Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

55

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

55 results for “co-evolution”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo52/100

DisVis-based filtering of contacts from co-evolution data (or other sources)

<p>Dataset described in the manuscript:&nbsp;<em>Improving the Quality of Co-evolution Intermolecular Contact Prediction with DisVis</em>Siri Camee van Keulen, Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin</p> <p>Details about the data set can be found at: &nbsp;https://github.com/haddocking/contact-filtering</p> <p>This archive contains in addition all the models generated with HADDOCK.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

On the Co-evolution of ML Pipelines and Source Code - Empirical Study of DVC Projects

<p>This is a replication package of our paper submission to the Saner 2021 entitled:</p> <p>On the Co-evolution of ML Pipelines and Source Code - Empirical Study of DVC Projects</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2021View details →
dryad40/100

Data for: Co-evolution of dormancy and dispersal in spatially autocorrelated landscapes

<p>The evolution of dispersal can be driven by spatial processes, such as landscape structure, and temporal processes, such as disturbance. Dormancy, or dispersal in time, is generally thought to evolve in response to temporal processes. In spite of broad empirical and theoretical evidence of trade-offs between dispersal and dormancy, we lack evidence that spatial structure can drive the evolution of dormancy. Here, we develop a simulation-based model of the joint evolution of dispersal and dormancy in spatially heterogeneous landscapes. We show that dormancy and dispersal are each favored under different landscape conditions, but not simultaneously under any of the conditions we tested. We further show that, when dispersal distances are short, dormancy can evolve directly in response to landscape structure. In this case, selection is primarily driven by benefits associated with avoiding kin competition. Our results are similar in both highly simplified and realistically complex landscapes.</p>

opencc-zeroAug 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Supplementary data to accompany Gernon, T.M., Hincks, T.K., Brune, S., Braun, J., Jones, S.M., Keir, D., Cunningham, A., & Glerum, A., Co-evolution of craton margins and interiors during continental breakup.

<p>Supplementary data to accompany Gernon, T.M., Hincks, T.K., Brune, S., Braun, J., Jones, S.M., Keir, D., Cunningham, A., &amp; Glerum, A., <em>Co-evolution of craton margins and interiors during continental breakup</em>. Nature (Accepted in Principle at time of writing, 3 June 2024).</p> <p><strong>Constraining thermochron uncertainty</strong></p> <p>We utilise published thermochron model data for 46 sites across southern Africa from Brown et al. (2002); Green et al. (2017); Kounov et al. (2013) and (2009); Stanley et al. (2020), (2015) and (2013); Tinker et al. (2008), and Wildman et al. (2017), (2016) and (2015).&nbsp;</p> <p>The above studies present model uncertainty in slightly different ways. However, we have attempted to provide equivalent estimates of uncertainty across the board in our analysis.&nbsp;</p> <p>Stanley and Flowers (2020) provide individual simulation runs for 15 sites, and we use these directly to estimate maximum temperature drop and associated timing for each simulation. For the 12 sites provided by Wildman et al. (2017, 2016, 2015), we use the best fit and 95 percentile envelope, and assume the 'good fit' envelopes of Kounov et al. (2009) to be broadly equivalent. For 15 sites (see MinMax.csv) we utilise the best fit curve together with an estimate of the minimum and maximum plausible timing of the point of maximum temperature drop.</p> <p>Green et al. (2017) provides only a best fit curve, and in the absence of further data we cannot provide an uncertainty estimate here.&nbsp;</p> <p><br><strong>Files provided</strong></p> <p><strong>SourceData.csv</strong><br>Summary of each site, associated data source(s), coordinates and model uncertainty. Please see references listed within for complete thermochron model descriptions and original data.</p> <p><strong>MinMax.csv</strong><br>Name/Location and references for thermochron source data for 15 sites with best fit curves, and estimates of the min/max time of maximum temperature drop.<br>Tmin and Tmax (degrees C) are the minimum and maximum modelled temperatures for each location. t1_Ma and t2_Ma are the minimum and maximum times (Ma) where the model simulations (best, good or acceptable fit) reach the midpoint temperature Tmid= (Tmax -Tmin)/2<br>The most likely timing is taken from the best fit curve.&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Files in Thermochron_bestfit</strong><br>Best fit thermochron curves (Age in Ma, and Temp in degrees C) for 31 sites digitized from the original publications. Names correspond to File Names in SourceData.csv, which also provides references.</p> <p><strong>Files in Thermochron_Envelopes</strong><br>Lower and Upper 95 percentile thermochron envelopes (denoted *_L95.csv or *_U95.csv) for 12 sites, digitized from Wildman et al. (2017, 2016, 2015).<br>Lower and Upper good fit thermochron envelopes (denoted *_L.csv or *_U.csv) for three sites, digitized from Kounov et al. (2009)<br>Age in Ma, and Temp in degrees C.<br>&nbsp;<br><strong>Files in Stanley2020_model_runs</strong><br>Individual model output directly from Stanley and Flowers 2020 for 15 sites (no modification of original published data). Note these files include modelled best fit curves.</p> <p>If any of the thermochron model data/summaries given here are re-used, please cite the original source(s) as provided below.</p> <p><br><strong>Complete references</strong></p> <p>R. W. Brown, M. A. Summerfield, and A. J. W. Gleadow. Denudational history along a transect across the Drakensberg Escarpment of southern Africa derived from apatite fission track thermochronology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 107(B12), 2002.</p> <p>P. F. Green, I. R. Duddy, P. Japsen, J. M. Bonow, and J. A. Malan. Post-breakup burial and exhumation of the southern margin of Africa. Basin Research, 29(1):96&ndash;127, 2017.</p> <p>A. Kounov, G. Viola, I. Dunkl, and H. E. Frimmel. Southern African perspectives on the long-term morpho-tectonic evolution of cratonic interiors. Tectonophysics, 601:177&ndash;191, 2013.</p> <p>A. Kounov, G. Viola, M. deWit, and M. A. G. Andreoli. Denudation along the Atlantic passive margin: new insights from apatite fission-track analysis on the western coast of South Africa. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 324(1):287&ndash;306, 2009.</p> <p>J. R. Stanley and R. M. Flowers. Mesozoic denudation history of the lower Orange River and eastward migration of erosion across the southern African Plateau. Lithosphere, 12(1):74&ndash;87, 2020.</p> <p>J. R. Stanley, R. M. Flowers, and D. R. Bell. Erosion patterns and mantle sources of topographic change across the southern African Plateau derived from the shallow and deep records of kimberlites. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 16(9):3235&ndash;3256, 2015.</p> <p>J. R. Stanley, R. M. Flowers, and D. R. Bell. Kimberlite (U-Th)/He dating links surface erosion with lithospheric heating, thinning, and<br>metasomatism in the southern African Plateau. Geology, 41(12):1243&ndash;1246, 2013.</p> <p>J. Tinker, M. de Wit, and R. Brown. Linking source and sink: Evaluating the balance between onshore erosion and offshore sediment accumulation since Gondwana break-up, South Africa. Tectonophysics, 455(1):94&ndash;103, 2008.</p> <p>M. Wildman, R. Brown, C. Persano, R. Beucher, F. M. Stuart, V. Mackintosh, K. Gallagher, J. Schwanethal, and A. Carter. Contrasting Mesozoic evolution across the boundary between on and off craton regions of the South African plateau inferred from apatite fission track and (U-Th-Sm)/He thermochronology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122(2):1517&ndash;1547, 2017.</p> <p>M. Wildman, R. Brown, R. Beucher, C. Persano, F. Stuart, K. Gallagher, J. Schwanethal, and A. Carter. The chronology and tectonic style of landscape evolution along the elevated Atlantic continental margin of South Africa resolved by joint apatite fission track and (U-Th-Sm)/He thermochronology. Tectonics, 35(3):511&ndash;545, 2016.</p> <p>M. Wildman, R. Brown, R. Watkins, A. Carter, A. Gleadow, and M. A. Summerfield. Post break-up tectonic inversion across the southwestern cape of South Africa: New insights from apatite and zircon fission track thermochronometry. Tectonophysics, 654:30&ndash;55, 2015.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →
dryad40/100

Paradoxes in the co-evolution of contagions and institutions

<p>Epidemic models study the spread of undesired agents through populations, be it infectious diseases through a country, misinformation in social media, or pests infesting a region. In combating these epidemics, we rely neither on global top-down interventions, nor solely on individual adaptations. Instead, interventions commonly come from local institutions such as public health departments, moderation teams on social media platforms, or other forms of group governance. Classic models, which are often individual or agent-based, are ill-suited to capture local adaptations. We leverage developments of institutional dynamics based on cultural group selection to study how groups attempt local control of an epidemic by taking inspiration from the successes and failures of other groups. Incorporating institutional changes into epidemic dynamics reveals paradoxes: a higher transmission rate can result in smaller outbreaks as does decreasing the speed of institutional adaptation. When groups perceive a contagion as more worrisome, they can invest in improved policies and, if they maintain these policies long enough to have impact, lead to a reduction in endemicity. By looking at the interplay between the speed of institutions and the transmission rate of the contagions, we find rich co-evolutionary dynamics that reflect the complexity of known biological and social contagions.</p>

opencc-zeroJul 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 10. Mimosphinctes rudicostatus Bogoslovsky, 1980, PIMUZ 28595, bed 48 in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 10. Mimosphinctes rudicostatus Bogoslovsky, 1980, PIMUZ 28595, bed 48, Polygnathus inversus Zone, Dzhaus−beds, early Emsian, Khodzha− Kurgan Gorge, Zerashan Range, Uzbekistan. This individual had suffered from a deep fracture, which had caused an irritation of the mantle. This had the formation of a spiral trace as a consequence.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 13 in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 13. Relation between phragmocone size and spiral pit diameter (A) and between whorl height and spiral pit diameter (B).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 7. Longitudinal section through the well preserved specimen PIMUZ 28583 in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 7. Longitudinal section through the well preserved specimen PIMUZ 28583 of Sellanarcestes spp., Sellanarcestes wenkenbachi Zone, Emsian, Oufrane (S of Tata), Morocco. A. +/− median section displaying many "Housean pits", most with internal tube; overview. "Housean pits" are marked by white arrows. B. Three closely spaced pits, two displaying the internal tubes, the remaining void inside the pit is filled with a fine−grained sparitic matrix, note the continuous ammonoid shell layer covering the pits and the septum, which grew on the pit wall, note the distinguishable shell layers, which are recrystallised to varying degrees. C. A corroded pit with tube, note the continuation of the innermost ammonoid shell layer. D. Two adjacent fused pits, only the right pit shows the delicate internal tube, mural part of septum on the left.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 5 in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 5. "Housean pits" type 3. Sobolewia nuciformis (Whidborne, 1889), three specimens kept under the same number (MNHN−R.08459), Givetian, Redjel Iamrad, Algeria, Jacques Follot collection. A. A heavily weathered specimen in which the erosion was most intense around the pits; lateral (A1) and (A2) dorsal views, weathered specimen, where the shell broke at the pits and weathering intensified in those radii. B. Lateral view of a specimen showing only two pits, additional pits probably covered by shell. C. The best preserved specimen, previously published in Korn and Klug (2002: fig. 52B), in ventral (C1) and lateral (C2) views, well preserved specimen, where the shell broke off only at the four lateral pits, showing the tube cross section in the pits (the globular structures in the centre of the pit at the bottom and on the left are artefactsfrom the production of the cast). Images taken from epoxy casts. All specimens coated with NH4Cl.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 6. A–C in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 6. A–C. "Housean pits" type 4, Ivoites sp. nov. B, early Emsian, middle Kaub Formation (Hunsrück Slate), W−Germany; the images were stretched in PhotoShop in order to reconstruct the original form. A. HS 371 (Bartels collection), Bundenbach (Eschenbach–Bocksberg quarry); note the flattened phragmocone. B. H 55a (Lehmann collection), Bundenbach (Eschenbach–Bocksberg quarry); note the spiral trace between the aperture and the first pit pair. C. SMF−HF 940 (Senckenberg collection), Herrenberg (Schielebach quarry). D, E. "Housean pits" type 5, early Emsian, Ouidane Chebbi, Tafilalt, Morocco, from Klug et al. (2008). D. Chebbites reisdorfi Klug, 2001, PIMUZ 7484; in lateral (D1) and ventral (showing pits) (D2) views. E. Gracilites maghribensis Klug, 2001, PIMUZ 7490; in ventral (showing pits) (E1) and lateral (E2) views. All specimens coated with NH4Cl except in A and C.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 9 in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 9. Trematode (?) pits in the internal mould of an Early Devonian palaeotaxodont bivalve (modified after Klug et al. 2008b: pl. 3). Nuculoidea grandaeva (Goldfuss 1837), PIMUZ 7338, Faunule 2, Polygnathus gronbergi (Polygnathus excavatus) Zone, early Emsian, Ouidane Chebbi (Tafilalt, Morocco) in dorsal (A) and lateral (B) views.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 2 in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 2. Palaeogeographic map for the Emsian showing occurrences of the genera Sellanarcestes and Anarcestes with and without "Housean pits" of type 1. Modified from Scotese (2001).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 3 in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 3. "Housean pits" type 1. A. Sellanarcestes ebbighauseni Klug, 2002, GPIT 1871−171, Sellanarcestes wenkenbachi Zone, Emsian, northern Jebel Amessoui, Tafilalt, Morocco, from Klug (2002); in ventral (A1) and lateral (A2) views. B. Sellanarcestes cf. ebbighauseni Klug, 2002, PIMUZ 28582, Sellanarcestes wenkenbachi Zone, Emsian, Jebel Ouaoufilal, Tafilalt, Morocco; in lateral (B1) and ventral (B2) views. C. Large pits in Anarcestes sp., PIMUZ 28581, late Emsian, Jebel Mech Agrou, Tafilalt, Morocco; in lateral (C1) and ventral (C2) views. All specimens coated with NH4Cl.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 4 in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 4. "Housean pits" type 2. A. Crispoceras tureki Klug, 2002, PIMUZ 28591, Pinacites jugleri Zone, Eifelian, Jebel Ouaoufilal, Tafilalt, Morocco; in dorsal (A1) and lateral (A2) views; A3, detail of A2, whose position is pointed out by the black arrow in A2, note the three pits (white arrows), the middle pit shows the pit filling and the base of the tube cross section. B. Crispoceras tureki Klug, 2002, PIMUZ 28590, Pinacites jugleri Zone, Eifelian, Jebel Ouaoufilal, Tafilalt, Morocco; in lateral (B1) and (B2) dorsal views, pits continue into the body chamber. C–E. Afromaenioceras sulcatostriatum Bensaïd, 1974, Givetian, Jebel Ouaoufilal, Tafilalt, Morocco; in ventral (C1, D1, E1) and lateral (C2, D2, E2) views. C. PIMUZ 28592. D. PIMUZ 28593. E. PIMUZ 28594. All specimens coated with NH4Cl except in A3.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 14 in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 14. Relation between the estimated amount of pits per half whorl and the ratio between pit size and phragmocone diameter.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1 in Pollen eaters and pollen morphology: co-evolution through the Permian and Mesozoic

Fig. 1. Eucommiidites group pollen (Cryptosaccites pabularis Krassilov et Tekleva) in the gut compression of Ceroxyela dolichocera Rasnitsyn (Xyelidae, Hymenoptera) from the Lower Cretaceous of Baissa, Transbaikalia: (A) insect impression; (B) stereomicroscope view of the fore-gut with pollen grains; (C) pollen grains amassed at the hind end of the abdomen, (D) same, enlarged. Scale bars: 2 mm (A), 1 mm (B, C), 30 µm (D).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2007View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 2 in Pollen eaters and pollen morphology: co-evolution through the Permian and Mesozoic

Fig. 2. Pollen loads of Palaeozoic and Mesozoic insects: (A) Protohaploxypinus-type taeniate pollen from Sellardsiopsis conspicua G. Zalessky, Lower Permian Tchekarda locality; (B) Protohaploxypinus- type taeniate pollen from Parapsocidium uralicum G. Zalessky (Psocida), same locality; (C) Vittatina-type taeniate pollen from Sojanidelia floralis Rasnitsyn (Grylloblattida), same locality; (D) Lunatisporites-type taeniate pollen from Idelopsocus diradiatus Rasnitsyn, same locality; (E) Eucommiidites-group pollen (Cryptosaccites pabularis Krassilov et Tekleva) from Ceroxyela dolichocera Rasnitsyn (Xyelidae, Hymenoptera), Lower Cretaceous Baissa locality, Transbaikalia; (F) Classopollis-type rimulate pollen from Aboilus cf. dilutus Gorochov (Orthoptera, katydids), Upper Jurassic of Karatau, Kazakhstan. Scale bars: 30 µm (A), 10 µm (B–F).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2007View details →
dryad40/100

Paradoxes in the co-evolution of contagions and institutions

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2024View details →
dryad40/100

Evolutionary advantage of guilt: Co-evolution of social and non-social guilt in structured populations

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2025View details →
dryad40/100

Data for: Co-evolution of dormancy and dispersal in spatially autocorrelated landscapes

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2022View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record