Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
10
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
10 results for “cohesion policy”
PERCEIVE WP5: The multiplicity of shared meanings of EU and Cohesion Regional and Urban Policy at different discursive levels
<p>The data set will contain all the shareable data collected and generated through the different tasks of WP5, that are interdependent. In particular, in Task5.1 we collected a bibliography, which is already included in the dataset. In Task5.2 we collected a large collection of data from different documentary sources and media: EU policies and reports, descriptions and reports created by Local Managing Authorities, newspaper articles, tweets, Facebook posts referred to EU CP policies. During Task5.3 we analyzed these data through Mallet software to elicit topics, as sets of words that co-occur together. The results of the linear regression analysis will be in this data set as well. The results of the analysis will consist of tables of texts and of numerical data.</p> <p>Collected data are only partly available online, therefore our generated data will have a unique value, as there is no comparable public source of data. Data will be helpful for all student and practitioners willing to understand how the concepts of Cohesion Policies, Europe and European identity are shaped in the public sphere.</p>
Polidoc.net CODEBOOK: National and Regional Manifestos and other Political Documents Collected for the Research Projects "Representation in Europe: Congruence between Preferences of Elites and Voters" (REPCONG) and "The Impact of EU Cohesion Policy on European Identification" (COHESIFY)
<p>The Political Documents Archive http://www.polidoc.net/ contains election manifestos, coalition agreements, government declarations and various other documents of political actors from developed democracies. Currently, the archive builds on a stock of more than 3000 political documents from 20 European countries. The aim of the repository is to provide political texts in order to facilitate scholarly research in different areas of comparative politics such as party competition, coalition politics, legislative decision-making or electoral behavior.</p> <p>National electoral manifestos have been collected in the course of the REPCONG project ("Representation in Europe: Policy Congruence between Citizens and Elites"), and the archive includes party manifestos for regional elections in several European democracies. Because the process of European integration resulted in a strengthening of regions in EU member states and in countries that want to join the European Union, the relevance of the regional level for political decision-making has increased during the last decades. Therefore, also the policy profiles of regional parties are required to get a full picture of democratic responsiveness in European states across all levels of the political system. The collection of regional manifestos was supported by the COHESIFY project (www.cohesify.eu), funded under the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. The aim of COHESIFY is to study whether the European Structural and Investment Funds affect people’s support for and identification with the European project.</p> <p>The archive is freely accessible (after a simple registration) and meant to foster rigorous research in these areas by enabling scholars to produce valid and reliable findings from empirical studies of textual data rather than unnecessarily struggling to obtain and process texts.</p>
PERCEIVE: WP5: The multiplicity of shared meanings of EU and Cohesion Regional and Urban Policy at different discursive levels
<p>This data set contains all the shareable data collected and generated through the different tasks of WP5, which are interdependent.</p> <p>In particular, in Task5.1 we collected a bibliography, which is the basis for our theoretical work.</p> <p>In Task5.2 we collected a large collection of data from different documentary sources and media: EU policies and reports, descriptions and reports created by Local Managing Authorities, newspaper articles, tweets, Facebook posts referred to EU CP policies. We don’t have the permission to share these data (as they are protected by copyright), but all the sources are described in Deliverable 5.2, which is public (see <a href="http://doi.org/10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5726">http://doi.org/10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5726</a> or <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1318184">http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1318184</a>).</p> <p>During Task5.3 we analyzed the textual content of data listed in Task5.2, to construct a database of discursive topics in Task5.4. Data set includes the description of topics (results of topic modeling), clusters of topics obtained both interpretively and algorithmically, and the relevant data regarding sentiment and semantic analyses.</p> <p>Task5.5 regards a statistical analysis linking public discourse and different definitions of being Europeans on the one hand with European identification on the other hand. The data set contains the measures of variables used to run the regression test, and the results of the test in tabular form.</p>
PERCEIVE: WP4: Spatial determinants of policy performance and synergies: Task4.4: Cohesion Policy vs Urban and Rural policies to address spatial discrepancies in EU territorial policy
<p>This dataset consists of data addressing the relationship between territorial cohesion objectives and the problems perceived by citizens. In particular a comparative analysis between the case study regions will generate data useful for identifying best practices in mixing the EU policy instruments for a better achievement of regional needs. Data that will be generated via focus groups interviews among representatives of LMA (local management authorities) in 2 Polish regions: Dolnośląskie and Warmińsko-Mazurskie . Interview transcripts and report was used to address how territorial cohesion objectives match the “real problems” of regions. The focus groups were built around the following main topics: 1) governance of the Cohesion Policy projects, in order to understand how different authorities at different levels cooperate and share the responsibilities for the implementation of the Cohesion Policy; 2) level of citizen engagement, in order to understand whether a bottom-up approach is used; 3) how the media inform on the Cohesion Policy programmes, in order to appreciate the discrepancies (if any) about the aims of Cohesion Policy and its construction on the public discourse. Comparing current and past programming periods, we investigate how the policy performs in reducing the gap between territorial cohesion objectives and “real problems” defined by LMAs and citizens. Because it is project-specific data and reflects the concept and methodology of the study under PERCEIVE they are perceived as unique - similar data does not exist. Potential users are be Regional Policy’s European/National/Local policy makers and practitioners, European networks and associations looking to data on LMA opinions on cohesion policy implementation in Poland to be used in policy recommendation, studies and policy making process; next group of potential data users are researchers working on assessment of Cohesion Policy, data may be used as a source for topic-related studies, case studies, comparisons.</p> <p>The dataset is made up of 5 files: 2 files consist of reports from the workshops, 2 files consist in transcripts of interviews to practitioners, beneficiaries and targets of the Cohesion Policy projects in the Polish selected case‐study regions. Interviewees are asked to provide their views and perceptions on the multilevel governance system, on the communication activities of the Operational Programmes and on the effectiveness of Cohesion Policy. 1 readme file is included.</p>
PERCEIVE. WP4_ T4-5_Citizens vs Practitioners views of the EU Cohesion Policy in 9 PERCEIVE case-study regions
<p>This dataset contains data related to the papers: Tudor MM, Florian V, Rosu, SE, Kruzslicika M (2019) "Citizens’ vs practitioners’ perception on EU regional approach", published by Rural areas and Development & Tudor MM, Florian V (2019) "Percepția cetățenilor vs. percepția practicienilor cu privire la politica de coeziune a UE", published in proceedings of "Piețele Agricole și Spațiul Rural în Contextul Modernizării și Simplificării Politicii Agricole Comune". The dataset was built collecting data from different sources: the dataset “<em>PERCEIVE: WP1: Framework for comparative analysis of the perception of Cohesion Policy and identification with the European Union at citizen level in different European countries: Survey at citizen level and data relative to regional performance of the Cohesion Policy and institutional quality</em>” (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3346047">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3346047</a>); the dataset “<em>PERCEIVE. WP1. Framework for comparative analysis of the perception of Cohesion Policy and identification with the European Union at citizen level in different European countries. Task1.2. Focus group with Cohesion Policy practitioners</em>” (focus groups and other interviews) (<a href="http://amsacta.unibo.it/6215/">http://amsacta.unibo.it/6215/</a>).</p>
PERCEIVE. WP3_ T3-1_ Communication strategies effectiveness in the context of EU Cohesion Policy - Romanian case study – Sud Est NUTS II region
<p>This dataset contains data related to the papers: Tudor MM, Florian V, (2018) "Impactul și eficacitatea strategiilor de comunicare în contextul politicii de coeziune a Uniunii Europene. Studiu de caz - România", published in proceedings of "Economia agroalimentară și dezvoltarea rurală din perspectiva integrării europene". The dataset was built collecting data from the dataset “<em>PERCEIVE. WP1. Framework for comparative analysis of the perception of Cohesion Policy and identification with the European Union at citizen level in different European countries. Task1.2. Focus group with Cohesion Policy practitioners</em>” (focus groups and other interviews) (<a href="http://amsacta.unibo.it/6215/">http://amsacta.unibo.it/6215/</a>). Data used in the above-mentioned paper regarding the Section II from the Focus Group protocol and is related with Romanian PERCEIVE case-study region – Sud EST (RO22).</p>
PERCEIVE: WP1: Framework for comparative analysis of the perception of Cohesion Policy and identification with the European Union at citizen level in different European countries: Survey at citizen level and data relative to regional performance of the Cohesion Policy and institutional quality
<p>1. Orignal PERCEIVE survey data (STATA file)</p> <p>2. description of survey questions, descriptive results (word file)</p> <p>3. EU Deliverable document with descriptive analysis of survey questions</p> <p> </p> <p>***please cite the following when using the microdata:</p> <p>Bauhr, M., & Charron, N. (2020). The EU as a savior and a saint? Corruption and public support for redistribution. <em>Journal of European Public Policy</em>, <em>27</em>(4), 509-527.</p> <p>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13501763.2019.1578816</p>
PERCEIVE: WP2: Evaluation of EU citizens' perception of the EU project: Task2.1: Data relative to regional performance of the Cohesion Policy and institutional quality
<p>1. PERCEIVE regional panel datasets - secondary data collected from Eurostat, EU Commission on Strutural Fund Expenditures and quality of government for NUTS 1, 2 and 3 regions from 1990-2015, (STATA files). See codebook for more detail about variables</p> <p>2. Flash Eurobarometer survey data on "Awarness of EU Regional Policy" and questionaires (STATA files)</p> <p>3. Standard Eurobaromter survey data, annual, from 2000-2016 and questionaires (STATA files)</p> <p>4. Expenditure data on EU Structural Funds, latest three budget periods (2000-2020) (Excel file)</p> <p>5. codebook for all regional data</p>
Dataset used in the article: Cunico, G., Aivazidou, E., Mollona, E. (2019), "European Cohesion Policy performance and citizens' awareness: A holistic System Dynamics framework", Investigaciones Regionales – Journal of Regional Research (In Press)
<p>In the context of the abovementioned article, interviews with experts about EU funding, as well as a workshop, were performed to find any missing factors or links in the conceptual model developed. This dataset provides detailed information about the interviews and the workshop. The related research is conducted in the context of the Horizon 2020 project PERCEIVE (www.perceiveproject.eu).</p>
PERCEIVE_WP4_T4-5_Citizens vs Practitioners views of the EU Cohesion Policy_20191006_v01
<p>The data set include data generated by PERCEIVE project Task 4.5. based on the results of the Section III of the focus group performed in WP1 at the level of each PERCEIVE case-study region. The data set referring to the local stakeholders' perception on hierarchy of regional needs and CP's contribution in addressing them. The data set contains individual report for each PERCEIVE case-study region regarding the above mentioned information.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.