Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,409
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,409 results for “avian”
Avian Response to Hemlock Woolly Adelgid in Southern New England 2000-2001
This study examines changes in avian community composition associated with the decline and loss of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr.) resulting from chronic hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae Annand; HWA) infestations. Overstory hemlock mortality was highly correlated with avian community composition. Abundance of eastern wood-pewee (Contopus virens), brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater), tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor), white-breasted nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis), red-eyed vireo (Vireo olivaceus),hooded warbler (Wilsonia citrina), and several woodpecker species was highest at points with greater than 60% mortality. Black-throated green warbler (Dendroica virens), Acadian flycatcher (Empidonax virescens), blackburnian warbler (Dendroica fusca), and hermit thrush (Catharus guttatus) were strongly associated with intact hemlock stands that exhibit little or no mortality from HWA. Eastern hemlock has unique structural characteristics that provide important habitat for numerous bird species in the northeastern U.S. As a result, removal of hemlock by HWA has profound effects on avian communities. Black-throated green warbler, blackburnian warbler, and Acadian flycatcher are very strongly associated with hemlock forests in southern New England and appear to be the species that are particularly sensitive to hemlock removal. The hooded warbler, a species whose status is of regional concern, may actually benefit from the development of a dense seedling layer associated with high hemlock mortality.
Avian sound propagation in three Michigan Forests, 2022
In three forest types, dry-mesic northern forest, rich conifer swamp, and boreal forest, we recorded pure tones within songbirds’ auditory range (2 to 8 KHz) at 6 different distances along a transect and quantified different aspects of the vegetation through which the pure tones traveled. Four transects per forest type were used and sounds were recorded at two different heights (1 and 5 m). Linear regression analysis was used to determine if the pure tones were attenuated differently along transects, between sampling heights, and across forest types.
Iceland as stepping stone for intercontinental spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus between Europe and North America: data set on phylogeographic analysis
<p>Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIV) subtype H5 clade 2.3.4.4b have widely spread within the northern hemisphere since 2020 and threaten wild bird populations as well as poultry production. For the very first time, HPAIV were detected in wild birds and, subsequently, in poultry holdings in Iceland.</p> <p>Here, we present phylogeographic evidence that Iceland has been used as a stepping stone for HPAIV translocation from Northern Europe to North America in 2021 and describe two independent incursions of HPAI H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b viruses of two different genotypes to Iceland in 2021 and 2022.</p>
Ecology and environment predict spatially stratified risk of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4b in wild birds across Europe
<p>The data in this repository were used to conduct the analysis outlined in the following bioRxiv preprint:</p> <ul> <li>Sarah Hayes, Joe Hilton, Joaquin Mould-Quevedo, Christl Donnelly, Matthew Baylis, Liam Brierley (2025) "Ecology and environment predict spatially stratified risk of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4b in wild birds across Europe" <em>bioRxiv</em> doi:10.1101/2024.07.17.603912</li> </ul> <p>The codes used for the analyses are available at https://github.com/sarahhayes/avian_flu_sdm/ </p> <p>The following lookup table can be used to cross-reference between the variable descriptions in Tables 1 and 2 of the preprint and the files in this repository:</p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <h3> Variable description </h3> </td> <td> <h3> Filename </h3> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Minimum elevation (metres above sea level) </td> <td> elevation_min_10kres.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Maximum elevation (metres above sea level) </td> <td> elevation_max_10kres.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Difference between minimum and maximum elevation </td> <td> elevation_diff_10kres.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Modal elevation (metres above sea level) </td> <td> elevation_mode_10kres.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) </td> <td> ndvi_*_quart_2022_eco_rasts.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Land cover </td> <td> landcover_output_full_2022_10kres.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Distance to coast </td> <td> dist_to_coast_10kres.csv </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Distance to inland water </td> <td> dist_to_water_output_10kres.csv </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Relative humidity </td> <td> mean_relative_humidity_q*_10kres_eco_quarts.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Seasonal weighted mean of the month-wise difference in the minimum temperature and maximum temperature (degrees Celsius) </td> <td> mean_diff_*_quart_eco_rasts.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Seasonal weighted mean of monthly mean temperatures (degrees Celsius) (Mean monthly temperature for each month calculated using: Mean temperature = Minimum temperature + diurnal range/2)</td> <td> mean_mean_*_quart_eco_rasts.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Seasonal temperature variation (degrees Celsius)<br>(Difference between the maximum and minimum of<br>mean monthly temperature values across months<br>majority-represented within the season)</td> <td> variation_in_quarterly_mean_temp_q*_eco_rasts.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Precipitation </td> <td> mean_prec_*_quart_eco_rasts.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Seasonal mean of daily zero-degree isotherm (metres<br>above sea level) </td> <td> isotherm_mean_q*_eco_rasts.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Number of days the zerodegree isotherm was below 1 metre at midday at Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) </td> <td> isotherm_midday_days_below1_q*_eco_quarts.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Chicken density </td> <td> chicken_density_2010_10kres.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Duck density </td> <td> duck_density_2010_10kres.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <em>Anatinae</em> (dabbling ducks) </td> <td> anatinae_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <em>Anserinae</em> (swans and geese) </td> <td> anserinae_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <em>Ardeidae</em> (herons) </td> <td> ardeidae_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <em>Arenaria/Calidris</em> (turnstones and sandpipers) </td> <td> arenaria_calidris_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <em>Aythyini</em> (diving ducks)</td> <td> aythyini_rast_eco_bds.tif</td> </tr> <tr> <td> Laridae (gulls) </td> <td> laridae_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Percentage time spent feeding within 2m of water surface </td> <td> around_surf_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Percentage time spent feeding >2m below water surface </td> <td> below_surf_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Percentage diet plants </td> <td> plant_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Percentage diet scavenging </td> <td> scav_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Percentage diet endothermic vertebrates </td> <td> vend_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Congregative </td> <td> cong_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Migratory </td> <td> migr_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Below threshold phylogenetic distance to known host species </td> <td> host_dist_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Species richness </td> <td> species_richness_rast_eco_bds.tif </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
Audio tagging of avian dawn chorus recordings in California, Oregon, and Washington
<p><strong>General Summary</strong></p> <p>This acoustic data collection includes 1,575 5-minute soundscape recordings randomly selected from passive acoustic recordings made at 525 sites during 2022 on federally managed lands in western California, Oregon, and Washington, USA. We fully labeled 141 recordings (11.75 hrs) with 39,717 annotations for 118 sound types, including 58 avian species, two mammalian species, six aggregated biotic sounds, and eight non-biotic sound types. An additional 215 recordings were partially annotated with 1,466 annotations. The remaining unlabeled recordings have been included to facilitate novel research applications and methodological evaluations. Beyond the labeled soundscape recordings, we have included township and range identifications and 38 environmental covariates for each recording location.</p> <p><strong>Data Collection</strong></p> <p>Lesmeister et al. (2021) collected passive acoustic recordings during 2022 in support of long-term monitoring of federally threatened northern spotted owl (<em>Strix occidentalis caurina) </em>populations under the Northwest Forest Plan Effective Monitoring Program (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1990, U. S. Department of Agriculture and U. S. Department of the Interior 1994). These data were collected at 643 hexagons that were randomly selected from a tessellation of 5 km2 hexagons covering the entire range of the northern spotted owl (Northern California, Oregon, Washington) under a selective constraint that hexagons contain ≥ 50 % forest-capable lands (<em>def.</em> forested lands or lands capable of developing closed-canopy forests) and be ≥ 25% federal ownership (Davis et al., 2011).</p> <p>Each hexagon was sampled by four Song Meter 4 (SM4) acoustic recording units (Wildlife Acoustics, Maynard, MA) deployed in a standardized spatial arrangement, such that recorders on a site were placed ≥ 500 m apart and were ≥ 200 m from the edge of the sampling hexagon boundary. Recorders were mounted to small trees (15 – 20 cm diameter at breast height) approximately 1.5 m above the ground and were placed on mid-to-upper slopes and ≥ 50 m from roads, trails, and streams. The SM4 devices each have two built-in omnidirectional microphones with a signal-to-noise ratio of 80 dB, typical at 1 kHz, and a recording bandwidth of 20 Hz – 48 kHz. Each device recorded ~11 hours of audio daily for six weeks from March to August at a sampling rate of 32 kHz. The daily recording schedule included a 4-hour window from two hours before sunrise to two hours after sunrise, a 4-hour window from one hour before sunset to 3 hours after sunset, and 10-minute recordings outside the two longer recording blocks at the start of every hour.</p> <p><strong>Data Sampling</strong></p> <p>The goal of this project was to develop a tagged audio dataset (hereafter project dataset) focused on the avian dawn chorus, which is an ecologically important period for the study of avian behavior (McNamara et al. 1987, Staicer et al. 1996, Zhang et al. 2015) and monitoring avian biodiversity (Bibby et al. 2000), but remains a challenging problem for acoustic classification systems (Duan et al. 2013, Stowell 2022). Passive acoustic monitoring on our sites occurs throughout the day. We filtered the full dataset to recordings collected between May and August during the hour immediately after sunrise. From the recordings meeting our filtering criteria, we randomly selected three 5-minute files from each site, which were assigned ordinal labels 'A, 'B,' or 'C.' The final project dataset comprised 131.25 hours of acoustic data.</p> <p><strong>Annotation Protocol</strong></p> <p>We randomly selected 141 sites from the project dataset and fully annotated each recording at a 2-second resolution. We applied labels to each 2-second window of the selected recordings following a predefined sound phonology library (available in the 'metadata.tsv' file), which concatenated the 2021 eBird taxonomy codes (Clements list; Clements et al. 2022) with standardized sonotype codes that incremented depending on the species repertoire (i.e., 'call_1,' 'song_1,' 'drum_1'). For example, 'herthr_song_1' is the label for Hermit Thrush, song_1. Unknown signals were labeled 'unknown,' and clips with no biotic signals (or noise classes of interest documented in metadata.tsv) were labeled 'empty.' Windows were labeled 'complete' and considered fully annotated when every signal was assigned an annotation. Files were deemed fully annotated when every 2-second window contained the 'complete' label.</p> <p><strong>Environmental Covariates</strong></p> <p>Sampling locations will not be published to afford protections for Federally Threatened or Endangered species which may occur on our sites. However, we provide the State, Township, and Range for each sampling location along with the site-specific values for 38 forest structure, topographic, and climatic environmental covariates developed by the Landscape Ecology, Modeling, Mapping, and Analysis group in the Pacific Northwest (<a href="https://lemma.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data">https://lemma.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data</a>; Ohmann and Gregory 2002). State, Township, and Range values are sufficient to explore geographic variation in species- or community-specific call and song phenology and the extracted environmental covariates may provide useful contextual information for novel machine-learning developments (Liu et al. 2018). </p> <p><strong>Description of Data Format</strong></p> <p>The fully annotated audio files can be accessed by downloading and extracting "annotated_recordings.zip." Partially annotated and non-annotated audio files can be accessed by downloading and extracting "additional_recordings_part_1.zip" or "additional_recordings_part_2.zip." Acoustic file names contain site and replicate indicators, such that file "Site_001_Rep_A.wav' was recorded on site 1 and is the A replicate random draw from the available set of dawn chorus recordings. The site and replicate numbers link to additional recording information in "files.tsv," annotations in "annotations.tsv" and "partial_annotations.tsv," as well as site and replicate specific environmental characteristics in "environmental_characteristics.tsv."</p> <p>Metadata describing sound classes and environmental characteristics can be found in "metadata.tsv," and "environmental_characteristics_metadata.tsv."</p> <p><strong>Acknowledgments</strong></p> <p>Acoustic data collection was funded and collected by the US Forest Service and the US Bureau of Land Management. Annotation work was funded by Google. We would also like to thank the many biologists that collected and processed the data compiled here. The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government of any product or service.</p>
BirdVox-full-night: a dataset for avian flight call detection in continuous recordings
<p>BirdVox-full-night: a dataset for avian flight call detection in continuous recordings<br> ======================================================================================<br> Version 3.0, March 2018.</p> <p><br> Created By<br> ----------</p> <p>Vincent Lostanlen (1, 2, 3), Justin Salamon (2, 3), Andrew Farnsworth (1), Steve Kelling (1), and Juan Pablo Bello (2, 3).</p> <p>(1): Cornell Lab of Ornithology (CLO)<br> (2): Center for Urban Science and Progress, New York University<br> (3): Music and Audio Research Lab, New York University</p> <p>https://wp.nyu.edu/birdvox</p> <p> </p> <p>Description<br> -----------</p> <p>The BirdVox-full-night dataset contains 6 audio recordings, each about ten hours in duration. These recordings come from ROBIN autonomous recording units, placed near Ithaca, NY, USA during the fall 2015. They were captured on the night of September 23rd, 2015, by six different sensors, originally numbered 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10.</p> <p>Andrew Farnsworth used the Raven software to pinpoint every avian flight call in time and frequency. He found 35402 flight calls in total. He estimates that about 25 different species of passerines (thrushes, warblers, and sparrows) are present in this recording. Species are not labeled in BirdVox-full-night, but it is possible to tell apart thrushes from warblers and sparrrows by looking at the center frequencies of their calls. The annotation process took 102 hours.</p> <p>The dataset can be used, among other things, for the research,<br> development and testing of bioacoustic classification models, including the reproduction of the results reported in [1].</p> <p>For details on the hardware of ROBIN recording units, we refer the reader to [2].</p> <p>[1] V. Lostanlen, J. Salamon, A. Farnsworth, S. Kelling, J. Bello. BirdVox-full-night: a dataset and benchmark for avian flight call detection. Proc. IEEE ICASSP, 2018.</p> <p>[2] J. Salamon, J. P. Bello, A. Farnsworth, M. Robbins, S. Keen, H. Klinck, and S. Kelling. Towards the Automatic Classification of Avian Flight Calls for Bioacoustic Monitoring. PLoS One, 2016.</p> <p>@inproceedings{lostanlen2018icassp,<br> title = {BirdVox-full-night: a dataset and benchmark for avian flight call detection},<br> author = {Lostanlen, Vincent and Salamon, Justin and Farnsworth, Andrew and Kelling, Steve and Bello, Juan Pablo},<br> booktitle = {Proc. IEEE ICASSP},<br> year = {2018},<br> published = {IEEE},<br> venue = {Calgary, Canada},<br> month = {April},<br> }</p> <p> </p> <p>Data Files<br> ------------</p> <p>The BirdVox-full-night_flac-audio folder contains the recordings as FLAC files, sampled at 24 kHz, with a single channel (mono).</p> <p> </p> <p>Metadata Files<br> --------------</p> <p>The BirdVox-full-night_csv-annotations folder contains JAMS files, where each row correspond to a different location in the time frequency domain (columns "Time (s)" and "Freq (Hz)").</p> <p>The approximate GPS coordinates of the sensors (latitudes and longitudes rounded to 2 decimal points) and UTC timestamps corresponding to the start of the recording for each sensor are included as CSV files in the main directory.</p> <p> </p> <p>Please acknowledge BirdVox-full-night in academic research<br> ----------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>When BirdVox-full-night is used for academic research, we would highly appreciate it if scientific publications of works partly based on this dataset cite the following publication:</p> <p>V. Lostanlen, J. Salamon, A. Farnsworth, S. Kelling, J. Bello. BirdVox-full-night: a dataset and benchmark for avian flight call detection, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2018.</p> <p>The creation of this dataset was supported by NSF grants 1125098 (BIRDCAST) and 1633259 (BIRDVOX), a Google Faculty Award, the Leon Levy Foundation, and two anonymous donors.</p> <p> </p> <p>Conditions of Use<br> -----------------</p> <p>Dataset created by Vincent Lostanlen, Justin Salamon, Andrew Farnsworth, Steve Kelling, and Juan Pablo Bello.</p> <p>The BirdVox-full-night dataset is offered free of charge under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license:<br> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</p> <p>The dataset and its contents are made available on an "as is" basis and without warranties of any kind, including without limitation satisfactory quality and conformity, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy or completeness, or absence of errors. Subject to any liability that may not be excluded or limited by law, Cornell Lab of Ornithology is not liable for, and expressly excludes all liability for, loss or damage however and whenever caused to anyone by any use of the BirdVox-full-night dataset or any part of it.</p> <p> </p> <p>Feedback<br> -----------</p> <p>Please help us improve BirdVox-full-night by sending your feedback to:<br> vincent.lostanlen@gmail.com and af27@cornell.edu</p> <p>In case of a problem, please include as many details as possible.</p> <p> </p> <p>Acknowledgements<br> ----------------</p> <p>Jessie Barry, Ian Davies, Tom Fredericks, Jeff Gerbracht, Sara Keen, Holger Klinck, Anne Klingensmith, Ray Mack, Peter Marchetto, Ed Moore, Matt Robbins, Ken Rosenberg, and Chris Tessaglia-Hymes.</p> <p>We acknowledge that the land on which the data was collected is the unceded territory of the Cayuga nation, which is part of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) confederacy.</p>
Supplementary materials for: How effective are insect aposematism and Batesian mimicry in deterring a wild avian predator?
<p><strong><a name="_Hlk180513890"></a>Acoustic_parameters_10cm.txt</strong><br>Acoustic parameters of the sounds produced by insects in flight, species recorded at 10 cm from the microphone.</p> <p><strong>Acoustic_parameters_5cm.txt<br></strong>Acoustic parameters of the sounds produced by insects in flight, species recorded at 5 cm from the microphone.</p> <p><strong>Robin_behaviours.txt</strong> <br><em>Erithacus rubecula</em> reactions measured in Boris software from videos of behavioural experiments.</p> <p><strong>Rscript_robin_behaviours.R</strong><br>R script used for the analysis of robins’ behaviours (using Robin_behaviours.txt).</p> <p><strong>Rscript_acoustical_analyses.R</strong><br>R script used for the analysis of acoustical parameters of insect buzzing sounds (using Acoustic_parameters_10cm.txt and Acoustic_parameters_5cm.txt).</p> <p><strong>Robin_experiment_video.mp4<br></strong>Behavioural experiment with a wild European robin (<em>Erithacus rubecula</em>) in its habitat. A freshly defrosted insect specimen and the corresponding buzzing sound of each recorded hymenopteran model and lepidopteran mimic (plus a housefly as a control) were presented in random order to the robin at a feeder with <em>Tenebrio molitor</em> larvae.</p> <p><strong>Robin_experiment_video_Metadata.docx</strong><br><span>Metadata for the supplementary video Robin_experiment_video.mp4.</span></p>
Dataset from: Spatially heterogeneous shifts in vegetation phenology induced by climate change threaten the integrity of the avian migration network
<p>Original data and code for the study:</p> <p>Wei, J., Xu, F., Cole, E. F., Sheldon, B. C., de Boer, W. F., Wielstra, B., Fu, H., Gong, P., & Si, Y. (2024, Accepted). Spatially heterogeneous shifts in vegetation phenology induced by climate change threaten the integrity of the avian migration network. Global Change Biology.</p> <p>The dataset mainly contains data showing the climate change-induced heterogeneous shifts in vegetation phenology and the migration integrity change from 2000 to 2020 for 16 Asian herbivorous waterfowl species. These data were derived from the following resources available in the public domain.</p> <p>The Global Lakes and Wetlands Database is available from “https://www.worldwildlife.org/pages/global-lakes-and-wetlands-database”. The global land cover datasets are available from European Space Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) products, “https://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download.php”. The Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data are available from “https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/terrain-monitoring-and-modeling”. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Terra surface reflectance product is available from “https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/mod09.php”. The bird distribution maps are available from Birdlife International, “https://www.birdlife.org/”. The bird foraging attribute data are available from EltonTraits 1.0, “https://figshare.com”. The bird occurrence data are available from eBird Basic Dataset (EBD), “https://science.ebird.org/en/use-ebird-data/download-ebird-data-products”. The Hackett backbone phylogenetic trees are available from “https://birdtree.org/”.</p> <p>The code contains the R scripts and MATLAB scripts that we used for this study.</p> <p>For details please see the file “Readme.txt”, and the research paper.</p>
BirdVox-ANAFCC: A dataset for American Northeast Avian Flight Call Classification
<p>BirdVox-ANAFCC: A dataset for American Northeast Avian Flight Call Classification<br> ===============================================================<br> Version 2.0, February 2022.</p> <p>https://wp.nyu.edu/birdvox</p> <p><br> Description<br> ---------------</p> <p>BirdVox-ANAFCC is a dataset of short audio waveforms, each of them containing a flight call from one of 14 birds of North America: four American sparrows, one cardinal, two thrushes, and seven New World warblers.<br> * American Tree Sparrow (ATSP)<br> * Chipping Sparrow (CHSP)<br> * Savannah Sparrow (SAVS)<br> * White-throated Sparrow (WTSP)<br> * Red-breasted Grosbeak (RBGR)<br> * Gray-cheeked Thrush (GCTH)<br> * Swainson's Thrush (SWTH)<br> * American Redstart (AMRE)<br> * Bay-breasted Warbler (BBWA)<br> * Black-throated Blue Warbler (BTBW)<br> * Canada Warbler (CAWA)<br> * Common Yellowthroat (COYE)<br> * Mourning Warbler (MOWA)<br> * Ovenbird (OVEN)</p> <p>It also contains other sounds which are often confused for one of the species above. These "confounding factors" encompass flight calls from other species of birds, vocalizations from non-avian animals, as well as some machine beeps.</p> <p>BirdVox-ANAFCC results from an aggregation of various smaller datasets, integrated under a common taxonomy. For more details on this taxonomy, we refer the reader to [1]:</p> <p>[1] Cramer, Lostanlen, Salamon, Farnsworth, Bello. Chirping up the right tree: Incorporating biological taxonomies into deep bioacoustic classifiers. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2020.</p> <p>The second version of the BirdVox-ANAFCC dataset (v2.0) contains flight calls from the BirdVox-full-night dataset. These flight calls were present in the ICASSP 2020 benchmark but did not appear in the initial release of BirdVox-ANAFCC.</p> <p><br> Data Files<br> ------------<br> BirdVox-ANAFCC contains the recordings as HDF5 files, sampled at 22,050 Hz, with a single channel (mono). Each HDF5 file contains flight call vocalizations of a particular species. The name of each HDF5 file follows the format: `<data-source>_<taxonomy-code>_original.h5`. The name of the HDF5 dataset in each file is "waveforms", with the corresponding key for each audio recording varying in format depending on the data source.</p> <p> </p> <p>Metadata Files<br> ---------------<br> `taxonomy.yaml` details the three-level taxonomy structure used in this dataset, reflected in three-number-codes which largely follow "<family>.<order>.<species>". Additionally, at any level of the taxonomy, the numeric code "0" is reserved for "other" and the code "X" refers to unknown. For example, 1.1.0 corresponds to an American Sparrow with a species outside of our scope of interest, and 1.1.X corresponds to an American Sparrow of unknown species. At the top level (family), the "other" codes (0.\*.\*) deviate from the family-order-species in order to capture a variety of other out-of-scope sounds, including anthropophony, non-avian biophony, and biophony of avians outside of the scope of interest.</p> <p><br> Please acknowledge BirdVox-ANAFCC in academic research<br> --------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>When BirdVox-ANAFCC is used for academic research, we would highly appreciate it if scientific publications of works partly based on this dataset cite the following publication:</p> <p>Cramer, Lostanlen, Salamon, Farnsworth, Bello. Chirping up the right tree: Incorporating biological taxonomies into deep bioacoustic classifiers. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2020.</p> <p>The creation of this dataset was supported by NSF grants 1125098 (BIRDCAST) and 1633259 (BIRDVOX), a Google Faculty Award, the Leon Levy Foundation, and two anonymous donors.</p> <p> </p> <p>Conditions of Use<br> ----------------------</p> <p>Dataset created by Aurora Cramer, Vincent Lostanlen, Bill Evans, Andrew Farnsworth, Justin Salamon, and Juan Pablo Bello.<br> <br> The BirdVox-ANAFCC dataset is offered free of charge under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International License:<br> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/<br> <br> The dataset and its contents are made available on an "as is" basis and without warranties of any kind, including without limitation satisfactory quality and conformity, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy or completeness, or absence of errors. Subject to any liability that may not be excluded or limited by law, the authors are not liable for, and expressly exclude all liability for, loss or damage however and whenever caused to anyone by any use of the BirdVox-ANAFCC dataset or any part of it.</p> <p><br> Feedback<br> -------------</p> <p>Please help us improve BirdVox-full-night by sending your feedback to:<br> vincent.lostanlen@gmail.com and auroracramer@nyu.edu</p> <p>In case of a problem, please include as many details as possible.<br> <br> <br> Versions<br> ------------<br> 1.0, May 2020: initial version, paired with ICASSP 2020 publication.<br> 2.0, February 2022: added a missing dataset file (BirdVox-70k), updated name of first author (Aurora Cramer).<br> </p> <p><br> Acknowledgement<br> --------------------------<br> Jessie Barry, Ian Davies, Tom Fredericks, Jeff Gerbracht, Sara Keen, Holger Klinck, Anne Klingensmith, Ray Mack, Peter Marchetto, Ed Moore, Matt Robbins, Ken Rosenberg, and Chris Tessaglia-Hymes.</p> <p>We thank contributors and maintainers of the Macaulay Library and the Xeno-Canto website.</p> <p>We acknowledge that the land on which the data was collected is the unceded territory of the Cayuga nation, which is part of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) confederacy.</p>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - Sweden
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund.</li> </ul>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - Portugal
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund.</li> </ul>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - Lithuania
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund.</li> </ul>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund</li> </ul> <p>Disclaimer: In accordance with the Agreement on the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, and in particular with the Protocol on IE/NI, the EU requirements on data sampling are also applicable to Northern Ireland.</p>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - Italy
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund.</li> </ul>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - Croatia
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund.</li> </ul>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - Romania
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund.</li> </ul>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - Finland
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund.</li> </ul>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - Spain
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund.</li> </ul>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - Estonia
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund.</li> </ul>
AI results complementing the 2021 Annual Report on surveillance for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union - Denmark
<p>This dataset contains the results of the EU co-funded surveillance activities conducted in 2021, which consisted of:</p> <ul> <li>Serological surveys to monitor the circulation of AIV subtypes H5 and H7 in poultry (active surveillance). These surveys should preferentially target poultry species or production systems with increased risk for introduction of avian influenza (AI).</li> <li>Passive surveillance aiming at the virological detection of AI in wild birds found dead or moribund.</li> </ul>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.