Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
71
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
71 results for “blood feeding”
Dataset for multiple blood feeding bouts in mosquitoes
<p>Dataset to accompany R code and findings in the Holmes et al., 2024 publication entitled, "Multiple blood feeding bouts in mosquitoes allow for prolonged survival and are predicted to increase viral transmission during dry periods."</p>
Carbon dioxide and blood-feeding shift visual cue tracking during navigation in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
<p>Hematophagous mosquitoes need a blood meal to complete their reproductive cycle. To accomplish this, female mosquitoes seek vertebrate hosts, land on them, and bite. As their eggs mature, they shift attention away from hosts and towards finding sites to lay eggs. We asked whether females were more tuned to visual cues when a host-related signal, carbon dioxide, was present, and further examined the effect of a blood meal, which shifts behavior to ovipositing. Using a custom, tethered-flight arena that records wing stroke changes while displaying visual cues, we found the presence of CO2 enhances visual attention towards discrete stimuli and improves contrast sensitivity for host-seeking <em>Aedes aegypti</em> mosquitoes. Conversely, intake of a blood meal reverses vertical bar tracking, a stimulus that non-fed females readily follow. This switch in behavior suggests that physiological status modulates visual attention in mosquitoes, a phenomenon that has been described before in olfaction but not in visually-driven behaviors.</p>
Growth, nutrient uptake, blood metabolites and bone properties in broilers consuming feed with mineral-enriched whole black soldier fly larvae
<p>Recycling critical minerals like phosphorus is essential for future circular agriculture. This study explored adding mineral-enriched black soldier fly larvae (BSFL), grown on substrates with sewage sludge recyclates (SSR), to broiler feed to reintroduce minerals from restricted waste streams into the nutrient cycle. Results showed that including 15% mineral-enriched BSFL in broiler diets for 42 days had no adverse effects on growth, nutrient intake, or bone condition, and maintained acceptable levels of heavy metals.</p>
Fig. 3 in New record of a blood-feeding terrestrial leech, Haemadipsa rjukjuana Oka, 1910 (Haemadipsidae, Arhynchobdellida) on Heuksando Island and possible habitat estimation in the current and future Korean Peninsula using a Maxent model
Fig. 3. Current (A and F) and future distribution models (B-E, G-J) for Haemadipsa rjukjuana in Korea. Dark gray represents over 0.5 MaxEnt value (suitable habitat) and light gray represents below 0.5 (unsuitable habitat). A is projected to the current climate conditions (2020), and F was built with the restricted spatial area between Heuksando Island and Gageodo Island. B-E are projections of the Maxent model to SSP585 of GISS-E2-1 climate scenarios by NASA and G-J were SSP585 of INM-CM4-8 scenarios by The Institute of Numerical Mathematics. B-E and G-J are respectively 2040, 2060, 2080, and 2100.
Fig. 2 in New record of a blood-feeding terrestrial leech, Haemadipsa rjukjuana Oka, 1910 (Haemadipsidae, Arhynchobdellida) on Heuksando Island and possible habitat estimation in the current and future Korean Peninsula using a Maxent model
Fig. 2. Projection of MaxEnt Haemadipsa rjukjuana distribution model from Heuksando Island and Gageodo Island to the current climate condition of South Korea. Red color (lower value) represents less suitable habitats and blue (higher value close to 1.0) represents suitable habitats for H. rjukjuana.
Fig. 1 in New record of a blood-feeding terrestrial leech, Haemadipsa rjukjuana Oka, 1910 (Haemadipsidae, Arhynchobdellida) on Heuksando Island and possible habitat estimation in the current and future Korean Peninsula using a Maxent model
Fig. 1. The map of study sites (inset) and the Korean Peninsula. Haemadipsa rjukjuana was identified from the regions shaded in gray.
Figure 6 in Blood-feeding behavior of Anopheles species (Diptera: Culicidae) in the district of Ilha de Santana, state of Amapá, eastern Brazilian Amazon
Figure 6 Absolute frequency by time of the main species of Anopheles captured in collections to evaluate anthropophilic and zoophilic behavior in the district of Ilha de Santana, municipality of Santana, state of Amapá; A) Anopheles albitarsis s.l.; B) Anopheles braziliensis; C) Anopheles darlingi; D) Anopheles nuneztovari s.l. Significant difference between the number of anthropophilic and zoophilic individuals was observed only for A. albitarsis s.l. (Student's t test [3] = -2.67; p = 0.03). Graph with standard deviation bars.
Figure 5 in Blood-feeding behavior of Anopheles species (Diptera: Culicidae) in the district of Ilha de Santana, state of Amapá, eastern Brazilian Amazon
Figure 5 Species of Anopheles captured in collections to evaluate anthropophilic and zoophilic behavior during 24 months in the district of Ilha de Santana, municipality of Santana, state of Amapá. Graph with standard deviation bars.
Figure 4 in Blood-feeding behavior of Anopheles species (Diptera: Culicidae) in the district of Ilha de Santana, state of Amapá, eastern Brazilian Amazon
Figure 4 Species of Anopheles captured in collections to evaluate anthropophilic and zoophilic behavior by month, during 24 months in the district of Ilha de Santana, municipality of Santana, state of Amapá. A) Anopheles albitarsis s.l.; B) Anopheles braziliensis; C) Anopheles darlingi; D) Anopheles nuneztovari s.l. Graph with standard deviation bars.
Figure 1 in Blood-feeding behavior of Anopheles species (Diptera: Culicidae) in the district of Ilha de Santana, state of Amapá, eastern Brazilian Amazon
Figure 1 Map indicating the location of the district of Ilha de Santana, state of Amapá, Brazil. In right corner is the smaller map of Brazil showing the localization of the State of Amapá (in red); Below map of the State of Amapá showing the study area (red circle). Satellite image of the district of Ilha de Santana with the 52 collection sites indicated according to the three collection categories (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend).
Fig. 2 in Efficacy of a federally approved flea bait, orally administered to white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus), against blood feeding Ixodes scapularis larvae under simulated field conditions
Fig. 2. Representative images of Day 2 and Day 4 capsules observations. Nonengorging larvae attached to Treatment mouse at (A) Day 2 and (B) Day 4. Engorging larvae attached and actively feeding on Control mouse at (C) Day 2 and (D) Day 4. At Day 4, the majority of larvae fed to repletion and detached from the Control mice, while the majority died in situ on the Treatment mice. Green arrows indicate live larvae and red arrows indicate dead larvae. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 1 in Efficacy of a federally approved flea bait, orally administered to white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus), against blood feeding Ixodes scapularis larvae under simulated field conditions
Fig. 1. Capsule observations via microscopy. (A) Non-engorged (deceased) larvae, (B) engorging larvae, (C) fully engorged (replete) larvae nearing detachment.
Data for "Influences of Glyphosate Contaminations and Concentrate Feed on Performance, Blood Parameters, Blood Cell Functionality and DNA Damage Properties in Fattening Bulls"
<p>The deposited data consist of three data tables and three tables containing legends for the data:</p> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/afb9373a-d44c-4441-ba97-052c0b6ec1b6/oneTimepoint.txt">oneTimepoint.txt</a> contains data from statistical tests within one timepoint; <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/afb9373a-d44c-4441-ba97-052c0b6ec1b6/oneTimepoint_legend.txt">oneTimepoint_legend.txt</a> contains the corresponding legend.</p> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/afb9373a-d44c-4441-ba97-052c0b6ec1b6/threeTimepoints.txt">threeTimepoints.txt</a> contains data from statistical tests inclduing three distinct timepoints; <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/afb9373a-d44c-4441-ba97-052c0b6ec1b6/threeTimepoints_legend.txt">threeTimepoints_legend.txt</a> contains the corresponding legend.</p> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/afb9373a-d44c-4441-ba97-052c0b6ec1b6/Performance.txt">Performance.txt</a> contains data from statistical tests inclduing two time periods in fattening; <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/afb9373a-d44c-4441-ba97-052c0b6ec1b6/Performance_legend.txt">Performance_legend.txt</a> contains the corresponding legend.</p>
Carbon dioxide and blood-feeding shift visual cue tracking during navigation in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Feeding black soldier fly larva to replace soybean meal in growing pigs – responses in the amine metabolites in blood
<p>Insect meals from black soldier fly (<em>Hermetia illucens</em>; BSF) larvae as dietary protein source have the ability to deliver nutrients, particularly dietary amino acids (AA) and could provide functional properties that positively supports animal health and productivity. More knowledge, however, is needed to assess the impact of BSF based diet on gut and animal health. Sixteen male pigs with an average initial body weight of 34.9 ± 3.4 kg were randomly assigned to groups fed for three weeks with iso-caloric and iso-proteinaceous experimental diets prepared with either soybean meal (SBM) as reference protein source or with BSF, as single source of dietary protein. At the end of the feeding trial, blood plasma were collected to study the changes at systemic level in plasma amine metabolites as an effect of the experimental diet.</p>
Behavioral and postural analyses establish sleep-like states for mosquitoes that can impact host landing and blood feeding
<p>Sleep is an evolutionarily conserved process that has been described in different animal systems. For insects, sleep characterization has been primarily achieved using behavioral and electrophysiological correlates in a few systems. Sleep in mosquitoes, which are important vectors of disease-causing pathogens, has not been directly examined. This is surprising as circadian rhythms, which have been well studied in mosquitoes, influence sleep in other systems. In this study, we characterized sleep in mosquitoes using body posture analysis and behavioral correlates and quantified the effect of sleep deprivation on sleep rebound, host landing and blood-feeding propensity. Body and appendage position metrics revealed a clear distinction between the posture of mosquitoes in their putative sleep and awake states for multiple species, which correlate with a reduction in responsiveness to host cues. Sleep assessment informed by these posture analyses indicated significantly more sleep during periods of low activity. Nighttime and daytime sleep deprivation resulting from the delivery of vibration stimuli induced sleep rebound in the subsequent phase in day and night active mosquitoes, respectively. Lastly, sleep deprivation suppressed host landing in both laboratory and field settings, and impaired blood-feeding of a human host when mosquitoes would normally be active. These results suggest that quantifiable sleep states occur in mosquitoes and highlight the potential epidemiological importance of mosquito sleep.</p>
Effects of marking, chilling and mechanical separation on the blood feeding success, fecundity and fertility of wMel-infected Aedes aegypti.
<p>In field trial II (Nausori 2019), mosquitoes were sampled from the emergence cages (rearing control), after cold-immobilization at 4°C for 30 minutes (immobilization control) and at the end of UAV flights (aerial). Collected mosquitoes were sorted into cages of 50 females and 15 males. Females were allowed to blood feed and the blood feeding success was determined. Blood fed females were kept and allowed to oviposit and fecundity is shown as eggs per female. Eggs were hatched and larvae were counted 48 hours post hatching to determine fertility. Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA. NS = Not statistically significant and ND = Not done.</p>
Occurrence of blood feeding terrestrial leeches in a degraded forest ecosystem
<b>Description: </b><p>This dataset includes the abundance of two species of terrestrial leech collected at multiple sites at the SAFE project in Sabah, Malaysia. Leech collections took place over two seasons, one in the dry season of 2015 and one in the wet season of 2016. For each of the sites, four repeated visits took place and 20 minute searches were conducted within the boundaries of 25 m2 vegetation plots. As these sites have been subjected to differennt degrees of current and historic degradation, the vegetation structure data is also included for each site. For a subset of the leech sites there is corresponding mammal detection data from camera traps across the landscape, which is also included in this dataset.</p><p><b>Project: </b>This dataset was collected as part of the following SAFE research project: <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/projects/project_view/10"><b>The effects of rainforest fragmentation on mammal community assemblages using leech blood-meal analysis</b></a></p><p><b>Funding: </b>These data were collected as part of research funded by: </p><ul><li>NERC (Standard grant , NE/K016148/1)</li></ul><p>This dataset is released under the CC-BY 4.0 licence, requiring that you cite the dataset in any outputs, but has the additional condition that you acknowledge the contribution of these funders in any outputs.</p><p></p><p><b>XML metadata: </b>GEMINI compliant metadata for this dataset is available <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/datasets/xml_metadata?id=3476542">here</a></p><p><b>Files: </b>This consists of 1 file: Drinkwater2019_leech_occurrence.v2.xlsx</p><p><b>Drinkwater2019_leech_occurrence.v2.xlsx</b></p><p>This file contains dataset metadata and 4 data tables:</p><ol><li><p><b>Leech abundance and survey-covariates 2015</b> (described in worksheet abundance2015)</p><p>Description: This dataset has the abundance of all the leech individuals of both species collected during surveys in 2015 between February and June. The number of leech collected is split by species of leech and each of the four visits per site. For each survey at a site the associated survey-specific covariates are included. These are the associated effort (number of people collecting the leeches) and the date the visits happened (julian day since the beginning of the year). </p><p>Number of fields: 17</p><p>Number of data rows: 169</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>site</b>: SAFE second order point (Field type: location)</li><li><b>visit_B1</b>: Number of brown leeches collected during first visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_B2</b>: Number of brown leeches collected during second visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_B3</b>: Number of brown leeches collected during third visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_B4</b>: Number of brown leeches collected during fourth visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_T1</b>: Number of tiger leeches collected during first visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_T2</b>: Number of tiger leeches collected during second visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_T3</b>: Number of tiger leeches collected during third visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_T4</b>: Number of tiger leeches collected during fourth visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>eff_1</b>: Number of people collecting leeches per survey as a measure of survey effort for the first visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>eff_2</b>: Number of people collecting leeches per survey as a measure of survey effort for the second visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>eff_3</b>: Number of people collecting leeches per survey as a measure of survey effort for the third visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>eff_4</b>: Number of people collecting leeches per survey as a measure of survey effort for the fourth visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>date.1</b>: Julian date of visit 1 (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>date.2</b>: Julian date of visit 2 (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>date.3</b>: Julian date of visit 3 (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>date.4</b>: Julian date of visit 4 (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>Leech abundance and survey-covariates 2016</b> (described in worksheet abundance2016)</p><p>Description: This dataset has the abundance of all the leech individuals of both species collected during surveys in 2016 between September and December. The number of leech collected is split by species of leech and each of the four visits per site. For each survey at a site the associated survey-specific covariates are included. These are the associated effort (number of people collecting the leeches) and the date the visits happened (julian day since the beginning of the year). </p><p>Number of fields: 17</p><p>Number of data rows: 169</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>site</b>: SAFE second order point (Field type: location)</li><li><b>visit_B1</b>: Number of brown leeches collected during first visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_B2</b>: Number of brown leeches collected during second visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_B3</b>: Number of brown leeches collected during third visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_B4</b>: Number of brown leeches collected during fourth visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_T1</b>: Number of tiger leeches collected during first visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_T2</b>: Number of tiger leeches collected during second visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_T3</b>: Number of tiger leeches collected during third visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>visit_T4</b>: Number of tiger leeches collected during fourth visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>eff_1</b>: Number of people collecting leeches per survey as a measure of survey effort for the first visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>eff_2</b>: Number of people collecting leeches per survey as a measure of survey effort for the second visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>eff_3</b>: Number of people collecting leeches per survey as a measure of survey effort for the third visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>eff_4</b>: Number of people collecting leeches per survey as a measure of survey effort for the fourth visit to each site (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>date.1</b>: Julian date of visit 1 (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>date.2</b>: Julian date of visit 2 (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>date.3</b>: Julian date of visit 3 (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>date.4</b>: Julian date of visit 4 (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>Site specific covariates</b> (described in worksheet covariates)</p><p>Description: Vegetation structure data associated with each site for which leech surveys were conducted. The metrics include canopy height, moran's I and plant-area-index. These data were extracted from LiDAR data with a 50 m2 buffer around the centroid for each site.</p><p>Number of fields: 6</p><p>Number of data rows: 169</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>site</b>: SAFE second order point code (Field type: location)</li><li><b>tch</b>: Top of canopy height per site (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>canopy_height_moran</b>: Habitat heterogeneity - Morans I - per site (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>canopy_height_sd</b>: Standard deviation of canopy height (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>pai_mean</b>: Mean plant area index at site (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>pai_sd</b>: Plant area index standard deviation (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>Mammal detections </b> (described in worksheet mammals)</p><p>Description: This dataset contains the mammal detections recorded from camera traps at a subset of the leech survey locations. Sampling effort is also included as a measure of survey effort. </p><p>Number of fields: 27</p><p>Number of data rows: 83</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>Camera</b>: Name of camera (Field type: location)</li><li><b>CTNs</b>: Measure of trapping effort - number of nights the cameras were operational (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Asian Elephant</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Banded Civet</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Banteng</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Bearded Pig</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Bornean Yellow Muntjac</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Common Palm Civet</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Greater Mouse-deer</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Leopard Cat</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Lesser Mouse-deer</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Long-tailed Macaque</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Long-tailed Porcupine</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Malay Civet</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Malay Porcupine</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Marbled Cat</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Masked Palm Civet</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Moonrat</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Mousedeer sp.</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Muntjac sp.</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Orangutan</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Pig-tailed Macaque</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Red Muntjac</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Sambar Deer</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Sun Bear</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Sunda Pangolin</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Thick-spined Porcupine</b>: Count of detections for this taxon (Field type: abundance)</li></ul></li></ol><p><b>Date range: </b>2015-02-01 to 2016-12-31</p><p><b>Latitudinal extent: </b>4.5000 to 5.0700</p><p><b>Longitudinal extent: </b>116.7500 to 117.8200</p><p><b>Taxonomic coverage: </b><br> All taxon names are validated against the GBIF backbone taxonomy. If a dataset uses a synonym, the accepted usage is shown followed by the dataset usage in brackets. Taxa that cannot be validated, including new species and other unknown taxa, morphospecies, functional groups and taxonomic levels not used in the GBIF backbone are shown in square brackets.</p><div> -  Animalia <br> -  -  Chordata <br> -  -  -  Mammalia <br> -  -  -  -  Rodentia <br> -  -  -  -  -  Hystricidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Hystrix</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Hystrix brachyura</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Hystrix crassispinis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Trichys</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Trichys fasciculata</i> <br> -  -  -  -  Proboscidea <br> -  -  -  -  -  Elephantidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Elephas</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Elephas maximus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  Carnivora <br> -  -  -  -  -  Viverridae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Viverra</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Viverra tangalunga</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Paguma</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Paguma larvata</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Paradoxurus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Paradoxurus hermaphroditus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Hemigalus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Hemigalus derbyanus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Felidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pardofelis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pardofelis marmorata</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Prionailurus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Prionailurus bengalensis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Ursidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Helarctos</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Helarctos malayanus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  Primates <br> -  -  -  -  -  Cercopithecidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Macaca</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Macaca fascicularis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Macaca nemestrina</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Hominidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pongo</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pongo pygmaeus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Homo</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Homo sapiens</i> <br> -  -  -  -  Pholidota <br> -  -  -  -  -  Manidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Manis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Manis javanica</i> <br> -  -  -  -  Erinaceomorpha <br> -  -  -  -  -  Erinaceidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Echinosorex</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Echinosorex gymnura</i> <br> -  -  -  -  Artiodactyla <br> -  -  -  -  -  Suidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Sus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Sus barbatus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Bovidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Bos</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Bos javanicus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Tragulidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Tragulus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Tragulus napu</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Tragulus kanchil</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Cervidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Muntiacus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Muntiacus atherodes</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Muntiacus muntjak</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Rusa</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Rusa unicolor</i> <br> -  -  Annelida <br> -  -  -  Clitellata <br> -  -  -  -  Arhynchobdellida <br> -  -  -  -  -  Haemadipsidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Haemadipsa</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Haemadipsa</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Haemadipsa picta</i> <br></div><p></p>
Behavioral and postural analyses establish sleep-like states for mosquitoes that can impact host landing and blood feeding
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Functional dissection of mosquito humidity sensing reveals distinct dry and moist cell contributions to blood feeding and oviposition
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.