Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
134
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
134 results for “Total Evidence”
Data from: Molecular Dating of Phylogeny of Sturgeons (Acipenseridae) Based on Total Evidence Analysis
<p>Bayesian chronograms (original and updated 08.10.2022) of cladogenesis of fossil and recent Acipenseriformes reconstructed on the basis of combined (mtDNA, morphological characters) data.</p>
Data from: Skyline fossilized birth-death model is robust to violations of sampling assumptions in total-evidence dating
<p>Several total-evidence dating studies under the fossilized birth-death (FBD) model have produced very old age estimates, which are not supported by the fossil record. This phenomenon has been termed "deep root attraction (DRA)". For two specific datasets, involving divergence time estimation for the early radiations of ants, bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) and of placental mammals (Eutheria), it has been shown that the DRA effect can be greatly reduced by accommodating the fact that extant species in these trees have been sampled to maximize diversity, so called diversified sampling. Unfortunately, current methods to accommodate diversified sampling only consider the extreme case where it is possible to identify a cut-off time such that all splits occurring before this time are represented in the sampled tree but none of the younger splits. In reality, the sampling bias is rarely this extreme, and may be difficult to model properly. Similar modeling challenges apply to the sampling of the fossil record. This raises the question of whether it is possible to find dating methods that are more robust to sampling biases. Here, we show that the skyline FBD (SFBD) process, where the diversification and fossil-sampling rates can vary over time in a piecewise fashion, provides age estimates that are more robust to inadequacies in the modeling of the sampling process and less sensitive to DRA effects. In the SFBD model we consider, rates in different time intervals are either considered to be independent and identically distributed, or assumed to be autocorrelated following an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process. Through simulations and reanalyses of the Hymenoptera and Eutheria data, we show that both variants of the SFBD model unify age estimates under random and diversified sampling assumptions. The SFBD model can resolve DRA by absorbing the deviations from the sampling assumptions into the inferred dynamics of the diversification process over time. Although this means that the inferred diversification dynamics must be interpreted with caution, taking sampling biases into account, we conclude that the SFBD model represents the most robust approach available currently for addressing DRA in total-evidence dating.</p>
Figure 1 in Character mapping and cladogram comparison versus the requirement of total evidence: does it matter for polychaete systematics?
Figure 1. Example of the error of cladogram comparisons. A, phylogenetic hypotheses inferred from separate sets of premises. Letters on cladogram 'nodes' indicate population-splitting events relevant to the various hypotheses of character origin/fixation within ancestral populations. The requirement of total evidence precludes such a comparison of cladogram topologies because explanations of characters 1(1)–5(1) by population-splitting events A–C (left cladogram) contradict explanations of 6(1)–8(1) by population-splitting events D–F. See text for further discussion. B, explaining observations in accordance with the requirement of total evidence, correcting the problem in 'A'.
Figure 2 in Character mapping and cladogram comparison versus the requirement of total evidence: does it matter for polychaete systematics?
Figure 2. Example of the error of character mapping. A, phylogenetic hypotheses are inferred for a set of characters. Numbers on cladogram 'nodes' indicate population-splitting events relevant to the various hypotheses of character origin/fixation within ancestral populations (not shown; cf. fig. 1). B, a different set of characters are 'mapped' onto the branches of the cladogram in 'A'. C, the 'mapped' characters in 'B' actually refer to phylogenetic hypotheses inferred separately from the hypotheses implied by the cladogram in 'A' and 'B'. D, explaining observations in accordance with the requirement of total evidence, correcting the problem in 'B' and 'C'. See text for further discussion.
FIGURE 16 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 16. Peduncle: A, lateral peduncle in Polistes instabilis; B, central peduncle in Polistes carolina.
FIGURE 10 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 10. Propodeum and propodeal orifice: A, propodeal striae absent, and propodeal orifice rounded in Polistes torresae; B, propodeal striae weak all over and propodeal orifice rounded in Polistes apachus; and C, propodeal striae strong all over and propodeal orifice elongate in Polistes versicolor.
FIGURE 15 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 15. Comb shape: A, circular in Polistes fuscatus; B, subcircular in Polistes instabilis; C, leaf shaped in Polistes versicolor; D, narrow in Polistes crinitus; and E, long and vertical in Polistes goeldii.
FIGURE 9 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 9. Mesepisternum: dorsal groove complete and epicnemial carina absent in A, Polistes cavapytiformis; and B, dorsal groove incomplete and epicnemial carina complete in Polistes thoracicus.
FIGURE 2 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 2. Single most parsimonious tree obtained in the analysis of morphological, behavioral and molecular data for 101 species of Polistes (opposite page and continued above). Node numbers represent support values from symmetrical resampling, reported as absolute frequencies.
FIGURE 6 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 6. Gena width at midlength, lateral view: A, equal to or slightly wider than eye in Polistes pacificus; and B, distinctly wider than eye in Polistes rufiventris.
FIGURE 14. Mesosoma, terga I and II in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 14. Mesosoma, terga I and II shape and dimensions: A, Vespula squamosa (outgroup); B, Polistes apachus; C, Polistes bicolor; D, Polistes fuscatus; E, Polistes terresae; and F, Polistes versicolor.
FIGURE 8 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 8. Occipital carina and pronotal carina of A, Polistes cavapytiformes and B, Polistes penai. Extension of occipital carina and shape and extension of pronotal carina.
FIGURE 13. Tergum I in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 13. Tergum I shape, lateral view: A, abruptly widened in Polistes huristicornis, and B, gradually widened in Polistes occipitalis.
FIGURE 7 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 7. Head and pronotum, in dorsal view: A, occiput strongly convex, anterior region of pronotum rounded and humeri outline not projecting in Polistes cavapytiformis; B, occiput almost straight or weakly convex and humeri outline slightly projecting in Polistes occipitalis; C, anterior region of pronotum with a central projection and humeri outline strongly projecting in Polistes testaceicolor.
FIGURE 12. Terga I and II in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 12. Terga I and II, dorsal view: A, tergum I conical, as wide as long, and tergum II as wide as long in Polistes aurifer; and B, tergum I conical, longer than wide and tergum II longer than wide in Polistes exclamans.
FIGURE 11 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 11. Mesosoma, dimensions of scutum and scutellum: A, Vespula squamosa (outgroup); B, Polistes apachus; C, Polistes fuscatus; D, Polistes versicolor; E, Polistes bicolor; and F, Polistes terresae.
FIGURE 5 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 5. Face in front view: A, clypeus wider than long, clypeal apex strongly bidentate, clypeus touching for an extension greater than width of antennal socket the eye in Vespula germanica (outgroup); B, clypeus as long as wide, clypeal apex rounded, clypeus touching for an extension equal to width of antennal socket the eye Polistes cavapytiformis; C, clypeus as long as wide, clypeal apex pointed, clypeus touching for an extension shorter than width of antennal socket the eye in Polistes carnifex; and D, clypeus longer than wide, clypeal apex pointed, clypeus narrowly separated by eye in Polistes thoracicus. For all bristles length very long (A), long (B), short, becoming long toward the apex (D).
FIGURE 4 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 4. Summary subgenera relationships for New World Polistes obtained in our analyses compared to previous studies.
FIGURE 3 in Total-evidence Phylogeny of the New World Polistes Lepeletier, 1836, Paper Wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polistini)
FIGURE 3. Single most parsimonious tree obtained in the analysis of morphological, behavioral, and molecular data, with the dataset restricted to the 53 species of Polistes for which molecular data was available. Node numbers represent support values from symmetrical resampling, reported as absolute frequencies.
FIGURE 6 in Total Evidence Phylogenetic Analysis Supports New Morphological Synapomorphies for Bovidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla)
FIGURE 6. Maximum clade credibility Bayesian total evidence topology (opposite page, above, and next page). Extinct species are labeled Ancient DNA or Fossil to denote how they appear in the matrix. Posterior probabilities for each node over 0.5 are represented as scaled circles. Divergence dates estimated from fossil calibrations are represented in millions of years. Note the estimated divergence time of the clade Oreotragini + Cephalophini + Antilopini was older than the estimated divergence of the rest of Antilopinae in which it belongs.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.