Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
191
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
191 results for “User data”
[Dataset] Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects - Raw Data
<p><strong>Explanation/Overview:</strong></p> <p>Corresponding raw data for the analyses described in D3.3 (can be found here), which are the result of our research that culminated into the publication "Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects", a conference paper for the conference CollabTech 2022: <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6">Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing</a> and published as part of the <a href="https://link.springer.com/bookseries/558">Lecture Notes in Computer Science</a> book series (LNCS,volume 13632) <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_5">here</a>. Usernames have been anonymised.</p> <p>The raw data is in the <code>.json</code> format and can be read by most languages/tools. It is recommended to import the data into a MongoDB to work with it.</p> <p><strong>Purpose:</strong></p> <p>The purpose of this dataset is to provide the basis for possible further examinations, involving additional (not yet analysed) features such as the content of the comments etc. and also new ways of extracting networks.</p> <p><strong>Relatedness:</strong></p> <p>The data of the different projects was derived from the forums of 7 Zooniverse projects based on similar discussion board features. The projects are: 'Galaxy Zoo', 'Gravity Spy', 'Seabirdwatch', 'Snapshot Wisconsin', 'Wildwatch Kenya', 'Galaxy Nurseries', 'Penguin Watch'.</p> <p><strong>Content:</strong></p> <p>The dataset contains three files:</p> <ul> <li><code>Comments.json</code> <ul> <li>contains the basic data representation with multiple fields (e.g., <code>time_created</code>, <code>user_login</code>). Each data field represents a comment.</li> </ul> </li> <li><code>Discussions.json</code> <ul> <li><code></code>contains all discussions. Each data field is a discussion, with multiple fields (e.g., <code>comments_count</code>, <code>user_login</code>)</li> </ul> </li> <li><code>Projects.json</code> <ul> <li><code></code>contains all projects. Each data field is a project, with multiple fields (e.g., <code>project_id</code>, <code>description</code>)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Grouping:</strong></p> <p>The projects (and thus the corresponding discussions and comments) were collected on the basis of common forum features such as the discussion boards.</p>
User-centered Usability Analysis of 41 Open Government Data Portals
<p>The data were collected during the user-centered analysis of usability of 41 open government data portals including EU27, applying a common methodology to them, considering aspects such as specification of open data set, feedback and requests, further broken down into 14 sub-criteria. Each aspect was assessed using a three-level Likert scale (fulfilled - 3, partially fulfilled - 2, and unfulfilled – 1), that belongs to the acceptability tasks. This dataset summarises a total of 1640 protocols obtained during the analysis of the selected portals carried out by 40 participants, who were selected on a voluntary basis. This is complemented with 4 summaries of these protocols, which include calculated average scores by category, aspect and country. These data allow comparative analysis of the national open data portals, help to find the key challenges that can negatively impact users’ experience, and identifies portals that can be considered as an example for the less successful open data portals.</p>
MoTiV: a Dataset of European User Mobility for Behavioral-Data
<p>Mobility is a system involving several stakeholders. Therefore, it is relevant to characterize mobility behavior and preferences in a detailed way, to enable nuanced decisions. Current paradigms rely mostly on time saving, proposing to users solutions that include the shortest path. Even though the value of travel time can be extended beyond travel duration, no dataset to characterize mobility and value of travel time from different perspectives exists. This creates a gap between novel mobility paradigms and the characterization of user mobility. To enable the mining of user mobility under these new paradigms, in this paper, we present the MoTiV (Mobility and Time Value) dataset, which contains data about travelers and their journeys, collected from a mobile application, called Woorti. Each trip contains multi-faceted information: from the transport mode, through its evaluation, to the positive/negative experience factors. We also present a use case, which compares corresponding legs with different transport modes, studying experience factors that negatively impact users. We conclude by discussing other application domains and research opportunities enabled by the dataset.</p>
Anthropomorphic Mechanisms for User Acceptance in Human-Robot Interaction - PRISMA pass data
<p>This is the data produced in the course of selecting relevant literature for the <em>"User Acceptance in Human-Robot Interaction"</em> literature review article.</p> <p><strong>Contents:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Initial pass records: <em>prisma0_wos.xlsx + prisma0_scopus.xlsx</em></li> <li>Initial pass eligibility assessment:<em><strong> </strong>prisma0_eval.xlsx</em></li> <li>Second pass records, filtering and coarse assessment:<em><strong> </strong>prisma1.xlsx</em></li> <li>Third pass records, filtering and coarse assessment:<em><strong> </strong>prisma2.xlsx</em></li> <li>Fine eligibility assessment of 2nd and 3rd pass: <em>prisma_avalanche_1_and_2_report_update_04_26.pdf</em></li> </ul> <p> </p>
MEDIATOR Driving Simulator Study Germany: Questionnaire Data User Evaluation HMI
<p>The dataset provided resulted from a driving simulator study conducted by Chemnitz University of Technology (TUC) within work package 3 of the MEDIATOR project. The study focused on the user evaluation of the Mediator system and its functionalities, including the innovative Human Machine interface (HMI). The user evaluation centred on acceptance, trust, usability, comfort and the experience of Transitions of Control (TOCs). The core idea of the Mediator system is to mediate between the human driver and the automated system. Thereby, the Mediator system aims at establishing both as a team that is aware of each other’s strengths, limitations as well as current states in order to achieve safe TOCs, which are actively proposed by the HMI. The main focus of the driving simulator study was on comfort TOCs from manual to automated driving, simulated automation degradation and related TOCs by the human driver, comfort critical situations (i.e., close approach to the rear-end of a traffic jam) as well as the influence of driver characteristics. The provided dataset contains the questionnaire data of 74 German-speaking participants.</p> <p> </p> <p>This document contains information about the study methodology and coding of the variables. For a detailed description, please consult Mediator deliverable D3.3 ‘Results of the MEDIATOR driving simulator evaluation studies’ (Part II – Driving simulator study Germany). Please note that selected passages of this deliverable were adopted (partly in a slightly modified manner) in this document.</p> <p> </p> <p>This dataset is licensed under a <a href="https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-4.0.html">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</a> License.</p> <p> </p> <p>The research leading to this dataset received funding from the European Commission Horizon 2020 programme under the project MEDIATOR (<a href="https://mediatorproject.eu/">https://mediatorproject.eu/</a>), grant agreement number 814735.</p> <p> </p> <p>If you use the dataset, please cite it as: MEDIATOR (2023). MEDIATOR Driving Simulator Study Germany: Questionnaire Data User Evaluation HMI. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7638299">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7638299</a></p> <p> </p> <p>For further information, please contact: <a href="mailto:cornelia.hollander@psychologie.tu-chemnitz.de">cornelia.hollander@psychologie.tu-chemnitz.de</a>.</p>
Multi-Dimensional Data Viewer (MDV) user manual for data exploration: "Systematic analysis of YFP traps reveals common discordance between mRNA and protein across the nervous system"
<table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p> Please also see the latest version of the repository:<br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6374011">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6374011</a> and<br> our website: <a href="https://ilandavis.com/jcb2023-yfp">https://ilandavis.com/jcb2023-yfp</a></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p>The explosion in the volume of biological imaging data challenges the available technologies for data interrogation and its intersection with related published bioinformatics data sets. Moreover, intersection of highly rich and complex datasets from different sources provided as flat csv files requires advanced informatics skills, which is time consuming and not accessible to all. Here, we provide a “user manual” to our new paradigm for systematically filtering and analysing a dataset with more than 1300 microscopy data figures using Multi-Dimensional Viewer (MDV) -<a href="https://mdv.molbiol.ox.ac.uk/projects/mdv_project/7012?view=RNA+%2F+Protein+Distribution">link</a>, a solution for interactive multimodal data visualisation and exploration. The primary data we use are derived from our published systematic analysis of 200 YFP traps reveals common discordance between mRNA and protein across the nervous system (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202205129">eprint link</a>). This manual provides the raw image data together with the expert annotations of the mRNA and protein distribution as well as associated bioinformatics data. We provide an explanation, with specific examples, of how to use MDV to make the multiple data types interoperable and explore them together. We also provide the open-source python code <a href="https://github.com/ilandavislab/Annotate.OMERO.Fig">(github link)</a> used to annotate the figures, which could be adapted to any other kind of data annotation task.</p>
Data set of two dual-task paradigms to measure listening effort in cochlear implant users
<p>This data set presents the data from the paper by Hendrikse, Dingemanse, & Goedegebure (2022). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using listening effort to measure relatively small differences in SNR, as would arise from different hearing-device settings. Listening effort was chosen, because there are indications in literature that listening effort may be more sensitive to differences between hearing-device settings than established speech intelligibility measures. Two behavioral listening effort tests were performed at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) where the intelligibility was high. A sentence final word identification and recall test (SWIRT), and a sentence verification test (SVT) were compared with a group of 18 Dutch CI users. SWIRT measured the ability to recall the final words of sentences after a list of five or seven sentences was presented. The SVT measured the ability and reaction time to determine whether a sentence was true or false. Both tests were conducted in background noise at SNRs +4 dB and +8 dB above the 50% speech perception threshold. The structure of the data files is explained in the README file.</p>
L3Pilot Global User Acceptance Survey, Second Phase Data
<p>The research leading to these results received funding from the European Commission Horizon 2020 programme under the project L3Pilot (L3Pilot.eu), grant agreement number 723051. The L3Pilot Global User Acceptance Survey investigated the acceptance of SAE Level 3 (L3) conditionally automated cars. Survey data was collected in two phases. This dataset contains the data from the second phase of the survey with responses collected from 9 countries on five continents. This document contains information about the survey methodology and coding of the variables. For a detailed description of the first and second phase survey methodology, please consult L3Pilot deliverable D7.1 ‘Annual quantitative survey about user acceptance towards ADAS and vehicle automation’ by Nordhoff et al. (2021).</p> <p>If you use the dataset, please cite it as: L3Pilot (2023). L3Pilot Global User Acceptance Survey, Second Phase Data. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8389718">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8389718</a></p> <p>For further information, please contact: <a href="mailto:user-survey@eict.de">user-survey@eict.de</a></p>
User requirements of Big Earth Data - Survey 2019
<p>The survey was conducted between November 2018 and May 2019 with the aim to find out how users working with large volumes of environmental data interact with data, what challenges they face and how they would like to use cloud-based data services in the future.</p> <p>The term Big Earth Data in this context refers to digital information about Earth, including observations, imagery, derived higher-level products, forecasts and analyses produced by computer models.</p> <p>The survey was conducted in collaboration with the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and as part of a PhD thesis on "Big Data technologies for environmental and climate data" at University of Marburg, Germany.</p> <p>The results are published in form of two articles:</p> <ul> <li>Wagemann, J., Siemen, S., Seeger, B. and J. Bendix (2021): Users of open Big Earth data - An analysis of the current state. Computers and Geosciences 2021. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104916">doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104916</a></li> <li>Wagemann, J. Siemen, S., Seeger, B. and J. Bendix (2021): A user perspective on future cloud-based services for Big Earth data. International Journal of Digital Earth 2021. doi: <a href="http://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2021.1982031">10.1080/17538947.2021.1982031</a></li> </ul> <p> </p>
User study data: Nudges to Mitigate Confirmation Bias during Web Search for Opinion Formation, automatic vs. reflective study
<p>Data of two user studies (282 and 307 participants), investigating the risks and benefits of warning labels with and without obfuscations to mitigate confirmation bias during web search on debated topics.</p> <p> </p> <p>Study Variables (study 1 and study 2)</p> <p> </p> <p> display_con: Search result display<br> - Study 1<br> - 1: targeted warning label with obfuscation<br> - 2: random warning label with obfuscation<br> - 3: regular (no intervention)<br> - Study 2<br> - 1: targeted warning label with obfuscation<br> - 2: targeted warning label without obfuscation<br> - 3: random warning label with obfuscation<br> - 4: random warning label without obfuscation<br> - 5: regular (no intervention)<br>- CRT_cat: Cognitive reflection<br> - 1: intuitive<br> - 2: analytic<br>- topic: Assigned debated topic<br> - 1: Is drinking milk healthy for humans? <br> - 2: Is homework beneficial?<br> - 3: Should people become vegetarian?<br> - 4: Should students have to wear school uniforms?<br>- clicksup_prop: Clicks on attitude-confirming (AC) search results (proportion of all clicks)<br>- clickwarn_prop: Clicks on warning label (WL) search results (proportion of all clicks)<br>- show_clicked: Clicks on show-button (number of clicks, only in conditions with obfuscation)<br>- accuracy_bias: Accuracy bias estimation (Difference between a) observed bias (as the proportion of attitude-confirming clicks) and b) perceived bias (reported in the post-interaction questionnaire and re-coded into values from 0 to 1), positive values indicate an overestimation of bias)<br>- att_change: Attitude change (Difference between attitude reported in the pre-interaction questionnaire and the post-interaction questionnaire. Negative values indicate an attitude change in the attitude-opposing direction, while positive values indicate an attitude strengthening in the attitude-supporting direction.)<br>- knowledge_1: Self-reported prior knowledge (Reported on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from non-existent to excellent as a response to how they would describe their knowledge on the topic they were assigned to)<br>- N_clicks: Cumulative clicks (Number of all clicks on search results)<br>- NFC: Need for Cognition (Mean response to 4-item subset of the NFC questionnaire)<br>- UX_usability: Usability (Mean of responses on a seven-point Likert scale to the module "usability"from the meCUE 2.0 questionnaire)<br>- UX_usefulness: Usefulness (Mean of responses on a seven-point Likert scale to the module "usefulness"from the meCUE 2.0 questionnaire)</p>
User study Data: Boosting Intellectual Humility During Search on Debated Topics
<pre><strong>User study data </strong> The following column headers correspond to the following study variables: Intervention = Intervention (CONTROL= control, DUMMYCONTROL = ATI control, PRIME = prime, QUESTIONNAIRE = remind, FULL = reinforce) DV1_AC_Clicks = Attitude confirming clicks DV2_Lowest_Rank = Lowest rank clicked DV3_Dwell_Time = Dwell time DV4_Task_Completion = Task completion time DV5_Cumulative_Clicks = Cumulative clicks IH = Intellectual Humility Ranking = Ranking Topic = Topic rationale = Rationale for behavior (free text) rationale_category = Rationale for behavior (category, one of IH_driven = driven by IH, ranking_driven = ranking, bias_driven = confirmation bias, content/form_driven = content/form, task_driven/unclear = task/unclear)) Att_change = Attitude change Knowledge = Knowledge gain (1 = no knowledge gain, 5 = substantial knowledge gain) NASA.Mental = Reflection on search task, mental demand NASA.Temporal = Reflection on search task, temporal demand NASA.Performance = Reflection on search task, performance NASA.Effort = Reflection on search task, effort NASA.Frustration = Reflection on search task, frustration</pre>
Data and Results of eELib Simulations for the User-Based Multi-Use of Battery Storage Systems
<p>The dataset contains the configuration for the eElib models (model_data.json) and computed simulation results (.hdf5-files). The following scenarios were computed:</p> <ul> <li>ave_A_static-eq</li> <li>ave_A_static</li> <li>ave_A_dynamic_charging</li> <li>ave_A_fully_dynamic</li> <li>ave_B_static-eq_bss</li> <li>ave_B_static_bss</li> <li>ave_B_dynamic_charging_bss</li> <li>ave_B_fully_dynamic_bss</li> <li>MELANI_static</li> <li>MELANI_static_equal</li> <li>MELANI_dynamic_charging</li> <li>MELANI_fully_dynamic</li> </ul> <p><strong>Description of syntax of simulation results:</strong></p> <ul> <li>average (ave_B is half the size of the BSS of ave_A) and MELANI describe the considered multi-family house</li> <li>static/ static / dynamic_charging / fully_dynamic are the three developed operating strategies for the user-based multi-use</li> <li>static-equal: the allocation keys are equally, i.e., the PVS and BSS capabilities are equally distributed among the households of the multi-family house</li> </ul> <div> <div><strong>As part of the publication:</strong></div> <div>Henrik Wagner, Constantin von Lützow, Marcel Lüdecke, Michel Meinert, Bernd Engel "Empowering Collective Self-Consumption in Multi-Family Houses: User-Based Multi-Use of Residential Battery Storage Systems", 23rd Wind & Solar Integration Workshop 2024, Helsinki, Finland, doi: 10.1049/icp.2024.3901</div> <div> </div> <div><strong>Changelog:</strong></div> <div>v2: Added doi for WIW 2024 conference paper to improve citation possibilities</div> </div>
Anonymized Graph Data with Friend Connections of 189505 VKontakte Users
<p>The dataset contains anonymized graph data with friend connections of 189505 VKontakte users. The dataset was used in <a href="http://github.com/filipp134/vk_bot_detection">this</a> Github project on the detection of social bots on VKontakte. The script which was used for the collection of the dataset is <a href="https://github.com/filipp134/vk_bot_detection/blob/main/Collecting%20datasets%20and%20merging%20them%20into%20one/collect_graph_data.py">here</a>.</p> <p>The dataset was collected in the following 2 steps by using the official <a href="https://dev.vk.com/api/getting-started">VKontakte API</a>:</p> <p>1. Friend connections of 11766 VKontakte users, who had 177739 unique friends, were collected.</p> <p>2. Friend connections of these 177739 users were collected. </p> <p>The dataset is in JSON format and is quite heavy: 424.5 MB.</p> <p> </p>
[DATA_SCIENCE] Interviews PomBase Users, January-February 2016
<p>Here you find the transcripts of interviews collected by Sabina Leonelli as part of the ERC project "The Epistemology of Data-Intensive Science". You also find the information sheet provided to interviewees, which gives you the context for this project. Further information and related publications can be found at www.datastudies.eu. One paper that specifically makes use of these interviews was published by Sabina Leonelli in the journal Philosophy of Science in 2018, under the title "Data in Time: Time-Scales of Data Use in the Life Sciences." The transcripts document yeast researchers' attitudes to data curation and the use of databases in their field. Researchers have consented to have these transcripts made available as Open Data. Other interviewees did not give consent, so those transcripts are held securely by the research team in Exeter.</p>
User Study Data from "Point-and-Shake: Selecting from Levitating Object Displays"
<p>This dataset contains anonymous user study data from the two experiments described in the corresponding CHI 2018 publication.</p>
Example Dataset for npstat: Population genetics from Pooled NGS data NPStat v1: User guide
<p>Example Dataset for npstat to test the program and the different options.</p> <p>The example dataset contains a pileup file with sequences of of the 2L chromosome from fifteen pooled inbreed individuals of <em>Drosophila melanogaster </em>(<span>doi: 10.1038/nature10811</span>). The dataset also contains the sequence reference of the 2L chromosome in fasta format, an outgroup sequence in fasta format of <em>D. yakuba</em> (SRR26246471), a GFF3 annotation file and a file with a brief list of selected SNPs to be analyzed.</p>
User survey data of learning environment eTKMY3, Turku School of Economics, Finland.
<p>User survey data of learning environment (eTKMY3) of an introduction to statistics course, Turku School of Economics. </p> <p>Variables</p> <p>question_11_row_1 Starting eTKMY3 was difficult</p> <p>question_11_row_3 eTKMY3 is a successful system</p> <p>question_11_row_4 I can manage my studying and exercises easily</p> <p>question_11_row_5 Navigation was easy</p> <p>question_11_row_7 eTKMY3 was complex</p> <p>question_12_row_8 individual starting values of most exercises as a good way to promote independent working</p> <p>Observations: Students of Turku School of Economics taking the course "TKMY3 Introduction of Statistics", Spring 2024.</p>
Sparse camera volumetric video applications. A comparison of visual fidelity, user experience, and adaptability: Subjective fidelity study data
<p>Supplementary Material to the Paper: <em>Sparse camera volumetric video applications. A comparison of visual fidelity, user experience, and adaptability</em></p> <p>This folder contains all collected data and scripts that were used to analyze the subjective fidelity study.</p>
User Study Data for "Perception of Ultrasound Haptic Focal Point Motion"
<p>Data from two experiments about the perception of ultrasound haptic feedback.</p>
Tagged Twitter timelines for users reporting SARS-CoV-2 infections and related data
<p>Twitter data was collected through the Twitter API v2.0, specifically through the timeline endpoint. Details about the inference of SARS-CoV-2 self-reports and the tagging of the full timeline of each user can be found in the <a href="https://github.com/digitalepidemiologylab/content_changes_paper">GitHub repository</a>. The larger dataset ("preprocessed_data.csv") consists of a total of 8,534,171 tweets posted by 30,856 users from January 1, 2020 to October to September 30, 2021.</p> <p>The raw data from Twitter, including tweet and user IDs, has been removed or anonymized in order to comply with the EPFL guidelines for data sharing.</p> <p>In particular, the date of the tweets was removed, the text of the tweets, URLs and URL domains have been substituted with the "text", "<URL>" and "<URL_DOMAIN>" token respectively.</p> <p>User IDs have been substitued with new IDs in the [0, number of users] range (e.g. U0, U1, ...) .</p> <p>Tweet IDs have been substitued with new IDs in the [0, number of tweets] range (e.g. T0, T1, ...) .</p> <p>In addition to self-explanatory columns about topics, emotions, URL classification and symptoms we tagged, we also share the columns:</p> <ul> <li>pdate: date of the SARS-CoV-2 infection self-report for that user (adjusted with SUTime)</li> <li>effective_date: date of the tweet adjusted with SUTime, when the SUTime columns is available.</li> <li>rel_effective_day(week, month): days (weeks, months) computed with respect to the positivity date (i.e. "pdate" column). Negative numbers refer to tweets posted before the user reported a COVID-19 infection on Twitter.</li> </ul>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.