Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
26
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
26 results for “decision-making process”
IMPACT HTA, WP7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Results of the 2nd Web-Delphi process to HTA stakeholders, organized in a single panel
<p>IMPACT HTA, WP7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Results of the 2<sup>nd</sup> Web-Delphi process to HTA stakeholders, organized in a single panel (all stakeholder groups in a single panel, 2 rounds), about the views of stakeholders regarding “This aspect should be considered in the evaluation of new medicines on a common basis” (2019)</p> <p>For details on the Web-Delphi process, see: IMPACT HTA, Work Package 7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2, Deliverable 7.2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Advancing knowledge and MCDA tools to assist HTA agencies in evaluating medicines on a common basis (2021) Oliveira, M.D. (IST), Panos Kanavos (LSE), Bana e Costa, C. (IST)</p>
IMPACT HTA, WP7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Results of the 1st Web-Delphi process to HTA stakeholders, organized into 6 separate parallel panels
<p>IMPACT HTA, WP7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Results of the 1<sup>st</sup> Web-Delphi process to HTA stakeholders, organized into 6 separate parallel panels (one panel per stakeholder group, 2 rounds), about the views of stakeholders regarding “This aspect should be considered in the evaluation of new medicines on a common basis” (2019)</p> <p>For details on the Web-Delphi process, see: IMPACT HTA, Work Package 7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2, Deliverable 7.2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Advancing knowledge and MCDA tools to assist HTA agencies in evaluating medicines on a common basis (2021) Oliveira, M.D. (IST), Panos Kanavos (LSE), Bana e Costa, C. (IST)</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 18. Different Modules involved in the Autonomous Decision-Making Process
<p>The basic functioning of this architecture is now described in the following step by step<br> using Figure 18a-f, where always the relevant modules of the model are highlighted for better<br> comprehension.</p>
Fig. 2 in Hierarchical establishment of information sources during foraging decision-making process involving Acromyrmex subterraneus (Forel, 1893) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
Fig. 2. Decision time (s) spent by the A. subterraneus target worker according to number of trips (n) made by the respective target worker and the concentration of pheromone manipulated on the branch that does not lead to the food, estimated by total flow of foragers.
Fig. 1. Y in Hierarchical establishment of information sources during foraging decision-making process involving Acromyrmex subterraneus (Forel, 1893) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
Fig. 1. Y-trail system with branches of equal length (225 mm). Branches arranged at an angle of 60◦ connected to a bifurcation. Decision lines (LD) established at fixed points 140 mm far from the bifurcation center on the right and left branches, and 25 mm from the base branch to calculate the A. subterraneus workers' frequency of passage when half of their bodies had crossed each LD.
The Decision-Making Process Behind Library Adoption
<p>This is the Factors/Process Book for the research paper "The Decision-Making Process Behind Library Adoption", submitted to: The 35th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME).</p>
The Decision-Making Process Behind Software Library Adoption
<p>Dataset supporting journal publication "The Decision-Making Process Behind Software Library Adoption".</p>
Visual processing and collective motion-related decision-making in desert locusts
<p>Collectively moving groups of animals rely on decision-making of locally interacting individuals in order to maintain swarm cohesion. However, the complex and noisy visual environment poses a major challenge to the extraction and processing of relevant information. We addressed this challenge by studying swarming-related decision-making in desert locust nymphs. Controlled visual stimuli, in the form of random dot kinematograms, were presented to tethered locust nymphs in a trackball setup, while monitoring movement trajectory and walking parameters. In a complementary set of experiments, the neurophysiological basis of the observed behavioral responses was explored. Our results suggest that locusts utilize filtering and discrimination upon encountering multiple stimuli simultaneously. Specifically, we show that locusts are sensitive to differences in speed at the individual conspecific level, and to movement coherence at the group level, and may use these to filter out non-relevant stimuli. The locusts also discriminate and assign different weights to different stimuli, with an observed interactive effect of stimulus size, relative abundance, and motion direction. Our findings provide insights into the cognitive abilities of locusts in the domain of decision-making and visual-based collective motion and support locusts as a model for investigating sensory-motor integration and motion-related decision-making in the intricate swarm environment.</p>
Visual processing and collective motion-related decision-making in desert locusts
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Decision-making in Emergency Medicine: Estimates of Intuitive and Rational Information Processing
<p>Dummy and target vignettes.</p>
The Decision-Making Process Behind Library Adoption
<p>This is the Factors/Process Book for the research paper "The Decision-Making Process Behind Library Adoption", submitted to: The 35th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME).</p>
Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Shared Decision-making Process
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05424809. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 11.
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Dentists' Decision-Making Process During Caries Detection
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07027189. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Impact of Anxiety on the Decision-making Processes of Anesthesiologists
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05364801. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 35.
A Tool for Improving the Shared Decision-making Process in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06122064. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Improving the Process of Shared Decision-Making by Integrating Online Structured Information and Self-Assessment Tools
<p>Data of the SDM cases.</p>
Gaze behavior and decision-making processes of handball referees: Insights from gender differences and expertise levels
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Decision-Making Processes While Online Grocery Shopping
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03248583. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
Mechanisms of Nudges on Families' Decision-Making Process
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03816241. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Decision-making Process of Couples Confronted With Prenatal Diagnosis of an Isolated CCA
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05843110. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.