Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,426
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
1,426 results for “comparative morphology”
Figs 274‒288. 274–279 ‒ male sternite 8 in Comparative genitalic morphology in ten genera of thread-legged bugs of the tribe Metapterini, and its phylogenetic importance (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae)
Figs 274‒288. 274–279 ‒ male sternite 8 (S8): 274–276 ‒ ventral view, 277‒279 ‒ lateral view; 280‒288 ‒ pygophore: 280‒282 ‒ dorsal view, 283‒285 ‒ lateral view, 286‒288 ‒ ventral view. 274, 277, 280, 283, 286 ‒ Bergemesa brachmanni (Berg, 1884); 275, 278, 281, 284, 287 ‒ Gardena faustina McAtee & Malloch, 1925; 276, 279, 282, 285, 288 ‒ Tagalis seminigra Champion, 1899. Scale bar: 0.5 mm
Figs 79‒88 in Comparative genitalic morphology in ten genera of thread-legged bugs of the tribe Metapterini, and its phylogenetic importance (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae)
Figs 79‒88. Pygophore in lateral view. 79–81 – Ghinallelia Wygodzinsky, 1966; 82–83 – Liaghinella Wygodzinsky, 1966; 84 – Onychomesa Wygodzinsky, 1966; 85–86 – Pseudometapterus Wygodzinsky, 1966; 87–88 – Schidium Bergroth, 1916. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. Abbreviations: mpp – medial posterior process of pygophore; pa – paramere; vpp – ventral protruding of the pygophore.
Figs 122‒131 in Comparative genitalic morphology in ten genera of thread-legged bugs of the tribe Metapterini, and its phylogenetic importance (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae)
Figs 122‒131. Phallus in dorsal view. 122–124 – Ghinallelia Wygodzinsky, 1966; 125–126 – Liaghinella Wygodzinsky, 1966; 127 – Onychomesa Wygodzinsky, 1966; 128–129 – Pseudometapterus Wygodzinsky, 1966; 130–131 – Schidium Bergroth, 1916. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. Abbreviations: dps – dorsal phallothecal sclerite; duc – ductifer.
Fig. 13 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 13. Habitat and habits of Laius spp. A. Type locality (Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia) of Laius baliensis sp. nov. and L. satoi Yoshitomi, 2008, three Laius species living sympatrically. B. L. baliensis sp. nov., female. C. L. satoi, male. D. L. asahinai Nakane, 1955 (at Miyake-jima). Photographs by HY.
Fig. 11 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 11. Larva of Laius rodriguesensis sp. nov. A. Maxillae and labium in ventral view. B. Labrum in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views. C. Mandible in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views.
Fig. 12 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 12. Laius andamanensis sp. nov., ♂, paratype. A. Inner part of fore leg, showing enlarged femur and tibia. B. Antennomere III. C. Aedeagal apex. D. Spinous area (SEM photographs).
Fig. 8 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 8. Male antennomere III of Laius spp. A. Laius baliensis sp. nov. (paratype). B. L. andamanensis sp. nov. (paratype). C. L. rodriguesensis sp. nov. (paratype). D. L. maai Wittmer, 1973 (paratype). E. L. marchei Pic, 1922. F. L. politus Fairmaire, 1880. G. L. sabangensis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). H. L. sericatus Champion, 1924. I. L. submariniformis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype).
Fig. 5 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 5. Dorsal habitus of Laius spp. of ♂ (holotypes A, C, E) and ♀♀ (paratypes B, D, F). A–B. Laius baliensis sp. nov. C–D. L. andamanensis sp. nov. E–F. L. rodriguesensis sp. nov. Scale bars = 1.0 mm.
Fig. 4 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 4. Endophallic sclerites of Laius spp. A. Laius etsukoae Satô, Yoshitomi & Ohbayashi, 2006 (paratype). B. L. flavicornis (Fabricius, 1801). C. L. keiichii Satô, Yoshitomi & Ohbayashi, 2006 (paratype). D. L. lutaoensis Yoshitomi & Lee, 2010 (paratype). E. L. madli Yoshitomi, 2010 (paratype). F. L. miyamotoi Nakane, 1955. G. L. satoi Yoshitomi, 2008. H. L. taiwanus Yoshitomi & Lee, 2010 (paratype). I. L. pankowi Wittmer, 1999.
Fig. 6 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 6. Dorsal habitus of Laius spp. (left: ♂; right: ♀). A. Laius maai Wittmer, 1973 (paratype). B. L. marchei Pic, 1922. C. L. politus Fairmaire, 1880. D. L. sabangensis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). E. L. sericatus Champion, 1924. F. L. submariniformis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). Scale bars = 1.0 mm.
Fig. 2 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 2. Aedeagus of Laius lutaoensis Yoshitomi & Lee, 2010, showing the terminology and abbreviations for measurement of endophallic structures. A. Aedeagus with extracted endophallus. B. Aedeagus with holding endophallus (from Yoshitomi & Lee 2010). C. Gonoporal piece. D. Ligula.
Fig. 7 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 7. Left antennae of Laius spp. (above: male; below: female). A. Laius baliensis sp. nov. (paratype). B. L. andamanensis sp. nov. (paratype). C. L. rodriguesensis sp. nov. (paratype). D. L. maai Wittmer, 1973 (paratype). E. L. marchei Pic, 1922. F. L. politus Fairmaire, 1880. G. L. sabangensis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). H. L. sericatus Champion, 1924. I. L. submariniformis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype).
Fig. 1 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 1. Copulation of Laius baliensis sp. nov. A. Endophallus fully engaged with female structures in dorsal view. B. Endophallus fully engaged with female structures in dorsal view, close up. Abbreviations: M = male, F = female.
Fig. 14. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology
Fig. 14. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs from two medium-sized specimens (BIOICE sample 2060, IINH-40471). A. Anterior end, ventral view. B–C. Unciniger 2, dorsal and ventral uncini, respectively. D–E. Unciniger 7, dorsal and ventral uncini, respectively. F. Scaphal hooks and scaphal basis ciliary patches.
Fig. 10. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology
Fig. 10. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs from three large specimens (BIOICE sample 3252, IINH-40477). A. Anterior end, left ventrolateral view. B. Notochaetal scale covering, detail. C–D. Unciniger 1, dorsal and ventral uncini, respectively. E–F. Unciniger 12, dorsal and ventral uncini, respectively.
Fig. 2 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology
Fig. 2. Temperature vs depth data of the BIOICE samples where specimens of Pectinariidae were found. A. Amphictene auricoma (O.F. Müller, 1776). B. Lagis koreni Malmgren, 1866. C. Cistenides granulata (Linnaeus, 1767). D. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. Specimens studied under SEM are indicated with black arrows and sample numbers.
Fig. 12. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs from a in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology
Fig. 12. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs from a medium-sized specimen (BIOICE sample 2660, IINH-40474). A. Anterior end, right lateral view (framed: paleae distal end, detail). B–C. Unciniger 1, dorsal and ventral uncini, respectively. D–E. Unciniger 9, dorsal and ventral uncini, respectively. F. Scaphal hooks.
Fig. 8 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology
Fig. 8. Cistenides granulata (Linnaeus, 1767). SEM micrographs from two large specimens (BIOICE sample 3249, IINH-40467). A. Anterior end, right lateral view. B–C. Unciniger 1, dorsal and ventral uncini, respectively. D. Unciniger 6, ventral uncini. E. Unciniger 12, dorsal uncini. F. Scaphe, posterodorsal view (framed: scaphal hooks, detail).
Fig. 15. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology
Fig. 15. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs from two medium-sized specimens (BIOICE sample 2060, IINH-40471). A. Mid-body parapodium, notochaetae. B. Notochaeta, serrated distal end, detail. C. Scaphe, dorso-lateral view. D. Cuticular structures (framed in C). E. Anal lobe and anal papilla. F. Ciliary field dorsal to anal lobe (framed in E).
Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation
<p class="western">These data were collected as part of a comparative study of the relationship between female ornamentation and sexual dimorphism in eye morphology. Data come from specimens collected in the field in Scotland near Loch Lomond in the summers of 2009, 2010, and 2011 as well as the summer of 2012 near Glen Williams in Ontario, Canada. The repository contains raw image files including information on magnifications at which these were taken, excel spreadsheets of morphological measurements taken from these images, a dataset from search of Collin's (<span>1961</span>) key to the Empidinae for reports of sexual dimorphism and exaggerations of male eye morphology, and an Rnotebook file detailing the analytical steps taken.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.