Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

50

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

50 results for “condoms”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Brief Intervention and/or Distribution of Free Condoms for Travelers

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01056536. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Non-Comparative Study of the Safety and Contraceptive Efficacy of the Woman's Condom

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01223313. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Evaluation of Polyurethane Male Condoms

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04622306. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Consistent condom use among highly effective contraceptive users in an HIV-endemic area in rural Kenya

<p><strong>Background</strong>: Women of reproductive age are at the highest risk of both HIV infection and unintended pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa. Highly effective contraceptives (HECs) such as hormonal injectable and implants are widely used in this region. HECs are effective for preventing pregnancies. However, unlike condoms, HECs offer no protection against HIV. Dual-method use, or the use of condoms with HECs, is an ideal option to reduce HIV risk but is infrequently practiced. Rather, women tend not to use condoms when they use HECs and increase their HIV risk from their sexual partners. However, it remains unknown whether HIV status affects such tendency. Given the increasing popularity of HECs in sub-Saharan Africa, this study examined the association between the use of HECs and condom use among HIV-positive and negative women. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 833 sexually active women aged 18-49 years, recruited from six clinics in Siaya county, Kenya. From March to May 2017, female research assistants interviewed the women using a structured questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between HEC use and consistent condom use in the past 90 days, adjusting for potential confounders. It was also examined with regular partners (husbands or live-in partners) and non-regular partners, separately. In addition, a sub-sample analysis of HIV-negative or unknown women was conducted. Results: In total, 735 women were available for the analysis. Among the women, 231 (31.4%) were HIV-positive. HIV-positive women were more likely to use HECs than HIV-negative or status unknown women (70.1% vs. 61.7%, p=0.027). HEC use was significantly associated with decreased condom use with a regular partner (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=0.25; 95% CI 0.15-0.43, p&lt;0.001) and a non-regular partner (AOR=0.25; 95% CI 0.11-0.58, p=0.001). However, compared with HIV-negative or status unknown women, HIV-positive women were more likely to use HECs and condoms consistently with a regular partner (AOR=6.54, 95% CI 2.15-20.00, p=0.001). Other factors significantly associated with consistent condom use included partner's positive attitude toward contraception, partner's HIV-positive status, high HIV risk perception, and desire for children in the future. Conclusion: Dual-method use was limited among HIV-negative women and women who had HIV-negative partners due to inconsistent condom use. The use of HECs was significantly associated with decreased condom use, regardless of partner type and their HIV status. Due to this inverse association, HIV-negative women may increase their HIV risk from their sexual partners. Therefore, interventions should be strengthened to reduce their dual risks of HIV infection and unintended pregnancy by promoting dual-method use. Family planning services should strengthen counseling on the possible risk of HIV infection from their sexual partners and target not only women but also their partners, who may play a key role in condom use.</p>

opencc-zeroDec 2019View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

A Pilot Functional Performances Study of Two Synthetic Male Condom

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03324594. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

A Functional Performance Study of The Wondaleaf Female Condom

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04076774. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 13.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Psychoeduc Interv. Through Meta-universes on Condom's Use Self - Efficacy and Sexual Behavior in Students of UAChile

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03684668. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 7.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Assessing Preference for 3 Female Condoms: A Comparative Evaluation of the PATH Woman's Condom, FC2 and the Reddy 6

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01452503. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

A Pilot Trial of an Individualized Web-Based Condom Use Intervention

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01726153. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Functional Performance and Acceptability Study of Synthetic Nitrile, and Latex Graphene, Compared to Standard Latex Male Condom

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04881877. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 8.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Performance and Safety Trial of an Innovative Female Condom (Wondaleaf®)

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02593214. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Condom Performance in a Longitudinal Enhanced Assessment of User Experiences

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02753842. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 2.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Functional Performance and Acceptability Evaluation of the Miss Liberty Female Condom Compared to the FC2 Female Condom

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06821152. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

A Trial on the Effect of Sino-implant (II) Use on Condom Use Among Women in Kingston, Jamaica

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01684358. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Comparative Study of the Contraceptive Efficacy of the Cupid, Cupid 2 and FC2 Female Condom

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04233632. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 13.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Testing Use of Condoms on Regression of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02907333. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

A Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Promoting Condom Use Among MSM and Transgender Individuals in China

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02516930. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 11.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) and Acute Failure Modes Study of the PATH Woman's Condom and FC2 Female Condom

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01178840. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Consistent condom use among highly effective contraceptive users in an HIV-endemic area in rural Kenya

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2019View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Condom Use Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02855489. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 7.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record