Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
22,365
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
22,365 results for “Systems”
Evaluation of stormwater urban ecological infrastructure in Phoenix, Arizona (USA): a case study of a small-scale bioretention basin system
In 2017, Arizona State University finished construction on a pedestrian mall central to its Tempe campus, which included a small-scale bioretention basin system for stormwater management. This study analyzed the flood control and water quality improvement performance of the small-scale bioretention basin system in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area, AZ USA. Flood control efficacy was quantified by calculating discharge from the basin system using water level loggers and measuring soil moisture levels using soil moisture probes. Stormwater runoff samples were collected for twenty-one storm events and analyzed for nitrogen and phosphorus constituent concentrations. Nutrient concentrations at the system inflow and outflow were used to determine percent change in concentration. Water quality improvement performance was compared to results from previous studies on bioretention basin system performance. These data were used to create relevant graphical figures. Results were obtained by performing statistical analysis calculations on the data measurements. The results indicated that the bioretention basin system performed adequately for flood control and water quality improvement, supporting the use of stormwater urban infrastructure systems in arid and semi-arid climates. Further research can reveal how these systems may perform during more severe storm events and offer improvements for future designs.
Root Systems of Individual Plants Worldwide 2022
The above- and below-ground sizes and shapes of plants strongly influence plant competition, community structure, and plant-environment interactions, but the plant size and shape across climate regimes remain incompletely understood. In this study I seek to understand how plant geometries respond to varying climates via trade-offs in shoot height and width, and root depth and spread. I more than doubled the Root Systems of Individual Plants (RSIP) database to contain 5,647 observations, to our knowledge the largest database describing the maximum rooting depth, lateral spread, and shoot size of terrestrial plants in the world. Shoot size and root system size strongly covary. Across climatic gradients woody plants show deeper-narrower root systems in arid climates and taller shoots in humid climates. Phylogeny greatly influences shoot size. Rooting depth is primarily influenced by climate seasonality and lateral root spread is strongly influenced by shoot size. Using our newly expanded global database I found that shoot size covaries strongly with rooting system size; however, these relationships are not static across the climate space, as the geometries of plants shift considerably.
PIE LTER dissolved nutrient and particulate concentrations of freshwater inputs to the Plum Island estuarine system, Massachusetts, taken approximately monthly.
Multi-year data of water chemistry including nutrient concentrations for various forms of N, P, C, as well as suspended sediments, was determined from monthly grab samples taken at watershed inputs to the Plum Island Sound Estuary. Sampling sites were the Ipswich River (Sylvania Dam, Ipswich, MA), Parker River Dam (Central St, Newbury, MA), Egypt River (Ipswich, MA) Mill River (Newbury, MA), Muddy Run (Ipswich, MA), Little River (Newbury, MA). These nutrient concentrations are then used in conjunction with USGS discharge data (recorded at gages in the Parker River at Byfield, MA and the Ipswich River at Ipswich, MA) to calculate annual nutrient loading to the Plum Island Sound Estuary, coming over each dam. Annual yield is also calculated for both dams. Refer to file WAT-VA-Load for loading data.
Size scalability of Monte Carlo simulations applied to oxidized polypyrrole systems: Data and Codes
<p>This work generalizes our recently proposed coarse grained force field (CGFF) for halogen oxidized PPy in the condensed phases and introduces a novel implementation of the Nettropolis Monte Carlo (MMC) simulation based on the CGFF that enables simulations of polymer systems with more than<br>100000 particles. The MMC implementation utilizes a combination of CPU and GPUs and exploits a numerical approximation based on polynomial piecewise interpolation for the calculation of the CGFF pairwise additive terms. Our simulations evidence that the oxidized PPy thermodynamic and structural properties are consistent as the system size is scaled up. Predicted properties include density, enthalpy, potential energy, heat capacity, coefficient of thermal expansion, caloric curve, glass transition temperature range, compressibility, bulk modulus, radial distribution functions, and polymer chain characteristics.</p>
Data from: Satellite-based Lagrangian model reveals how upwelling and oceanic circulation shape krill hotspots in the California Current System [updated]
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>In the California Current System, wind-driven nutrient supply and primary production, computed from satellite data, provide a synoptic view of how phytoplankton production is coupled to upwelling. In contrast, linking upwelling to zooplankton populations is difficult due to relatively scarce observations and the inherent patchiness of zooplankton. While phytoplankton respond quickly to environmental forcing, zooplankton grow slower and tend to aggregate into mesoscale “hotspot” regions spatially decoupled from upwelling centers. To better understand mechanisms controlling the formation of zooplankton hotspots, we use a satellite-based Lagrangian method where variables from a plankton model, forced by wind-driven nutrient supply, are advected by near-surface currents following upwelling events. Modeled zooplankton distribution reproduces published accounts of euphausiid (krill) hotspots, including the location of major hotspots and their interannual variability. This satellite-based modeling tool is used to analyze the variability and drivers of krill hotspots in the California Current System, and to investigate how water masses of different origin and history converge to form predictable biological hotspots. The Lagrangian framework suggests that two conditions are necessary for a hotspot to form: a convergence of coastal water masses, and above average nutrient supply where these water masses originated from. The results highlight the role of upwelling, oceanic circulation, and plankton temporal dynamics in shaping krill mesoscale distribution, seasonal northward propagation, and interannual variability.</p> <p><strong>Data set description</strong></p> <p>This data set includes 2 files:</p> <ul> <li>a satellite-based 1993-2023 monthly retrospective of krill concentrations (Zbig) modeled using the growth-advection method in the California Current upwelling system. Inputs include the nitrate supply product described below and GlobCurrent 15 m oceanic currents. This dataset is updated monthly (using NRT data) at https://www.mbari.org/science/upper-ocean-systems/biological-oceanography/krill-hotspots-in-the-california-current/.</li> <li>a satellite-based 1993-2023 monthly retrospective of wind-driven nitrate supply estimated in a 150 km coastal band at 0.125° latitudinal resolution. Nitrate supply was calculated based primarily on CCMP v3.1 winds, AVISO geostrophic currents, and a climatology of in situ nitrate at 60m. This dataset is updated monthly (using NRT data) at https://www.mbari.org/science/upper-ocean-systems/biological-oceanography/nitrate-supply-estimates-in-upwelling-systems/.</li> </ul> <p>See details regarding data sources and calculations in <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.835813">Messié et al. (2022)</a>.</p> <p>[IMPORTANT NOTE:] There is an error in the Ekman pumping fields (trans_pump, Nsupply_pump, Nsupply_total) that will be corrected soon (those fields are not used in publications where only coastal transport was considered). Please contact me if you need Ekman pumping fields before this is fixed.</p>
Mid-winter habitat suitability indices for centrarchids in contiguous lentic areas of the Upper Mississippi River System: 1994-2018
This dataset includes raw measurements and calculated bluegill winter habitat suitability indices for depth (HSID), dissolved oxygen (HSIDO), temperature (HSIT), and flow (HSIF), as well as an overall bluegill winter habitat suitability index (HSIO), for 2915 mid-winter, lentic sampling locations across 208 contiguous lentic areas throughout the Upper Mississippi River System (Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers) from 1994-2018. This dataset also includes several spatial and temporal climatic and hydrogeomorphic parameters that were used to assess potential drivers of winter habitat suitability.
Migratory shorebird habitat use, diet, and prey selection on mudflats in the Virginia barrier island and lagoon system, 2023-2024
Migratory shorebirds require access to heterogenous resources during migration. Understanding how shorebirds utilize different foraging substrates and food resources across the coastal landscape is important for informing conservation. We compared shorebird habitat use and invertebrate prey communities between barrier island and mudflat foraging substrates. We counted shorebirds and collected prey samples at random points on sand, peat, and mudflat substrates during spring migration (May 14 - June 2), 2023 - 2024. We opportunistically collected fecal samples on mudflats in our study area and used fecal DNA metabarcoding with 18S (invertebrates) and 23S (biofilm) primers to describe the diets of dunlin (Calidris alpina), red knots (Calidris canutus rufa) and semipalmated sandpipers (Calidris pusilla). We then used network null modeling to determine if our focal species were selectively consuming invertebrates on mudflats. Peat banks were the most heavily used intertidal substrate and mudflats supported similar shorebird abundances and species richness to sand. Dunlin and semipalmated sandpipers were more abundant on peat and mudflats, while red knots were more abundant on sand and peat. Invertebrate density was highest on peat banks and similar between mudflat and sand substrate, though mudflats supported a more diverse prey community. Amphipod crustaceans, blue mussels (Mytilus edulis), and polychaete worms were main prey consumed by all species on mudflats. Dunlin and semipalmated sandpipers fed primarily on crustaceans whereas red knots mainly fed on bivalves. All species consumed biofilm and a high proportion of diatoms were observed in fecal samples collected from semipalmated sandpipers. Red knots and dunlin selectively consumed bivalves on mudflats while semipalmated sandpipers showed no dietary preferences. Managing staging sites to preserve a diversity of intertidal habitats is critical for meeting the variable foraging requirements of migratory shorebirds.
Isometric exercise facilitates attention to salient events in women via the noradrenergic system
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
How ovarian hormones influence the behaviroal activation and inhibition system through the dopamine pathway
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Dataset of EEG recordings of pediatric patients with epilepsy based on the 10-20 system
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Updated DEVOTES indicator catalogue of MSFD indicator systems targeting descriptors D1, D2, D4, and D6
<p>This is version 8 of the Catalogue of Indicators of the FP7 project DEVOTES (grant number 308392) that aims at supporting the implementation of the EU MSFD. This catalogue of indicators is an inventory of existing methods. The metadata have been updated and extended since deiverable D3-1 of the DEVOTES project. You can learn more about the DEVOTES project at: http://www.devotes-project.eu</p> <p>All data are provided without a guarantee of correctness or completeness. We are aware of some errors in the database content and are continuously working on correcting these and on supplementing the content with new metadata.</p> <p>The data can be best viewed with the free DEVOTool software, available at http://www.devotes-project.eu/devotool. By using the DEVOTool software, you accept the license conditions as outlined in section 6 of the software manual distributed together with DEVOTool. </p>
Shoreline series of the Doniños coastal system, NW Iberia (1945-2020): A Geospatial Dataset
<p>This repository stores shoreline data spanning from 1945 to 2020, derived from aerial photography and orthophotos, for the Doniños coastal system in NW Iberia. The shoreline indicator is defined as the boundary between vegetated dunes and bare beach sand. The methodology and dataset are detailed in the following publication:</p> <p><em><strong>Rita González-Villanueva, Martiño Pastoriza, Armand Hernández, Rafael Carballeira, Alberto Sáez, Roberto Bao. "Primary drivers of dune cover and shoreline dynamics: A conceptual model based on the Iberian Atlantic coast." Geomorphology, Volume 423, 2023, 108556, ISSN 0169-555X. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108556" target="_new">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108556</a>.</strong></em></p> <p>The shoreline dataset is encapsulated in a single GEOJSON file: <code>SHORES_1945_2020.geojson</code>. This dataset encompasses the shorelines mapped from all available aerial data for the Doniños coastal system, on the Galician coast, NW Iberia, from 1945 to 2020. It comprises a total of 15 shorelines. The geospatial layer employs the ETRS89/UTM zone 29N coordinate system (EPSG: 25829).</p> <p><strong>SHORES_1945_2020.geojson</strong>: This layer presents the shorelines, where each feature is a MultiLinestring with the following attributes:</p> <ul> <li><code>objectid</code>: Identifier of the shoreline.</li> <li><code>date</code>: Date of the shoreline capture, in month/year format (mm/yyyy).</li> <li><code>SHAPE_Leng</code>: Length of the mapped shoreline, in meters.</li> <li><code>Source</code>: Source of the original image from which the shoreline was derived, including the Centro Nacional de Información Geográfica (CNIG) and the Centro Cartográfico y Fotográfico del Ejército del Aire (CECAF).</li> <li><code>Type</code>: 'O' signifies an orthophotograph, and 'AP' signifies an aerial photograph.</li> <li><code>GEO_Error</code>: Georeferencing error for each manually georeferenced photograph.</li> <li><code>geometry</code>: The type of geometry used in the file, specified as MultiLineString.</li> <li><code>coordinates</code>: UTM coordinates for each node in the multiline.</li> </ul>
Dataset of "Neutron imaging and molecular simulation of systems from methane and p‑xylene"
<p>The dataset contains parameterizations, and input files for molecular dynamics simulations used in the study of methane dissolution in p-xylene. For selected conditions, full simulation data, i.e., trajectories and energetics are provided. All used simulation results data are provided in the table, along with the measured experimental data.</p>
GHG Dataset for the frontiers publication "Soil Nitrous Oxide Emission and Methane Exchange from Diversified Cropping Systems in Pannonian Region"
<p>GHG Dataset used in the Frontiers Publication "Soil Nitrous Oxide Emission and Methane Exchange from Diversified Cropping Systems in Pannonian Region". Additionally including CO2 besides N2O and CH4. Includes 3 cropping seasons.</p> <p>The data is also available online on the GHG flux visualisation and calculation tool "gasflxvis": https://sae-interactive-data.ethz.ch/gasflxvis/</p> <p>Further details on the calulation are provided both on gasflxvis and the Frontiers publication. Calculation procedure according the following PLOS ONE publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200876</p>
Reprocessing of the dataset "Plasma Proteome Profiling Reveals the Effects of Weight Loss on the Apolipoprotein Family and Systemic Inflammation Status"
<p>Reprocessing of the MassIVE repository MSV000080596, originally generated to investigate the dynamic changes in the plasma proteomes of a cohort of individuals with obesity following weight loss and maintenance. The reprocessing included all samples from 52 individuals taken right after the weight-loss process and during the weight maintenance phase of the study (Weeks 0, 4, 13, 26, 39, and 52).</p> <p>We used the sequence database generated by ProHap (<a href="https://github.com/ProGenNo/ProHap">https://github.com/ProGenNo/ProHap</a>) representing all populations from the 1000 Genomes Project (doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10149277). For the search, SearchGUI version 4.3.1 and PeptideShaker version 3.0.0 were used with the X!Tandem and Tide search engines. The modification settings specified were carbamidomethylation of C as fixed and oxidation of M, deamidation of N and Q, Pyrrolidone of E and Q, and acetylation of protein N-terminus as variable modifications. The maximum peptide length was set to 40 amino acids and the precursor and fragment ion tolerances were set to 7 and 20 ppm, respectively. Resulting PSMs were processed as described in (doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00243) using Percolator version 3.5 provided with features based on peptide retention time (DeepLC version 1.1.2) and fragmentation predictors (MS2PIP version 3.9.0), and filtered at a 1% estimated FDR.</p> <p>The attached file contains all the peptide-spectrum matches identified at 1% FDR. The peptides have been annotated with transcripts, genes, and alleles using the ProHap Peptide Annotator v1.1 (<a href="https://github.com/ProGenNo/ProHap_PeptideAnnotator">https://github.com/ProGenNo/ProHap_PeptideAnnotator</a>).</p>
WorldSeasons: a seasonal classification system interpolating biomes within the year for improved temporal aggregation
<p>We present a seasonal classification system to improve the temporal framing of comparative scientific analysis. Research often uses yearly aggregates to understand inherently seasonal phenomena like harvests, monsoons, and droughts. This obscures important trends across time and differences through space by including redundant data. Our classification system allows for a more targeted approach. We split global land into four principal climate zones: desert, arctic and high montane, tropical, and temperate. A cluster analysis with zone-specific variables and weighting splits each month of the year into discrete seasons based on the monthly climate. We expect the data will be able to answer global comparative analysis questions like: are global winters less icy than before? Are wildfires more frequent now in the dry season? How severe are monsoon season flooding events? This is a natural extension of the historical concept of biomes, made possible by recent advances in climate data availability and artificial intelligence.</p>
Data for "Breaking the Paywall: The role of Open Journal System as key Open Science infrastructure"
<h3><strong>Context</strong></h3> <p>This research was conducted within the NSF-SEEKCommons Project, a research initiative dedicated to supporting Open Science and Open Access in disciplinary research. The project has a special interest in understanding the role that critical infrastructure has in supporting open initiatives. The Open Journal System (OJS) serves as a long-standing fundamental piece for Open Access throughout the globe. Hence, it provides valuable information about experiences developing, deploying, and maintaining open technologies. </p> <h3><strong>Methods<br></strong></h3> <div> <div>We used mixed methods for our research, triangulating repository data, installation data, interviews, and documentary analysis. We collected repository data using a report generator (Kopp [2018] 2024) that uses repository metadata to present general statistics about a Git project. The resulting information was manually curated, disambiguated, and annotated to have a homogeneous set of developers with information about their institutional affiliation and country. </div> <div> </div> <div>Names are normalized based on the information in qualitative interviews and by browsing the full-extent commits in the GitHub repository. Other sources for this were the institutional materials (available in current and archived versions of the PKP website), meeting minutes, the user forum, and further project documentation available online. GitHub handles are homologated to their most comprehensive version. For institutional and country affiliation, we resorted to GitHub profiles, PKP documentation and forums, institutional domains available in emails, and researchers' ORCID IDs. </div> </div> <h3><strong>Available files</strong></h3> <ol> <li><strong>Information about the codebase</strong> (number of files, lines of code, and timestamp) organized by <strong>month, quarter, and semester. </strong><br>See file: OJS_GitStats_04-24.csv</li> <li>Information about the historical evolution of the codebase (number of files, lines of code, and timestamp), including <strong>a description of the top committers for each month</strong>. Commiters are described by including their institutional affiliation and country of origin. <br>See file: OJS_DevStats_Institution-Country_1.tsv</li> <li>Information about the <strong>historical evolution of the codebase </strong>focusing on <strong>top committers</strong>, along with their institution and country. This file is formatted to map the co-occurrence of developers and attributes by month between 2004-2024.<br>See file: OJS_DevStats_Institution-Country_2.tsv</li> <li>Selected fields to describe<strong> working and regularly maintained plugins for OJS as of October 2024.</strong> Includes name of the plugin, homepage, description, maintainer, and institutional affiliation. <br>See file: OJS_Plugins_2024_Processed.tsv</li> <li>Details of the aggregated <strong>information</strong> included in <strong>Table</strong> <strong>5</strong> of the article.<br>See file: OJS_Plugins_2024_Table5.tsv</li> <li><strong>Snapshot</strong> to XML information of the <strong>plugin gallery of OJS </strong>(October 21) retrieved from PKP website (Smecher 2024)<br>See file: OJS_Plugins_2024.csv</li> </ol> <h3>Funding</h3> <p><span>The SEEKCommons Project is funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), grant #2226425</span></p>
Global Coastal Transect System (GCTS)
<p>Cross-shore coastal transects are essential to coastal monitoring, offering a consistent reference line to measure coastal change, while providing a robust foundation to map coastal characteristics and derive coastal statistics thereof. The Global Coastal Transect System consists of more than 11 million cross-shore coastal transects uniformly spaced at 100-m intervals alongshore, for all OpenStreetMap coastlines that are longer than 5 kilometers.</p> <p>While the data is available here for download, we highly recommend direct access via the cloud. For latest usage instructions please see the tutorials at https://github.com/TUDelft-CITG/coastpy. The dataset is extensively described in Calkoen, F. R., Luijendijk, A. P., Vos, K., Kras, E., & Baart, F. (2025). Enabling coastal analytics at planetary scale. <em>Environmental Modelling & Software</em>, <em>183</em>, 106257; please cite this paper when the data is used. </p>
EUNIS-ESy: Expert system for automatic classification of European vegetation plots to EUNIS habitats
<p><strong>EUNIS-ESy</strong> is an expert system for automatic classification of European vegetation plots to habitat types of the EUNIS Habitat Classification. The EUNIS classification and the principles of the expert system are described by <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12519">Chytrý et al. (2020)</a>. The classification of a set of vegetation plots can be run using the JUICE program (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02069.x">Tichý 2002</a>; <a href="https://www.sci.muni.cz/botany/juice/">https://www.sci.muni.cz/botany/juice/</a>), TURBOVEG 3 program (Hennekens 2015) and an R script (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12562">Bruelheide et al. 2021</a>).</p> <p>This dataset contains two parts: (1) the expert system and related files necessary for running it; (2) characterization of EUNIS habitats based on the results of the expert system classification.</p> <p><strong>1. Expert system and related files necessary to run it</strong></p> <p>1.1. <strong>EUNIS-ESy-2025-10-03.txt </strong>– a file containing the script for the classification of vegetation plots by EUNIS-ESy. This version contains tested definitions for the revised EUNIS classification of vegetated Marine (MA), Coastal (N), Wetland (Q), Grassland (R), Shrubland (S), Forest (T), Inland sparsely vegetated (U) and Man-made (V). It also contains tested definitions of Aquatic plant communities (P3) and Springs (P2N). This file is different from the analogous file in the previous versions.</p> <p>1.2. <strong>Nomenclature-translation-from-Turboveg-2-databases.zip </strong>– an archive containing the scripts for automatic translation of taxon concepts and names used in individual European Turboveg 2 databases (<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/3237010">Hennekens & Schaminée 2001</a>; <a href="https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/turboveg/">https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/turboveg/</a>) to the nomenclature that can be used as an input for EUNIS-ESy. This file is the same as in the previous versions.</p> <p>1.3. <strong>EUNIS-ESy-User-Guide.pdf </strong>– a brief user guide to the classification of vegetation plots by EUNIS-ESy using the JUICE program. Please read this guide carefully before running the expert system to avoid misclassifications. This file is the same as in the previous versions.</p> <p><strong>2. Characterization of the EUNIS habitats based on the results of the EUNIS-ESy classification</strong></p> <p>2.1. <strong>EUNIS-habitats-2025-10-03.xlsx </strong>– the current list of EUNIS habitats. This file is different from the analogous file in the previous versions.</p> <p>2.2. <strong>EUNIS-EuroVegChecklist-crosswalk-2025-10-03.xlsx</strong> – a crosswalk between the EUNIS habitat classification and phytosociological alliances of EuroVegChecklist (<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12257">Mucina et al. 2016</a>; <a href="https://floraveg.eu/vegetation/">https://floraveg.eu/vegetation/</a>).</p> <p>2.3. <strong>EUNIS-habitats-Characteristic-species-combintation-2025-10-03.xlsx </strong>– a database of habitats' characteristic species combinations in a spreadsheet format. These species combinations are based on the analysis of vegetation plots from the European Vegetation Archive (EVA; <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12191">Chytrý et al. 2016</a>; <a href="http://euroveg.org/eva-database">http://euroveg.org/eva-database</a>) and other databases classified by EUNIS-ESy v2025-10-03. Analytical methods are described in <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12519">Chytrý et al. (2020)</a>. This file is different from the analogous file in the previous versions.</p> <p>2.4. <strong>EUNIS-habitats-Distribution-maps-2025-10-03.xlsx </strong>– a set of distribution maps in the TIFF format based on the analysis of vegetation plots from the European Vegetation Archive (EVA; <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12191">Chytrý et al. 2016</a>; <a href="http://euroveg.org/eva-database">http://euroveg.org/eva-database</a>) and other databases classified by EUNIS-ESy v2025-10-03.</p> <p>2.5. <strong>Data-sources-EUNIS-classification-2025-10-03.pdf </strong>– a list of data sources used to produce the distribution maps and characteristic species combinations.</p> <p>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p><strong>Differences from the previous version (2021-06-01)</strong></p> <p>Aquatic plant communities (P3), spring (P2N), some wetland (Q61-Q63) and some inland sparsely vegetated (U71-U72) habitats were added to the EUNIS-ESy expert system. Plant taxon concepts and nomenclature were extensively revised. Some previously included habitat definitions were slightly refined. New vegetation-plot records added to the EVA database by 8 August 2025 were used to characterize habitat types. Unlike in the previous version, this version does not provide Habitat factsheets because summarized information about each habitat is now available in the FloraVeg.EU database at <a href="https://floraveg.eu/habitat/">https://floraveg.eu/habitat/</a>.</p> <p>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Recommended citation of this version of the EUNIS-ESy expert system</strong></p> <p>Chytrý et al. (2020), version 2025-10-03</p> <p>Chytrý M., Tichý L., Hennekens S.M., Knollová I., Janssen J.A.M., Rodwell J.S., Peterka T., Marcenò C., Landucci F., Danihelka J., Hájek M., Dengler J., Novák P., Zukal D., Jiménez-Alfaro B., Mucina L., Abdulhak S., Aćić S., Agrillo E., Attorre F., Bergmeier E., Biurrun I., Boch S., Bölöni J., Bonari G., Braslavskaya T., Bruelheide H., Campos J.A., Čarni A., Casella L., Ćuk M., Ćušterevska R., De Bie E., Delbosc P., Demina O., Didukh Y., Dítě D., Dziuba T., Ewald J., Gavilán R.G., Gégout J.-C., Giusso del Galdo G.P., Golub V., Goncharova N., Goral F., Graf U., Indreica A., Isermann M., Jandt U., Jansen F., Jansen J., Jašková A., Jiroušek M., Kącki Z., Kalníková V., Kavgacı A., Khanina L., Korolyuk A.Yu., Kozhevnikova M., Kuzemko A., Küzmič F., Kuznetsov O.L., Laiviņš M., Lavrinenko I., Lavrinenko O., Lebedeva M., Lososová Z., Lysenko T., Maciejewski L., Mardari C., Marinšek A., Napreenko M.G., Onyshchenko V., Pérez-Haase A., Pielech R., Prokhorov V., Rašomavičius V., Rodríguez Rojo M.P., Rūsiņa S., Schrautzer J., Šibík J., Šilc U., Škvorc Ž., Smagin V.A., Stančić Z., Stanisci A., Tikhonova E., Tonteri T., Uogintas D., Valachovič M., Vassilev K., Vynokurov D., Willner W., Yamalov S., Evans D., Palitzsch Lund M., Spyropoulou R., Tryfon E., Schaminée J.H.J. (2020) EUNIS Habitat Classification: expert system, characteristic species combinations and distribution maps of European habitats. Applied Vegetation Science, 23, 648–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12519</p>
Pubmed Journal Recommendation System dataset
<p>Dataset for Journal recommendation, includes title, abstract, keywords, and journal.</p> <p>We extracted the journals and more information of:</p> <p>Jiasheng Sheng. (2022). PubMed-OA-Extraction-dataset [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6330817.</p> <p>Dataset Components:</p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>data_pubmed_all:</strong> This dataset encompasses all articles, each containing the following columns: 'pubmed_id', 'title', 'keywords', 'journal', 'abstract', 'conclusions', 'methods', 'results', 'copyrights', 'doi', 'publication_date', 'authors', 'AKE_pubmed_id', 'AKE_pubmed_title', 'AKE_abstract', 'AKE_keywords', 'File_Name'.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>data_pubmed:</strong> To focus on recent and relevant publications, we have filtered this dataset to include articles published within the last five years, from January 1, 2018, to December 13, 2022—the latest date in the dataset. Additionally, we have exclusively retained journals with more than 200 published articles, resulting in 262,870 articles from 469 different journals.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>data_pubmed_train, data_pubmed_val, and data_pubmed_test:</strong> For machine learning and model development purposes, we have partitioned the 'data_pubmed' dataset into three subsets—training, validation, and test—using a random 60/20/20 split ratio. Notably, this division was performed on a per-journal basis, ensuring that each journal's articles are proportionally represented in the training (60%), validation (20%), and test (20%) sets. The resulting partitions consist of 157,540 articles in the training set, 52,571 articles in the validation set, and 52,759 articles in the test set.</p> </li> </ul>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.