Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
61
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
61 results for “Time-series data”
Long time-series ecological niche modelling using archaeological settlement data.
<p><strong>CR_settlement_niche_[N]_[Yr]_[BC/AD].tif</strong></p> <p>Ecological niche models in GeoTIFF format generated with the MaxEnt software based using prehistoric settlement evidence as training data and environmental layers (elevation, mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature, landscape water balance, soil types) as background data. Raster values represent the probability of presence of a settlement.<br> <strong>N</strong> - chronological ordering<br> <strong>Yr, BC/AD</strong> - calendar years BC or AD</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>CR_settlement_niche_combined.tif</strong></p> <p>All models combined by averaging.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>CR_settlement_archeo.zip</strong></p> <p>Archaeological data used to train the MaxEnt models in ESRI SHP format with the following fields:</p> <p><strong>Site_Type:</strong> Cemetery or Settlement</p> <p><strong>Archeo_Dat:</strong> Archaeological dating (culture or period)</p> <p><strong>Source:</strong> Source dataset (AMCR or LONGWOOD)</p> <p>AMCR: Archeologická mapa České republiky – Archaeological Map of the Czech Republic. Retrieved from https://digiarchiv.aiscr.cz/.</p> <p>LONGWOOD: Kolář, J., Tkáč, P., Macek, M., & Szabó, P. (2016). Archaeology and Historical Ecology: the Archaeological Database of the LONGWOOD ERC Project. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 46/4, 539-554.</p> <p><strong>Yrs_BP_Avg:</strong> Average dating in calendar years BP (based on the archaeological dating)</p> <p><strong>Yrs_BP_Unc:</strong> Temporal uncertainty of the dating (half of the culture or period's duration)</p> <p><strong>Loc_Accur:</strong> Spatial accuracy derived from the recorded degree of the accuracy of location (radius in meters around the center point)</p>
Pacific salmon population time-series dataset to support Appendix S1: Data and additional information on declines of Pacific Salmon
<p>Dataset used to support the main paper 'Protecting our coast for everyone’s future: Indigenous and scientific knowledge support marine spatial protections proposed by Central Coast First Nations in Pacific Canada' by Reid et al. 2022. Dataset cited in Appendix S1 regarding trends in adult salmon abundances in the Central Coast. The data were as compiled by Will Atlas from the <a href="https://wildsalmoncenter.org/">Wild Salmon Center</a> to describe trends in the abundance of adult salmon returning to the Central Coast, which is the sum of escapement and harvest, as derived from the following sources:</p> <ol> <li>Escapement data from DFO: <a href="https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/c48669a3-045b-400d-b730-48aafe8c5ee6">NuSEDS-New Salmon Escapement Database System - Open Government Portal (canada.ca)</a></li> <li>Harvest rates estimated by Karl English and colleagues and available at: <a href="https://data.salmonwatersheds.ca/data-library/">Salmon Watersheds Program - Data Library</a>.</li> <li>Information on total harvest that is reported in the DFO post season review (DFO 2020).</li> </ol>
Annual maps of cropland abandonment, land cover, and other derived data for time-series analysis of cropland abandonment
<p>This archive contains raw annual land cover maps, cropland abandonment maps, and accompanying derived data products to support:</p> <blockquote> <p>Crawford C.L., Yin, H., Radeloff, V.C., and Wilcove, D.S. 2022. Rural land abandonment is too ephemeral to provide major benefits for biodiversity and climate. <em>Science Advances</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm8999">doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm8999</a><em>.</em></p> </blockquote> <p>An archive of the analysis scripts developed for this project can be found at: <a href="https://github.com/chriscra/abandonment_trajectories">https://github.com/chriscra/abandonment_trajectories</a> (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6383127">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6383127</a>).</p> <p>Note that the label "_2022_02_07" in many file names refers to the date of the primary analysis. "dts” or “dt” refer to “data.tables," large .csv files that were manipulated using the data.table package in R (Dowle and Srinivasan 2021, <a href="http://r-datatable.com/">http://r-datatable.com/</a>). “Rasters” refer to “.tif” files that were processed using the raster and terra packages in R (Hijmans, 2022; <a href="https://rspatial.org/terra/">https://rspatial.org/terra/</a>; <a href="https://rspatial.org/raster">https://rspatial.org/raster</a>).</p> <p>Data files fall into one of four categories of data derived during our analysis of abandonment: <strong>observed</strong>, <strong>potential</strong>, <strong>maximum</strong>, or <strong>recultivation</strong>. Derived datasets also follow the same naming convention, though are aggregated across sites. These four categories are as follows (using “age_dts” for our site in Shaanxi Province, China as an example):</p> <ol> <li><strong>observed</strong> abandonment identified through our primary analysis, with a threshold of five years. These files do not have a specific label beyond the description of the file and the date of analysis (e.g., shaanxi_age_2022_02_07.csv);</li> <li><strong>potential</strong> abandonment for a scenario without any recultivation, in which abandoned croplands are left abandoned from the year of initial abandonment through the end of the time series, with the label “_potential” (e.g., shaanxi_potential_age_2022_02_07.csv);</li> <li><strong>maximum</strong> age of abandonment over the course of the time series, with the label “_max” (e.g., shaanxi_max_age_2022_02_07.csv);</li> <li><strong>recultivation </strong>periods, corresponding to the lengths of recultivation periods following abandonment, given the label “_recult” (e.g., shaanxi_recult_age_2022_02_07.csv).</li> </ol> <p> </p> <p><strong>This archive includes multiple .zip files, the contents of which are described below:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>age_dts.zip</strong> - Maps of abandonment age (i.e., how long each pixel has been abandoned for, as of that year, also referred to as length, duration, etc.), for each year between 1987-2017 for all 11 sites. These maps are stored as .csv files, where each row is a pixel, the first two columns refer to the x and y coordinates (in terms of longitude and latitude), and subsequent columns contain the abandonment age values for an individual year (where years are labeled with "y" followed by the year, e.g., "y1987"). Maps are given with a latitude and longitude coordinate reference system. Folder contains observed age, potential age (“_potential”), maximum age (“_max”), and recultivation lengths (“_recult”) for all sites. Maximum age .csv files include only three columns: x, y, and the maximum length (i.e., “max age”, in years) for each pixel throughout the entire time series (1987-2017). Files were produced using the custom functions "cc_filter_abn_dt()," “cc_calc_max_age()," “cc_calc_potential_age(),” and “cc_calc_recult_age();” see "_util/_util_functions.R."</li> <li><strong>age_rasters.zip</strong> - Maps of abandonment age (i.e., how long each pixel has been abandoned for), for each year between 1987-2017 for all 11 sites. Maps are stored as .tif files, where each band corresponds to one of the 31 years in our analysis (1987-2017), in ascending order (i.e., the first layer is 1987 and the 31st layer is 2017). Folder contains observed age, potential age (“_potential”), and maximum age (“_max”) rasters for all sites. Maximum age rasters include just one band (“layer”). These rasters match the corresponding .csv files contained in "age_dts.zip.”</li> <li><strong>derived_data.zip</strong> - summary datasets created throughout this analysis, listed below.</li> <li><strong>diff.zip</strong> - .csv files for each of our eleven sites containing the year-to-year lagged differences in abandonment age (i.e., length of time abandoned) for each pixel. The rows correspond to a single pixel of land, and the columns refer to the year the difference is in reference to. These rows do not have longitude or latitude values associated with them; however, rows correspond to the same rows in the .csv files in "input_data.tables.zip" and "age_dts.zip." These files were produced using the custom function "cc_diff_dt()" (much like the base R function "diff()"), contained within the custom function "cc_filter_abn_dt()" (see "_util/_util_functions.R"). Folder contains diff files for observed abandonment, potential abandonment (“_potential”), and recultivation lengths (“_recult”) for all sites.</li> <li><strong>input_dts.zip</strong> - annual land cover maps for eleven sites with four land cover classes (see below), adapted from Yin et al. 2020 <em>Remote Sensing of Environment </em>(<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111873">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111873</a>)<em>. </em>Like “age_dts,” these maps are stored as .csv files, where each row is a pixel and the first two columns refer to x and y coordinates (in terms of longitude and latitude). Subsequent columns contain the land cover class for an individual year (e.g., "y1987"). Note that these maps were recoded from Yin et al. 2020 so that land cover classification was consistent across sites (see below). This contains two files for each site: the raw land cover maps from Yin et al. 2020 (after recoding), and a “clean” version produced by applying 5- and 8-year temporal filters to the raw input (see custom function “cc_temporal_filter_lc(),” in “_util/_util_functions.R” and “1_prep_r_to_dt.R”). These files correspond to those in "input_rasters.zip," and serve as the primary inputs for the analysis.</li> <li><strong>input_rasters.zip</strong> - annual land cover maps for eleven sites with four land cover classes (see below), adapted from Yin et al. 2020 <em>Remote Sensing of Environment. </em>Maps are stored as ".tif" files, where each band corresponds one of the 31 years in our analysis (1987-2017), in ascending order (i.e., the first layer is 1987 and the 31st layer is 2017). Maps are given with a latitude and longitude coordinate reference system. Note that these maps were recoded so that land cover classes matched across sites (see below). Contains two files for each site: the raw land cover maps (after recoding), and a “clean” version that has been processed with 5- and 8-year temporal filters (see above). These files match those in "input_dts.zip."</li> <li><strong>length.zip</strong> - .csv files containing the length (i.e., age or duration, in years) of each distinct individual period of abandonment at each site. This folder contains length files for observed and potential abandonment, as well as recultivation lengths. Produced using the custom function "cc_filter_abn_dt()" and “cc_extract_length();” see "_util/_util_functions.R."</li> </ul> <p><strong>derived_data.zip</strong> contains the following files:</p> <ul> <li>"<strong>site_df.csv</strong>" - a simple .csv containing descriptive information for each of our eleven sites, along with the original land cover codes used by Yin et al. 2020 (updated so that all eleven sites in how land cover classes were coded; see below).</li> <li><strong>Primary derived datasets </strong>for both observed abandonment (“area_dat”) and potential abandonment (“potential_area_dat”). <ul> <li><strong>area_dat</strong> - Shows the area (in ha) in each land cover class at each site in each year (1987-2017), along with the area of cropland abandoned in each year following a five-year abandonment threshold (abandoned for >=5 years) or no threshold (abandoned for >=1 years). Produced using custom functions "cc_calc_area_per_lc_abn()" via "cc_summarize_abn_dts()". See scripts "cluster/2_analyze_abn.R" and "_util/_util_functions.R."</li> <li><strong>persistence_dat</strong> - A .csv containing the area of cropland abandoned (ha) for a given "cohort" of abandoned cropland (i.e., a group of cropland abandoned in the same year, also called "year_abn") in a specific year. This area is also given as a proportion of the initial area abandoned in each cohort, or the area of each cohort when it was first classified as abandoned at year 5 ("initial_area_abn"). The "age" is given as the number of years since a given cohort of abandoned cropland was last actively cultivated, and "time" is marked relative to the 5th year, when our five-year definition first classifies that land as abandoned (and where the proportion of abandoned land remaining abandoned is 1). Produced using custom functions "cc_calc_persistence()" via "cc_summarize_abn_dts()". See scripts "cluster/2_analyze_abn.R" and "_util/_util_functions.R." This serves as the main input for our linear models of recultivation (“decay”) trajectories.</li> <li><strong>turnover_dat</strong> - A .csv showing the annual gross gain, annual gross loss, and annual net change in the area (in ha) of abandoned cropland at each site in each year of the time series. Produced using custom functions "cc_calc_abn_diff()" via "cc_summarize_abn_dts()" (see "_util/_util_functions.R"), implemented in "cluster/2_analyze_abn.R." This file is only produced for observed abandonment.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Area summary files </strong>(for observed abandonment only) <ul> <li><strong>area_summary_df</strong> - Contains a range of summary values relating to the area of cropland abandonment for each of our eleven sites. All area values are given in hectares (ha) unless stated otherwise. It contains 16 variables as columns, including 1) "site," 2) "total_site_area_ha_2017" - the total site area (ha) in 2017, 3) "cropland_area_1987" - the area in cropland in 1987 (ha), 4) "area_abn_ha_2017" - the area of cropland abandoned as of 2017 (ha), 5) "area_ever_abn_ha" - the total area of those pixels that were abandoned at least once during the time series (corresponding to the area of potential abandonment, as of 2017), 6) "total_crop_extent_ha" - the total area of those pixels that were classified as cropland at least once during the time series, 7) "total_area_abn_remaining_2017" - duplicate of "area_abn_ha_2017," the area abandoned as of 2017 (ha), taken from "area_recult_threshold," 8) "total_initial_area_abn" - the sum of the initial area of each cohort of abandonment when it is first classified as "abandoned," i.e., at the 5 year mark (note that this is cumulative, and because it counts those pixels that were abandoned more than once, it is therefore larger than "area_ever_abn_ha"), taken from "area_recult_threshold" 9) "total_area_abn_recultivated_2017" - the area of abandoned land that was recultivated as of 2017 (cumulatively, i.e., "total_initial_area_abn" - "area_abn_ha_2017"), taken from "area_recult_threshold," 10) "proportion_recultivated" - the proportion of all abandoned cropland (including multiple periods per pixel) that was recultivated by 2017, taken from "area_recult_threshold," 11) "area_2017_as_prop_site" - area abandoned as of 2017 as a proportion of the total site area, 12) "area_2017_as_prop_total_crop" - area abandoned as of 2017 as a proportion of the total crop extent, 13) "area_2017_as_prop_crop87" - area abandoned as of 2017 as a proportion of cropland area in 1987, 14) "area_ever_abn_as_prop_site" - area ever abandoned as a proportion of the total site area, 15) "area_ever_abn_as_prop_total_crop" - area ever abandoned as a proportion of the total crop extent, 16) "area_ever_abn_as_prop_crop87" - area ever abandoned as a proportion of cropland area in 1987. See script "1_summary_stats.Rmd."</li> <li><strong>area_recult_threshold</strong> - Contains data on the proportion of observed abandoned cropland area that is recultivated by the end of our time series. This includes the area of abandoned cropland as of 2017 ("total_area_abn_remaining_2017") and the sum of the initial area of each cohort of abandonment when it is first classified as abandoned (at year 5; "total_initial_area_abn"). This "total_initial_area_abn" is cumulative, and allows for pixels that were abandoned multiple times during the time series to be counted multiple times. The difference between these two columns yields the "total_area_abn_recultivated_2017," which in turn is used to calculate the "proportion_recultivated," and the (ascending) "order" of sites based on this proportion. This file includes recultivation stats for each site for three abandonment definitions: 5, 7, and 10 years. See script "1_summary_stats.Rmd."</li> <li><strong>abn_lc_area_2017</strong> - Contains the number of pixels and corresponding area (in ha) of abandoned cropland in the year 2017 at each site, according to the land cover class (either woody vegetation [2], or herbaceous vegetation [4]) and the age in 2017 (5 to 30 years). See script "cluster/6_lc_of_abn.R."</li> <li><strong>abn_prop_lc_2017 </strong>- Contains the number of pixels and corresponding area (ha) of cropland abandoned in the year 2017 in each land cover type (woody vegetation [2], or herbaceous vegetation [4]). It also shows this area as a proportion of the total area abandoned at each site (i.e., in either land cover class: 2 or 4). See script "cluster/6_lc_of_abn.R."</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Carbon</strong> <ul> <li><strong>carbon_df </strong>– contains the observed and potential carbon accumulation in abandoned croplands in each site in each year (in Mg C), for two abandonment thresholds: 5 years (our default abandonment definition) and 1 year (i.e., no threshold). Each data point corresponds to one of two scenarios (“type” column), either “observed” or “potential.” Carbon accumulation figures are for both the sum of forest and soil carbon at each site in a given year. Carbon accumulation is listed in three columns: 1) “C_up_to_20” contains the total carbon accumulated in those abandoned croplands with abandonment durations between 5 and 20 years. 2) “C_21_30” contains the total carbon accumulation in croplands with durations between 21 and 30 years, which are differentiated in order to account for non-linear carbon accumulation rates in soils over time, and 3) “total_C_Mg” contains the sum of the previous two columns, representing the total carbon accumulated across all abandoned croplands in each year.</li> <li><strong>soc_mean</strong> – contains mean soil organic carbon accumulation rates for years 1-20 and years 21-80, derived from Sanderman et al. 2020 (in Mg C; <a href="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HA17D3">https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HA17D3</a>). These values correspond to accumulation rates in croplands upon abandonment and regeneration to natural vegetation (Sanderman et al. 2020’s “rewilding” scenario). These mean values are calculated across those pixels identified as cropland by Sanderman et al. 2020 at each site. Mean values in year 20 and 80 are contained in columns “mean_soc_20” and “mean_soc_80” respectively, and the annualized rate over the first 20 years and the subsequent years 21 through 80 are contained in columns “mean_annual_soc_1_20” and “mean_annual_soc_21_80” respectively.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Decay model data</strong> – two R data files containing data products for our linear models of abandonment recultivation trajectories. <ul> <li><strong>decay_endpoints_files</strong> – an R data file (.rds) containing seven data products produced as part of our common endpoint analysis, which calculated mean trajectories for each site across a range of common endpoints, ensuring that means were based on coefficient estimates derived from a consistent number of observations for each cohort. These files are: <ul> <li><strong>common_endpoint_dat – </strong>a .csv containing subsets of “persistence_dat” for each “endpoint” (7 through 29).</li> <li><strong>endpoint_n – </strong>a .csv describing, for each endpoint, the corresponding number of observations per cohort (“n_obs”), the number of cohorts (“n_cohorts”), the total number of observations across cohorts included (“total_obs”), and the cohorts that meet the endpoint threshold (“cohorts”).</li> <li><strong>coef_l3_endpoints – </strong>corresponding model coefficients for our primary model (“l3”) parameterized by the range of subsets across endpoints.</li> <li><strong>augment_endpoints – </strong>fitted values (i.e., model predictions) for linear models produced across the full range of endpoint subsets.</li> <li><strong>fitted_endpoints – </strong>a simplified .csv containing the mean linear and log coefficients for each site at each endpoint, and the corresponding predicted proportion remaining abandoned through time (based on the “age,” or duration, of abandonment).</li> <li><strong>time_to_endpoints – </strong>a .csv containing, for mean trajectories for each endpoint at each site, the estimated time required for a given amount of abandoned cropland in a cohort to be recultivated (deciles, 10% through 100%).</li> <li><strong>endpoint_half_lives – </strong>a .csv containing the half-lives calculated for the mean trajectories for each endpoint at each site.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>decay_mod_archive</strong> - an R data file (.rds) containing eleven data products derived from linear models of abandonment recultivation ("decay"): <ul> <li><strong>lm_mega_lin_log_lin_l</strong> – the primary linear model produced in our analysis. This model is referred to as “lin_log_lin” (or “l3”) because the model predicts linear persistence (“lin”) as a function of a log term of time (“log”) and a linear term of time (“lin”). “mega” refers to the fact that this model is run for the full dataset, pooled across all 11 sites.</li> <li><strong>coef_l3_mega</strong> – a .csv containing model coefficients for our primary linear model of recultivation (“lin_log_lin”, or “l3”), with a single row each for the linear term of time and the log term of time, for 26 cohorts at 11 sites.</li> <li><strong>mean_coef_l3_mega</strong> – a data frame containing the mean coefficient values for the log and linear terms of time across cohorts at each site. This also contains the mean of the low and high coefficient estimates, based on the 95% confidence interval.</li> <li><strong>half_lives_all_cohorts_l3</strong> – half-lives calculated for each cohort at each site, for our primary model.</li> <li><strong>half_life_mean_coefs_l3</strong> – half-lives calculated based on the mean trajectory for each site (based on the mean log coefficients and mean linear coefficients across all cohorts), for our primary model.</li> <li><strong>mod_AIC_mega</strong> – Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) values for all tested model specifications.</li> <li><strong>fitted_combo</strong> – fitted values (i.e., model predictions) for our primary model (“l3”) and a series of alternative model specifications (“l3_trim” – excluding cohorts with fewer than 5 observations; “lin_log” – a model including only one log time term; “log2_lin” – in which the log of persistence is predicted by log and linear time terms; and “l3_no_cohort” – our primary model, predicting linear persistence as a function of log time and linear time, but without cohort-level fixed effects).</li> <li><strong>time_to_combo</strong> – contains the estimated time required for a certain amount of abandoned cropland in a cohort to be recultivated (deciles, 10% through 100%). See script "2_decay_models.Rmd." These values are calculated for a range of alternative model specifications ("l3_trim", “lin_log”, "log2_lin", and "l3_no_cohort"; see above).</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Length data</strong> – includes “_distill_df” files and “mean_length_df” files for observed, potential, and recultivation. <ul> <li><strong>length_distill_df</strong> - .csvs containing the number ("freq") of abandonment periods of a specific "length" of time (i.e., age) at each site over the course of the entire time series. Derived from the "length" files in "length.zip." See script "cluster/5_distill_lengths.R."</li> <li><strong>mean_length_df</strong> - .csvs with the mean, median, and standard deviation, for each site, for both "all" lengths or just the "max" length per pixel, and for a range of abandonment definitions (1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years). Derived from "length_distill_df." See script "1_summary_stats.Rmd."</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Duration summary files</strong> – includes “summary_stats_all_sites” and “summary_stats_all_sites_pooled,” for observed and potential abandonment, and recultivation periods following abandonment. <ul> <li><strong>“summary_stats_all_sites”</strong> - A simple .csv derived from "mean_length_df" files containing summary stats across the 11 sites. This includes the mean of the mean abandonment duration ("length", in years) for each of our 11 sites ("mean_of_means"), the standard deviation of these site mean abandonment lengths ("sd_of_means"), the mean of the standard deviation at each site ("mean_of_sds"), the mean median ("mean_of_medians"), and the mean number of abandonment periods ("mean_n_abn_periods"). Note that length "all" indicates that these stats account for all periods (including multiple per pixel), rather than just the max duration per pixel. See script "1_summary_stats.Rmd."</li> <li><strong>“summary_stats_all_sites_pooled”</strong> - A summary .csv similar to "summary_stats_all_sites," but calculated by pooling all distinct periods of abandonment across all eleven sites, and then calculating the mean, median, and standard deviation of abandonment duration. See script "1_summary_stats.Rmd."</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Comparing annual approach to identifying abandonment to a two-timepoint (“2yr”) approach:</strong> <ul> <li><strong>abn_2yr_ages_df</strong> - Contains the age of former croplands identified as "abandoned" using a two-timepoint method (i.e., 2017 - 1987), where age values (as of 2017) are derived from our map of abandonment identified using the full annual time series. This includes the area in hectares (ha), in each age class (along with the number of pixels), at each of our 11 sites. This dataset is used to calculate the percent of cropland "abandonment" identified using the two-year method that is actually too "young," i.e., less than 5 years old, and therefore not truly abandonment according to our five-year abandonment definition</li> <li><strong>abn_2yr_overestimation</strong> - Compares the area (in hectares) of cropland abandonment at each site identified with our full annual time series (and a five-year abandonment definition) and the "abandonment" identified using a two-timepoint method (2017-1987). This also includes the percent difference in area between the two methods, the Jaccard similarity of the areas identified as abandonment, and the percent of "young" (i.e., <5-year-old) "abandonment" identified by the two-timepoint method.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Input land cover maps:</strong></p> <p>As noted, the file "input_rasters.zip" contain the raw annual land cover maps for eleven sites generated by:</p> <blockquote> <p>Yin, H., A. Brandão, J. Buchner, D. Helmers, B. G. Iuliano, N. E. Kimambo, K. E. Lewińska, E. Razenkova, A. Rizayeva, N. Rogova, S. A. Spawn, Y. Xie, and V. C. Radeloff. 2020. Monitoring cropland abandonment with Landsat time series. <em>Remote Sensing of Environment</em> 246:111873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111873</p> </blockquote> <p>These land cover maps served as raw inputs for this project and form the basis of the analysis.</p> <p>All land cover maps have a resolution of 30-m and exist for each year from 1987 through 2017. The exceptions are Nebraska / Wyoming (1986-2018) and Wisconsin (1987-2018); these additional years were excluded from our analysis of abandonment duration.</p> <p><strong>Land cover categories in these maps are coded as follows:</strong></p> <ol> <li>Non-vegetated area (e.g., water, urban, barren land)</li> <li>Woody vegetation (e.g., forests)</li> <li>Cropland</li> <li>Herbaceous vegetation (e.g., grassland)</li> </ol> <p><strong>Site file names correspond to the following geographic locations:</strong></p> <ul> <li>belarus = Vitebsk, Belarus / Smolensk, Russia</li> <li>bosnia_herzegovina = Bosnia & Herzegovina</li> <li>chongqing = Chongqing, China</li> <li>goias = Goiás, Brazil</li> <li>iraq = Iraq</li> <li>mato_grosso = Mato Grosso, Brazil</li> <li>nebraska = Nebraska / Wyoming, USA</li> <li>orenburg = Orenburg, Russia / Uralsk, Kazakhstan</li> <li>shaanxi = Shaanxi/Shanxi, China</li> <li>volgograd = Volgograd, Russia</li> <li>wisconsin = Wisconsin, USA</li> </ul> <p>This dataset is minimally altered from Yin et al. 2020. However, land cover codes were updated for five sites (Iraq, Nebraska/Wyoming, Orenburg/Uralsk, Volgograd, and Wisconsin) in order to maintain consistency in how land cover was coded across all sites. The original land cover codes (matching Yin et al. 2020) are described in the file "site_df.csv" and are as follows:</p> <ol> <li>Iraq: 1 Non-vegetated; 2 Cropland; 3 Woody; 4 Herbaceous</li> <li>Nebraska / Wyoming (USA): 1 Cropland; 2 Woody; 3 Non-vegetated; 4 Herbaceous</li> <li>Orenburg, Russia / Uralsk, Kazakhstan: 1 Non-vegetated; 2 Cropland; 3 Herbaceous; 4 Woody</li> <li>Volgograd (Russia): 1 Non-vegetated; 2 Cropland; 3 Herbaceous; 4 Woody</li> <li>Wisconsin (USA): 1 Cropland; 2 Herbaceous; 3 Woody; 4 Non-vegetated</li> </ol>
Data from: Using Landsat time-series to investigate nearly 50 years of tree canopy cover change across an urban-rural landscape in southern Ontario
<p><strong>Paper Abstract:</strong></p> <p>Canadian urban and adjacent landscapes have been dynamic over the last 50 years due to land management, land cover alternations, climate change, and disturbances. Remote sensing, particularly the Landsat archive, provides the only means to spatially quantify these long-term dynamics locally. Here, we explore the utility of Landsat, including the often-forgotten MSS sensor, for investigating percent tree canopy cover (TCC) change between 1972 and 2020 in a Canadian urban-rural context. We build a TCC time-series by training random forest models using visually interpreted TCC from high-resolution imagery. Predictors include topographic and yearly LandsatLinkr-harmonized and LandTrendr-fitted tasseled cap indices. Yearly binary TCC maps are built to mask consistently treeless areas and limit noise. To increase confidence in observed TCC change without historical reference imagery, we investigate multiple temporal validation options. Our TCC time-series (R2: 0.89, RMSE: 10.7%), quantifies TCC dynamics while limiting erroneous change and predictor space extrapolation. We explore TCC changes across landscapes, revealing periods of gain and loss associated with agricultural reforestation (1978-1996), housing development (on-going), drought (late 1990s), emerald ash borer (2010s), an ice storm (2013), and other drivers. Results demonstrate how long-term Landsat time-series can be used to better understand historical tree canopy change at local-regional scales. </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Dataset details:</strong></p> <p>See paper. </p> <ul> <li>cc_72to20.tif: Yearly tree CC predictions (1972-2020)</li> <li>always_nonforest10_nowater.tif: continuous-non-canopy mask</li> <li>water.tif: water mask</li> <li>Yearly.zip: Annual predictors (including CC10) and asc outputs</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>See code on GitHub: <a href="https://github.com/ZZMitch/PredictTreeCC_Landsat_1972to2020">ZZMitch/PredictTreeCC_Landsat_1972to2020: Code from the portion of my PhD about using Landsat time-series to predict tree canopy cover from 1972 - 2020. Code will be released as papers are published. (github.com)</a></p>
Extended data tables to Haering and Habermann, F1000Res, RNfuzzyApp: an R shiny RNA-seq data analysis app for visualisation, differential expression analysis, time-series clustering and enrichment analysis
<p><b>Background</b> </p> <p>RNA-seq is a widely adopted affordable method for large scale gene expression profiling. However, user-friendly and versatile tools for wet-lab biologists to analyse RNA-seq data beyond standard analyses such as differential expression, are rare. Especially, the analysis of time-series data is difficult for wet-lab biologists lacking advanced computational training. Furthermore, most meta-analysis tools are tailored for model organisms and not easily adaptable to other species.</p> <p><b>Results</b></p> <p>With RNfuzzyApp, we provide a user-friendly, web-based R-shiny app for differential expression analysis, as well as time-series analysis of RNA-seq data. RNfuzzyApp offers several methods for normalization and differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data, providing easy-to-use toolboxes, interactive plots and downloadable results. For time-series analysis, RNfuzzyApp presents the first web-based, automated pipeline for soft clustering with the Mfuzz R package, including methods to aid in cluster number selection, Mfuzz loop computations, cluster overlap analysis, as well as cluster enrichments.</p> <p><b>Conclusion</b></p> <p>RNfuzzyApp is an intuitive, easy to use and interactive R shiny app for RNA-seq differential expression and time-series analysis, offering a rich selection of interactive plots, providing a quick overview of raw data and generating rapid analysis results. Furthermore, its orthology assignment, enrichment analysis, as well as ID conversion functions are accessible to non-model organisms.</p>
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy time-series data with and without peak artifacts - simulated data
<p>This is a dataset of FCS time-series with and without peak artifacts. It was created by 2D Monte Carlo simulations of diffusing particles. The provenance of the data is recorded in <a href="https://github.com/aseltmann/fluotracify/blob/data/data/exp-201231-clustsim/LabBook-exp-201231-clustsim.org">this file</a> (see a rendered version <a href="https://aseltmann.github.io/fluotracify/data/LabBook-all.html#sec-2-2">here</a>). This parent project (<a href="https://github.com/aseltmann/fluotracify">https://github.com/aseltmann/fluotracify</a>]) also contains examples of how to use this data and related Python code to load it.</p> <p>The following connected paper is currently under review and should be cited together with this dataset: Seltmann, A.; Carravilla, P.; Reglinski, K.; Eggeling, E.; Waithe, D. Neural Network Informed Photon Filtering Reduces Artifacts in Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Data. 2023 (currently under review)</p> Data structure inside each .csv file <table><tbody> <tr> <td><header></td> <td> <p>10 to 12 lines, contains metadata</p> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>...</td> <td>...</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td><source_1></td> <td><target_1a></td> <td><target_1b></td> <td><source_2></td> <td><target_2a></td> <td><target_2b></td> <td>...</td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>FCS time-series with artifact</p> </td> <td>Artifact time series</td> <td> <p>FCS time series without artifact</p> </td> <td> <p>FCS time series with artifact</p> </td> <td>Artifact time series</td> <td> <p>FCS time-series without artifact</p> </td> <td>...</td> </tr> <tr> <td>...</td> <td>...</td> <td>...</td> <td>...</td> <td>...</td> <td>...</td> <td>...</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
Extended data tables to Haering and Habermann, F1000Res, RNfuzzyApp: an R shiny RNA-seq data analysis app for visualisation, differential expression analysis, time-series clustering and enrichment analysis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Soil chemical variation along a four-decade time-series of reclaimed water amendments in northern Idaho forests
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
InSAR Time-series of Jakobshavn and Petermann from Sentinel-1 Data
<p>Dataset 1: Sentinel-1 ascending track 90, descending track 127</p> <p>Study areas: Jakobshavn glacier in Greenland. We separate Jakobshavn into three individual areas (N, NE, and S) based on different reference locations.</p> <p>Date: Ascending: April 2016 to March 2020; Descending: July 2017 to April 2020.</p> <p>Processor: ISCE/topsStack + MintPy</p> <p>Dataset 2: Sentinel-1 ascending track 90, descending track 26</p> <p>Study areas: Petermann glacier in Greenland. </p> <p>Date: Ascending: April 2017 to April 2020; Descending: January 2017 to April 2020.</p> <p>Processor: ISCE/topsStack + MintPy</p>
Scripts and data for "The adequacy of time-series reduction for renewable energy systems"
<p>This upload provides the scripts and data used for the computations in the aforementioned working paper. To run these files, you will need to adjust the directory in the files 'testTimeSeries.jl' and 'calli.bat' to your local directory.</p> <p>The subfolder 'reduceTimeSeries' contains all data and the script 'reduceTimeSeries.jl' to reduce the full time-series. Reduction using the 'Gerbaulet' method unfortunately requires a GAMS installation. The results of the reduction are already provided in the folder 'output'.</p> <p>The subfolder 'testTimeSeries' contains all data and the script 'testTimeSeries.jl' to test the reduced time-series with a capacity expansion model. The 'comment' and ‘source’ columns in the AnyMOD.jl input files provide further documentation on the used input parameters. The labels 'lowDem' and 'newDem' relate to what was referred to conventional demand and demand with sector integration in the paper, respectively.</p>
Data from: Girth increment changes in response to soil water availability in lowland dipterocarp forest in Borneo: an individualistic time-series analysis
<p><span>Time-series data offer a way of investigating the causes driving ecological processes as phenomena. To test for possible differences in water relations between species of different forest structural guilds at Danum (Sabah, NE Borneo), daily stem girth increments (gthi), of 18 trees across six species were regressed individually on soil moisture potential (SMP) and temperature (TEMP), accounting for temporal autocorrelation (in GLS-arima models), and compared between a wet and a dry period. The best-fitting significant variables were SMP the day before and TEMP the same day. The first resulted in a mix of positive and negative coefficients, the second largely positive ones. An adjustment for dry-period showers was applied. Interactions were stronger in dry than wet period. Negative relationships for overstorey trees can be interpreted in a reversed causal sense: fast transporting stems depleted soil water and lowered SMP. Positive relationships for understorey trees meant they took up most water at high SMP. The unexpected negative relationships for these small trees may have been due to their roots accessing deeper water supplies (if SMP was inversely related to that of the surface layer), and this was influenced by competition with larger neighbour trees. A tree-soil flux dynamics manifold may have been operating. Patterns of mean diurnal girth variation were more consistent among species, and time-series coefficients were negatively related to their maxima. Expected differences in response to SMP in the wet and dry periods did not clearly support a previous hypothesis differentiating drought and non-drought tolerant understorey guilds. Trees within species showed highly individual responses when tree size was standardized. Data on individual root systems and SMP at several depths are needed to get closer to the mechanisms that underlie the tree-soil water phenomena in these tropical forests. Neighborhood stochasticity importantly creates varying local environments experienced by individual trees.</span></p>
"Toy Data Set" referenced in the article "A deep-learning based analysis framework for ultra-high throughput screening time-series data" (https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.22.609110)
<p>This data set, referenced as "toy data set" in the article "A deep-learning based analysis framework for ultra-high throughput screening time-series data" (<a href="Lint-to-article">https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.22.609110</a>), mimics a high-throughput screening data set. To demonstrate the application of our analysis framework described in the main article this toy data set was generated. It contains in total 1536000 individual transient signals, splitted in 5 batches of each 200 plates in 1536-well plate format. Five distinct signal classes were used to resemble typical shapes encountered in biological experiments. Fequency of occurrences for each class is reported in the main article.</p>
LA-ICP-MS line scan data and time-series analysis outputs for Baltic Sea sediment core F80
<p>The datafile contains two sheets: HTM and MCA, corresponding to geochemical data from the Holocene Thermal Maximum and Medieval Climate Anomaly intervals, respectively, of a sediment core from the Baltic Sea (site F80, 58°00.00N, 19°53.81E, water depth 191m, Fårö Deep, collected during the HYPER/COMBINE cruise of R/V Aranda, May/June 2009). In each sheet, columns A-J contain Laser Ablation (LA)-ICP-MS line scan data of element ratios in resin-embedded sediment (Mo/Al, Fe/Al and Br/P) presented in the time domain (Age in years BP). Dating of the sediment core is described in the accompanying manuscript and references therein. These profiles are presented in three forms: Raw= raw data resampled to 1 year resolution; Det= detrended and normalized to unit variance; Gau; Gaussian bandpass filter at a period of 20-100 years. Columns L-S contain time-series analysis results of the detrended, normalized elemental ratios in period domain, including power spectra of each ratio (Blackman-Tukey window, columns M-O) and cross-spectral analysis (Blackman-Tukey window, bandwidth 5 years) of Mo/Al vs Br/P (columns P-Q) and Mo/Al vs Fe/Al (columns R-S), respectively. All analyses were performed in Analyseries 1.1.1 (Paillard et al., 1996). Figures containing the data have been submitted as part of a manuscript to Geophysical Research Letters (Jilbert et al., forthcoming),</p> <p> </p> <p>Paillard, D., Labeyrie, L., & Yiou, P. (1996). Macintosh program performs time‐series analysis. <em>Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union</em>,<em> 77</em>(39), 379-379. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96EO00259">https://doi.org/10.1029/96EO00259</a></p> <p>Jilbert, T., Gustafsson, B.G., Veldhuijzen, S., Reed, D.C., van Helmond, N.A.G.M., Hermans, M., & Slomp, C.P (forthcoming). Iron-phosphorus feedbacks drive multidecadal oscillations in Baltic Sea hypoxia. Submitted to <em>Geophysical Research Letters</em></p>
Data from: Whiskers provide time-series of toxic and essential trace elements, Se:Hg molar ratios, and stable isotope values of an apex Antarctic predator, the leopard seal
<p>In an era of rapid environmental change and increasing human presence, researchers need efficient tools for tracking contaminants to monitor the health of Antarctic flora and fauna. Here, we examined the utility of leopard seal whiskers as a biomonitoring tool that reconstructs time-series of significant ecological and physiological biomarkers. Leopard seals (<em>Hydrurga leptonyx</em>) are a sentinel species in the Western Antarctic Peninsula due to their apex predator status and top-down effects on several Antarctic species. However, there are few data on their contaminant loads. We analyzed leopard seal whiskers (n = 18 individuals, n = 981 segments) collected during 2018–2019 field seasons to acquire longitudinal profiles of non-essential (Hg, Pb, and Cd) and essential (Se, Cu, and Zn) trace elements, stable isotope (ẟ<sub>15</sub>N and ẟ<sub>13</sub>C) values and to assess Hg risk with Se:Hg molar ratios. Whiskers provided between 46 and 286 cumulative days of growth with a mean ~125 days per whisker (n = 18). Adult whiskers showed variability in non-essential trace elements over time that could partly be explained by changes in diet. Whisker Hg levels were insufficient (<20 ppm) to consider most seals being at "high" risk for Hg toxicity. Nevertheless, maximum Hg concentrations observed in this study were greater than that of leopard seal hair measured two decades ago. However, variation in the Se:Hg molar ratios over time suggest that Se may detoxify Hg burden in leopard seals. Overall, we provide evidence that the analysis of leopard seal whiskers allows for the reconstruction of time-series ecological and physiological data and can be valuable for opportunistically monitoring the health of the leopard seal population and their Antarctic ecosystem during climate change.</p>
Data and code example for the article: "Massively parallel hybrid quantum-classical machine learning for kernelized time-series classification"
<p>Data needed to reproduce the figures of <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05881">https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05881</a> and a simple code example of a quantum-convex-classical neural network used to train a sine versus cosine classification problem.</p>
UK Electricity consumption time-series from Elexon data portal (Actual Total Load Per Bidding Zone)
<p>Data from 2015-01-01 to 2023-08-10. Downloaded using ElexonDataPortal for Python.</p> <p>Dataset B0610 – Actual Total Load per Bidding Zone: <a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDYQw7AJahcKEwjw1P2089yAAxUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.elexon.co.uk%2Fdocuments%2Fbmrs-api-and-data-push-guide-for-p408%2F&psig=AOvVaw3JTwF_pxNDLFZp3HSDJa_s&ust=1692128319855369&opi=89978449">https://www.elexon.co.uk/documents/bmrs-api-and-data-push-guide-for-p408/</a></p>
Lake Vansjø-Vanemfjorden long time-series data for nutrients_colour and cyanobacteria
<p>Data from lake Vansjø-Vanemfjorden basin from 1996-2020 for total phosphorus, total nitrogen, water colour and maximum biovolume of cyanobacteria.</p>
Bermuda Atlantic Time-Series Study (BATS) Pigment Data
<p>This dataset is published on Zenodo by the Simons CMAP curators for long-term care. All credits go to the data producers at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS): https://bats.bios.asu.edu/bats-data/ </p><p>The BATS (Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study) Pigment dataset is time-series spanning from 1988 to 2022. The dataset contains the 21 separate in-situ pigment measurements along with sampling depth and the BATS Cruise ID.</p><p>This description has been reproduced using https://www.dropbox.com/s/8kk760972lpj5sa/bats_pigments.txt?dl=0</p>
Data from: Girth increment changes in response to soil water availability in lowland dipterocarp forest in Borneo: an individualistic time-series analysis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
RNA-seq data for an embryonic chicken digit tissue time-series, treated in vivo with smoothened agonist to induce ectopic feathers
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.