included are CS and US information, keypress responses, keypress response times and key correctness for each of 18 healthy unmedicated participants (10 males and 8 females aged 25.7+/-5.0 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. Simple and complex CS are delivered to the intermediate phalanges of the index and middle fingers of the non-dominant hand. Simple stimuli are stimulations to either index or middle finger, complex stimuli are stimulations of different temporal structure to both index and middle fingers. CS intensity is set to a perceivable but not unpleasant level. US is a train of electric square pulses delivered with a constant current stimulator (Digitimer DS7A, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK) on participants' dominant forearm through a pin-cathode/ring-anode configuration. SOA between the CS and US is 3.5 s. The ITI is randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
Somatosensory phase-encoded bilateral full-body light touch stimulation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data set for "Cell class-specific long-range axonal projections of neurons in mouse whisker-related somatosensory cortices"
<p>Data set for: Liu Y, Bech P, Tamura K, Délez LT, Crochet S, Petersen CCH (2024) Cell class-specific long-range axonal projections of neurons in mouse whisker-related somatosensory cortices. eLife 13: RP97602. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.97602</p> <p>There are 3 files in this upload:</p> <p>1. The file named "2024_Liu_eLife.pdf" is the Open Access pdf of the online publication in eLife.</p> <p>2. The file named "Liu_anatomy_data_code.zip" (~35 GB) is a zipped version of a folder "Liu_anatomy_data_code" (~111 GB), which contains the anatomical data analysed in the study along with the Python codes used to generate the published figures 1-7 and their associated figure supplements. </p> <p>3. The file named "Liu_function_data_code.zip" (~10 GB) is a zipped version of a folder "Liu_function_data_code" (~35 GB), which contains the functional data analysed in the study along with the Python codes used to generate the published figure 8 and its associated figure supplement. </p> <p>After unzipping, the Python codes should run as a Jupyter notebook (anatomy .ipynb code) or Python code (function .py code) in Anaconda.</p>
Primary somatosensory cortical processing in tactile communication
<p>Touch is an essential form of non-verbal communication. While language and its neural basis are widely studied, tactile communication is less well understood. We used fMRI and multivariate pattern analyses in pairs of emotionally close adults to examine the neural basis of human-to-human tactile communication. In each pair, a participant was designated either as sender or as receiver. The sender was instructed to communicate specific messages by touching only the arm of the receiver, who was inside the scanner. The receiver then identified the message based on the touch gesture alone. We designed two multivariate decoders – one based on the sender's intent (sender-decoder), and another based on the receiver's response (receiver-decoder). Both were able to differentiate accurately the messages using signals from the receiver's primary somatosensory cortex (S1). The receiver-decoder, which is based on receivers' interpretations of the touch gestures, outperformed the sender-decoder, which is more indicative of sensory input. Our results support the notion of non-sensory factors being represented in S1. </p><p>Content: anonymized T1, functional EPI from run1 and run 2 per subject, analysis script (ECOC_s1.mat)</p><p>Log files can be found here: https://zenodo.org/uploads/10012490</p>
A VTA to basal amygdala dopamine projection contributes to signal salient somatosensory events during fear learning
<p>This dataset represents the raw data that gave rise to the study by Tang et al., J. Neuroscience 2020 (DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1796-19.2020). Please refer to the original publication regarding experimental design and methodological details of data acquisition and analysis. Below we supply information on the provided metadata files (which, in turn, refer to individual raw data files), and essential details on the specific data formats.</p> <ol> <li>raw data is organized in the datasets related to the Figs. 1H-L, 1M, 3B-C, 2, 4G-H, 5D-E, 5H-I of the paper (Tang et al., 2020);</li> <li>the metadata for each individual dataset, which lists individual data filenames from the respective dataset, are stored in separate “.csv” files, one per each dataset. Field separator: comma;</li> <li>individual metadata files for each dataset are described in the master metadata file “metadata_master.csv”. Field separator: comma;</li> <li>widefield fluorescent images of single coronal slices containing VTA (Fig. 1H-M) were converted from the proprietary format of Olympus slide scanning microscope into composite TIFF format readable by FIJI/ImageJ (<a href="https://fiji.sc/">https://fiji.sc/</a> or <a href="https://imagej.net/Fiji/Downloads">https://imagej.net/Fiji/Downloads</a>). Image stacks covering the injection area of CTB into BA are provided in single multi-plane TIFF files, one per animal. Unless specified in the metadata file, the information on pixel resolution is embedded inside the individual image files as TIFF metadata. Attribution of fluorescent probes to the color channels is given in the corresponding metadata files; AP positions refer to Franklin KB, Paxinos G (2016) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates, Ed 4. San Diego: Elsevier/Academic;</li> <li>confocal fluorescent image stacks acquired from single coronal slices containing VTA (Fig. 3B-C) are provided in the original format “.lsm” written by a confocal software Zen (Carl Zeiss). Besides the original Zen software, this format can be readily imported into FIJI/ImageJ using built-in converters “LSM…” or “Bio-Formats”. All the metadata containing imaging parameters is embedded in this format and can be accessed from FIJI/ImageJ after importing the stack. Attribution of fluorescent probes to the color channels is given in the corresponding “.csv” metadata file; AP positions refer to Franklin and Paxinos (2016);</li> <li>video recordings of animal behavior are provided as “.wmv” files, unmodified from the original version created by the acquisition software VideoFreeze (MedAssociates Inc). Video stream parameters: wmv3 codec, color space yuv420p, 320x240 pixels, bitrate 300 kb/s, 30 fps;</li> <li>timing patterns of the sound (CS) and of the footshock (US) applications during each day of fear conditioning protocol are provided in the respective “.csv” files: “day1_CS_timing.csv”, “day2_CS_timing.csv”, “day2_US_timing.csv”, “day3_CS_timing.csv”. The timestamps in these files are expressed in seconds relative to the start of the VideoFreeze video recordings (see p. 4 above). These patterns are in common for all the video recordings done on respective training days in every data subset (Figs. 2, 4-5);</li> <li>extracellular optrode recording data (Fig. 2) were converted from the original proprietary “.mcd” format of the MC_Rack software (Multichannel Systems) into the open HDF5 format “.h5” using the Multi Channel DataManager software (Multichannel Systems). We provide both the continuous recording data acquired during behavior sessions on days 1-3 of the fear learning protocol, as well as recordings of light-evoked spiking acquired during the opto-tagging sessions on each experimental day. In the latter, each of 8-10 consequently recorded data files contains individual triggered sweeps (from -50 to +50 ms), each centered around a single laser pulse (t=0 ms);</li> <li>the raw unfiltered electrode data is stored as a 32-bit integer matrix 16xN (16 - number of electrodes, N - number of sampling points @ 40 kHz) in the container Data->Recording_0->AnalogStream->Stream_1->ChannelData of the HDF5 files. Conversion factor to the units of volts for the raw values is 1.25e-6. Correspondence of the rows of the data matrix to the electrodes “E1”-“E16” is indexed by the string array Data->Recording_0->AnalogStream->Stream_1->I_Label. The electrodes were physically arranged into four tetrodes in following groups: E1-E4, E5-E8, E9-E12, E13-E16;</li> <li>timestamps for the continuous recordings, or for each of the triggered sweeps in case of opto-tagging, are stored in the 2D floating point array Data->Recording_0->AnalogStream->Stream_1->ChannelDataTimeStamps; the timestamp values are in microseconds;</li> <li>the timing of CS and US stimuli produced by the VideoFreeze software (see p. 5 above) was sampled as input digital triggers by the amplifier for extracellular recordings for precise synchronization between the optrode- and video recordings. These signals are stored as single bit changes in the 32-bits integer N-samples array Data->Recording_0->AnalogStream->Stream_0->ChannelData of the corresponding HDF5 files.</li> </ol>
nNOS-expressing interneurons control basal and behaviorally evoked arterial dilation in somatosensory cortex of mice
<p>Cortical neural activity is coupled to local arterial diameter and blood flow. However, which neurons control the dynamics of cerebral arteries is not well understood. We dissected the cellular mechanisms controlling the basal diameter and evoked dilation in cortical arteries in awake, head-fixed mice. Locomotion drove robust arterial dilation, increases in gamma band power in the local field potential (LFP), and increases calcium signals in pyramidal and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS)-expressing neurons. Chemogenetic or pharmocological modulation of overall neural activity up or down caused corresponding increases or decreases in basal arterial diameter. Modulation of pyramidal neuron activity alone had little effect on basal or evoked arterial dilation, despite pronounced changes in the LFP. Modulation of the activity of nNOS-expressing neurons drove changes in the basal and evoked arterial diameter without corresponding changes in population neural activity.</p>
Data + Analyses: "Gaze-dependent Coding of Somatosensory Reach Targets after Effector Movement: Testing the Impact of Online Information, Movement Timing, and Target Distance"
<p>This upload contains the experiment scripts (written in Presentation), data, and analyses (performed with MATLAB and SPSS) underlying the publication<strong> </strong>by Mueller & Fiehler (2017). <em>PloS one</em>. doi:<strong>10.1371/journal.pone.0180782</strong></p>
Bilateral integration in somatosensory cortex is controlled by behavioral relevance
<p><span><span>Sensory</span> <span>p</span><span>ercep</span><span>tion</span><span> naturally </span><span>requires</span> <span>processing</span> <span>stimuli </span><span>from</span> <span>both sides of the body</span><span>.</span> <span>Yet</span><span>, </span><span>how</span> <span>neurons</span> <span>bind stimulus</span> <span>features</span><span> across the hemispheres to </span><span>create</span><span> a unified </span><span>percept</span><span>ual</span><span> experience</span> <span>remains</span> <span>unknown.</span> <span>To </span><span>address this </span><span>question</span><span>, w</span><span>e </span><span>performed</span><span> large-scale</span> <span>recordings</span><span> from</span> <span>neurons in</span> <span>both</span><span> somatosensory cort</span><span>ices</span><span> (S1)</span> <span>while</span> <span>mice</span> <span>shared information between </span><span>their </span><span>hemispheres</span> <span>and</span><span> discriminate</span><span>d</span><span> between two categories of bilateral </span><span>stimuli</span><span>. </span><span>When </span><span>expert </span><span>mice </span><span>touched</span> <span>stimuli</span> <span>associated with reward</span><span>,</span> <span>they</span> <span>moved their whiskers</span><span> with greater bilateral symmetry</span><span>.</span> <span>During this period,</span> <span>synchronous spiking</span><span> and </span><span>enhanced </span><span>spike-field coupling</span> <span>emerged</span> <span>between</span> <span>the hemispheres</span><span>.</span> <span>This coordinated activity </span><span>was </span><span>absent</span><span> in</span> <span>stimulus</span><span>-matched</span><span> naïve animals</span><span>,</span> <span>indicating</span><span> that </span><span>interhemispheric </span><span>(IH)</span> <span>binding</span> <span>was</span> <span>controlled</span> <span>by</span> <span>a</span><span> goal-directed</span><span>,</span> <span>internal </span><span>process</span><span>.</span> <span>I</span><span>n</span> <span>S1 neurons,</span> <span>the addition of ipsilateral touch</span><span> primarily </span><span>facilitate</span><span>d</span> <span>the </span><span>contralateral</span><span>, principal whisker</span><span> response. </span><span>Th</span><span>is</span> <span>facilitation</span> <span>primarily </span><span>emerged</span><span> for</span><span> reward-associated </span><span>stimuli</span> <span>and </span><span>was lost on trials </span><span>where</span> <span>expert </span><span>mice </span><span>failed to</span><span> re</span><span>spond</span><span>.</span> <span>Taken together</span><span>, t</span><span>hese </span><span>results</span><span> reveal </span><span>a</span> <span>novel</span> <span>state-dependent l</span><span>ogic</span> <span>underlying</span> <span>bilateral </span><span>integration</span><span> in S1</span><span>,</span><span> where</span> <span>stimulus</span> <span>binding</span><span> and</span><span> facilitation are controlled by </span><span>behavioral relevance</span><span>. </span></span></p>
High frequency somatosensory MEG: evoked responses, FreeSurfer reconstruction
<p>This dataset contains somatosensory evoked responses recorded with Elekta TRIUX magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. The purpose of the measurements was to examine high-frequency (HF) somatosensory responses. To this end, a large number of responses (couple of thousand) were recorded with a short interstimulus interval (randomized between 300-350 ms). A constant-current electric stimulator was used, with the electrodes placed around the median nerve at the right wrist. The magnitude of the current was individually determined so that the stimulation was slightly below motor threshold; it was approximately 7 mA. The length of the current pulse was set at 200 microseconds.</p> <p>Measurements from two subjects are included. The dataset also contains anatomical MRIs and FreeSurfer reconstructions. Only evoked (averaged) MEG data is included; raw MEG data is in a separate dataset at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.889295</p> <p> </p>
Dataset: Stimulus selection drives value-modulated somatosensory processing in superior colliculus
<p>Pluta Lab</p> <p>.mat data files used in the following paper</p> <p>Stimulus selection drives value-modulated somatosensory processing in superior colliculus </p> <p>Details can be found in readme.txt</p>
Bayesian Surprise Shapes Neural Responses in Somatosensory Cortical Circuit
<p>Numerous psychophysical studies demonstrate that Bayesian inference governs sensory decision-making, however the specific neural circuitry underlying this probabilistic mechanism remains unknown. We record extracellular neural activity along the somatosensory pathway of mice while delivering sensory stimulation paradigms designed to isolate the response to the surprise generated by Bayesian inference. Our results demonstrate that laminar cortical circuits in early sensory areas encode Bayesian surprise. Systematic sensitivity to surprise is not identified in the somatosensory thalamus, rather emerging in the primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices. Multiunit spiking activity and evoked potentials in layer 6 of these regions exhibit the highest sensitivity to surprise. Gamma power in S1 layer 2/3 exhibits an NMDAR-dependent scaling with surprise, as does alpha power in layers 2/3 and 6 of S2. These results demonstrate a precise spatiotemporal neural representation of Bayesian surprise<br> and suggest that Bayesian inference is a fundamental component of cortical proc</p>
Data from: Scn2a insufficiency alters spontaneous neuronal Ca2+ activity in somatosensory cortex during wakefulness
<p class="MsoNormal">SCN2A protein-truncating variants (PTV) can result in neurological disorders such as autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability, but they are less likely to cause epilepsy in comparison to missense variants. While<em> <span>i</span>n vitro </em>studies showed PTV reduce action potential firing, consequences at <em>in vivo</em> network level remain elusive. Here, we generated a mouse model of Scn2a insufficiency using antisense oligonucleotides (Scn2a ASO mice), which recapitulated key clinical feature of SCN2A PTV disorders. Simultaneous two-photon <span>Ca<sup>2+</sup></span> imaging and electrocorticography (ECoG) in awake mice showed that spontaneous <span>Ca<sup>2+</sup></span> transients in somatosensory cortical neurons, as well as their pairwise co-activities were generally decreased in Scn2a ASO mice during spontaneous awake state and induced seizure state. The reduction of neuronal activities and paired co-activity are mechanisms associated with motor, social and cognitive deficits observed in our mouse model of severe Scn2a insufficiency, indicating these are likely mechanisms driving SCN2A PTV pathology.</p>
Data from: Scn2a insufficiency alters spontaneous neuronal Ca2+ activity in somatosensory cortex during wakefulness
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
nNOS-expressing interneurons control basal and behaviorally evoked arterial dilation in somatosensory cortex of mice
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data set for "Anatomically and functionally distinct thalamocortical inputs to primary and secondary mouse whisker somatosensory cortices"
<p>Data set for: El-Boustani S, Sermet BS, Foustoukos G, Oram TB, Yizhar O, Petersen CCH (2020) Anatomically and functionally distinct thalamocortical inputs to primary and secondary mouse whisker somatosensory cortices. Nature Communications 11: 3342. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17087-7</p> <p>There are 4 files in this upload:</p> <p>1. The file named "2020_El-Boustani_NCOMMS.pdf" is the Open Access pdf file of the manuscript published in Nature Communications.</p> <p>2. The file named "2020_El-Boustani_NCOMMS_SupMovie1.avi" is Supplementary Movie 1 in .avi format, accompanying the Nature Communications publication.</p> <p>2. The file named "2020_El-Boustani_NCOMMS_SupMovie2.avi" is Supplementary Movie 2 in .avi format, accompanying the Nature Communications publication.</p> <p>4. The file named "El-Boustani_data_code.zip" (~36 GB) is a zipped version of a folder "El-Boustani_data_code" (~45 GB), which contains the data analysed in the study along with the Matlab code used to generate the published figures. To access the data and the code, first unzip the file. In the main folder, data for all experiments are stored within folders starting by the prefix “SB”. The code for generating population data and plotting figures from the paper are in the folder “Matlab_code”. In this folder, several Matlab scripts are named after the panels or figures they will plot such as “Plot_Fig3d_Axon_GCaMP6s_traces_example.m”. After opening each file, executing the script will automatically plot the panels and name them accordingly. In some files, the type of data to plot should be specified at the very beginning of the script: “VPM” for VPM data, “POMf” for POm-FO data and “Layer1” for POm-HO data in layer 1. For figure 2, the code is located in a dedicated folder where a Matlab file “Plot_Fig2d_g_Populatin_Plot_POm_FO_HO.m” is used to generate the figures. Finally, other Matlab files are included that are used to create population .mat files or for additional analysis related to the manuscript.</p>
Data set for "Projection-specific activity of layer 2/3 neurons imaged in mouse primary somatosensory barrel cortex during a whisker detection task"
<p>Data set for: Vavladeli A, Daigle T, Zeng H, Crochet S, Petersen CCH (2020) Projection-specific activity of layer 2/3 neurons imaged in mouse primary somatosensory barrel cortex during a whisker detection task. FUNCTION 1: zqaa008. doi: 10.1093/function/zqaa008</p> <p>There are 2 files in this upload:</p> <p>1. The file named "2020_Vavladeli_FUNCTION.pdf" is the Open Access pdf file of the manuscript published in FUNCTION.</p> <p>2. The file named "Vavladeli_data_code.zip" (~2 GB) is a zipped version of a folder named "Vavladeli_data_code" (~2 GB), which contains the data analysed in the study along with the Matlab code used to generate the published figures. When unzipped, the folder contains 8 Matlab '.m' files with analysis code and two '.mat' data files. In order to run the analysis of the data set, you need to execute the '.m' file with the corresponding figure name.</p>
Data from: Area 2 of primary somatosensory cortex encodes kinematics of the whole arm
<p>Proprioception, the sense of body position, movement, and associated forces, remains poorly understood, despite its critical role in movement. Most studies of area 2, a proprioceptive area of somatosensory cortex, have simply compared neurons' activities to the movement of the hand through space. By using motion tracking, we sought to elaborate this relationship by characterizing how area 2 activity relates to whole arm movements. We found that a whole-arm model, unlike classic models, successfully predicted how features of neural activity changed as monkeys reached to targets in two workspaces. However, when we then evaluated this whole-arm model across active and passive movements, we found that many neurons did not consistently represent the whole arm over both conditions. These results suggest that 1) neural activity in area 2 includes representation of the whole arm during reaching and 2) many of these neurons represented limb state differently during active and passive movements.</p>
Gaze-dependent Coding of Somatosensory Reach Targets after Effector Movement: Testing the Impact of Online Information, Movement Timing, and Target Distance
<p>The uploaded files contain data as SPSS data files (.sav) and tab delimited (.csv) textfiles as well as the respective variable desriptions as images (.png). In particular, I uploaded 1) the raw data, 2) the means of reach errors which we analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA, and 3) the means of ellipse sizes on which repeated-measures ANOVA of precision were based.</p> <p>After publication of the article, I also uploaded the reported analyses and corresponding datafiles (plus some more material) here: </p> <p>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.821307</p>
Dataset supporting "Reach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate tactile suppression"
<p>Here we provide the psychophysical and kinematic data reported in: Gertz, H., Voudouris, D., & Fiehler, K. (2017). Reach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate tactile suppression. <em>Journal of Neurophysiology</em>, jn.00052.2017. http://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00052.2017</p> <p>Tactile stimuli on moving limbs are typically attenuated during reach planning and execution. This phenomenon has been related to internal forward models that predict the sensory consequences of a movement. Tactile suppression is considered to occur due to a match between the actual and predicted sensory consequences of a movement, which might free capacities to process novel or task-relevant sensory signals. Here we examined whether and how tactile suppression depends on the relevance of somatosensory information for reaching. Participants reached with their left or right index finger to the unseen index finger of their other hand (body target) or an unseen pad on a screen (external target). In the body target condition, somatosensory signals from the static hand were available for localizing the reach target. Vibrotactile stimuli were presented on the moving index finger before or during reaching, or in a separate no-movement baseline block, and participants indicated whether they detected a stimulus. As expected, detection thresholds before or during reaching were higher compared to baseline. Tactile suppression was also stronger for reaches to body targets than external targets, as reflected by higher detection thresholds and lower precision of detectability. Moreover, detection thresholds were higher when reaching with the left than with the right hand. Our results suggest that tactile suppression is modulated by position signals from the target limb that are required to successfully reach to the own body. Moreover, limb dominance seems to affect tactile suppression presumably due to disparate uncertainty of feedback signals from the moving limb.</p>
High frequency somatosensory evoked magnetic fields recorded with MEG (OLD)
<p>** Old version - do not use **</p> <p>This dataset contains somatosensory evoked responses recorded with Elekta TRIUX magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. The purpose of the measurements was specifically to examine high-frequency (HF) somatosensory responses, which have very small amplitude. To this end, a large number of responses (thousands) were recorded with a short interstimulus interval (randomized between 300-350 ms). A constant-current electric stimulator was used, with the electrodes placed around the median nerve at the right wrist. The magnitude of the current was individually determined so that the stimulation was slightly below motor threshold; it was approximately 7 mA. The length of the current pulse was set at 200 microseconds.</p> <p>Both datasets contain raw FIFF files and MRIs in DICOM format. There are two recordings for subject 'A' and one for subject 'B'. The length of each recording is approximately 15 minutes. The data of subject 'A' has more prominent high-frequency responses and smaller stimulator artifact. Both subjects also have a 2-minute empty room recording, acquired just before the actual measurement.</p> <p>MEG recording parameters: sampling frequency 3000 Hz, analog lowpass 1000 Hz. Single-shot HPI was done at the beginning of the measurement, but continuous HPI was not used. No active shielding systems were in use. The data were recorded at the BioMag laboratory of Helsinki University Central Hospital. The two subjects were healthy male volunteers, age 38-40 years.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.